What you need to know about kinematic alignment for total knee arthroplasty

Kinematical alignment better restores native patellar tracking pattern than mechanical alignment

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess whether kinematic alignment (KA) outperforms mechanical alignment (MA) in restoring patellar tracking to native patterns by using a clustering algorithm.

METHODS

Twenty cadavers (40 knees) were evaluated. For each cadaver, one knee was randomly assigned to KA and the other to MA. KA total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures were performed using a caliper-verified technique, while MA TKA procedures utilized a measured resection technique. Subsequently, all specimens were mounted on a customized knee-testing system, and patellar tracking was measured using a motion analysis system. All patellar tracking data were clustered using the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise algorithm. Differences in patellar tracking patterns and the restoration of native patellar tracking were compared between the two alignment strategies.

RESULTS

Patellar tracking patterns following KA were considerably different from MA. Pre- and post-TKA patellar tracking patterns following MA were grouped into separate clusters, whereas a substantial proportion of patellar tracking patterns following KA were grouped into the pre-TKA dominant cluster. Compared to MA, a greater proportion of patellar tracking patterns following KA showed similar patterns to native knees (p < 0.05) and more patellar tracking patterns following KA paired with preoperative patterns (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

KA restored native patellar tracking patterns more closely compared to MA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Calipered kinematic alignment restored the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle, achieved high satisfaction and improved clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether unrestricted calipered kinematic alignment (KA), coupled with a medial-stabilised (MS) implant system, can reproduce the patient's constitutional alignment as per the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) and improve clinical outcomes.

METHODS

One-hundred and ninety-three patients received total knee arthroplasty by the senior author. To determine whether the constitutional alignment was achieved, the postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) alignment was compared against the aHKA. Range of motion (ROM) was determined preoperative and postoperatively at 6 months and 2 years by measuring the active flexion and extension. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) including Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Visual Analogue Scale for Satisfaction were also completed. The Sports and Recreation component of KOOS was used to assess the patient's ability to return to sports and daily activities.

RESULTS

There was a strong correlation between postoperative HKA and aHKA (r = 0.7, p < 0.05). There was a significant improvement in both extension and flexion seen from as early as 6 months postoperatively, with a mean flexion of 123° ± 11° and extension of 1° ± 3° at 2 years. PROMs had significant improvements with a mean score of 42.8 ± 6.0 for the OKS and all KOOS subscales consisting of Symptoms (88.0 ± 11.7), Pain (91.4 ± 11.6), Activities of Daily Living (91.1 ± 12.4), Sports (76.8 ± 22.1) and Quality of Life (83.0 ± 19.1). The FJS had significant improvements from 6 months to 2 years of 19.9 (p < 0.05), with a mean score of 69.2 ± 26.6 at 2 years. Ninety-three percent (180 patients) were classified as 'satisfied' at the 2-year timepoint. The KOOS Sports component was completed by 64% (124 patients), whereby the mean age was younger than the noncompliant patients (67.7 ± 9.4 vs. 71.7 ± 8.2 years).

CONCLUSION

Unrestricted calipered KA can result in an alignment that closely resembles the patient's constitutional alignment, as per the aHKA. This resulted in improved knee ROM and patient satisfaction, as well as assisting younger patients to return to sports and daily activities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Which method for femoral component sizing when performing kinematic alignment TKA? An in silico study

INTRODUCTION

The kinematically alignment (KA) technique for TKA aims to reproduce the pre-arthritic knee anatomy, including both the femoro-tibial and femoro-patellar joints. An in silico study was conducted to compare 3 different femoral component sizing techniques to identify the anatomical landmark which allows closest restoration of the native trochlear anatomy. Our study's question was: what was the best method for sizing the femoral component when performing KA-TKA? It was hypothesized that sizing the femoral component by aiming to restore the groove height would be the best method to restore the native trochlear anatomy.

METHODS

GMK sphere® (Medacta) femoral component 3D models were virtually kinematically aligned on 30 tri-dimensional (3D) bony osteoarthritis knee models. The femoral component was mediolaterally positioned to match distal native and prosthetic grooves. Three methods were used to size the femoral component: a conventional method with the anterior femoral cut flush to the femoral cortex (C-KATKA) and two alternative personalized methods aiming to recreate either the medial facet's height (ATM-KATKA) or the groove's height (ATG-KATKA). In-house analysis software was used to compare native and prosthetic trochlear articular surfaces and mediolateral implant overhangs.

