One-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty versus unilateral total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective case-matched study

Hip and knee arthroplasty in one surgical session: early morbi-mortality study

INTRODUCTION

Bilateral prosthetic hip or knee replacement in one surgical session is a procedure that has been widely validated in the literature, whereas hip and knee replacement in one surgical session remains poorly documented. This study reports on the results of these procedures by analyzing early post-operative complications in a retrospective multicenter study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2009 and 2023, 51 patients underwent hip and knee replacement surgery in a single surgical session at 4 French centers. They were 24 men and 27 women, with a mean age of 68.8 years (36-87); 7 patients were ASA 1, 30 were ASA 2 and 14 ASA 3. Prosthetic hip replacement was always performed first, associated 33 times with the ipsi-lateral knee and 18 times with the contralateral knee. All early complications, within the first 90 days post-operatively, were recorded: death, phlebitis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, surgical site infection (SSI), knee stiffness treated by mobilization under general anesthesia, urinary tract infection, acute urine retention or any other adverse event related to care. Transfusion rates were also reported.

RESULTS

The rate of early complications was 9.8% (5/51). No deaths, no phlebitis, no pulmonary embolism and no SSI were observed. Complications included one myocardial infarction, one urinary tract infection, one superficial infection, one haematoma treated by surgical evacuation and one recurrent instability requiring revision surgery (hip arthroplasty). The transfusion rate was 17.6% (9/51). The complication rate of ASA 3 patients was higher than that of ASA 1 and 2 patients, while there was no difference related to age or BMI.

DISCUSSION

Our results confirm the feasibility of single-stage hip and knee replacement, with a low complication rate in ASA 1 and 2 patients. This study adds to the few published works on the subject and reports comparable results. The small sample size and the heterogeneity of patients and centers limit the scope of the results, these limitations being relative to the volume expected for a rare procedure.

CONCLUSION

Single-session hip and knee arthroplasty should be reserved for patients selected according to comorbidities: ASA score, age and body mass index. ASA 3 patients have a higher risk of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective.

ONE STAGE BILATERAL TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT

Introduction

One-stage bilateral total hip replacement has gained popularity due to its advantages, which include its lower cost, anesthetic time, hospitalization, and recovery.

Objective

to show the clinical result of one-stage bilateral total hip replacement.

Methodology

A case series of patients who underwent one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty. The medical records of 100 patients were evaluated from 2001 to 2022. The posterolateral route was chosen for the procedures. Of the 100 replaced prostheses, 85% were hybrid and 15 were cemented. Procedures averaged 180 minutes in length.

Results

The average length of stay totaled three days. No deaths occurred in the 100 evaluated patients. Complications showed 1% rate of venous and pulmonary thromboembolism, one case of late dislocation (after three months. It was twice reduced and later revised), five cases of hematoma (5%. They were drained on the third postoperative day. Moreover, two occurred in both hips).

Conclusion

One-stage bilateral total hip replacement has advantages but it must be performed on carefully selected patients and by a qualified team. Evidence level IV, Case reports.

Total blood loss after hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: Anterior versus posterior approach

INTRODUCTION

Femoral neck fractures constitute a public health problem due to significant associated morbidity and mortality amongst the ageing population. Perioperative blood loss can increase this morbidity. Blood loss, as well as the influence that the surgical approach exerts on it, remains poorly evaluated. We therefore conducted a retrospective comparative study in order to: (1) compare total blood loss depending on whether the patients were operated on using an anterior or posterior approach, (2) compare the transfusion rates, operating times and hospital stays between these two groups and, (3) analyze dislocation rates.

HYPOTHESIS

Total blood loss is greater from an anterior approach following a hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture, compared to the posterior approach.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center comparative study included 137 patients operated on by hip hemiarthroplasty between December 2020 and June 2021, and seven patients were excluded. One hundred and thirty patients were analyzed: 69 (53.1%) had been operated on via the anterior Hueter approach (AA) and 61 (46.9%) via the posterior Moore approach (PA). The analysis of total blood loss was based on the OSTHEO formula to collect perioperative "hidden" blood loss. The risk of early dislocation (less than 6 months) was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Total blood loss was similar between the two groups, AA: 1626±506mL versus PA: 1746±692mL (p=0.27). The transfusion rates were also similar between the two groups, AA: 23.2% versus PA: 31.1% (p=0.31) as well as the duration of hospitalization, AA: 8.5±3.2 versus PA: 8.2±3.3 days (p=0.54). The operating time was shorter in the PA group (Δ=10.3±14.1minutes [p<0.001]) with a greater risk of early dislocation when the patient was operated on by PA with AA: 9.8% versus PA: 1.4% (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

This study does not demonstrate any influence of the approach (anterior or posterior) on total blood loss. Transfusion rates and length of hospitalization were similar between the groups with a slightly shorter operating time but a greater risk of early dislocations after posterior hemiarthroplasty in a population at high anesthesia-related risk.

