Validation of the French version of the self-administered international hip outcome tool-33 questionnaire

Can hip function be assessed with self-report questionnaires? Feasibility study of a French self-report version of the Harris Hip and Merle d'Aubigné scores

INTRODUCTION

The Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Merle D'Aubigné Postel (MDP) score both provide an objective and subjective evaluation of hip function. These scores are collected during the follow-up of patients who have a hip disease. The objectives of this prospective study were (1) to analyze the differences between the two new French self-report versions of the HHS and MDP, and the traditional surgeon-assessed HHS and MDP; (2) to analyze the correlation between the self-report HHS and MDP and the surgeon-assessed HHS and MDP; (3) to analyze the floor and ceiling effects of the two self-report scores and the reliability of these self-report scores in operated and non-operated patients.

HYPOTHESIS

The French self-report HHS and MDP are sufficiently reliable to accurately estimate the patient's objective and subjective outcomes compared to the clinical examination done by a surgeon.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter study was done with patients who had a hip disease. Two self-report questionnaires were completed by the patient, independently of the clinical examination done by the surgeon. The questionnaires were in French and consisted solely of checkboxes, with sample photos that corresponded to the various range of motion items in the HHS and MDP. The agreement between the self-report scores and the surgeon-assessed scores were evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Differences in the mean values were evaluated with a paired t test.

RESULTS

The analysis involved 89 patients. The self-report HHS was 2.7±3.7 points (/100) lower than the surgeon-assessed HHS, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.34). The self-report MDP was significantly less by 1.2±2.9 points (/18) than the surgeon-assessed MDP (p=0.01). The agreement between the self-report HSS and the surgeon-assessed HSS was excellent (ICC=0.86) as was the one between the self-report MDP and the surgeon-assessed MDP (ICC=0.75). There was a strong positive correlation between the surgeon-assessed and self-report HHS in operated patients (ICC= 0.84; R=0.75; p<0.001) and in non-operated patients (ICC=0.96; R=0.89; p<0.001). This positive correlation was also found between the surgeon-assessed and self-report MDP for operated patients (ICC=0.73; R=0.62; p<0.001) and non-operated patients (ICC=0.79; R=0.64; p<0.001). A ceiling effect (maximum of 100 points) was found in 22% of patients (20/89) for the self-report HHS and in 34% of patients (30/89) for the self-report MDP (maximum of 18 points). No floor effect was observed for either questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

The French version of the HHS self-report questionnaire is an excellent overall estimator of the HHS score for patients with hip osteoarthritis or fracture, whether operated or not. The addition of the MDP, whose self-report version is less accurate, is also a reliable tool. These self-report questionnaires, when validated on a larger scale, will be useful for the long-term follow-up of patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; prospective diagnostic study.

Development and validation of a French-language cross-cultural adaptation of the Pedi-IKDC Questionnaire

BACKGROUND

The Pedi-IKDC is an English-language, knee-specific, paediatric questionnaire used by orthopaedic surgeons around the world as a valuable patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). The objective of this study was thus to extend the applicability of the Pedi-IKDC to French-speaking Canadian patients, for both clinical practice and research, by developing a French-language cross-cultural adaptation of the original version.

HYPOTHESIS

The French adaptation of the Pedi-IKDC is valid and reliable for evaluating French-speaking children with knee conditions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Pedi-IKDC was translated to French by a panel of orthopaedic surgeons then back-translated by a professional translator. The original English version and the back-translation were compared to assess their similarity and confirm the faithfulness of the French translation. The validity of the French version was then tested at a major paediatric hospital in French-speaking Canada, in 203 children, including 163 with knee pain and 40 without knee symptoms. Internal consistency, construct validity, and discriminant capacity of the French version were assessed.

RESULTS

Internal consistency of the Pedi-IKDC adaptation was excellent (Cronbach's alpha, 0.934 in the knee-pain group). Construct validity was robust, with all nine hypotheses adapted from the original Pedi-IKDC article demonstrating strong (n=7) or moderate (n=2) correlations (p<0.001). The evaluation of discriminant capacity identified no statistically significant score differences according to most of the respondent characteristics (body mass index, age group, type of diagnosis, and type of treatment). However, scores differed significantly between females and males.

DISCUSSION

The French-language cross-cultural adaptation of the Pedi-IKDC obtained using a universally recognized method for translating PROMs demonstrated good performance, with psychometric properties similar to those of the original Pedi-IKDC and of its Danish, Italian, and Russian adaptations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Validation of the French version of the Caregivers' Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities questionnaire

INTRODUCTION

The Caregivers' Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities (CPCHILD) is a questionnaire that measures the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of children with cerebral palsy (CP). Though measuring HRQL is challenging in these children, it is a valuable help for medical decision-making. There is no questionnaire to assess HRQL in French-speaking children with severe CP.

