Proposal of a new CT arthrographic classification system of osteochondral lesions of the talus

Significant Clinical Improvement After Arthroscopic Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A 5-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (A-AMIC) for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) at 24 months and 60 months of follow-up. The secondary aim was to assess whether age, body mass index (BMI), and lesion surface affect outcomes.

DESIGN

Sixty-three patients (32 males, 31 females) with a median age of 37 years [interquartile range (IQR): 25-48] were included. Preoperative and postoperative (24 months and 60 months) clinical outcomes were evaluated using a Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain during walking, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), Short-Form Survey (SF-12), the Halasi, and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) scores. Patients were categorized according to age, BMI, and lesion surface (1-1.5 cm2 and over 1.5 cm2). The effect of each category was evaluated.

RESULTS

There were significant improvements in the VAS, AOFAS, SF-12, and UCLA, comparing the preoperative scores to the 60-month follow-up scores (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the above-mentioned outcomes between the follow-up periods. Patients older than 33 years had lower SF-12, Halasi, and UCLA scores (P = 0.005, 0.004, and <0.001, respectively). Overweight patients had lower VAS, SF-12, Halasi, and UCLA scores (P = 0.006, 0.002, 0.024, and 0.007, respectively). Lesion size was uninfluential.

CONCLUSION

A-AMIC yielded clinical improvements at a minimum follow-up of 60 months in patients with symptomatic OLTs, with clinical improvement peaking in the first 2 years, followed by a plateau period. Increased age and BMI were significantly associated with inferior outcomes.

Retroarticular drilling for osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Opinions differ on the optimal treatment for stable talar osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) with intact cartilage. Some recommend conservative management, while others prefer surgical care, which includes debridement and micro-fractures, transarticular drilling through a direct or medial malleolus approach and retroarticular drilling. The rationale behind retroarticular drilling is to induce bone marrow healing without touching the intact cartilage. The goal of this systematic review is to summarize the clinical outcomes of retroarticular drilling as a standalone procedure for stable talar OCD with intact cartilage.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature prospectively registered in the PROSPERO register was performed along the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Medline, EMBASE and Evidence-Based Medicine databases were searched from inception to December 2021 for retroarticular drilling for stable talar OCD with an intact cartilage. Two independent evaluators screened the search results, selected the articles to be included in the analysis and assessed the methodological quality of all included articles with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

RESULTS

Twelve studies, on 99 patients were included in the final analysis. Methodological quality was poor for all the included studies. High heterogeneity prevented any pooling or meta-analysis, but favorable clinical results were reported according to excellent post-intervention scores on the American Orthopedic Foot and Anke Score (AOFAS), ranging from 88.9 to 100. There was also significant improvement in pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging between 2.3 and 5.9.

DISCUSSION

Favorable results seem to be achieved with retroarticular drilling without grafting for stable talar OCD with intact cartilage, but more powered comparative studies between surgical options and conservative management are needed to establish the gold standard treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Return to sport after surgery for osteochondral lesions of the talar dome. Results of a multicenter prospective study on 58 patients

INTRODUCTION

Osteochondral lesions of the talar dome (OLTD) are most often found in patients for whom the return to sports activities is the main issue. Two types of surgery have been distinguished at present, bone marrow stimulation techniques and mosaicplasty techniques. The size of the lesion indicating the need for bone marrow stimulation as the required surgical procedure has recently been decreased (<1cm). The main objective of this study was therefore to evaluate the return to sport after OLTD surgery. Our hypothesis is that surgery of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome allows the resumption of sports activities in the majority of cases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This multicenter prospective study was conducted across 10 French centers specializing in foot and ankle surgery. All patients aged 18 to 65 with symptomatic OLTD resistant to thorough medical treatment for at least 6 months, justifying surgery, were included from June 2018 to September 2019. In addition to the usual demographic data, the practice of sport and level (professional, competitive, leisure) were systematically investigated preoperatively. A common protocol for surgical management and postoperative follow-up had previously been established according to the arthrographic stage of the lesion. The most recent recommendations based on size, but also depth, were taken into account. The primary endpoint was return to sport.

RESULTS

A final functional evaluation with the AOFAS (American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society) score was performed at a minimum of 12 months. Of 58 sports patients, 70.6% returned to sport (41/58) with an average delay of 4.3 months. A high AOFAS functional score (p=0.02) and a stage 1 lesion (p=0.006) were the only preoperative criteria significantly associated with a return to sport. No other factor was predictive of a return to sport.

CONCLUSION

Our prospective study shows that 70.6% of sports patients returned to sport after OLTD surgery according to a surgical protocol and standardized follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Osteochondral Lesions of the Ankle and Foot

Osteochondral lesions (OCLs) in the ankle are more common than OCLs of the foot, but both share a similar imaging appearance. Knowledge of the various imaging modalities, as well as available surgical techniques, is important for radiologists. We discuss radiographs, ultrasonography, computed tomography, single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate OCLs. In addition, various surgical techniques used to treat OCLs-debridement, retrograde drilling, microfracture, micronized cartilage-augmented microfracture, autografts, and allografts-are described with an emphasis on postoperative appearance following these techniques.