LEVEL OF PROOF

III, comparative study of continuous series.

Similar complications and outcomes with simultaneous versus staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty with the direct anterior approach: A comparative study

INTRODUCTION

Simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) has demonstrated similar clinical outcomes to staged bilateral THA. However, there is scarce data regarding the early postoperative complications. This study compares simultaneous to staged bilateral THA with the direct anterior approach (DAA) regarding early complications and revision surgeries.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study included all bilateral THAs, performed by DAA between 2013 and 2021 with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. A total of 264 THAs (132 patients) were identified [simultaneous group (1T): 58 patients; staged group (2T): 74] with a mean follow-up of 54 months. Complications and revisions, clinical outcomes, and days off work were assessed at the last follow-up. Moreover, blood loss was evaluated by the modified method of Mercuriali and Inghilleri.

RESULTS

Blood loss was higher in the 1T group (1003 mL 1T vs. 740 mL 2T; p < 0.001) but there was no significant difference in transfusion rates (5% 1T vs. 3% 2T; p = 0.4). There were no complications in 1T, while the complication rate was 5.2% (n = 6) in 2T (p = 0.012). There were 5 revisions in the 2T group, including 2 debridements with polyethylene exchange and implant retention for early infections, 2 revisions for aseptic loosening in the same patient, and 1 revision due to fracture. Postoperative pain on D3 was equivalent in both groups (4.2 1T vs. 4.3 2T; p = 0.79). The improvement in function according to the HHS at 2 months was better in the 1T group, but not significant (36.8 1T vs. 32.9 2T; p = 0.05). The total number of days off work was significantly higher in the 2T group (82.6 days vs. 178.8; p = 0.025).

DISCUSSION

Simultaneous bilateral THA with the DAA seems to be a safe procedure, with no risk of increased early postoperative complications when compared to the staged procedure with similar functional outcomes and significantly fewer complications and days off work.

Simultaneous vs staged bilateral hip arthroplasty: monocentric analysis of satisfaction rate and complications

PURPOSE

Interest in bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been increasing over the past decade. This study aims to compare postoperative local and systemic complications, hospital readmissions, and satisfaction assessment in patients undergoing simultaneous versus staged bilateral THA.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted among patients who underwent simultaneous or staged bilateral THA between 2017 and 2020. Data on perioperative parameters, local and systemic complications, and 30-day hospital readmissions were collected. Patient satisfaction was assessed using Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). The comparison of continuous variables with normal distribution of variance was performed by ANOVA; for variables with abnormal distribution, the nonparametric test Mann-Whitney U was adopted. The distribution of dichotomous variables was analyzed by chi-square test, and statistical significance was calculated by Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

The study included 199 patients, of whom 156 underwent staged and 43 simultaneous bilateral THA. A total of 44 patients developed complications (21 systemics, 12 locals, and 20 postoperative anemia). There were no significant differences regarding local (simultaneous 5% vs. staged 6%; p = 0.999) or systemic complications (simultaneous 14% vs. staged 10%; p = 0.408). Only the incidence of postoperative anemia was significantly higher in simultaneous group compared with staged group (p = 0.003). There were no significant differences in FJS between the two groups (p = 0.258).

CONCLUSION

No differences in local or systemic complications nor readmission rates were observed following simultaneous or staged bilateral THA. Simultaneous bilateral THA is non-inferior to staged implants in terms of safety and patient satisfaction.

Can hip function be assessed with self-report questionnaires? Feasibility study of a French self-report version of the Harris Hip and Merle d'Aubigné scores

INTRODUCTION

The Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Merle D'Aubigné Postel (MDP) score both provide an objective and subjective evaluation of hip function. These scores are collected during the follow-up of patients who have a hip disease. The objectives of this prospective study were (1) to analyze the differences between the two new French self-report versions of the HHS and MDP, and the traditional surgeon-assessed HHS and MDP; (2) to analyze the correlation between the self-report HHS and MDP and the surgeon-assessed HHS and MDP; (3) to analyze the floor and ceiling effects of the two self-report scores and the reliability of these self-report scores in operated and non-operated patients.