RESULTS

Compared with the C-KATKA, ATG-KATKA and ATM-KATKA techniques increased the component size by a mean of 0.90 (SD 0.31, min 0.5 to max 1.5) (p<0.001) and 1.02 (SD 0.31, min 0.5 to max 1.5) (p<0.001), respectively. C-KATKA technique substantially proximally understuffed the trochleae with maximum values of 7.11mm (SD 1.39, min 3.93mm to max 10.57mm) in the medial facet, 4.72mm (SD 1.27, min 1.46mm to max 6.86mm) in the lateral facet and 4.51mm (SD 1.40, min 1.92mm to max 7.30mm) in the groove, respectively. Alternative techniques understuffed medial facet with maximum values of 5.07mm (SD 1.29, min 2.83mm to max 8.34mm) and 4.70mm (SD 1.52, min 0.83mm to max 8.04mm) for ATG-KATKA and ATM-KATKA techniques, respectively. There was no significant understuffing of the groove or lateral facet for alternative techniques (ATM and ATG). The ATM-KATKA and ATG-KATKA techniques generated mediolateral implant overhang, mainly postero-lateral, with a rate of 90.0% and 86.7%, respectively. In this study, no mediolateral implant overhang was found for C-KATKA.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

The C-KATKA technique substantially understuffs the native trochlear articular surfaces in medial, lateral and groove parts. Alternative techniques (ATM-KATKA and ATG-KATKA) for sizing the femoral component better restore the native trochlear anatomy but also generate a high rate of postero-lateral implant overhangs. Would this postero-lateral implant overhang be clinically deleterious remains unknown? The aspect ratio of contemporary femoral TKA implants can probably be optimized to allow a better anatomical restoration of the anterior femoral compartment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, in silico study.

Finite element analysis in the optimization of posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

Posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (PS-TKA) is associated with high rates of satisfaction and functional recovery. This is notably attributed to implant optimization in terms of design, choice of materials, positioning and understanding of biomechanics. Finite elements analysis (FEA) is an assessment technique that contributed to this optimization by ensuring mechanical results based on numerical simulation. By close teamwork between surgeons, researchers and engineers, FEA enabled testing of certain clinical impressions. However, the methodological features of the technique led to wide variations in the presentation and interpretation of results, requiring a certain understanding of numerical and biomechanical fields by the orthopedic community. The present study provides an up-to-date review, aiming to address the following questions: what are the principles of FEA? What is the role of FEA in studying PS design in TKA? What are the key elements in the literature for understanding the role of FEA in PS-TKA? What is the contribution of FEA for understanding of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral biomechanical behavior? What are the limitations and perspectives of digital simulation and FEA in routine practice, with a particular emphasis on the "digital twin" concept? LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, expert opinion.

Preoperative flexion contracture does not affect outcome in total knee arthroplasty: A case-control study of 2,634 TKAs

BACKGROUND

One issue in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is management of preoperative flexion contracture, which may be associated with poor functional outcome.

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare functional results in TKA with or without preoperative flexion contracture, treated according to a standardized algorithm of tissue release and bone cut.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A single-center retrospective case-control study was performed on prospectively collected data for the period 1987-2016. Patients with >10̊ flexion contracture were assigned to the "contracture" group and associated to a selected control group at a ratio of 1:4. Clinical analysis used pre and post-operative International Knee Society (IKS) scores. The significance threshold was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and forty-nine cases and 3,304 controls were included, comprising a total of 2,838 male and 1,315 female participants. Mean preoperative extension deficit was 13̊±6̊ in the contracture group and 1̊±2̊ in controls. Preoperative IKS total and functional scores were significantly poorer in the contracture group (38±18 and 54±20) than in controls (52±16 and 59±19) (p<0.001). Postoperatively, the two groups did not significantly differ in IKS functional score (77±22 vs. 79±21, p=0.143). There were differences in IKS knee score (87±12 vs. 88±13, p=0.006) and maximal flexion (114̊±14̊ vs. 119̊±13̊, p<0.0001) that were statistically, but not clinically, significant.

