Clinical outcome and return to sports activity after surgical treatment for recurrent shoulder instability with a modified Latarjet procedure

Subscapularis atrophy and function after arthroscopic Trillat procedure

INTRODUCTION

Several studies have reported a strength deficit in internal rotation (IR) following a Latarjet procedure, which can persist for months or even years. The arthroscopic Trillat procedure does not require splitting the subscapularis muscle, potentially making it less damaging.

HYPOTHESIS

The arthroscopic Trillat procedure does not cause any atrophy or strength deficit in the subscapularis muscle.

METHODS

This was a single center, retrospective study of patients treated between 2013 and 2021. Included were patients who had chronic anterior shoulder instability with an indication for surgical stabilization using an arthroscopic Trillat procedure and who underwent a CT scan before surgery and a second one at 6 months postoperative. The following morphological parameters were measured on all the rotator cuff muscles: cross-sectional area (CSA), thickness and fatty infiltration using the mean muscle attenuation (MMA) measurement. Isokinetic tests were done 1 year post-surgery.

RESULTS

One hundred seventeen patients underwent arthroscopic Trillat surgery between 2013 and 2021; 58 were included, 30 were analyzed and 17 patients underwent isokinetic testing. The CSA of the subscapularis was significantly smaller by 5.3% (17.0 vs. 16.1; p = 0.03). None of the other rotator cuff muscles had a smaller CSA. The MMA of the subscapularis increased significantly while the MMA of the external rotators decreased postoperatively. No strength deficit was found at 1 year postoperative in the internal and external rotators.

DISCUSSION

The arthroscopic Trillat procedure produces minor atrophy of the subscapularis muscle at 6 months, with no strength deficit at 1 year postoperative. Several studies have reported a deficit in internal rotation strength after a Latarjet procedure, ranging from 6% to 19% depending on the study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Faster strength recovery and better strength ratio with arthroscopic Latarjet compared to the open technique: An observational study

INTRODUCTION

The arthroscopic bone block has shown reliability and reproducibility regarding functional scores and shoulder mobility compared to the open bone block technique. The recovery of muscle strength, especially the strength ratio external rotator/internal rotator (ER/IR), is crucial to recovering satisfactory function. This ratio should be as near to 1 as possible, meaning a good strength balance. Little is known about the difference in strength recovery between the open and arthroscopic techniques.

HYPOTHESIS

Arthroscopic Latarjet reduces surgical stress and improves the strength recovery and strength ratio.

OBJECTIVES

To compare arthroscopic and open Latarjet procedures for shoulder muscle strength and functional outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

It was an observational longitudinal and prospective cohort follow-up. Two groups of patients were accessible for comparison: 35 in an arthroscopy group and 38 in an open group. The main outcome was the muscle strength of shoulder muscles measured with a dynamometer and expressed in Newton (N) at day 21 (D21), D45, D90, D180, and D365 in the operated and contralateral shoulders. The measurements were made for the pectoralis major, the three deltoid fascicles, and the subscapularis. The shoulder ER/IR strength ratio was calculated. Other variables were the range of motion (ROM), the Walch-Duplay (WD), the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability score (WOSI), and the Visual Analogic Scale for pain assessment. The strength, ROM, and functional scores were compared between open and arthroscopy with linear mixed models.

RESULTS

The median strengths at 52 weeks were significantly higher than at 3 weeks (P<10-4): anterior deltoid (AD) 8N (Q1:7, Q3: 9) versus 4N (Q1:2, Q3: 5), lateral deltoid (LD) 9N (Q1:9, Q3: 11) versus 6N (Q1:4, Q3: 7), posterior deltoid (PD) 14N (Q1:12, Q3: 15) versus 9N (Q1:8, Q3: 10), subscapularis 10N (Q1:9, Q3: 12) versus 7N (Q1:5, Q3: 8), and pectoralis major (PM) 11N (Q1:9, Q3: 12) versus 7N (Q1:5, Q3: 10). The overall strengths were lower in the open group compared to the arthroscopy group: AD -2.1N (CI95%[-3.1--1.2], p=0.0005), LD -1.3N (CI95% [-2.4--0.15], p=0.03), PD -0.35N (CI95% [-1-0.9], p=0.52), subscapularis -2.1N (CI95% [-3.3--0.7], p=0.006), and PM -1.4N (CI95% [-2.2--0.02], p=0.03). The ER/IR ratio was stable throughout the follow-up for both the operated and contralateral shoulders (p>0.5). The overall mean ratio was 1.3 (median 1.2, Q1: 1, Q3:1.45) for the operated shoulder and 1.1 (median 1, Q1: 0.9, Q3:1.3) for the contralateral shoulder (p=0.0004). The average ER/IR ratio was 0.27 points higher in the open group (CI95% [0.1-0.46], p=0.003). The ROM was similar between the two groups, and there was no correlation between the ER/IR ratio and the ROM (p>0.5). The VAS < 3 weeks and WD > 12 weeks were significantly poorer in the open group: +0.61 (CI95% [0.03-1.16] p=0.02), and -7.3 points (CI95% [-13--0.01], p=0.05), on average, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The patients in the arthroscopy group had a better ER/IR strength ratio (closer to 1) and better WOSI after 12 weeks. The strength and the ROM were not correlated with each other.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Open Stabilization Procedures of the Shoulder in the Athlete: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes

Shoulder instability is a relatively common injury especially in the young athletic population and its surgical management continues to remain a controversial topic in sports medicine orthopedics. Anterior instability is the most common type encountered and is estimated to have an incidence rate of 0.08 per 1000 person-years in the general population; however, this figure is likely higher in the young athletic population. While in recent practice, arthroscopic surgery has become the new gold standard for management, reported failure rates as high as 26% and high recurrence rates in specific subpopulations such as young men in high collision sports have led to the consideration of alternative open procedures such as open Bankart repair, Latarjet, capsular shift, and glenoid bone grafting. These procedures may be preferred in specific patient subgroups such as young athletes involved in contact sports and those with Hill-Sachs defects and multidirectional instability, with postoperative recurrence rates of instability as low as 10%. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of different open surgical techniques in the management of shoulder instability and summarize patient outcomes including recurrence rates for shoulder instability, return to sport, range of motion (ROM), muscle strength, and complications either individually by procedure or in comparison with other techniques, with special focus on their impact in the athletic population.