Osteochondral lesions of the talar dome

Ankle pain and/or instability is a frequent, non-specific reason for consultation, and may reveal an osteochondral lesion of the talar dome (OLTD). There are 2 types of OLTD: (1) posteromedial, usually idiopathic, wide and deep, featuring isolated pain with severe functional impact; (2) anterolateral, often implicating trauma and associated in 30% of cases with lateral ligament involvement, in a clinical presentation associating pain and instability. The aim of the present study was to review the issue of OLTD, with 5 questions: HOW TO ESTABLISH THE DIAGNOSIS, WITH WHAT WORK-UP?: There are no specific clinical signs. A diagnosis of OLTD should be considered in all cases of painful and/or unstable ankle and especially in case of history of sprain. The clinical work-up screens systematically for laxity or associated hindfoot malalignment. CT-arthrography is the gold-standard, enabling morphologic analysis of OLTD. WHAT CLASSIFICATIONS SHOULD BE USED?: CT-arthrography determines length, depth and any cartilage dissection, classifying OLTD in 3 grades. Grade 1 is a lesion<10mm in length and<5mm in depth. Grade 2 is>10mm in length and/or>5mm in depth with intact cartilage around the lesion. Grade 3 is the same as grade 2 but with overlying cartilage dissection. WHAT ARE THE CURRENT TREATMENT INDICATIONS?: After failure of 6 months' well-conducted medical treatment (sports rest, analgesics, physiotherapy), surgical options in France today comprise microfracture in grade 1 OLTD, raising the fragment, freshening the floor of the lesion and fixing the fragment (known as "lift, drill, fill, fix" (LDFF)) in grade 2, and mosaicplasty in grade 3. WHAT ARE THE PROSPECTS FOR FUTURE TREATMENTS AND THEIR ROLES?: Treatments are progressing and improving. Ideal treatment should restore hyaline cartilage to prevent secondary osteoarthritis. Matrix and cell culture techniques need to be validated. WHAT RESULTS CAN BE EXPECTED AND WHAT SHOULD PATIENTS BE TOLD?: Management according to grade secures AOFAS scores≥80/100 in 80% of cases, whatever the grade. Return to sport is feasible in 80% of case, at a mean 6 months. Progression is satisfactory after treatment adapted to the lesion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, expert opinion.

The too-long anterior process and osteochondral lesion of the talus: Is there an anatomical predisposition? A case-control study on 135 feet

INTRODUCTION

The too-long anterior process (TLAP) increases mechanical stress on the hindfoot and could lead to osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) by localized hyper-pressure. The purpose of this study is to investigate an association between TLAP and OLT in children.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, multicenter, case-control study conducted between 2010 and 2020. The OLT group was compared to a control group (CoG). TLAP is characterized by a distance between the anteromedial process of the calcaneus and the navicular bone (CN) of< 5 mm.

RESULTS

Forty-three feets were included in the OLT group and 92 in the CoG. The OLT group had a lower CN distance on CT than the CoG, a median of 2.8 mm versus 3.75 mm (p = 0.002); 86% of patients (37 feet/43) in the OLT group had a CN distance of< 5 mm (OR=3.0 [1.1; 9.5], p = 0.023) compared to 67% in the CoG.

DISCUSSION

The OLT group had an increased risk of developing TLAP compared to the CoG.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Higher preoperative range of motion is predictive of good mid-term results in the surgical management of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a prospective multicentric study

INTRODUCTION

Osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) are a frequent cause of pain in young patients and a new CT arthrographic classification system of OLT was recently proposed to help guide the choices of and standardize the indications for surgical treatment. The primary hypothesis was that this algorithm would result in a postoperative AOFAS score of ≥ 80/100. The secondary hypothesis was to identify the preoperative factors of successful surgery.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational multicenter study. Eighty-six patients who underwent surgery for OLT after at least 6 months of unsuccessful conservative management were included for a mean follow-up of 15 months (12-36). Forty-nine patients with stage 1 OLT underwent microperforation, 2 patients with stage 2 OLT underwent a lift, drill, fill, and fix graft procedure with screw fixation, and 35 patients with stage 3 OLT were treated with mosaicplasty.

RESULTS

After a follow-up of at least 1 year, 56 patients (65%) had an AOFAS score > 80 and the mean AOFAS score was 82 (16-100). A lower BMI (p = 0.038), a higher preoperative range of motion in the ankle (p = 0.033), higher preoperative AOFAS and FAOS scores (p = 0.001 and p = 0.011), and the presence of a preoperative bone bruise on MRI (p = 0.020) were good prognostic factors on univariate analysis. The presence of grade 1 osteoarthritis on the Van Dijk classification was predictive of a poor prognosis (p = 0.044). Multivariate analysis showed that a good preoperative range of motion (OR = 1.080 [1.020-1.150] p = 0.01) was predictive of a positive outcome, while grade 1 osteoarthritis was predictive of a poor outcome (OR = 0.147 [0.036-0.603] p = 0.008). The postoperative AOFAS decreased in six patients and 17 patients had at least one complication: six dysthesias of the superficial fibular nerve, two of the sural nerve, and nine stage 1 complex regional pain syndromes.