DISCUSSION

A systematic standardized algorithm for surgical treatment of flexion contracture during primary total knee arthroplasty provided clinical outcomes similar to those of patients without preoperative flexion contracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; case-control study.

Current Concepts in Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

In an effort to increase satisfaction among total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients, emphasis has been placed on implant positioning and limb alignment. Traditionally, the aim for TKA has been to achieve a neutral mechanical alignment (MA) to maximize implant longevity. However, with the recent spike in interest in individualized alignment techniques and with the advent of new technologies, surgeons are slowly evolving away from classical MA.

METHODS

This review elucidates the differences in alignment techniques for TKA, describes the concept of knee phenotypes, summarizes comparative studies between MA and individualized alignment, and provides a simple way to incorporate the latter into surgeons' practice.

RESULTS

In order to manage patients by applying these strategies in day-to-day practice, a basic understanding of the aforementioned concepts is essential. Transition to an individualized alignment technique should be done gradually with caution in a stepwise approach.

CONCLUSION

Alignment and implant positioning are now at the heart of the debate and surgeons are investigating a more personalized approach to TKA.

Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a review

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alignment has recently become a hot topic in the orthopedics arthroplasty literature. Coronal plane alignment especially has gained increasing attention since it is considered a cornerstone for improved clinical outcomes. Various alignment techniques have been described, but none proved to be optimal and there is a lack of general consensus on which alignment provides best results. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the different types of coronal alignments in TKA, correctly defining the main principles and terms.

Alignment philosophy influences trochlea recreation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study using image-based robotic technology

PURPOSE

The ability of kinematic alignment (KA) to consistently restore trochlea anatomy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is unknown despite recreation of constitutional anatomy being its rationale for use. The purpose of this study was to assess if alignment choice in TKA effects the ability to restore the native trochlea groove.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-two consecutive patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA using the MAKO image-based robotic platform had simulated femoral components placed according to kinematic, mechanical and functional alignment principals. Implant position and trochlea restoration between groups were compared. Restoration was assessed by shift (medial-lateral) and depth relative to the native groove from three consistent points; full extension (0°), mid-flexion (30°-40°) and deep flexion (70°-80°).

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixty-six alignment options were analysed. Femoral alignment was significantly different between groups. Of KA, 13.1% compared to 3.3% of FA plans were outside safe coronal boundaries. The trochlear groove was translated the most by MA compared to KA and FA (full extension, MA 7.84 ± 1.99 mm lateral to the native groove, KA 6.40 ± 2.43 mm and FA 6.88 ± 1.74 mm, p ≤ 0.001). In full extension, FA most closely restored the trochlear groove depth in all three positions of flexion.

CONCLUSION

Alignment philosophy led to significant differences in trochlea groove recreation. A kinematically placed femoral component led to positioning considered unsafe in over 13% of cases. A functionally placed femoral component most closely restored trochlea depth in all three positions of flexion.

How to optimize patellar tracking in knee arthroplasty?

Good patellar tracking is needed for functionally successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and depends on several factors. The aim of the present Instructional Lecture is to identify the main factors and how to control them so as to optimize patellar tracking: more or less "patella-friendly" prosthetic trochlea design, requiring precise assessment and choice of model; patellar component design; type of tibial implant; surgical approach and management of peripatellar structures, and any lateral release; distal and posterior femoral bone cuts, determining femorotibial alignment, femoral component rotation and patellar height; tibial implant rotation with respect to the anterior tibial tubercle; patellar cut characteristics in resurfacing. In case of instability or patellar maltracking despite correct implant positioning, there are 2 main surgical techniques: medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, and anterior tibial tubercle medialization. To obtain optimal patellar tracking, correction of other factors should be associated: trochlear component design, distal and posterior femoral bone cuts, tibial implant positioning, patellar component shape and positioning, etc.

