Comparison of oral vs. combined topical/intravenous/oral tranexamic acid in the prevention of blood loss in total knee arthroplasty: A randomised clinical trial

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Tranexamic Acid vs. Other Routes in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is often associated with significant blood loss, leading to complications such as acute anemia and increased risk of infection and mortality. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent, has been recognized for effectively reducing blood loss during TJA. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral TXA compared with other administration routes in TJA.

METHODS

Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, focusing on randomized clinical trials involving oral TXA in TJA. The studies were assessed for quality using the Cochrane risk assessment scale. Data synthesis involved network meta-analyses, comparing outcomes including hemoglobin drop, estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion rate, and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) rate.

RESULTS

Our comprehensive literature search incorporated 39 studies with 7,538 participants, focusing on 8 TXA administration methods in TJA. The combination of oral and intra-articular (oral + IA) TXA markedly reduced hemoglobin drop more effectively than oral, intravenous (IV), and IA alone, but the difference was not significant. Oral + IA TXA significantly reduced EBL more effectively than oral + IV, IA + IV, and oral, IV, and IA alone. Perioperative transfusion rates with oral + IA TXA was significantly lower than that of oral, IA, and IV alone. The DVT rate with oral + IA was significantly lower than that with all other routes, including oral + IV, IA + IV, and oral, IA, and IV alone.

