Oral administration of prednisone effectively reduces subacute pain after total knee arthroplasty

Oral Prednisone Use Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Increase Infections, but can be Associated With Higher Risk for Medical and Surgical Complications

BACKGROUND

Postoperative use of oral prednisone to augment the effect of multimodal pain regimens after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has increased in popularity. However, data on the risks of its utilization, especially as it relates to infection, have been lacking. We tested the null hypothesis that perioperative prednisone use is not associated with the incidence of surgical and medical complications after TKA.

METHODS

Using a national administrative claims database, we identified 949,555 patients undergoing primary TKA. We excluded patients who filled oral prednisone prescriptions within 90 days prior to surgery or between 90 and 364 days after surgery. Patients who had acute prednisone use were defined as those who filled prednisone prescriptions only within 30 days after surgery. Outcomes consisted of surgical and medical complications after TKA. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between acute prednisone use and complications, adjusting for age, sex, region, insurance plan, and Elixhauser comorbidities.

RESULTS

Patients in the acute prednisone cohort had greater adjusted odds of subsequent manipulation under anesthesia (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.23 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.09 to 1.38]; P < .001) and lysis of adhesions (adjusted OR = 1.58 [95% CI: 1.02 to 2.33]; P = .03) compared to patients who did not have acute prednisone use. Patients who had acute prednisone use also had greater adjusted odds of acute kidney injury (adjusted OR = 1.47 [95% CI: 1.25 to 1.71]; P < .001) and pneumonia (adjusted OR = 4.04 [95% CI: 3.53 to 4.59]; P < .001). There was no increased incidence of infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Prednisone use shortly following TKA may be associated with a higher incidence of certain surgical and medical complications, but without increased risk for infection. However, given these risks, the optimal patient profile for postoperative prednisone use remains to be defined.

The efficacy and safety of perioperative glucocorticoid for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of individuals undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which can result in pain, limited motor function and adverse complications such as infection, nausea and vomiting. Glucocorticoids have been shown anti-inflammatory and antiemetic effects, but can also elevate blood glucose levels and increase the risk of wound infection. Thus, it is essential to investigate the efficacy and safety of glucocorticoid usage in TKA.

METHOD

A comprehensive systematic search of PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of glucocorticoid application in TKA. The primary outcomes assessed were the postoperative pain assessment. Secondary outcomes included the range of motion in knee joint, levels of inflammatory cytokines, adverse complications, and the length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Thirty-six randomized controlled trials were included in the final analysis. The glucocorticoid group exhibited significant reduction in the resting VAS scores on postoperative days 1, 2 (POD1, 2)and postoperative 3 months (POM3), as well as decreased morphine consumption on POD1 and increased range of motion (ROM) in knee joint on POD1, 3. Additionally, the glucocorticoid group exhibited decreased levels of postoperative inflammatory cytokines and the incidence of PONV along with a shorter length of hospital stay. The blood glucose concentration was significantly increased in the glucocorticoid group on POD1 compared with the control group. While the blood glucose on POD2 and occurrence of postoperative adverse complications were similar between two groups including wound infection and venous thrombosis. The periarticular injection analgesia (PIA) group demonstrated lower VAS scores on POD2 comparing to the systemic administration (SA) group according to two studies. However, there was no significant difference of the resting VAS on POD1 and POD2 between PIA and SA group across all studies.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative glucocorticoids treatment in TKA significantly reduced short-term pain score and opioid-use which was probably not patient relevant. The application of glucocorticoids in TKA implied a beneficial trend in analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antiemetic effects, as well as improved range of motion and shortened hospital stay. While it will not increase the risk of continued high glucose, postoperative wound infection and venous thrombosis.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Corticosteroids With Enzymatic Agents in the Postoperative Sequelae for Lower Third Molar Surgery: A Prospective Study