An early clinical comparative study on total knee arthroplasty with kinematic alignment using specific instruments versus mechanical alignment in varus knees

Background

The kinematic alignment technique, as one of the alignment options for total knee arthroplasty, has attracted increasing attention from orthopedic surgeons and has been increasingly performed in the most populous countries in the world. The purpose of this study is to explore and compare the early clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty with KA using specific instruments vs. mechanical alignment in our nation.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis with varus deformity. Depending on the alignment method, patients were divided into a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA) group and a mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (MA-TKA) group. The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle before and after surgery, the knee joint clinical score (KS-C), the knee joint functional score (KS-F) and the forgotten joint score (FJS) at 3 months and 2 years after surgery were recorded and statistically analyzed.

Results

A total of 126 patients were enrolled, including 65 in the KA-TKA group and 61 in the MA-TKA group. The mean follow-up period was 30.8 months. The postoperative HKA angle was not significantly different at the 2-year follow-up between the two groups (P > 0.05). The KS-C, KS-F and FJS scores in the KA-TKA group were higher than those in the MA-TKA group at 3 months after surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At the 2-year follow-up, the KS-C, KS-F and FJS scores in the KA-TKA group were higher than those in the MA-TKA group, and the difference in the KS-C and FJS scores was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Patients who underwent KA-TKA had a postoperative lower limb alignment similar to that of those who underwent MA-TKA. The clinical outcomes of KA-TKA were superior to those of MA-TKA in terms of clinical performance, knee function and subjective sensation up to 2 years after surgery.

Personalized alignment™ for total knee arthroplasty using the ROSA® Knee and Persona® knee systems: Surgical technique

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures are expected to increase up to 565% in the United States over the next 3 decades. TKAs were traditionally performed with neutral mechanical alignments that provided equal medial and lateral gaps in extension and flexion to reduce implant wear but were less successful at restoring native knee function and associated with high patient dissatisfaction. Kinematic alignment (KA) restores native anatomy and minimizes soft tissue release; however, KAs that recreate severe deformities and/or biomechanically inferior alignments result in significant increases in implant stress and risk of aseptic loosening. Restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) recreates pre-arthritic anatomy within a range of acceptable alignment boundaries, and improved patient clinical scores and faster recoveries have been reported with rKA techniques. Personalized Alignment™ is an evolution of rKA that relies heavily upon robotic assistance to reliably recreate patient anatomy, native soft tissue laxity, and accurate component placement to improve patients' clinical outcomes. The purpose of this surgical technique report is to describe the Personalized Alignment TKA method using the ROSA^® Knee System and Persona^® The Personalized Knee^® implants. Herein we provide specific procedures for pre-operative planning, anatomical landmarking and evaluation, intra-operative planning and adjustment of resections and cuts, cut validation and soft tissue evaluation with robotic-assisted personalized TKA.

Extra-articular factors of the femur and tibia affecting knee balance in mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Although the joint gap distance and compartment loading of the knee are different parameters for obtaining balanced knees in patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the extent to which a balanced knee is achieved in patients with mechanically aligned TKA (MA-TKA) is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the anatomical factors that affect the ligament balancing in MA-TKA according to a gap balancing technique by measured resection technique.

METHODS

The relationship between compartment loading, gap distance, and lower limb alignment was analysed in forty-three patients who underwent navigation-assisted MA-TKA with the minimum soft-tissue release. Radiographic parameters included hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, femorotibial angle, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibial angle, posterior tibial slope, varus and valgus joint line convergence angle, femoral valgus angle, femoral shaft curve, and tibial shaft curve (TSC).

RESULTS

The postoperative HKA angle was 0.4±1.5°, with one coronal alignment outlier (2.3%). The gap distance showed four unbalanced knees for extension (9.3%) and flexion (9.3%), whereas the compartment loading identified 17 unbalanced knees (39.5%) at extension, 8 (18.6%) at 45° flexion, 7 (16.2%) at 90° flexion, and 10 (23.2%) at full flexion in MA-TKA. Mediolateral differentials of compartment loading correlated with femoral valgus angle (0°, 45°, and 90° flexion), mLDFA (45° and 90° flexion), and TSC (45° and 90° flexion). Femoral valgus angle and TSC were risk factors of the mediolateral differentials of compartment loading.