CONCLUSION

Oral TXA, particularly in combination with IA administration, demonstrates significantly higher efficacy in reducing blood loss and transfusion rates in TJA, with a safety profile comparable with that of other administration routes. The oral route, offering lower costs and simpler administration, emerges as a viable and preferable option in TJA procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of bleeding in people undergoing elective hip or knee surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hip and knee replacement surgery is a well-established means of improving quality of life, but is associated with a significant risk of bleeding. One-third of people are estimated to be anaemic before hip or knee replacement surgery; coupled with the blood lost during surgery, up to 90% of individuals are anaemic postoperatively. As a result, people undergoing orthopaedic surgery receive 3.9% of all packed red blood cell transfusions in the UK. Bleeding and the need for allogeneic blood transfusions has been shown to increase the risk of surgical site infection and mortality, and is associated with an increased duration of hospital stay and costs associated with surgery. Reducing blood loss during surgery may reduce the risk of allogeneic blood transfusion, reduce costs and improve outcomes following surgery. Several pharmacological interventions are available and currently employed as part of routine clinical care.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative efficacy of pharmacological interventions for preventing blood loss in elective primary or revision hip or knee replacement, and to identify optimal administration of interventions regarding timing, dose and route, using network meta-analysis (NMA) methodology.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews, from inception to 18 October 2022: CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Transfusion Evidence Library (Evidentia), ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs of people undergoing elective hip or knee surgery only. We excluded non-elective or emergency procedures, and studies published since 2010 that had not been prospectively registered (Cochrane Injuries policy). There were no restrictions on gender, ethnicity or age (adults only). We excluded studies that used standard of care as the comparator. Eligible interventions included: antifibrinolytics (tranexamic acid (TXA), aprotinin, epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA)), desmopressin, factor VIIa and XIII, fibrinogen, fibrin sealants and non-fibrin sealants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed the review according to standard Cochrane methodology. Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias, and extracted data. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using CINeMA. We presented direct (pairwise) results using RevMan Web and performed the NMA using BUGSnet. We were interested in the following primary outcomes: need for allogenic blood transfusion (up to 30 days) and all-cause mortality (deaths occurring up to 30 days after the operation), and the following secondary outcomes: mean number of transfusion episodes per person (up to 30 days), re-operation due to bleeding (within seven days), length of hospital stay and adverse events related to the intervention received.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 102 studies. Twelve studies did not report the number of included participants; the other 90 studies included 8418 participants. Trials included more women (64%) than men (36%). In the NMA for allogeneic blood transfusion, we included 47 studies (4398 participants). Most studies examined TXA (58 arms, 56%). We found that TXA, given intra-articularly and orally at a total dose of greater than 3 g pre-incision, intraoperatively and postoperatively, ranked the highest, with an anticipated absolute effect of 147 fewer blood transfusions per 1000 people (150 fewer to 104 fewer) (53% chance of ranking 1st) within the NMA (risk ratio (RR) 0.02, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0 to 0.31; moderate-certainty evidence). This was followed by TXA given orally at a total dose of 3 g pre-incision and postoperatively (RR 0.06, 95% CrI 0.00 to 1.34; low-certainty evidence) and TXA given intravenously and orally at a total dose of greater than 3 g intraoperatively and postoperatively (RR 0.10, 95% CrI 0.02 to 0.55; low-certainty evidence). Aprotinin (RR 0.59, 95% CrI 0.36 to 0.96; low-certainty evidence), topical fibrin (RR 0.86, CrI 0.25 to 2.93; very low-certainty evidence) and EACA (RR 0.60, 95% CrI 0.29 to 1.27; very low-certainty evidence) were not shown to be as effective compared with TXA at reducing the risk of blood transfusion. We were unable to perform an NMA for our primary outcome all-cause mortality within 30 days of surgery due to the large number of studies with zero events, or because the outcome was not reported. In the NMA for deep vein thrombosis (DVT), we included 19 studies (2395 participants). Most studies examined TXA (27 arms, 64%). No studies assessed desmopressin, EACA or topical fibrin. We found that TXA given intravenously and orally at a total dose of greater than 3 g intraoperatively and postoperatively ranked the highest, with an anticipated absolute effect of 67 fewer DVTs per 1000 people (67 fewer to 34 more) (26% chance of ranking first) within the NMA (RR 0.16, 95% CrI 0.02 to 1.43; low-certainty evidence). This was followed by TXA given intravenously and intra-articularly at a total dose of 2 g pre-incision and intraoperatively (RR 0.21, 95% CrI 0.00 to 9.12; low-certainty evidence) and TXA given intravenously and intra-articularly, total dose greater than 3 g pre-incision, intraoperatively and postoperatively (RR 0.13, 95% CrI 0.01 to 3.11; low-certainty evidence). Aprotinin was not shown to be as effective compared with TXA (RR 0.67, 95% CrI 0.28 to 1.62; very low-certainty evidence). We were unable to perform an NMA for our secondary outcomes pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction and CVA (stroke) within 30 days, mean number of transfusion episodes per person (up to 30 days), re-operation due to bleeding (within seven days), or length of hospital stay, due to the large number of studies with zero events, or because the outcome was not reported by enough studies to build a network. There are 30 ongoing trials planning to recruit 3776 participants, the majority examining TXA (26 trials).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found that of all the interventions studied, TXA is probably the most effective intervention for preventing bleeding in people undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery. Aprotinin and EACA may not be as effective as TXA at preventing the need for allogeneic blood transfusion. We were not able to draw strong conclusions on the optimal dose, route and timing of administration of TXA. We found that TXA given at higher doses tended to rank higher in the treatment hierarchy, and we also found that it may be more beneficial to use a mixed route of administration (oral and intra-articular, oral and intravenous, or intravenous and intra-articular). Oral administration may be as effective as intravenous administration of TXA. We found little to no evidence of harm associated with higher doses of tranexamic acid in the risk of DVT. However, we are not able to definitively draw these conclusions based on the trials included within this review.

Effect of recombinant human erythropoietin combined with iron sucrose on postoperative hemoglobin in patients undergoing artificial joint replacement

With the aging of the population, an increasing number of elderly patients are opting for artificial joint replacement, leading to the exploration of various rapid rehabilitation programs in the perioperative period. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of combining recombinant human erythropoietin and iron sucrose in altering the range and trend of postoperative hemoglobin in patients undergoing arthroplasty. Specifically, we will examine whether this combination can effectively alter the rise and fall of postoperative haemoglobin, identify the inflection point of haemoglobin change or recovery after arthroplasty, and assess the effect of treatment on serum iron in postoperative blood. We conducted a retrospective study of 138 patients who underwent unilateral total joint arthroplasty by the same surgeon in the same hospital before July 2022. The results of this study may provide valuable insights for the development of effective rehabilitation programs for patients undergoing arthroplasty.

