Spinal sagittal alignment and postoperative adding-on in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after surgery.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2022;
108:103352. [PMID:
35714918 DOI:
10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103352]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Surgery for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) may change spinal sagittal alignment, and postoperative adding-on may affect spinal sagittal balance after reconstruction. This study was to investigate the effect of surgery on spinal sagittal alignment and the relationship between postoperative adding-on and spinal sagittal balance in patients with AIS.
HYPOTHESIS
The hypothesis of this study was that the effect of surgery on AIS was associated with recovery of the spinal sagittal plane and that presence of postoperative adding-on might affect the spinal sagittal balance. Materials and methods This retrospective study enrolled 22 patients who received surgical treatment. Clinical, imaging and follow-up data were analyzed.
RESULTS
After surgery, T1 slope (T1S) and thoracic kyphosis (TK) were significantly (P<0.05) lower in patients with postoperative adding-on (16.73°±6.12° for T1S and 28.95°±11.3° for TK) than those without adding-on (24.82°±8.59° for T1S and 40.29°±12.08° for TK). At the last follow-up, cervical lordosis (CL), T1S, and TK were significantly (P<0.05) lower in patients with adding-on (3.05°±11.41° for CL, 22.12°±3.68° for T1S, and 37.89°±8.97° for TK) than those without adding-on (15.94°±°13.6 for CL, 28.86°±4.26° for T1S, and 47.64°±7.1° for TK). The Cobb angle was significantly (19.65°±8.69° vs. 50.66°±11.46°; P<0.001) decreased after compared with that before surgery. At the final follow-up, the Cobb angle (26.48°±9.61° vs. 19.65°±8.69°, P<0.001), T1S (24.87°±5.11° vs. 20.04°±8.13°), and TK (41.88°±9.45° vs 33.53°±12.71°) all significantly (P<0.01) increased compared with those immediately after surgery. The Cobb angle significantly (26.48°±9.61° vs. 50.66°±11.46°, P<0.001) decreased while CL, T1S, and TK all significantly (8.32°±13.67° vs 2.47°±14.42° for CL, T1S 24.87°±5.11° vs. 21.28°±5.88° for T1S, and 41.88°±9.45° vs. 33.13°±10.97° for TK, P<0.05) increased at the final follow-up compared with those before surgery.
DISCUSSION
Surgery affects spinal sagittal alignment, and postoperative adding-on may affect spinal sagittal balance after reconstruction. Surgery as the ultimate approach for AIS has good effects but may result in some side effects.
LEVEL OF PROOF
III, retrospective cohort study.
Collapse