OBJECTIVE

To translate and adapt transculturally the CPCHILD questionnaire into French (CPCHILD-FV).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The CPCHILD was translated from English into French by forward and backward translation by independents translators. The questionnaire was then tested on 32 caregivers of patients with CP classified as GMFCS IV or V, remarks of caregivers were analyzed by an expert committee and, if necessary, modifications were performed. Internal consistency of the CPCHILD-FV was assessed using a sample of 32 parents or caregivers and test-retest reliability was assessed on a random sample of 10 patients.

RESULTS

The translation and transcultural process resulted in a French version of the CPCHILD. Some items of the CPCHILD required careful discussion to ensure that items had the same meaning as in the original. Internal consistencies were over 0.70 for each domain except for health, and 0.97 for the total scores. The ICC for the test-retest reliability of the CHILD-FV total score was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.93-0.99) and ranged from 0.59 to 0.99 for the domains.

CONCLUSION

The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the CPCHILD questionnaire provides a French version than can measure the HRQL of children with severe CP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; prospective study without control group.

Validation of the French version of the Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS) in 113 hip arthroscopy procedures

BACKGROUND

The Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS) used to evaluate the hip in younger patients is a self-administered questionnaire with 20 items in four sections: pain, symptoms, function, and activities. Although used in France, no transcultural version had been validated. The objective of this study was to translate the NAHS into French then assess the validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change of the French-language version (NAHS-Fr) in younger patients with hip conditions other than osteoarthritis.

HYPOTHESIS

The NAHS-Fr demonstrates good validity and reliability when used in younger French-speaking patients with hip pain.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study in 105 patients (62 males and 43 females) scheduled for surgery on one or both hips (113 hips in total) to treat cam-type femoro-acetabular impingement or labral lesions. Before and 6 months after surgery, each patient completed the NAHS-Fr and Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Statistical tests were done to evaluate validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change, as recommended by the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN).

RESULTS

The response rate was 100%, confirming that the NAHS-Fr was easy to use. The NAHS-Fr was both valid and reliable. No ceiling or floor effect was detected for the total NAHS-Fr score. All items had Cronbach alpha coefficients greater than 0.8, indicating good internal consistency. External consistency between the NAHS-Fr and WOMAC was negative (-0.676) due to inversely proportional score indexing. Before surgery, the NAHS-Fr and WOMAC scores were strongly and significantly correlated (p<0.0001). The effect size was greater than 0.8, indicating good sensitivity to the change induced by surgery.

DISCUSSION

These results confirm the study hypothesis: the NAHS-Fr has the same good psychometric characteristics as does the original version and versions in other languages. The NAHS-Fr is useful for evaluating younger patients with non-osteoarthritic hip pain and can be used by French-speaking surgeons in everyday clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, prospective observational non-comparative cohort study.

Hip Pain and Movement Dysfunction Associated With Nonarthritic Hip Joint Pain: A Revision

The Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy (AOPT), formerly the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), has an ongoing effort to create evidence-based practice guidelines for orthopaedic physical therapy management of patients with musculoskeletal impairments described in the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). This is an update to the 2014 Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for Hip Pain and Movement Dysfunction Associated with Nonarthritic Hip Joint Pain. The goals of the revision were to provide a concise summary of the contemporary evidence since publication of the original guideline and to develop new recommendations or revise previously published recommendations to support evidence-based practice. This current CPG covers pathoanatomical features, clinical course, prognosis, diagnosis, examination, and physical therapy interventions in the management of nonarthritic hip joint pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(7):CPG1-CPG70. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0302.

Cross-Culturally Adapted Versions of Patient Reported Outcome Measures for the Lower Extremity

Background

A large number of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed in the English language for various lower extremity orthopaedic pathologies. Twenty different PROMs were recommended for 15 specific musculoskeletal lower extremity pathologies or surgeries. However, the availability of cross-culturally adapted versions of these recommended PROMs is unknown.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify the cross-culturally adapted versions of recommended PROMs for individuals experiencing orthopedic lower extremity pathologies or undergoing surgeries, and to identify the psychometric evidence that supports their utilization.

Study design

Literature Review.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL, SPORTDisucs and Scopus were searched for cross-culturally adapted translated studies through May 2022. The search strategy included the names of the 20 recommended PROMs from previous umbrella review along with the following terms: reliability, validity, responsiveness, psychometric properties and cross-cultural adaptation. Studies that presented a non-English language version of the PROM with evidence in at least one psychometric property to support its use were included. Two authors independently evaluated the studies for inclusion and independently extracted data.

Results

Nineteen PROMS had cross-culturally adapted and translated language versions. The KOOS, WOMAC, ACL-RSL, FAAM, ATRS, HOOS, OHS, MOXFQ and OKS were available in over 10 different language versions. Turkish, Dutch, German, Chinese and French were the most common languages, with each language having more than 10 PROMs with psychometric properties supporting their use. The WOMAC and KOOS were both available in 10 languages and had all three psychometric properties of reliability, validity, and responsiveness supporting their use.