Comparison of Intravenous, Topical, or Combined Routes of Tranexamic Acid in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction: The optimal route and dosing regimen of tranexamic acid (TXA) in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unclear. This study aims to explore if there was a synergistic effect of intravenous (IV) and topical TXA on blood loss and risk of complications. Materials and methods: From Jan 2019 to June 2021, medical records of patients aged 65 years or older who underwent primary unilateral TKA for primary osteoarthritis were retrospectively reviewed. The included patients were divided into 3 groups according to the methods of TXA application: Intravenous (IV) group, topical group, or combined group. Propensity-score match was used to reduce the bias and imbalance of confounding variables. The primary outcome was total blood loss. Results: The total blood loss, hidden blood loss, and the reduction of Hb concentration in the combined group were significantly lower than in the IV group and topical group (all P < .01). There is no significant difference in the transfusion rate, length of hospital stay, and incidence of thromboembolic events (both P > .05). Conclusions: Combined administration of IV and topical TXA is the most effective approach to decrease blood loss and postoperative Hb drop in the treatment of TKA without increasing any risk of complications.

Does tranexamic acid reliably reduce blood loss in proximal femur fracture surgery?

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to investigate the use of tranexamic acid in patients with proximal femoral fractures and compare the total blood loss, transfusion rates, complications, and the application method.

METHODS

A retrospective single center cohort study (level I trauma center) with 1479 patients treated operatively for a proximal femoral fracture between January 2016 and June 2020 was performed. 1 g of tranexamic acid was applied (systemic, topic or combined application). Patient data, surgical procedure, complications, and mortality were assessed. Hemoglobin levels, blood loss and transfusion rates for patients with and without tranexamic acid and the application methods were compared.

RESULTS

667 femoral neck fractures, 701 pertrochanteric and 109 subtrochanteric fractures were included. Mean age was 80.8 years. 274 patients received tranexamic acid. At admission average hemoglobin was 12.2 g/l. Hemoglobin drop postoperatively was less after tranexamic acid (9.72 vs. 9.35 g/dl). Transfusion rates were lowered significantly by 17.1% after tranexamic acid. Blood loss was reduced for all patients after tranexamic acid independent of fracture morphology. The combination of 1 g i.v. and 1 g topical-applied tranexamic acid seems to be more effective. Complication rates did not differ.

CONCLUSION

Tranexamic acid is effective in reducing blood loss and transfusion rates, without increasing the risk of thromboembolic events after proximal femoral fractures. For open reduction and nailing and arthroplasty in fracture setting combined topical and single i.v. application seems most effective and closed reduction with nailing can be treated by single dose i.v. application of 1 g tranexamic acid.

Blood transfusion and venous thromboembolism trends and risk factors in primary and aseptic revision total hip and knee arthroplasties: A nationwide investigation of 736,061 cases

BACKGROUND

Over the last years, new transfusion guidelines and pharmaceuticals have been introduced in primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty (P-THA, P-TKA, R-THA, R-TKA). In the US, a substantial decrease in transfusions has been observed in recent years. Little data exists on the subject in Europe. In this context we aimed to analyze: (1) Is there also a significant decrease in blood transfusion for these procedures in Germany? (2) Which patient and hospital related factors are associated with the risk of blood transfusion? (3) Is there a trend in complications, especially venous thromboembolism and stroke events that can be linked to tranexamic acid use?

