Do clinical results of arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis correlate with CT fusion ratio?

[Arthroscopic Subtalar Distraction Arthrodesis in Post-Traumatic Indications]

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This manuscript aims to present the method of arthroscopic assisted subtalar arthrodesis and to evaluate the benefi ts of this surgery on our study population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the period from 9/2007 to 1/2020, a total of 33 subtalar arthrodesis were performed in 31 patients aged 19-66 years (mean 48 years, median 50 years). The indication for arthrodesis was subtalar arthritis causing pain and gait disorders, or hindfoot deformities (most commonly after a calcaneus bone fracture). The arthroscopic assisted subtalar arthrodesis was performed with autologous tricortical bone block graft harvesting from the pelvis, supplemented by autologous cancellous bone graft. Stabilization was achieved by cannulated screws inserted in neutral ankle position. Patients in our retrospective study were followed up for a mean of 48 months (range, 24-130 months). The patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 2 years after surgery. The hindfoot angles and height (TCA - talocalcaneal angle, CIA - calcaneal inclination angle, TCH - talocalcaneal height) were evaluated on radiographs, bone union was assessed on radiographs and CT scans. The clinical assessment was performed using the ankle-hindfoot scale (AHS) of AOFAS (AOFAS score).

RESULTS

The preoperative AOFAS score was 35-68 points (mean 52, median 54), the postoperative AOFAS score at 2 years after arthrodesis was 58-94 points (mean 82, median 82). Both the mean and median values of AOFAS score showed a signifi - cant progress from the poor result to the good and excellent result. After 2 years the TCA value decreased in 18 patients (56%) by no more than 3°. The CIA decrease observed in 21 patients (64%) was by 1° on average. The TCH decrease of 1-5 mm after 2 years since the surgery was seen in 16 patients. In 2 patients incomplete healing of arthrodesis was observed, manifested as a clinically asymptomatic non-union. No deep infection was reported.

DISCUSSION

In agreement with the current literature, the arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis has been confi rmed to be a safe method for the management of consequences of hindfoot fractures, with minimum complications and leading to accelerated bone fusion. Differences can be found in the approach, position, use of cancellous bone graft and surgical techniques. In recent years, prone position, posterior approaches, use of cancellous bone graft, distraction and fi xation with 2-3 screws divergently inserted into the bone prevail. The degree of healing of the bone fusion is generally an important factor. In our study population, non-healing was recorded in 2 patients, namely in the form of a clinically silent non-union. Neurological or early complications and/or osteosynthesis material failure occurred in up to a maximum of 10% of cases. The conclusive results of minimally invasive arthrodesis based on the AOFAS score have been confi rmed by us as well as by most authors.

CONCLUSSIONS

Our study confi rmed that the arthroscopic assisted subtalar arthrodesis is a successful, reliable and safe minimally invasive method, with minimum complications, leading to stable arthrodesis.

KEY WORDS

subtalar arthrodesis, subtalar arthroscopy.

CT-Verified Union Rate Following Arthrodesis of Ankle, Hindfoot, or Midfoot: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Ankle, hindfoot, and midfoot arthrodesis surgeries are standard procedures performed in orthopaedics to treat pain and functional disabilities. Although fusions can effectively improve pain and quality of life, nonunions remain a significant concern for surgeons. With the increased availability of computed tomography (CT), more surgeons rely on this modality for increased accuracy in determining whether a fusion was successful. The objective of this study was to report the rates of CT-confirmed fusion following ankle, hindfoot, or midfoot arthrodesis.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane central register from January 2000 to March 2020. Inclusion criteria included studies with adults (<18 years) that received 1 or multiple fusions of the ankle, hindfoot, or midfoot. At least 75% of the study cohort must have been evaluated by CT postoperatively. Basic information was collected, including journal, author, year published, and level of evidence. Other specific information was collected, including patient risk factors, fusion site, surgical technique and fixation, adjuncts, union rates, criteria for successful fusion (%), and time of CT. Once data were collected, a descriptive and comparative analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Included studies (26, n = 1300) had an overall CT-confirmed fusion rate of 78.7% (69.6-87.7). Individual joints had an overall fusion rate of 83.0% (73-92.9). The highest rate of union was in the talonavicular joint (TNJ).