HYPOTHESIS

The French self-report HHS and MDP are sufficiently reliable to accurately estimate the patient's objective and subjective outcomes compared to the clinical examination done by a surgeon.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter study was done with patients who had a hip disease. Two self-report questionnaires were completed by the patient, independently of the clinical examination done by the surgeon. The questionnaires were in French and consisted solely of checkboxes, with sample photos that corresponded to the various range of motion items in the HHS and MDP. The agreement between the self-report scores and the surgeon-assessed scores were evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Differences in the mean values were evaluated with a paired t test.

RESULTS

The analysis involved 89 patients. The self-report HHS was 2.7±3.7 points (/100) lower than the surgeon-assessed HHS, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.34). The self-report MDP was significantly less by 1.2±2.9 points (/18) than the surgeon-assessed MDP (p=0.01). The agreement between the self-report HSS and the surgeon-assessed HSS was excellent (ICC=0.86) as was the one between the self-report MDP and the surgeon-assessed MDP (ICC=0.75). There was a strong positive correlation between the surgeon-assessed and self-report HHS in operated patients (ICC= 0.84; R=0.75; p<0.001) and in non-operated patients (ICC=0.96; R=0.89; p<0.001). This positive correlation was also found between the surgeon-assessed and self-report MDP for operated patients (ICC=0.73; R=0.62; p<0.001) and non-operated patients (ICC=0.79; R=0.64; p<0.001). A ceiling effect (maximum of 100 points) was found in 22% of patients (20/89) for the self-report HHS and in 34% of patients (30/89) for the self-report MDP (maximum of 18 points). No floor effect was observed for either questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

The French version of the HHS self-report questionnaire is an excellent overall estimator of the HHS score for patients with hip osteoarthritis or fracture, whether operated or not. The addition of the MDP, whose self-report version is less accurate, is also a reliable tool. These self-report questionnaires, when validated on a larger scale, will be useful for the long-term follow-up of patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; prospective diagnostic study.

Rate and Predictors of Patient Satisfaction After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Low-to-Middle-Income Country

Objective This study aimed to assess the rate of patient satisfaction after primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) using a validated satisfaction measure. Materials and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted, including all patients who underwent primary TJA between December 2021 and February 2023. The age of the study population was found to range from 23 to 86 years. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a validated tool comprising four questions and a quality of life (QoL) question. Results A total of 197 patients were included, with a mean age of 60.9 ± 12.7 years. Total knee replacement (TKR) was performed in 124 patients (62.9%), and total hip replacement (THR) in 73 patients (37.1%). The mean patient satisfaction score was 86.6 ± 14.4 out of a maximum of 100. A significant negative correlation was observed between the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the overall satisfaction score (p-value = 0.029). The majority of the patients (52.3%, n = 103) answered that their QoL had greatly improved, and a similar level of improvement was noted in elderly vs. adult patients (p-value = 0.17). A significantly higher proportion of male patients reported improvement more than they ever expected compared to female patients, the majority of whom reported their QoL was greatly improved (p-value = 0.025). Conclusion Total joint arthroplasty has been shown to achieve good patient satisfaction and an improvement in QoL. However, an increased comorbidity index and female gender were identified as factors for reduced satisfaction. Hence, it is recommended to consider these factors and counsel patients accordingly based on local patient data.

In-Hospital Complications and Costs of Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Case for Selection and Potential Cost Savings

Background

Published comparisons between bilateral and unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain controversial regarding the potential risks and benefits. Our objectives were to compare (1) postoperative complications and (2) resource utilization of patients having simultaneous bilateral THA with patients having unilateral procedures.

Methods

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients undergoing primary elective THA from January 2016 to December 2019. Complications and costs were compared between unilateral and simultaneous bilateral patients. Binary logistic regression analysis controlling demographics, comorbidities, and the primary diagnosis was performed to compare the cohorts of unilateral and bilateral patients.