HYPOTHESIS

There is a significant trend in decreasing blood transfusions in hip and knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Using nationwide healthcare insurance data for inpatient hospital treatment, 736,061 cases treated between January 2011 and December 2017 were included (318,997 P-THAs, 43,780 R-THAs, 338,641 P-TKAs, 34,643 R-TKAs). Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the odds of transfusion as a function of the year of surgery. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

In each cohort the odds of transfusion decreased over time (2017 vs. 2011 (reference): P-THA: OR 0.42 (95%CI: 0.39-0.45), P-TKA: OR 0.41 (95%CI: 0.37-0.46), R-THA: OR 0.52 (95%CI: 0.47-0.58), R-TKA: OR 0.53 (95%CI: 0.46-0.61). Patient-related risk factors for blood transfusion included older age, female gender, lower Body Mass Index, comorbidities such as renal failure, cardiac arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, valvular disease, coagulopathy, depression, and antithrombotic medication prior to surgery. Venous thromboembolism or stroke events did not increase over the study period.

DISCUSSION

The incidence of blood transfusions in primary and revision TKA and THA decreased over the study period. This may be due to new transfusion guidelines and the introduction of novel pharmaceuticals such as tranexamic acid. A further improved patient blood management and a focus on vulnerable patient groups might lead to a further future reduction of transfusions, especially in R-THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; comparative observational study.

EFFICACY OF EXTENDED ORAL TRANEXAMIC ACID ON BLOOD LOSS IN PRIMARY TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

Introduction:

Tranexamic acid is widely used for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the duration of systemic tranexamic acid (TXA) administration varies in many reports. Hence, this study aims to compare blood loss between a single intravenous (IV) TXA dose, and one dose of IV TXA combined with oral TXA, during 48-hour postoperative care in primary TKA.

Methods:

Ninety-four patients with primary osteoarthritis, who underwent primary TKA, were randomized into two groups. The first group consisted of 47 patients and received a dose of 750 mg IV TXA and 750 mg oral TXA postoperatively at 8-hour intervals for 48 hours. In the second group, 47 patients received a single dose of IV TXA and a placebo at the same intervals for the same time duration. Hemoglobin (Hb) was measured at 4, 24 and 72 hours after operation.

Results:

The mean total blood loss were not different between the two groups (p=0.37). There was no difference in total Hb reduction or closed suction drainage outputs (p=0.9 and 0.07, respectively).

Conclusion:

The extended use of oral TXA for 48-hour postoperative care did not decrease the total blood loss following TKA compared with a single dose of IV TXA. Level Of Evidence I; High quality randomized trial .

[Effectiveness and safety of tranexamic acid combined with intraoperative controlled hypotension on reducing perioperative blood loss in primary total hip arthroplasty]

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) combined with intraoperative controlled hypotension (ICH) for reducing perioperative blood loss in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

The clinical data of 832 patients with initial THA due to osteonecrosis of femoral head between January 2017 and July 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received TXA treatment, and 439 patients (hypotension group) received ICH treatment with an intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) below 80 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa) while 393 patients (normotension group) received standard general anesthesia with no special invention on blood pressure. There was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, basic arterial pressure, hip range of motion, internal diseases, preoperative hemoglobin (HB) and hematocrit (HCT), coagulation function, surgical approach, and TXA dosage between the two groups ( P>0.05). The perioperative blood loss and blood transfusion, anesthesia and operation time, hospitalization stay, postoperative range of motion, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The patients were further divided into MAP<70 mm Hg group (group A), MAP 70-80 mm Hg group (group B), and normotension group (group C). The perioperative blood loss and postoperative complications were further analyzed to screen the best range of blood pressure.