CONCLUSION

The new algorithm for OLT resulted in a postoperative AOFAS score of ≥ 80/100 in 65% of cases. The positive predictive factors of a successful postoperative outcome were the presence of a good preoperative range of motion and the absence of preoperative osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Long-term outcome for repair of osteochondral lesions of the talus by osteochondral autograft: A series of 56 Mosaicplasties®

INTRODUCTION

The present study analyzed results in 56 osteochondral Mosaicplasty® autografts for osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) at more than 5 years' follow-up.

HYPOTHESIS

Mosaicplasty® shows long-term efficacy and low morbidity in the treatment of OLT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study included patients treated by Mosaicplasty® with more than 5 years' follow-up. Preoperative data were collected from medical files, and all patients were reassessed. AOFAS scores and FAOS were calculated at last follow-up. Imaging comprised standard radiographs and MRI or CT arthrography of the ankle.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included, with a mean age of 34 years (range, 18-60 years). Seventeen involved work accidents. Mean follow-up was 8.5 years (range, 5-20 years). Mean AOFAS score at follow-up was 80.6±19.4 and mean FAOS 77.8±21.5. Work accident, preoperative osteoarthritis and untreated laxity correlated significantly with poorer results. At last follow-up, 22 patients (39%) showed signs of osteoarthritis. There was no morbidity implicating the malleolar osteotomy. There were 11 cases (20%) of persistent patellar syndrome at the donor site.

DISCUSSION

The present results were comparable to those reported elsewhere, showing that functional results of Mosaicplasty® autograft for OLT do not deteriorate over the long term. Work accidents correlated significantly with poorer functional outcome. Any associated instability must always be treated. Malleolar osteotomy provides good exposure without additional morbidity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

Osteochondral lesion of the talus: What are we talking about?

INTRODUCTION

The analysis of osteochondral lesions of talus (OLT) is currently mostly descriptive, not permitting an understanding of the different nosological frameworks of these lesions. Better knowledge of the characteristics of patients with OLT should make it possible to optimize the surgical indications and anticipate the associated lesions, which should not be overlooked. The main objective of this study was, therefore, to assess the characteristics of patients with OLT, and to analyze the lesions encountered.

HYPOTHESIS

OLTs correspond to variable entities responding to specific treatments.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This was a prospective multicenter descriptive study including all patients operated on for an OLT, aged between 15 and 65 years, across 10 French specialist centers. The demographic, clinical and radiological data of the patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

OLTs predominantly affect males and patients in their thirties. Two types of OLT should be distinguished: a lateral OLT; smaller and more superficial, most often presenting with painful instability, in the context of trauma, and a medial OLT; more frequent, wider and deeper.

DISCUSSION

Two nosological frameworks exist for OLTs, and correspond to precise surgical indications: medial lesions of more than 10mm² and more than 5mm in depth, with isolated anteromedial pain and significant functional impairment, most often idiopathic, generally requiring treatment by osteochondral autografts. Lateral lesions less than 5mm in depth and less than 10mm², often superficial, following trauma or ankle laxity, associated with lateral ligament damage in one-third of cases, and a clinical presentation associated to instability and pain, requiring treatment most often by microfracture with associated ligament repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Safety of malleolar osteotomies in surgery for osteochondral lesions of the talus

The talus is a central bone in the hindfoot that is difficult to access surgically. Performing a medial or lateral malleolar osteotomy in the management of an osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) is a feared procedure amongst surgeons and their patients. The objective of this study was to assess the complications inherent to malleolar osteotomies in the treatment of OLTs.

HYPOTHESIS

The use of a standardized protocol concerning the technical performance and osteosynthesis of malleolar osteotomies results in fewer postoperative complications than a non-standardized protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

This is a comparative study comprising a prospective multicenter non-randomized series with a standardized protocol for performing malleolar osteotomies, and a multicenter retrospective series without a standardized protocol. We included all patients aged 16 to 65 years with symptomatic OLTs, resistant to more than 6-months of well-conducted medical treatment, for whom surgery was considered. The minimum follow-up was 1 year for the prospective study, and 5 years for the retrospective study. A total of 86 and 97 patients were included in the prospective and retrospective studies, respectively. Of these 183 patients, 86 patients (33 prospective and 53 retrospective) underwent medial or lateral malleolar osteotomies as part of their surgery for OLT. Complications specific to the osteotomy procedures such as scar tissue, surgical site infection, non-union, articular malunion, neurological lesions or surgical revision, were investigated.

RESULTS

No specific complication was found to be associated to the malleolar osteotomy. No surgical revision was directly linked to the osteotomy procedure. No significant difference was found between the two series.

DISCUSSION

There was no evidence of morbidity related specifically to medial or lateral malleolar osteotomies. A standardized protocol, subject to rigorous technical implementation, does not improve results after malleolar osteotomy. The fear associated with this malleolar osteotomy procedure seems unfounded.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.