Results

Nine thousand nine hundred fifty-five Bilateral procedures and 785,609 unilateral procedures were identified. Patients with bilateral procedures were at increased risk for many medical complications including gastrointestinal complications (OR: 4.1; 95% CI: 2.4-6.9, P < .01), postoperative blood transfusions (OR: 3.6; 95% CI: 3.3-3.9, P < .01), and pulmonary embolisms (OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 2.0-5.1, P < .01). Patients with bilateral procedures were also at increased risk for joint complications, including periprosthetic fractures (OR: 7.4; 95% CI: 5.2-10.5, P < .01) and other mechanical complications (OR: 27.0; 95% CI: 23-30, P < .01). These patients also incurred higher index hospitalization costs ($25,347 vs $16,757, P < .001) and were discharged more commonly to a rehabilitation facility (17.8% vs 13.4%, P < .001).

Conclusions

Bilateral THA are at increased risk of developing postoperative complications despite being younger and having fewer comorbidities on average when compared with unilateral patients. While bilateral patients had a higher index hospitalization cost, the overall cost of one episode of care is lower than two separate hospitalizations.

Similar complication and readmission rates following simultaneous versus staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To compare short-term complications and readmission rates, in patients treated with simultaneous versus staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) within a year from the index procedure.

METHODS

We reviewed the charts of patients that underwent simultaneous and staged-within a year-bilateral THA, between 2016 and 2020. Preoperative baseline characteristics were evaluated, while differences in terms of 30-day major and 30-day minor complications and readmission rates were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

One-hundred-sixty patients (mean age, 64.3 years; SD, ± 11.7) were identified. Seventy-nine patients were treated with simultaneous (Group A) and eighty-one patients with staged (Group B) THA. There were no differences in baseline characteristic between the two groups (p  > 0.050). Group A was more likely to receive general anesthesia (43% vs. 9.9%, p < 0.001) and had longer total operative time (182.8 vs. 128.0 min, p  < 0.001). Group A had an overall shorter total length of hospital stay (5.8 vs. 8.6 days, p  < 0.001). No differences in transfusion rates (p  = 0.229) and no differences in major and minor complications (p > 0.05) were identified. Postoperative visits at the emergency department or readmissions were similar between the two groups (p > 0.050).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that similar complication and readmission rates are expected after simultaneous and staged THA. Simultaneous bilateral THA is a safe and effective procedure, that should be considered for patients that present with radiologic and clinical bilateral hip disease.

Early morbidity and mortality after one-stage bilateral shoulder arthroplasty

PURPOSE

One-stage bilateral shoulder arthroplasty has the advantage of requiring a single hospital stay and a single anaesthesia. The topic has been little reported, unlike one stage bilateral hip and knee arthroplasty, which have demonstrated their interest. The aim of the present study was to determine peri- and early post-operative morbidity and mortality after this procedure. The study hypothesis was that peri- and early post-operative morbidity and mortality in one stage bilateral shoulder arthroplasty is low in selected patients and that satisfaction is high.

METHODS

A single-centre retrospective study assessed peri- and early post-operative morbidity and mortality in one stage bilateral shoulder arthroplasty. Twenty-one patients, aged < 80 years, with ASA score ≤ 3, were consecutively operated on between 1999 and 2020. Indications comprised primary osteoarthritis, aseptic osteonecrosis, inflammatory arthritis, massive rotator cuff tear, and dislocation fracture, involving both shoulders.

RESULTS

There were no early deaths. The complication rate was 10% (4/21 cases). No prosthesis dislocation or sepsis was reported. Mean blood loss was 145 ± 40 cc, mean surgery time 164 ± 63 min, and mean hospital stay five ± four days. Only one patient required postoperative transfusion. Functional results at six months showed significantly improved range of motion and good patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

One-stage bilateral shoulder arthroplasty was feasible in selected patients. Mortality was zero, and morbidity was low. Surgery time was reasonable and required no repositioning. Postoperative home help is indispensable for patient satisfaction during rehabilitation.

Systematic evaluation of the degree of joint amnesia in patients after total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach (DAA) compared with posterior approach (PA)

OBJECTIVE

A comparative study of joint amnesia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with the direct anterior approach and posterior approach was conducted through a comprehensive evaluation.

METHODS

The literature on joint amnesia in postoperative patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach and the posterior approach was systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang, and VIP databases from the time of library construction until February 13, 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software after independent searching, screening of the literature, data extraction, and quality assessment of the included studies by two investigators in strict accordance with the guidelines for conducting meta-analyses.