Results

The intraoperative MAP, total blood loss, dominant blood loss, recessive blood loss, blood transfusion rate and blood transfusion volume, anesthesia time, operation time, and hospitalizarion stay in the hypotension group were significantly lower than those in the normotension group ( P<0.05). The postoperative hip flexion range of motion in the hypotension group was significantly better than that of the normotension group ( Z=2.743, P=0.006), but there was no significant difference in the abduction range of motion between the two groups ( Z=0.338, P=0.735). In terms of postoperative complications, the incidence of postoperative hypotension in the hypotension group was significantly higher than that in the normotension group ( χ ²=6.096, P=0.014), and there was no significant difference in the incidence of other complications ( P>0.05). There was no stroke, pulmonary embolism, or deep vein thrombosis in the two groups, and no patients died during hospitalization. Subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference in total blood loss, dominant blood loss, and recessive blood loss in groups A and B during the perioperative period ( P>0.05), which were significantly lower than those in group C ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in blood transfusion rate, blood transfusion volume, and incidence of acute myocardial injury between 3 groups ( P>0.05); the incidence of acute kidney injury in group A was significantly higher than that in group B, and the incidence of postoperative hypotension in group A was significantly higher than that in groups B and C ( P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between groups B and C ( P>0.05).

Conclusion

The combination of TXA and ICH has a synergistic effect. Controlling the intraoperative MAP at 70-80 mm Hg can effectively reduce the perioperative blood loss during the initial THA, and it is not accompanied by postoperative complications.

Effects of Tranexamic Acid on Hemorrhage Control and Deep Venous Thrombosis Rate After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery has a lot of complications, especially hemorrhage, which can be controlled via tranexamic acid (TXA). The guidelines endorse the integration of TXA interventions in the management of TKA-induced complications. However, uncertainty surrounds the effects of different TXA therapies. This frequentist model network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to compare hemorrhage control and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) rate of different TXA therapies in TKA.

Methods: Articles were searched with the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from 1966 to October 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different TXA therapies, or with placebo in patients with TKA were included. Two investigators independently conducted article retrievals and data collection. The outcome was total blood loss and DVT rate. Effect size measures were mean differences (MDs), or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We conducted a random-effects NMA using a frequentist approach to estimate relative effects for all comparisons and rank treatments according to the mean rank and surface under the cumulative ranking curve values. All analyses were performed in Stata software or R software. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020202404.

Results: We identified 1 754 citations and included 81 studies with data for 9 987 patients with TKA. Overall, all TXA therapies were superior to placebo for total blood loss in TKA. Of all TXA therapies, M therapy (IV/IV infusion + oral TXA > 3g) was most effective for total blood loss (MD=−688.48, −1084.04–−328.93), followed by F therapy (IV TXA ≥ 15 mg/kg or 1 g three times). TXA therapies in this study are not associated with the increase of DVT risk.

Conclusions: TXA therapies in this study are effective and safe for the treatment of TKA-induced complications. M therapy (IV/IV infusion + oral TXA > 3 g) may be the most effective TXA therapy for hemorrhage control. TXA therapies in this study do not increase DVT risk. Considering hemorrhage control and DVT rate simultaneously, F therapy (IV TXA ≥ 15 mg/kg or 1 g three times) may be suggested to apply for TKA, and this study may provide a crucial clue to future TXA use.

Blood loss after revision knee arthroplasty is 1.38- to 2.17-fold higher than after primary knee arthroplasty: A retrospective analysis of 898 cases

BACKGROUND

There are a number of factors that influence blood loss during and after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and revision TKA (rTKA). The purpose of this study was to provide a factorial assessment that would aid surgeons in managing expected blood loss in rTKA, when compared to TKA. The first question asked was the blood loss and transfusions between TKA and rTKA and the second question was risk factors for blood loss after rTKA.

HYPOTHESIS

Blood loss in any rTKA is higher than in TKA by a factor of 2.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective single-centre consecutive series of rTKA between 2006 and 2018 was performed. Based on the rTKA types identified in joint registries, 4 rTKA cohorts were created: aseptic minor rTKA, aseptic major rTKA, 1st stage, and 2nd stage septic rTKA. A consecutive TKA cohort from the same study period was used to create a propensity score matched cohort with the aseptic major rTKA cohort.

