Corrigendum to "Influence of posture on relationships between pelvic parameters and lumbar lordosis: Comparison of the standing, seated, and supine positions. A preliminary study" [Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 104 (2018) 565-568]

Instrumented L5-S1 interbody graft with IFUSE implant using the reverse Bohlman technique

BACKGROUND

In case of high sacral slope, anterior lumbosacral fusions can be performed by retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach using a reversed Bohlman technique with an autologous corticocancellous fibular graft. The use of a trans-lumbosacral implant can avoid the iatrogenic effects but currently, there is no implant specifically designed for this fusion technique. Could the IFUSE implant from SI BONE replace a fibular graft to avoiding the iatrogenic effect induced by sampling during a Reverse Bohlman technique?

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present the case of a 38-year-old woman with L5S1 interbody pseudarthrosis after posterior fixation for grade 2 L5-S1 spondylolisthesis with isthmic lysis of L5, and that of a 69-year-old woman who underwent a posterior T4 fusion to the pelvis for degenerative scoliosis. Both required a trans-lumbosacral instrumented fusion via an anterior approach using the reverse Bohlman technique. Surgical technique was described.

RESULTS

There were no perioperative or postoperative complications. At 6 months, the patients reported a decrease in lumbar and radicular symptomatology. There were no infectious, neurological or vascular complications. CT-scans confirmed the good position and stability of the IFUSE implant.

DISCUSSION

We present an innovative interbody grafting technique adapted to spines with high pelvic incidence. The surgical technique is safe, minimally invasive, and reduces surgical iatrogeny. The short and medium-term results are positive but require longer-term follow-up and a larger cohort.

Posterior Pubic Incidence: A Novel Morphologic Spinopelvic Parameter Nearly Equal to Pelvic Incidence

BACKGROUND

Pelvic incidence (PI) and Jackson's angle are 2 major spinopelvic parameters that define the position of the sacrum within the pelvis. These parameters are measured on standing lateral radiography, and the identification of the hip axis is essential for measurements. Moreover, identifying the hip axis in patients with hip diseases or femoral head deformity is challenging. In this study, we described a novel parameter named posterior pubic incidence (PPI) that could be measured using the posterior pubic edge instead of the hip axis.

METHODS

Group A comprised 50 volunteers who underwent standing lateral lumbosacral radiography. Group B comprised 54 patients with abdominal or urologic problems who underwent supine computed tomography. The PI, pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope, PPI, and posterior pubic tilt were measured. The differences between PI and PPI were evaluated. Linear regression analysis was used to predict the PI value from PPI.

RESULTS

The mean PI and PPI values were 47.41° ± 12.32° and 49.32° ± 11.94° in group A and 49.19° ± 9.99° and 49.99° ± 9.25° in group B, respectively. The mean absolute differences in groups A and B were 2.41° ± 1.63° and 1.9° ± 1.62°, respectively. High correlations were obtained between PI/PPI and pelvic tilt/posterior pubic tilt. PI could be calculated as PI° = PPI° - 2° on plain radiography and as PI° = PPI° - 1° on computed tomography.

CONCLUSIONS

PPI was strongly correlated with PI, which was nearly equal to PI, and may replace PI in formulas containing PI.

Pelvic incidence measurement with supine magnetic resonance imaging: A validity and reliability study

OBJECTIVE

Classically, pelvic incidence (PI) and other spinopelvic sagittal parameters are measured using plain x-ray obtained with the patient standing. However, it is difficult to obtain a perfect mid-sagittal appearance of the sacral endplate and superimposition of both femoral heads from a plain x-ray. Overlapping of the iliac wings also could obscure the appearance of the sacral endplate. Recent studies showed that MRI was more reliable than x-ray for evaluating some spinal sagittal parameters. To our knowledge, measurements of spinopelvic sagittal parameters using supine MRI have not been reported previously. We assessed the validity and reliability of measurements of spinopelvic sagittal parameters from standing lateral x-rays and supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

We recruited 26 asymptomatic volunteers for this study. Standing lateral lumbosacral radiographs, including femoral heads and spinopelvic MRI images with coronal images of the femoral heads were performed. The anatomic reference point required to measure PI was found on coronal MRI images and transferred to the midline sagittal MRI using the bladder wall as a second reference point. PI, sacral slope (SS), and pelvic tilt (PT) were measured on x-ray and MRI images. Validity and reliability of results also were tested.

RESULTS

Of 14 males and 12 females (average age, 31.30), PI was obtained from x-ray and MRI in 52. ± 6.89 and 51.42 ± 6.43, respectively. From standing x-ray to supine MRI, PT decreased by 3.16°, while SS increased 2.5°. A paired t-test showed a significant difference between PT values from x-ray and MRI. The correlation was highest between the x-ray and MRI measurements of PI, PT, and SS, respectively. Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities were between 0.88 and 0.96 on x-ray and MRI. All reliabilities were excellent, although MRI values were higher.

CONCLUSION

MRI was more reliable in the measurement of spinopelvic parameters than classic standing x-ray examination. Higher reliability and being radiation-free could make MRI a good alternative to standing x-ray.