RESULTS

A total of one RCT and six cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis results indicated that at 1 month postoperatively (MD = 2.08, 95% CI (0.20, 3.96), P = 0.03), 3 months (MD = 10.08, 95% CI (1.20, 18.96), P = 0.03), and 1 year (MD = 6.74, 95% CI (1.30, 12.19), P = 0.02), DAA total hip arthroplasty was associated with better FJS compared to PA at 1 year postoperatively. However, there was no statistical significance in FJS between the two groups at 5 years postoperatively (MD = 1.35, 95% CI (- 0.58, 3.28), P = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

Current evidence suggests that the degree of joint amnesia after THA for DAA was not found to be superior to that of PA. Further, these findings require confirmation by including a larger number of high-quality randomized controlled studies.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Increased Complication Risk Associated With Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Contemporary, Matched Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (sbTHA) continues to be performed in patients who have bilateral end-stage osteoarthritis. However, few studies have evaluated the risk associated with this practice compared to unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

Using a large national database, primary, elective sbTHAs, and unilateral THAs were identified from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2021. The sbTHAs were matched to unilateral THAs at a 1:5 ratio on age, sex, and pertinent comorbidities. Patient characteristics and comorbidities, and hospital factors were compared between both cohorts. Additionally, 90-day risk of postoperative complications, readmissions, and in-hospital deaths were assessed. After matching, 2,913 sbTHAs were compared to 14,565 unilateral THAs with an average age of 58.5 ± 10.0 years.

RESULTS

Compared to unilateral patients, sbTHA patients demonstrated higher rates of pulmonary embolism (PE) (0.4 versus 0.2%, P = .002), acute renal failure (1.2 versus 0.7%, P = .007), acute blood loss anemia (30.4 versus 16.7%, P < .001), and need for transfusion (6.6 versus 1.8%, P < .001). After accounting for confounders, sbTHA patients demonstrated increased risk of PE (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.76, 95% CI: 1.84 to 7.70, P < .001), acute renal failure (aOR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.72, P = .003), acute blood loss anemia (aOR: 2.3, 95% CI: 2.10 to 2.53, P < .001), and transfusion (aOR: 4.08, 95% CI: 3.35 to 4.98, P < .001) compared to unilateral THA patients.

CONCLUSION

The practice of performing sbTHA was associated with an increased risk of PE, acute renal failure, and risk of transfusion. Careful evaluation of patient-specific risk factors is warranted when considering these bilateral procedures.

How to avoid systematic postoperative blood test after total hip arthroplasty: A new risk scoring system compared to Wu's score

BACKGROUND

Routine laboratory studies are often performed following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, lately, their necessity has been challenged and risk factors for postoperative transfusion are still debated. Recently, a risk scoring system to single out patients that should have a postoperative blood test has been published by Wu et al. The purposes of this retrospective study were: (1) to validate this recently published risk scoring system to identify patients who should have a postoperative laboratory test; (2) to single out risk factors of postoperative transfusion; (3) to determine if another score can more accurately predict the need for postoperative transfusion.

HYPOTHESIS

Wu et al.'s risk scoring system can accurately identify patients who should have a postoperative blood test.

METHODS

In all, 1693 patients who underwent primary THAs between June 2015 and October 2020 were screened for potential eligibility to include 1000 patient for analysis. Preoperative and postoperative blood tests were done for every patient. Clinical information and laboratory results were retrospectively collected and analyzed. A descriptive analysis followed by univariate and multivariate analysis were sequentially performed. A multiple logistic regression model was employed to determine a formula predicting the transfusion risk called THABUS for Total Hip Arthroplasty Blood test Usefulness Score. The risk scoring system for complete blood count published by Wu et al. in may 2020 was performed for every patient and compared to the THABUS predictive model.