CONCLUSION

These values are lower than previous studies, which found the same procedures to have greater than 90% fusion rates. With these updated figures, as confirmed by CT, surgeons will have better information for clinical decision making and when having informed consent conversations.

Subtalar and talonavicular arthrodesis under lateral arthroscopy

Open hindfoot surgery incurs certain complications: notably, infection and skin problems. Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis reduced the complications rate while ensuring >90% fusion. To date, arthroscopy is little used for talonavicular arthrodesis. Here, we describe subtalar and talonavicular arthrodesis under arthroscopy via 2 lateral portals around the sinus tarsi. Level of evidence: IV.

Talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid fusion with PEEK H-pode™ vs. Titanium Maxlock™ locking plates: Comparison of functional and radiographic outcomes

BACKGROUND

Locking plates are increasingly used to achieve hindfoot fusion. The objective of this study was to compare hindfoot fusion outcomes with the PEEK H-pode™ (Biotech™) locking plate and the titanium Maxlock™ (Tornier-Wright™) locking plate.

HYPOTHESIS

A polyetheretherketone (PEEK) H-pode™ locking plate provides similar fusion rates to a titanium Maxlock™ locking plate for talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid arthrodesis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective comparative study in 39 patients (including 21 [54%] with pes planovalgus and 11 [28%] with neurological equinovarus deformities) who underwent talo-navicular and/or calcaneo-cuboid fusion, usually combined with subtalar fusion. The first 17 patients (January 2014-February 2016) were managed with Maxlock™ locking plates and the next 22 patients (March 2016-August 2018) with H-pode™ locking plates. These two cohorts of consecutive patients were comparable regarding age, sex distribution, body mass index, and comorbidities. At last follow-up more than 1year after surgery, we compared functional scores, pain intensity, and fusion assessed by radiographs and computed tomography (CT) (threshold set at 33%).

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 42months (range: 34-63months) in the Maxlock™ group and 25months (range: 12-36months) in the H-pode™ group. At last follow-up, the two groups were not significantly different for the mean values of the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society score, European Foot & Ankle Society score, and visual analogue scale pain score. Neither were the two groups significantly different for talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid fusion by CT. In the Maxlock™ group, we found non-significant trends towards a higher proportion of patients with talo-navicular nonunion (18% vs. 5% in the H-pode™ group) and weaker talo-navicular fusion in patients with pes planovalgus (60.8% vs. 82.0%, respectively). Radiographic results overestimated the fusion rates.

DISCUSSION

Talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid fusion was not significantly different with H-pode™ and Maxlock™ locking plates. CT was more accurate than standard radiography to assess fusion. These results underline the usefulness of PEEK locking plates for talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid fusion; moreover, the radiolucency of PEEK facilitates the interpretation of radiographs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

A comparison of outcomes of posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis with or without bone graft for treatment of subtalar arthritis

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether to perform a bone graft is necessary during posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis. The present research aimed to comparatively analyze the outcomes of arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis through a 3-portal posterior approach with or without bone graft.

METHODS

A total of 93 patients with subtalar arthritis who underwent posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis were retrospectively examined. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether they received bone graft or not. The clinical outcomes were compared for analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 93 patients included, 53 received bone graft and 40 did not. The union rate and time to osseous fusion suggested no significant difference between the two groups. The improvement of clinical outcomes were comparable between the two groups at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, bone graft could not effectively reduce the risk of nonunion and improve the outcome.

Inconclusive evidence that arthroscopic techniques yield better outcomes than open techniques for subtalar arthrodesis-A systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Open in situ subtalar arthrodesis (ISTA) has been a standard procedure for treating subtalar arthritis for varied etiologies with good outcomes. There has been a paradigm shift from ISTA to arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis (ASTA) over the past two decades due to increase in number of surgeons performing arthroscopy worldwide. However, there is only limited evidence in the existing literature to substantiate the benefit of this change with regards to patient benefit. To our knowledge, there are also no systematic reviews comparing the results of the two techniques for subtalar arthrodesis (STA).