CONCLUSION

Extra-articular factors of femoral valgus angle, mLDFA, and TSC were associated with the mediolateral imbalance of compartmental loading, suggesting there is a limit to obtaining balanced knees in MA-TKA due to these unadjustable extra-articular factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, therapeutic case series.

Tibiofemoral lift-off and resulting laxity following total knee arthroplasty: Frequency in a series of 906 continuous cases and functional consequences at 4 years' follow-up in a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Tibiofemoral instability is one reason for early revision of total knee arthroplasty. It can be the consequence of tibiofemoral laxity, especially in the coronal plane with tibiofemoral lift-off. But does femoral condyle lift-off on conventional postoperative radiographs suggest the presence of laxity or potential instability? To our knowledge, this question has not yet been answered. This led us to conduct a retrospective study to evaluate (1) the frequency of lift-off on postoperative radiographs, (2) the relationship between lift-off and laxity in the short term and (3) the functional consequences of lift-off.

HYPOTHESIS

Postoperative lift-off is a rare event that is predictive of laxity.

METHODS

We carried out a single-center retrospective study using postoperative radiographs from patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty between 2014 and 2016. The sample consisted of 906 patients. Lift-off was defined as a tibiofemoral angle of 3° or more on immediate postoperative radiographs (day 0) that were non-weightbearing and had no stress applied. The functional outcomes were determined in the 17 patients identified as having lift-off who had been operated in the first year (2014) to ensure the follow-up was long enough. These patients were compared to 34 matched control patients who were operated the same year and chosen randomly among patients not having lift-off. The matching ratio was 2 controls to 1 case. Preoperative and surgical data were compiled from each patient's electronic medical record. Patients were evaluated at 4 years postoperatively using the subjective Oxford-48, objective HSS score, IKS score, overall patient satisfaction and stress radiographs of the knee. The cases of lift-off observed in 2014 (n=17) were paired with a control group of patients selected randomly during 2014.

RESULTS

The frequency of the lift-off event was 63/906 or 7%. The frequency was consistent over the three years studied: 7.1% in 2014 (19/269), 6.2% in 2015 (22/354) and 7.8% in 2016 (22/283). There was no significant difference between the two groups (17 with lift-off and 34 without) in the sex, age, body mass index and coronal plane deformity (preoperative HKA angle). At a mean follow-up of 4 years (range 12-49 months), the knees with postoperative lift-off had more laxity (p=0.002), particularly laxity when varus stress was applied (p=0.009). There were no other significant differences in the outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Immediate postoperative lift-off after total knee arthroplasty is not a rare event, with a 7% frequency in our study. While it reveals that laxity is present in the particular compartment, there is no evidence of functional consequences at 4 years' follow-up; however, a long-term assessment is required to verify this finding.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III - case-control study.

Automated Artificial Intelligence-Based Assessment of Lower Limb Alignment Validated on Weight-Bearing Pre- and Postoperative Full-Leg Radiographs

The assessment of the knee alignment using standing weight-bearing full-leg radiographs (FLR) is a standardized method. Determining the load-bearing axis of the leg requires time-consuming manual measurements. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a novel algorithm based on artificial intelligence (AI) for the automated assessment of lower limb alignment. In the first stage, a customized mask-RCNN model was trained to automatically detect and segment anatomical structures and implants in FLR. In the second stage, four region-specific neural network models (adaptations of UNet) were trained to automatically place anatomical landmarks. In the final stage, this information was used to automatically determine five key lower limb alignment angles. For the validation dataset, weight-bearing, antero-posterior FLR were captured preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Preoperative images were measured by the operating orthopedic surgeon and an independent physician. Postoperative images were measured by the second rater only. The final validation dataset consisted of 95 preoperative and 105 postoperative FLR. The detection rate for the different angles ranged between 92.4% and 98.9%. Human vs. human inter-(ICCs: 0.85−0.99) and intra-rater (ICCs: 0.95−1.0) reliability analysis achieved significant agreement. The ICC-values of human vs. AI inter-rater reliability analysis ranged between 0.8 and 1.0 preoperatively and between 0.83 and 0.99 postoperatively (all p < 0.001). An independent and external validation of the proposed algorithm on pre- and postoperative FLR, with excellent reliability for human measurements, could be demonstrated. Hence, the algorithm might allow for the objective and time saving analysis of large datasets and support physicians in daily routine.

Mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty with the extension-first technique does not equally restore neutral knee alignment in all preoperative knee phenotypes

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the change in the long leg axis according to the preoperative knee phenotype using the mechanically aligned extension-first technique in total knee arthroplasty. The hypothesis of this study was that the knee phenotype would have an impact on the postoperative leg axis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective comparative study comprising 224 whole-leg radiographs of 112 patients. The leg axes of the pre- and postoperative radiographs were measured and categorized into three preoperative limb phenotypes (based on the hip-knee-ankle angle [HKA]) according to Hirschmann et al. (varus-HKA < 178.5°, neutral-HKA 178.5°-181.5°, and valgus-HKA > 181.5°). Additionally, femoral phenotypes (based on the femoral mechanical angle [FMA], i.e., the mechanical medial distal femoral angle [mMDFA], as well as the tibial phenotypes [based on the tibial mechanical angle, i.e., the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA)] was calculated. The change in the long leg axis was analyzed and compared with the preoperative limb phenotype.

RESULTS

Significantly more patients with preoperative varus alignment shifted to neutral alignment (46.3%, n = 31) than did patients with preoperative valgus alignment (38.9%; n = 14). Moreover, 43.3% of patients (n = 29) with the varus phenotype remained in a varus alignment, compared with the 58.3% of patients with preoperative valgus phenotype (n = 21) remaining in valgus alignment. These findings were similar for both females (p < 0.001) and males (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Using an extension-first mechanically aligned surgical technique, varus phenotypes predominantly result in neutral leg axes or remain varus, neutral phenotypes remain neutral, and valgus phenotypes remain valgus or change to neutral phenotypes. This study showed that preoperative knee phenotypes in valgus knees influence this technique more strongly than estimated in previous investigations, which is in line with modern alignment philosophies for TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective comparative study.

Contralateral knee flexion predicts postoperative knee flexion in unilateral total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative flexion angle is associated with preoperative flexion in the same knee after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, whether the preoperative contralateral knee flexion angle could influence postoperative flexion remains unknown. This study aimed to test the effect of contralateral knee flexion on final flexion in the postoperative knee after unilateral TKA. We hypothesized that the preoperative contralateral knee flexion angle affects postoperative knee flexion, as does preoperative flexion, in the operated knee.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-five patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) who underwent cruciate-retaining TKA were included in this study, and their maximum passive knee flexion angle was evaluated preoperatively and at final follow-up on the operative and contralateral sides. Patients were divided according to their preoperative flexion angles: Group C, those whose contralateral knee flexion angle was greater than the operative knee flexion angle; and Group O, those whose contralateral knee flexion angle was equal to or smaller than the operative knee flexion angle. We performed multiple regression analysis, with postoperative flexion and improvement in the flexion angle as objective variables and preoperative predictors (age, sex, body mass index, preoperative flexion, and contralateral knee flexion) as explanatory variables. The results of the flexion angles were compared between the two groups using unpaired t-tests.

RESULTS

Postoperative flexion angle was significantly affected by the preoperative contralateral knee flexion angle (β=0.35, p=0.002), and an improvement in flexion was negatively affected by preoperative flexion of the operated knee (β=-0.83, p<0.001) and positively affected by contralateral knee flexion (β=0.35, p=0.001). Group O achieved poorer postoperative flexion than Group C (110.4±16.6° vs 119.6±16.5°, p=0.0017).

CONCLUSION

Patients with less flexion of the contralateral knee are less likely to obtain a greater degree of knee flexion after TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective comparative study.

Kinematic alignment fails to achieve balancing in 50% of varus knees and resects more bone compared to functional alignment

PURPOSE

Evidence is emerging that tibio-femoral compartmental balancing is related to clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to assess if kinematic alignment (KA) delivered a balanced knee in flexion and extension after TKA on varus deformity, compared to functional alignment (FA).