RESULTS

The transfusion rate was 2.3% (23/1000). The risk-scoring system published by Wu and al. showed that a laboratory test was necessary for 60.6% (606/1000) however 13% (3/23) of the patients who needed a blood transfusion were missed by the risk-scoring system, giving it a sensitivity of 86.95% and a specificity of 40%. Increasing age, arterial hypertension, female gender, low preoperative hemoglobin, ASA score≥2 and diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the femoral head were significantly associated with postoperative transfusion. The THABUS formula can predict the risk for transfusion with a sensibility of 96.65% and a specificity of 75.54%. In our cohort of 1000 patients, following the THABUS formula would have led to 261 postoperative blood test and cost savings of 32,132$. Only one patient (4.3%) was missed by our new score. The THABUS formula is significantly better than Wu et al.'s complete blood count score in identifying both patient that will need a transfusion (p<0.01) and those who shouldn't have a postoperative blood test (p<0.001). Medical intervention because of creatinine or electrolytes abnormality was needed in 0.3% (3/1000) of patients.

DISCUSSION

In this study Wu et al.'s recently published complete blood count risk-scoring system was not validated. However, in the studied population the THABUS formula can accurately target patients who might need a transfusion. The use of the THABUS formula could reduce hospitalization costs without compromising the patients' safety.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, case-control study.

Bilateral simultaneous hip arthroplasty shows comparable early outcome and complication rate as staged bilateral hip arthroplasty for patients scored ASA 1-3 if performed by a high-volume surgeon

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare early outcomes after simultaneous and staged hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with bilateral symptomatic pathology.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all patients scheduled for primary THA for bilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA, n = 290). Patients either received simultaneous (n = 152, 52.4%) or staged (n = 138, 47.6%) bilateral THA based on individual preference. All operations (n = 428) were performed by one single, high-volume surgeon. Demographic data (e.g., age, ASA score) as well as perioperative parameters (haemoglobin drop (Hb), red blood cell transfusion, length of stay (LOS), operation time, six week complication rate and achievement of inpatient rehabilitation key points) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients in the simultaneous bilateral THA group were younger (62.8 ± 8.9 vs. 65 ± 9.7 years, p = 0.022) and had lower ASA scores (1.8, (34.2% ASA 1, 55.3% ASA 2, 37.2% ASA 3) vs. 2.0 (18.8% ASA 1, 61.6% ASA 2, 19.6% ASA 3)) than the staged group. While the average LOS was 7.1 ± 1.7 days for simultaneous bilateral THA, the combined LOS for the staged group was 12.9 ± 2.4 days (p < 0.001). The cumulative operation time in the simultaneous bilateral THA group was 61.1 ± 11.5 min and 57.6 ± 7.3 min in the staged group (p < 0.015). Cumulative Hb loss was significantly higher in the staged group (2.1 ± 7.2 g/dl vs. 3.7 ± 1.3 g/dl, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found concerning the complication rate or early inpatient rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous bilateral hip arthroplasty in patients with symptomatic bilateral hip osteoarthritis is as safe and successful as a staged procedure if performed by a high-volume surgeon.

Simultaneous bilateral versus unilateral total hip arthroplasty: Pain and physical function in a one- and five-year follow-up - retrospective patients record study

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) decreases pain and improves function in patients with osteoarthritis. In some cases, both hips have been operated simultaneously. Our aim was to report patients' pain and physical function after one- and five-years post-operatively among patients who underwent unilateral THA and those who underwent bilateral THA at the same time in one orthopaedic hospital in Finland.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 488 patients retrospectively selected patients from a single centre; 421 of them underwent unilateral THA and 67 underwent simultaneous bilateral THA. The patients had two clinical examinations one and five years postoperatively. Systematic data about pain and physical function were collected using the scaled Orton Hip Score (sOHS). Register data on revisions and mortality events were from the Finnish Institute of Health and Welfare.

RESULTS

At the one-year follow-up, total sOHS was improved remarkably from the preoperative situation, both in the unilateral THA (age and gender adjusted mean improvement 42 points (95% CI: 40 to 44, p < 0.001) and in the bilateral THA groups (age and gender adjusted mean improvement 45 [95% CI: 41 to 49], p < 0.001), with no group differences after five-years of operation (age and gender adjusted p = 0.19). Total sOHS was statistically higher in the bilateral THA compared to the unilateral THA after one year (98 vs. 95, p < 0.001) and five years (97 vs. 95, p = 0.003) of operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in unilateral THA and bilateral THA groups had increased their physical function, and pain had decreased after one-year follow-up of the primary THA operation, and condition remained after five years of operation. At follow-ups, patients who underwent bilateral THA had slightly better physical function compared to patients who underwent unilateral THA at follow-up; however, this difference had no clinical relevance.