AIM

Our systematic review aims to determine the superior technique for performing STA by comparing the outcomes, union rates, and complications between open and arthroscopic approach for in situ STA. We hypothesised that both procedures would have similar outcomes, union rates, time to union, and complication rate for in-situ STA.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Three databases, MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, were searched using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to compare the two procedures. Risk of bias assessment was done using The Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for assessing the risk of bias in the included studies. Weighted mean averages were computed for all parameters and tabulated separately for ASTA and ISTA.

FINDINGS

We included a total of 22 studies with a total of 978 (ASTA-310, ISTA-668) patients in the review. The most common indication for both techniques was post traumatic subtalar arthritis due to malunited calcaneal fracture in both groups (54.5%). The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score was better in the ASTA group with a weighted average improvement of 43.4, while the weighted average improvement was 31.1 in the ISTA group, respectively. Patients undergoing ASTA had a weighted average union rate of 95.5% (standard deviation [SD]-3.6) with a weighted average time to union of 12.2 weeks (SD-2.4) while the ISTA group reported 90.7% (SD-6) union rate with a weighted average time to union of 15.5 weeks (SD-8.4). The weighted overall average complication rate was 13.1% (SD-8.9) in ASTA group and 20.3% (SD-16.2) in the ISTA group with hardware-related complications being the most common in both the groups.

CONCLUSION

From the existing literature, our review suggests that both ASTA and ISTA techniques are effective procedures for STA. However, there is no conclusive evidence to recommend one technique over another. High quality randomised studies may be further required to clearly define the superiority of one technique over another LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level III.

Modified Posterior 2-Portal Technique of Arthroscopic Subtalar Joint Arthrodesis: Improved Pain and Functional Outcome at Mean 15 Months Follow-up-A Case Series

INTRODUCTION

Posterior arthroscopic subtalar joint arthrodesis (PASTA) via a posterior 2-portal technique has been described. We modified the surgical technique of creating the portals in the plane of the posterior facet (under fluoroscopy guidance) to enhance the ease of access to the joint, easier and complete removal of articular cartilage along with maintaining the heel height.

METHODS

Patients of post-traumatic subtalar joint arthritis, treated by PASTA during 2016 till 2019 were included in the study. Exclusion criteria: significant height collapse of calcaneum, lateral blow out or heel widening. The confirmation of subtalar joint as the source of pain was done by injection of local anaesthetic inside the joint under the image intensifier, bringing immediate pain relief. The primary outcome variables assessed were the pain and functional scores, assessed using visual analogue scale and AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) score, respectively.

RESULTS

The total of 16 patients (7 males, 9 females) was included. The average age was 40.68 years (23-58 years). The underlying pathology in all patients was post-traumatic subtalar arthritis secondary to calcaneus fracture malunion in 8 patients (50%), talus fracture malunion in 4 (25%) and ligament injury in 2 patients (12.5%). No bone grafting was done. The mean duration of follow-up was 15.6 months (9-24 months). There was a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.001) in mean VAS score at follow up (2; range 0-4) as compared to the mean preoperative score (7; range 6-9). The AOFAS score also improved significantly (p < 0.001) at the follow up (mean 79; range 68-89) as compared to the preoperative score (mean 18; range 10-25).

CONCLUSION

The posterior arthroscopic fusion of subtalar joint gives good results in terms of pain relief and functional scores when done for carefully selected patients of subtalar joint arthritis. Our slight modification of the original technique improves the ease of removing cartilage from subtalar joint with minimal height loss; thus, precluding any need for bone graft. It also makes the instrument movement easier inside the joint.

Arthroscopic Subtalar Joint Arthrodesis: Topical Review

BACKGROUND

Advances in foot and ankle arthroscopy over the last 2 decades have allowed for subtalar joint arthrodesis to be performed arthroscopically. The potential advantages of the arthroscopic technique include higher fusion rates, lower complications, reduced perioperative morbidity, and accelerated rehabilitation. Arthroscopic arthrodesis may, however, not be appropriate in the setting of complex deformity correction or the need for other open procedures.