Conclusion

Nineteen of the 20 recommended instruments were available in multiple languages. The PROM most frequently cross-culturally adapted and translated were the KOOS and WOMAC. PROMs were most frequently cross-culturally adapted and translated into Turkish. International researchers and clinicians may use this information to more consistently implement PROMs with the most appropriate psychometric evidence available to support their use.

Level of evidence

3a.

Predictive radiological parameters of failure following surgical management of femoroacetabular impingement associated with borderline acetabular dysplasia

INTRODUCTION

The role of arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in mild or borderline hip dysplasia (lateral center edge angle=18-25) is controversial. It is recommended to combine capsular plication with femoral neck osteoplasty and suture repair of the labrum. Few studies have investigated which radiological parameters are associated with failure of this procedure.

HYPOTHESIS

A larger number of radiological signs of mild or borderline hip dysplasia than radiological signs of FAI negatively influence the outcomes of arthroscopic treatment.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study done with data collected prospectively after a minimum of 2 years' follow-up in patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment of FAI due to cam impingement combined with mild to moderate hip dysplasia. Patients with hip osteoarthritis graded as ≥ Tönnis 2 were excluded. Functional outcome scores (mHHS and NAHS) were determined along with the need for reoperation. Three groups were defined based on the outcomes: success (mHHS ≥ Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State [PASS]); moderate improvement (improvement in mHHS + mHHS<PASS) and failure (worsening of the mHHS). Demographic data, radiographic parameters (LCEA, Tönnis angle, alpha angle, offset, FEAR index, Shenton's line, Cliff sign, anterior wall index [AWI], posterior wall index [PWI]) and intraoperative findings were compared between these three groups. The area under the curve (AUC) for the most relevant data identified during the univariate analysis were then modeled to define which factors were the best at predicting failed arthroscopic treatment a posteriori.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 39 patients. The mean mHHS was 76±15 [40-92]. The "success" group consisted of 21 patients (56%, 21/39), the "moderate improvement" group of 12 patients (31%, 12/39) and the failure group of 6 patients (13%, 6/39) (2 subsequently underwent total hip replacement, 4 underwent shelf acetabuloplasty). The FEAR index was significantly higher and the AWI and VCE were significantly lower in the "failure" group. The FEAR index was the best predictive factor; an index ≥ 4° detected 100% of failures with 96% specificity. The patients in the "moderate improvement" group were significantly older (37 years±8 [18-45]<p= 0.04) with a significantly higher offset (2mm±3 [-5-5]<p=0.004); an offset ≥ 2mm could detect 73% of them with a specificity of 72%.

CONCLUSION

A FEAR index ≥ 4° and offset ≥ 2mm is best able to detect patients at risk of failure and unsatisfactory results, respectively, in the mild clinical cam-type impingement in a population of FAI patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective series.

Validation of the French version of the Self-Administered International Hip Outcome Tool-12 Questionnaire and determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in the French speaking population

BACKGROUND

Patient-Reported Outcomes tools are becoming the gold standard in the evaluation of results in orthopaedic surgery. In 2012, the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) was developed. This self-administered questionnaire was designed to address the day-to-day clinical setting with faster completion and easier patient flow. In 2021, a French translation of the iHOT-33 questionnaire, from which the iHOT-12 is derived, proved to be valid. Since there is not data in French regarding iHOT-12, we performed a prospective study aiming to answer: (1) is this French version of the iHOT-12 questionnaire as valid, (2) can the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) value for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) be defined?

HYPOTHESIS

It is hypothesized that the iHOT-12-Fr would be valid and responsive to change in a cohort treated for FAI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the COSMIN recommendations, a multicentric prospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the reliability, validity, responsiveness and MCID of the iHOT-12-Fr.

RESULTS

In total, 101 patients were recruited for participation in the project. The reliability of the iHOT-12-Fr questionnaire was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC=0.84) and the internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha (α=0.86). The standard error of measurement (SEM=6.7) and the smallest detectable change (SDC=1.8) were calculated. Construct validity was evaluated with Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) by comparing the iHOT-12-Fr with the iHOT-33-Fr (r=0.96), the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Fr (r=0.68) and Nonarthritic Hip Score-Fr (r=0.82). Responsiveness was shown with a standardized effect size of 1.18, standardized response mean of 0.73, responsiveness ratio of 1.4 and an MCID of 11 points.

DISCUSSION

Metrological qualities of the iHOT-12-Fr are comparable to the original version and other versions translated into different languages. This study proves that the French translation of the iHOT-12 is valid, reliable and compares to the original iHOT-12.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV prospective study.