RESULT

A total of 622 rTKA were identified. Aseptic major rTKA had double the median blood loss than TKA. The lowest blood loss was observed in the TKA group followed by aseptic minor rTKA, and the highest in 2nd stage septic rTKA. The median total blood loss was higher in all rTKA by a factor ranging between 1.38 and 2.17. Higher age, female gender, lower preoperative hemoglobin, chronic heart disease and history of myocardial infarction were risk factors for increased blood loss. The type of rTKA performed was not predictive of blood loss in the linear regression analysis.

DISCUSSION

Blood loss after rTKA is 1.38 to 2.17-fold higher than after TKA. The blood loss observed in 2nd stage septic rTKA and aseptic major rTKA was the highest. Older female patients, with a low preoperative hemoglobin, were identified to be at the highest risk of blood loss after rTKA. Strategies for further blood loss reductions need to be utilised to the fullest extent for these procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective prognostic study.

Is serum gentamicin concentration modified with autologous cell-saved blood transfusion after total knee arthroplasty using tranexamic acid? A randomised control trial

BACKGROUND

Self-transfusion has been proven as an effective management of blood loss after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Considering that the high local concentration of antibiotic from bone cement is delivered intravenously through the self-transfusion process, systematic toxicity has never been evaluated. In addition, the effectiveness of self-transfusion with the routine concomitant use of other modern blood-salvage strategies, like tranexamic acid, should also be assessed. Therefore, we performed a randomised study to assess: 1) the safety of self-transfusion in TKA by comparing the gentamicin concentrations resulting from the use or not of autologous blood transfusion; 2) the efficacy of self-transfusion in TKA, with the concomitant administration of tranexamic acid.

HYPOTHESIS

Self-transfusion in TKA elevates the serum gentamicin concentration and the potential risk of nephrotoxicity.

METHODS

The serum concentration of aminoglycosides was measured in two groups of 20 patients each, after TKA, according to the use of self-transfusion. Hemoglobin, renal function and calculated blood loss were compared at several points in time between groups.

RESULTS

The only time where there was a statistically significant difference in serum gentamicin, was at 48h postoperatively between groups [0.3 ug/mL±0.21, range: 0.15 to 0.72 vs. 0.14ug/mL±0.1, range: 0 to 0.35 (p=0.02)]. There were no significant differences in total blood loss [1341mL±501, range: 830 to 2230 vs. 1263mL±459 range: 840 to 2480 (p=0.67)] and need of allogeneic blood transfusion [3 units vs. 2 units] between groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of autologous blood transfusion was found to be safe, in terms of nephrotoxicity of aminoglycosides after TKA, but it seemed to be ineffective as a blood salvage strategy, when used concomitantly with the administration of tranexamic acid.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II; low-powered randomised study. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04505748.

Implementation and results of an enhanced recovery (fast-track) program in total knee replacement patients at a French university hospital

INTRODUCTION

In total knee replacement (TKR) surgeries, "fast-track" or enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs are being developed, but their impact on care pathway quality and safety has not been fully explored in the French literature. The present study aimed to compare results in TKR between fast-track and conventional pathways, addressing the following questions: (1) Are 90-day rates of complications, readmission and surgical revision higher with fast-track? (2) Is mean length of stay (LoS) shorter with fast-track? (3) Are postoperative pain and clinical results improved by fast-track? And, (4) are patients and care staff satisfied with these new programs?

HYPOTHESIS

Implementing fast-track for TKR in a university hospital center is beneficial for the patient and does not impair the quality and safety of care.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A case-control study was performed using a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. A fast-track program was implemented for TKR by modifying the care pathway. This involved instituting a therapeutic education consultation, optimizing blood sparing, modifying surgical practices, and hastening early mobilization thus actively involving patients in their own management. Between January 2017 and January 2019, 216 patients with a mean age of 69.23±7.80years and mean BMI of 30.15±4.79kg/m² were included in the fast-track group, with 335 matched patients included in the conventional group.