METHODS

Surgical techniques of arthroscopic subtalar joint arthrodesis are described. Outcomes and complications associated with these procedures are presented, based on a comprehensive literature review. Thirteen Level IV studies of moderate quality were included.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Excellent arthrodesis union rates were achieved (average 96%, range 86%-100%), at a weighted average union time of 8.8 weeks (95% confidence interval 7.9-9.7). The overall complication rate was 21% (87/415 feet; range 10%-36.4%). Metal irritation was the most common complication (11.2%), followed by nerve injury (4.2%) and infection (0.9%). Similar fusion rates have been reported when comparing arthroscopic and open arthrodesis. Complication rates are also similar, excerpt for infection, which may be lower with arthroscopy. Three different approaches were used to access the subtalar joint with similar union and complication rates. There was no evidence that the use of bone graft or more than 1 screw improved outcomes. The superiority of arthroscopic subtalar fusion over open techniques cannot be demonstrated by the available studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Subtalar arthrodesis using a single compression screw: a comparison of results between anterograde and retrograde screwing

INTRODUCTION

The primary objective of this study was to compare the radiological and clinical results of anterograde and retrograde screwing in subtalar arthrodesis using a single compression screw. The secondary objective was to evaluate the subjective results and consolidation of this procedure. The hypotheses were that isolated screw fixation was sufficient to achieve good consolidation and that there was no difference between the two techniques with a similar rate of bone fusion.

METHODS

This is a monocentric, retrospective, radio-clinical study based on 99 patients (101 feet), 58 males and 41 females, with an average age of 64 years. The main aetiology was post-traumatic osteoarthritis, which represented 51% of cases. Two groups were formed: group A (52 feet) consisting of fixed arthrodesis with ascending (retrograde) screwing and group D (49 feet) consisting of fixed arthrodesis with descending (anterograde) screwing. The two groups were statistically comparable in terms of demographic data as well as aetiologies and comorbidities. Arthrodeses which were not fused at 6 months were reassessed at one year and in the event of any radio-clinical doubt regarding consolidation, an additional CT scan was prescribed. Average post-operative follow-up was 11 ± 5 years (2-27 years).

RESULTS

Ninety-two arthrodeses (93%) were fused at one year and 9 were considered to be in non-union, 5 (9.8%) in group A, and 4 (8.3%) in group D. We recorded 30 complications, 22 of which were due to a conflict with the screw head, 18 (34.5%) in group A and 4 (8.3%) in group D (p = 0.03). Conflict between the screw head and the heel led to the removal of the screw after consolidation of the arthrodesis. The clinical results were evaluated using Odom's criteria. Nine per cent of patients described their results as excellent, 29% as good, 51% as satisfactory and 11% found the result to be poor.

CONCLUSION

The fusion rate for isolated compression screw arthrodesis is good, and there is no difference between anterograde and retrograde screws. However, the discomfort caused by the screw head being insufficiently embedded in the retrograde group led to a non-negligible number of additional surgeries to remove the screw.

Arthroscopic Subtalar Arthrodesis as a Treatment Strategy for Subtalar Arthritis: A Systematic Review

Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis is a relatively new technique which is increasingly being used by foot and ankle surgeons as an alternative to open surgery. However, there is still a lack of consensus with respect to the efficacy of the procedure. The purpose of this review was to ascertain (1) whether arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis improves the functional outcome of treated patients and (2) how do the 2 techniques of subtalar arthroscopy (posterior and lateral) compare with each other. MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were accessed by 2 independent reviewers. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were predefined. National Institute of Health risk of bias assessment tool was used to determine the methodological quality of the included studies. A total of ten studies with 234 patients (240 feet) were included. The most common indication for arthroscopic subtalar fusion was posttraumatic subtalar arthritis. Weighted pre- and postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores were 47 and 80.7, respectively. Average time to fusion was 10.2 weeks and weighted mean fusion rate was 95%. Pain secondary to prominent hardware and nonunion were the most common complications. Although improvement in functional scores was higher and complication rate lower with the posterior group, a better fusion rate was seen with the lateral approach. Arthroscopic fusion techniques have shown to be an effective alternative to open surgery. While there was a trend for better functional outcome with the posterior approach, randomized control trials comparing the 2 techniques are needed to better assess their respective outcomes.