Comparative study of bilateral total hip arthroplasty in one or two stages

INTRODUCTION

Bilateral total hip arthroplasty (Bi THA) for disabling bilateral hip osteoarthritis can be performed in one or two operative sessions. The objective of this study was to compare the complication rates of a group of patients who had bilateral THA in one operating session (Bi-1S THA) to a matched group of patients who had bilateral THA in two separate operating sessions (Bi-2S THA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective case-control study compared 84 Bi-1S THA matched to 84 Bi-2S THA by age, gender, diagnosis, ASA score (1-2) and surgical approach. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. Complication rates, total blood loss, number of blood transfusion units, and functional outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (14.3%) in the Bi-1S THA group had minor or major complications, compared to twenty-one (25%) in the Bi-2S THA group (p=0.08): there were fewer minor complications in the Bi-1S THA group and a similar rate of major complications amongst the two groups. Total blood loss estimated using the OSTHEO formula was significantly lower in patients operated on by Bi-1S THA (1853±753mL versus 2804±1012mL, p <0.0001). The number of blood transfusion units was similar between the groups (0.5±0.8 versus 0.3±1.4 respectively, p=0.55). No significant difference was found regarding the functional results.

CONCLUSION

Under the conditions of this study, bilateral total hip arthroplasty in one operative session leads to fewer minor complications, and a similar rate of major complications, when compared to bilateral total hip arthroplasty in two separate sessions. This strategy can therefore be recommended for ASA 1 and 2 patients, under the age of 80 with disabling bilateral osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative study.

Overlapping surgery in arthroplasty - a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Planned overlapping surgery can improve efficiency, reduce costs and help manage long waiting lists; yet, this practice has been questioned due to patient safety concerns. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to answer the question: (1) are there any differences in the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes; and (2) are there any differences in length of stay or length of surgery, in elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed either as non-overlapping surgery (NOS) or overlapping surgery (OS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic search of literature in the databases of MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane from dates of inception was performed. All studies published in English were included. Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework were utilised. Relative risk (RR) was used for dichotomous outcomes, while mean difference (MD) was used for continuous variables, with 95% confidence intervals. Alpha was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of nine studies with 120,625 patients were included for analyses. There were no statistically significant differences for overall rates of postoperative complications, dislocations, fractures, infections, readmissions or revision surgery nor with length of stay or length of surgery (p>0.05). Patient characteristics between groups were similar (p>0.05).

DISCUSSION

There were no differences in postoperative adverse outcomes for elective orthopaedic THA and TKA performed as NOS when compared to OS. Operating schedules for OS in elective lower limb arthroplasty appear to be safe, given appropriate patient selection processes and may be a useful method to improve hospital efficiency. Informed consent and preoperative patient education should remain paramount.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The Symmetry and Predictive Factors in Two-Stage Bilateral Hip Replacement Procedures

Background: Approximately 10–25% of total hip replacement patients undergo a bilateral procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare selected parameters associated with the first and second hip arthroplasty in patients undergoing two-stage treatment due to bilateral hip osteoarthritis and establish the predictive factors for the second procedure. Methods: This study compared the data on bilateral total hip replacement surgeries conducted in the period between 2017 and 2021 (42 patients). The following parameters from the first and second procedure were compared: the prosthetic stem, head, and insert cup size; type of cup insert; duration of anesthesia; duration of hospitalization; and the number of complications. Results: The mean duration of hospital stay at the time of the first total hip arthroplasty was 5.83 days and 5.4 days during the second stay. The mean stem sizes used during the first and second total hip replacement procedures were 7.11 and 7.09, respectively. The mean sizes of endoprosthetic cups used at the first and second total hip replacement procedures were 52.64 and 53.04, respectively. There were no significant differences between the mean prosthetic head size at the first and second surgery. The cup type used during the first and second surgery showed no difference. The mean duration of anesthesia used during the first and second total hip replacement surgery was 108.09 min and 104.52 min, respectively. We recorded a mean of 0.07 complications per patient at the first surgery and 0.02 at the second surgery. Conclusions: Our study results showed symmetry duration of anesthesia, length of hospital stay, number of complications per patient, stem size, prosthetic head size, cup insert size, and cup insert type at the first and second surgery in patients with two-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty. We observed a strong correlation between the stem sizes of the first and second hip endoprostheses. There was also a strong correlation between the cup sizes used during the first and second surgery.