RESULTS

At 90days, there were no significant inter-group differences in rates of infection (fast-track=1.39%, conventional=0.90%; p=0.34), readmission (fast-track=3.24%, conventional=3.58%; p=0.49), or surgical revision (fast-track=2.78%, conventional=2.69%; p=0.298). The visual analog scale (VAS) pain rating was 1.56±1.36 in the fast-track group versus 5±2.41 in the conventional group; p<0.001. LoS was 3.17±1.59days in fast-track versus 7.25±1.85days in the conventional group; p<0.001. Ninety-five percent of patients and 96% of care staff were satisfied with the fast-track program.

DISCUSSION

Fast-track implementation ensured quality and safety of care; it did not increase the rate of complications in primary TKR. Mean length of stay was drastically reduced. Both patients and care staff were very satisfied with these new procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; case-control study.

Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of intravenous and topical regimens of tranexamic acid in complex tibial plateau fracture: a retrospective study

Background

Previous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) in orthopedic surgery. However, no study has investigated TXA in complex tibial plateau fracture surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to confirm the safety and effectiveness of i.v. (intravenous) TXA and topical TXA.

Material and methods

This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. The control group received an equal amount of placebo (physiological saline solution); the i.v. group received 1.0 g TXA by intravenous injection before the tourniquet was inflated and before the surgical incision was closed, and the topical group received 3.0 g TXA in 75 mL of physiological saline solution 5 min prior to the final tourniquet release. Perioperative blood loss, vascular events, wound complications, and adverse reactions were compared among the three groups. The pain, knee function, and quality of life (QoL) assessments were based on their corresponding scoring systems.

Results

Baseline data were comparable for all groups. The i.v. group showed the best results for total blood loss (TBL) and hidden blood loss (HBL) (424.5 ± 49.4 mL and 219.3 ± 33.4 mL, respectively, all P values < 0.001). Patients in the i.v. group had lesser real Hb decrease than those in the control group (0.9 vs 1.5, P<0.001) and topical group (0.9 vs 1.2, P = 0.026). The blood coagulation level as measured using fibrinolysis (D-dimer) was lower in the i.v. group than in the control and topical groups on POD1 and POD3; however, this difference was not significant; the fibrin-degradation products also showed a similar trend. Patients in the topical group experienced less pain than those in the control group on POD2, POD4, and PO6W. The VAS pain score was 3.6 vs. 4.4 (POD2, P<0.05), 2.8 vs 3.3 (POD4, P<0.05), and 2.1 vs. 2.6 (PO6W, P<0.001) in the topical group vs control group, respectively. No significant differences were identified in vascular events, wound complications, adverse reactions, knee function, and QoL among the three groups.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first study that showed both i.v. TXA and topical TXA are safe and effective for complex tibial plateau fractures. The i.v. regimen effectively reduced blood loss during the perioperative period, whereas patients under the topical regimen had less vascular events, wound complications, and a lower incidence of adverse reactions compared to those in the i.v. group.

Trial registration

The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-TRC-1800017754, retrospectively registered from 2018 to 01-01).

The optimal regimen of oral tranexamic acid administration for primary total knee/hip replacement: a meta-analysis and narrative review of a randomized controlled trial

Background

Oral tranexamic acid (TXA) has been demonstrated to reduce the blood loss in primary total knee and hip arthroplasty, but the optimal regimen of oral TXA administration is still unknown. This study aimed to find the best number of administrations of oral TXA for primary total knee and hip arthroplasty.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies published before March 20, 2020. Studies clearly reporting a comparison of multiple administrations of oral TXA for total hip/knee replacement were included, and the total blood loss (TBL), intraoperative blood loss (IBL), decline in hemoglobin (DHB), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), intramuscular venous thrombosis (IVT), length of hospital stay (LOS), and transfusion rate were evaluated. The weighted mean differences and relative risks were calculated using a fixed effects or random effects model.