Isolated Arthroscopic-Assisted Subtalar Fusion: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The subtalar joint has a complex anatomic function that includes inversion and eversion of the hindfoot, assisting in walking on uneven surfaces. Arthritis is the most common pathological condition affecting this joint and can require fusion. The surgery can be performed open or with arthroscopic assistance. This systematic review assesses articles written on the safety and efficacy of isolated arthroscopic subtalar fusion.

METHODS

Using MEDLINE and Embase, we systematically reviewed articles published before May 21, 2020.

RESULTS

Of 395 articles, 17 on a total of 395 patients (409 operations) were included in the review. The average duration of follow-up was 40.0 months (range, 3 to 105 months). Radiographic evidence of union was reported for 95.8% of cases at an average of 11.9 weeks (range, 6 to 56 weeks) postoperatively. Delayed union was reported in 1.0% of patients and nonunion, in 4.3% of patients. In the articles reporting patient satisfaction, including pain relief, 95.4% of patients had positive outcomes. Postoperative complications were reported in 64 patients (16.2%), including 37 (9.4%) with symptomatic implants, 11 (2.8%) with dysesthesia or neuropathic pain, and 3 (0.8%) with postoperative infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic subtalar fusion is a safe and effective alternative to open subtalar arthrodesis, with high patient satisfaction rates, high union rates at similar follow-up intervals, and low complication rates. The aim of future research should be to determine the ideal cases for this approach as well as the most efficient arthroscopic surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation to optimize function and union as seen on radiographs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of different bone graft with arthroscopy-assisted arthrodesis for the treatment of traumatic arthritis of the subtalar joint

AIM OF THE STUDY

To compare the clinical outcomes of traumatic arthritis of the subtalar joint treated by arthroscopy-assisted arthrodesis with autologous bone graft, allogenous bone graft, artifical bone graft, and no bone graft .

METHODS

Sixty-two patients (64 ft) with traumatic arthritis of subtalar joint were randomly divided into four groups. The cases treated with arthroscopy-assisted arthrodesis were analyzed retrospectively. The mean follow-up time was about 22 months (18-28 months) in each group. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and radiographic examination. The post-operative complications in each group were recorded respectively.

RESULTS

All operations were successful, without incision complications. The subtalar joint obtained full osseous fusion in each group. The average time of osseous fusion was about 12 weeks. There was no significant difference in the fusion time with each group (P = 0.991). The AOFAS and VAS scores in each group were improved significantly in the pre-operative vs post-operative evaluation (all P < 0.01). The average operation time in autologous bone graft group was 74.56 ± 11.45 min which significantly different from that of other groups(P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Similar clinical outcomes were achieved among each type of bone graft. Therefore, which types of bone graft or not may be not the most important for arthroscopy-assisted subtalar arthrodesis.

How many screws are necessary for subtalar fusion? A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Biomechanical studies have shown a higher compressive force and higher torsional stiffness for fixation with three screws compared to two screws. However, clinical data to compare these fixation techniques is still lacking.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 113 patients was performed, who underwent isolated subtalar fusion between January 2006 and April 2018.

RESULTS

Revision arthrodesis was required in 8% (n=6/36) for 3-screw-fixation and 38% (n=35/77) for 2-screw-fixation. For 3-screw-fixation, non-union, was observed in 14% (n=5/36) compared to 35% (n=27/77) in 2-screw fixation. Non-union (p=.025) and revision arthrodesis (p=.034) were significantly more frequent in patients with 2 screws. A body mass index ≥30kg/m² (p=.04, OR=2.6,95%CI:1.1-6.3), prior ankle-fusion (p=.017,OR=4.4,95%CI:1.3-14.5) and diabetes mellitus (p=.04,OR=4.9,95%CI:1.1-17.8) were associated with a higher rate of revision arthrodesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that successful subtalar fusion is more reliably achieved with use of three screws. However, future prospective studies will be necessary to further specify this recommendation.