Introduction The presence of impacted third molars is a prevalent problem associated with varying degrees of difficulty in extraction and potential consequences, including pain, swelling, and trismus. According to studies, enzymatic combinations, such as bromelain, rutoside, trypsin, and serratiopeptidase, are known to have a very promising role in reducing inflammation and promoting wound healing. This study compared natural enzymatic agents with corticosteroids for postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus in the impacted lower third molar surgery. Objectives The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of prednisolone, a combination of trypsin, chymotrypsin, bromelain, rutoside, and papain, and serratiopeptidase in the postoperative sequelae after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. The primary objective was to assess the difference in swelling between the three groups. The secondary objectives were to assess the difference in postoperative pain and trismus between the three groups. Materials and methods A total of 150 patients who presented to the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery for surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar with a moderately difficult score of 5-7 in the Pederson difficulty index were chosen for a prospective study. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the postoperative drug prescribed. In group 1, prednisolone 10 mg was prescribed; in group 2, a combination of trypsin, chymotrypsin, bromelain, rutoside, and papain was prescribed; and in group 3, serratiopeptidase 15 mg was prescribed. All patients were prescribed a combination drug of aceclofenac 100 mg and paracetamol 325 mg twice daily as a standard analgesic. Swelling, pain, and trismus in each patient were recorded preoperatively and at postoperative day one and day seven. The Friedman test was employed to evaluate the variation in pain levels within the groups over time, while the Kruskal-Wallis test was utilized to investigate the disparity in pain levels between the groups. The difference in swelling and trismus within the groups across the timeline was measured by repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the difference in swelling and trismus between the groups was measured by one-way ANOVA. A p-value below 0.05 was deemed to be statistically significant. Results Group 1 showed less swelling, pain, and trismus on both postoperative day one and day seven compared to group 2 and group 3, which was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). It was found that swelling, pain, and trismus measurements in postoperative day one and day seven in group 2 were comparatively less than in group 3. Neither group demonstrated any side effects or other complications during the follow-up period. Conclusion It can be concluded that the use of prednisolone postoperatively following surgical removal of the mandibular third molar provided better relief with regard to pain, trismus, and swelling compared to the enzymatic agents. Among enzymatic agents, a combination of trypsin, chymotrypsin, bromelain, rutoside, and papain was better in reducing pain, trismus, and swelling than serratiopeptidase drug.

Postoperative Pain Control Following Shoulder Arthroplasty: Rethinking the Need for Opioids

The use of opioid pain medication regimens to control perioperative pain has led to significant patient and societal consequences. There are several alternative, opioid-sparing and opioid-minimizing pain regimens that have been shown to provide equal, if not superior, pain relief with fewer secondary consequences. This article provides an in-depth review of the current evidence regarding efficacy, safety, and feasibility of a perioperative opioid-sparing clinical pathway for patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty.

Systemic glucocorticoids as an adjunct to treatment of postoperative pain after total hip and knee arthroplasty: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative analgesic effects of systemic glucocorticoids given as an adjunct to treatment are largely undetermined in alloplastic procedures.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the beneficial and harmful effects of peri-operative systemic glucocorticoid treatment for pain after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

DESIGN

A systematic review of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) with meta-analyses, trial sequential analyses and GRADE. Primary outcome was 24 h intravenous (i.v.) morphine (or equivalent) consumption with a predefined minimal important difference (MID) of 5 mg. Secondary outcomes included pain at rest and during mobilisation (MID, VAS 10 mm), adverse and serious adverse events (SAEs).

DATA SOURCES

We searched EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed and Google Scholar up to October 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

RCTs investigating peri-operative systemic glucocorticoid versus placebo or no intervention, for analgesic pain management of patients at least 18 years undergoing planned THA or TKA, irrespective of publication date and language.

RESULTS

We included 32 RCTs with 3521 patients. Nine trials were at a low risk of bias. Meta-analyses showed evidence of a reduction in 24 h cumulative morphine consumption with glucocorticoids by 5.0 mg (95% CI 2.2 to 7.7; P  = 0.0004). Pain at rest was reduced at 6 h by 7.8 mm (95% CI 5.5 to 10.2; P  < 0.00001), and at 24 h by 6.3 mm (95% CI 3.8 to 8.8; P  < 0.00001). Pain during mobilisation was reduced at 6 h by 9.8 mm (95% CI 6.9 to 12.8; P  < 0.00001), and at 24 h by 9.0 mm (95% CI 5.5 to 12.4, P  < 0.00001). Incidence of adverse events was generally lower in the glucocorticoid treatment group. SAEs were rarely reported. The GRADE rated quality of evidence was low to very low.