Results

Nine studies involving 1678 patients were included in this meta-analysis (TXA 1363 (one administration, 201; two administrations, 496; three administrations, 215; four administrations, 336; five administrations, 115); placebo 315); the results show that compared with placebo groups, oral TXA could significantly reduce the TBL, IBL, DHB, LOS, and transfusion rate. In addition, the incidences of IVT and DVT were similar between the TXA and placebo groups. Moreover, two administrations of oral TXA significantly reduced the TBL and DHB compared with one administration, three administrations of oral TXA were better than two administrations, and four administrations of oral TXA were better than three administrations.

Conclusion

Our results suggested that oral TXA could significantly reduce the blood loss and the length of hospital stay but could not increase the incidence of DVT and IVT for total joint replacement patients; additionally, the effectiveness of oral TXA administration increased as the number of administrations increased.

Tranexamic Acid Use in Foot and Ankle Surgery

Background:

There is a potential role for tranexamic acid (TXA) use in foot and ankle procedures; however, the benefits of this intervention have not been fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to explore the safety, outcomes, and medical complication profile of the use of intravenous TXA in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery.

Methods:

A prospective study with retrospective review of 241 patients undergoing elective and traumatic foot and ankle procedures was performed. One gram of intravenous (IV) TXA was administered prior to incision. Patients were followed and evaluated for medical comorbidities, intraoperative blood loss, wound complication, superficial and deep infections, hematoma formation, medical complications, 30-day hospital readmission rate, and return visits to the emergency department or urgent care setting prior to first postoperative visit. Descriptive statistics were used for subgroup analysis. Mean postoperative follow-up was 4.5 months.

Results:

Estimated blood loss in all cases was less than 20 mL. There was 1 case of superficial cellulitis (1/241, 0.4%), 1 deep infection after Achilles tendon repair (1/241, 0.4%), 4 cases of delayed wound healing (4/241, 1.6%), 1 instance of deep vein thrombosis (1/241, 0.4%), and 2 cases of postoperative pulmonary embolism (2/241, 0.8%). There were no instances of postoperative hematoma formation. There were no additional recorded thromboembolic events. There were no adverse drug reactions. There were no 30-day hospital readmissions or return visits to the emergency department or urgent care setting before the first postoperative visit. In a subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in wound complications or infections between nondiabetics and diabetics (P > .05) and traumatic and nontraumatic cases (P > .05).

Conclusions:

The use of IV TXA in foot and ankle surgeries was associated with low risk of wound complications, infections, hematoma formation, thromboembolic events, and overall complication rates with minimal side effect profile. Perioperative tranexamic acid use may prove to be beneficial in foot and ankle surgery patients but especially in higher-risk patients such as those with diabetes, trauma, and those that are immunocompromised.

Level of Evidence:

Level IV, case series.

Transdermal buprenorphine patch versus oral celecoxib for pain management after total knee arthroplasty: An open- label, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of transdermal buprenorphine (TDB) patched for post-operative pain control after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis was that patients receiving the TDB patch would have less pain in comparison to those treated with the oral COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib without increasing side effects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 160 patients scheduled for primary TKA were randomly assigned to two groups: patients provided the TDB patch (10μg/h) (TDB group) and those provided oral celecoxib (CX group). The outcomes were pain scores measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS) during rest and activity, as well as morphine requirement, operated knee functional recovery and adverse events post-operatively.

RESULTS

The total morphine given during the first 72h post-operatively was significantly lower in the TDB group than CX group. The VAS scores were significantly lower in the TDB group than CX group during rest at 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 and 48h post-operatively, and during activity at 12, 24 and 48h and 3 days post-operatively. The mean range of motion on post-operative days (PD) 1, 2 and 3 were significantly greater in the TDB group. In addition, the Lysholm score was significantly higher in the TDB group on PD 3. There were no remarkable adverse events in either group.

DISCUSSION

Use of the TDB patch provides effective pain relief and reduces the requirement for rescue morphine without increasing side effects in comparison with oral celecoxib during the early post-operative stage following TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.