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective cohort study assessed 110 consecutive TKAs performed with an image-based robotic system for pre-operative varus deformity. The ligament balancing in the medial and lateral femorotibial compartments was assessed intra-operatively with a robotic system to evaluate if a KA plan would deliver a balanced knee. Balance was considered achieved if tibio-femoral compartments (medial/lateral) were equal to or less than 1.5 mm, or if the estimated final gap position more than 2 mm from the global implant thickness (17 mm). Implant positioning was modified within limits previously defined for a FA philosophy to achieve balancing. Resection thickness and implant positioning were compared with the KA plan and after the FA adjustments; and also, between the patients with a final balanced knee in extension and at 90° of flexion.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients were eligible for final analysis. Mean age was 67.3 ± 8.2 years, average BMI was 29.1 ± 5.2 kg/m², mean pre-operative coronal alignment was 174.0° ± 3.3° and sagittal alignment 3.4° ± 5.9°. Mean post-operative coronal alignment was 177.7° ± 1.0° and sagittal alignment 0.8° ± 1.9°. A KA plan delivered medial-lateral tibio-femoral compartment balancing in 67 cases (65.7%) for the extension gap and in 50 cases (49.1%) for the flexion gap. All measured bone resection depths were significantly less for FA compared to KA. To achieve balancing targets, final femoral component position was more externally rotated relative to the posterior condylar axis, (0.5° with KA compared to 1.7° with FA (p < 0.0001), and the tibia in more varus (3.0° KA vs. 3.5° FA p = 0.0024). Only one soft tissue release was required.

CONCLUSION

KA failed to deliver a balanced TKA in more than 50% of cases, especially regarding the flexion gap. Consideration of soft tissue laxity led to significantly less bone resection, with more externally rotated femoral component and more varus tibial component.

Combining load sensor and robotic technologies for ligament balance in total knee arthroplasty

Good ligament balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is thought to improve clinical results, but is highly surgeon-dependent when performed without technological assistance. We therefore describe a TKA technique using the Mako robotic arm (Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA) as sole means of balancing ligament tension by bone recuts associated to control by the VERASENSE load sensor (Orthosensor, Inc, Dania Beach, Florida, USA). In this preliminary series of 29 patients, 27 (93%) showed a well-balanced knee in extension at end of procedure, and 23 (79%) showed a well-balanced knee in flexion and extension, without any periarticular soft-tissue release. The load sensor analyzes ligament balance after the initial bone cuts, and guides possible further femoral or tibial recuts. This technique enables quantifiable alignment and control of ligament tension. Collecting objective intraoperative data should improve knowledge in placing TKA prostheses.

Inverse Kinematic Alignment for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Patient specific alignment might improve clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Different alignment concepts are described, each providing specific features with theoretical benefits or possible disadvantages. Inverse kinematic alignment (iKA) is a new patient specific alignment concept with excellent reported clinical outcome and patient satisfaction at short-term follow-up. iKA is a tibia-first, gap balancing technique restoring the native tibial joint line obliquity (JLO). In each patient, within boundaries, equal medial and lateral tibial resections are performed, compensating for cartilage and bone loss. We describe the surgical technique of iKA using a robotic assisted system (Mako, Stryker, Kalamazoo, USA). A case series of 100 consecutive iKA cases is assessed and the bony resections and resection angles are reported. Both in the coronal plane and axial plane, iKA might offer advantages over existing alignment strategies, possibly providing optimal clinical outcome and durable long-term survival, regardless of the alignment is varus, neutral or valgus.

Patient-specific instrumentation makes sense in total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery was initially developed to increase accuracy. The potential PSI benefits have expanded in the last decade, and other advantages have been published. However, different authors are critical of PSI and argue that the advantages are not such and do not compensate for the extra cost. This article aims to describe the recently published advantages and disadvantages of PSI.

AREAS COVERED

Narrative description of the latest publications related to PSI in accuracy, clinical and functional outcomes, operative time, efficiency, and other benefits.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

We have published high accuracy of the system, with a not clinically relevant loss of accuracy, significantly higher precision with PSI than with conventional instruments, and a high percentage of cases in the optimal range and similar to that obtained with computer-assisted navigation, greater imprecision for tibial slope, a significant blood loss reduction, and time consumption, an acceptable and non-significant increase in the cost per procedure and no difference in complications during hospital admission and at 90 days. We think that PSI will not follow the Scott Parabola and that it will continue to be a valuable type of device in some instances of TKA surgery.