CONCLUSION

Peri-operative systemic glucocorticoid treatment reduced postoperative morphine consumption to an individually relevant level following hip and knee arthroplasty. Pain levels were reduced but were below the predefined MID. The quality of evidence was generally low.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO ID: CRD42019135034.

Management of perioperative pain after TKA

Postoperative pain is the prime obstacle to recovery of motion and return to activity after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Combating pain is a key point in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. Outcome depends on the efficacy of pain relief, making it a major issue. The pain originates locally in the knee and also remotely via neural pathways. Regression can be slow, over several months. Pain may sometimes be definitive, to a varying degree. Pain should be managed at each step of ERAS, from the preoperative period to the last follow-up consultation, and most especially during the perioperative phase. Pain needs to be anticipated and limited for as long as necessary. The impact of analgesics should be enhanced by means of potentiators. Some are administered by general route, sometimes preoperatively; others are applied locally, directly in the surgical site by local injection, or close to the nerves, to reduce painful stimuli. The two main principles of pain management are preventive analgesia and multimodal analgesia associating various molecules and routes.

Continuous vs. single-shot adductor canal block for pain management following primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Adductor canal block (ACB) provides effective analgesia following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This systematic review aimed to compare continuous and single-shot ACB for pain management and functional recovery following TKA.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL were searched up to January 5th, 2021. Included studies were randomized controlled trials comparing continuous to single-shot ACB for postoperative pain management after primary TKA. Primary outcome was opioid consumption and secondary outcomes were pain intensity, quadriceps strength, mobility, complications, and length of hospital stay. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects method.

RESULTS

Eleven studies (910 patients) were included in this systematic review. Continuous ACB did not significantly decrease opioid consumption (8 studies; 642 patients; MD=-5.67; 95% CI: -13.87 to 2.54; I²=13%) but significantly decreased 48hours pain scores (10 studies; 852 patients; MD=-0,73; 95% CI: -0.93 to -0.54; I²=54%). Continuous ACB improved quadriceps strength (4 studies; 250 patients; SMD=0.59; 95% CI: 0.16 to 1.03; I²=63%) but not Timed Up and Go test performance (5 studies; 524 patients; MD=3.99; 95% CI: -8.98 to 1.01; I²=89%). Type of ACB did not affect nausea and vomiting (5 studies; 357 patients; RR=1.23; 95% CI: 0.65 to 2.34; I²=0%) nor length of hospital stay (8 studies; 655 patients; MD=-0.13; 95% CI: -0.28 to 0.01; I²=36%).

CONCLUSION

Continuous ACB did not reduce opioid consumption following TKA. Larger trials are required.

Contralateral knee flexion predicts postoperative knee flexion in unilateral total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative flexion angle is associated with preoperative flexion in the same knee after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, whether the preoperative contralateral knee flexion angle could influence postoperative flexion remains unknown. This study aimed to test the effect of contralateral knee flexion on final flexion in the postoperative knee after unilateral TKA. We hypothesized that the preoperative contralateral knee flexion angle affects postoperative knee flexion, as does preoperative flexion, in the operated knee.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-five patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) who underwent cruciate-retaining TKA were included in this study, and their maximum passive knee flexion angle was evaluated preoperatively and at final follow-up on the operative and contralateral sides. Patients were divided according to their preoperative flexion angles: Group C, those whose contralateral knee flexion angle was greater than the operative knee flexion angle; and Group O, those whose contralateral knee flexion angle was equal to or smaller than the operative knee flexion angle. We performed multiple regression analysis, with postoperative flexion and improvement in the flexion angle as objective variables and preoperative predictors (age, sex, body mass index, preoperative flexion, and contralateral knee flexion) as explanatory variables. The results of the flexion angles were compared between the two groups using unpaired t-tests.

RESULTS

Postoperative flexion angle was significantly affected by the preoperative contralateral knee flexion angle (β=0.35, p=0.002), and an improvement in flexion was negatively affected by preoperative flexion of the operated knee (β=-0.83, p<0.001) and positively affected by contralateral knee flexion (β=0.35, p=0.001). Group O achieved poorer postoperative flexion than Group C (110.4±16.6° vs 119.6±16.5°, p=0.0017).

CONCLUSION

Patients with less flexion of the contralateral knee are less likely to obtain a greater degree of knee flexion after TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective comparative study.