Coronal and sagittal alignment of the lower limb in Caucasians: Analysis of a 3D CT database

INTRODUCTION

Lower limb alignment is a major determinant of long-term outcomes after osteotomy or total knee replacement. The aim of this paper is to define the mean values of coronal and sagittal lower limb alignment for Caucasians as a function of sex using 3D reconstructions from CT-scans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The analysis involved 586 Caucasian patients (269 males and 317 females) who had their hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA), lateral and medial proximal posterior tibial angles (LPPTA/MPPTA), posterior distal femoral angle (PDFA), and non-weightbearing joint convergence angle (nwJLCA) measured. This analysis was performed using a CT-scan-based modelling system (SOMA). Differences between sexes and morphotypes (neutral, varus and valgus) were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

The mean HKA was 180±2.57°, LDFA 86.1±1.87°, MPTA 86.1±2.15°, PPTA 84.6±2.58°, LPPTA 84.9±3.17°, MPPTA 85.1±3.21°, PDFA 85.3±1.50° and nwJLCA 0.82±1.32°. There was a significant difference between sexes for the HKA (180.3±2.46° and 179.0±2.52°), LDFA (85.6±1.90° and 86.8±1.61°), MPPTA (84.7±3.06° and 85. 6±3.31°). The neutral morphotype was more frequent in women than men (78% vs. 73%), the varus morphotype was more frequent in men than women (20% vs. 7.6%) and the valgus morphotype was more frequent in women than men (15% vs. 6.7%).

CONCLUSION

Normal parameters for lower limb alignment in Caucasian patients were described in the coronal and sagittal planes. There was a significant influence of sex in the coronal plane, which was not found in the sagittal plane.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective cohort study.

Current concept of kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty and its derivatives

The kinematic alignment (KA) approach to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has recently increased in popularity. Accordingly, a number of derivatives have arisen and have caused confusion. Clarification is therefore needed for a better understanding of KA-TKA. Calipered (or true, pure) KA is performed by cutting the bone parallel to the articular surface, compensating for cartilage wear. In soft-tissue respecting KA, the tibial cutting surface is decided parallel to the femoral cutting surface (or trial component) with in-line traction. These approaches are categorized as unrestricted KA because there is no consideration of leg alignment or component orientation. Restricted KA is an approach where the periarthritic joint surface is replicated within a safe range, due to concerns about extreme alignments that have been considered ‘alignment outliers’ in the neutral mechanical alignment approach. More recently, functional alignment and inverse kinematic alignment have been advocated, where bone cuts are made following intraoperative planning, using intraoperative measurements acquired with computer assistance to fulfill good coordination of soft-tissue balance and alignment. The KA-TKA approach aims to restore the patients’ own harmony of three knee elements (morphology, soft-tissue balance, and alignment) and eventually the patients’ own kinematics. The respective approaches start from different points corresponding to one of the elements, yet each aim for the same goal, although the existing implants and techniques have not yet perfectly fulfilled that goal.

Specific case consideration for implanting TKA with the Kinematic Alignment technique

The Kinematic Alignment (KA) technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an alternative surgical technique aiming to resurface knee articular surfaces.The restricted KA (rKA) technique for TKA applies boundaries to the KA technique in order to avoid reproducing extreme constitutional limb/knee anatomies.The vast majority of TKA cases are straightforward and can be performed with KA in a standard (unrestricted) fashion.There are some specific situations where performing KA TKA may be more challenging (complex KA TKA cases) and surgical technique adaptations should be included.To secure good clinical outcomes, complex KA TKA cases must be preoperatively recognized, and planned accordingly.The proposed classification system describes six specific issues that must be considered when aiming for a KA TKA implantation.Specific recommendations for each situation type should improve the reliability of the prosthetic implantation to the benefit of the patient.The proposed classification system could contribute to the adoption of a common language within our orthopaedic community that would ease inter-surgeon communication and could benefit the teaching of the KA technique. This proposed classification system is not exhaustive and will certainly be improved over time. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:881-891. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210042.