Coronal and sagittal alignment of the lower limb in Caucasians: Analysis of a 3D CT database

Knees with isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis show a substantial variability in functional knee phenotypes with demographic-specific variations: Phenotypic analysis of 305 knees

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this study was to assess and describe the phenotypic variation in the coronal plane of knees affected by isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis (OA). The secondary aim was to investigate the potential gender-specific and age-related differences in functional knee phenotypes among knees with isolated lateral compartment OA.

METHODS

A comprehensive classification system was used to categorize 305 knees with isolated lateral compartment OA based on their mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femoral mechanical angle (FMA), and tibial mechanical angle (TMA). The phenotypic variation of functional knee phenotypes was assessed for the entire cohort and stratified by gender and age category.

RESULTS

Among knees with isolated lateral compartment OA, a total of 60 distinct functional knee phenotypes were identified, with phenotype VALHKA6°NEUFMA0°VALTMA3° being the most prevalent (10.8 %). Gender-specific differences were evident, with females exhibiting significantly greater valgus alignment in both mean HKA and TMA values compared with males (HKA: -6.4° vs. -5.4°, respectively; P = 0.02 and TMA 94.4° vs. 89.0°, respectively; P = 0.005). Age-related variations included younger patients predominantly displaying femoral deformities, while older patients primarily exhibited isolated tibial- or combined femoral and tibial deformities.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a broad variation of functional knee phenotypes among knees affected by isolated lateral compartment OA, with gender-specific and age-related differences. Recognizing this inherent phenotypic diversity during preoperative planning may facilitate the implementation of tailored approaches that account for the unique characteristics and bony deformities of the individual knee.

Weight-bearing line at the ankle joint level shifted laterally after total knee arthroplasty for varus knee osteoarthritis: Evaluation of the hip-to-calcaneus line

BACKGROUND

Few studies have comprehensively examined how alignment beyond the ankle joint changes after Total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This retrospective study aimed to answer the questions: (1) do the radiological parameters beyond the ankle joint, including the weight-bearing line at the ankle joint level, change after TKA in varus knee osteoarthritis? (2) Does the lower extremity alignment correlate with alignment beyond the ankle joint?

HYPOTHESIS

Our hypothesis was that TKA altered the radiological parameters beyond the ankle, which correlated with the lower extremity alignment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 67 patients who underwent mechanically aligned TKA for varus knee osteoarthritis. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), tibial plafond inclination angle (TPIA), hindfoot alignment angle (HA), talar tilt (TT), and weight-bearing line at the ankle joint level (mechanical ankle joint axis point [MAJAP]) were measured using radiographs taken before and 6 months after TKA; each parameter was compared between the two time points. The correlations between HKA and other parameters were examined preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

The mean HKA, TPIA, HA, TT, and MAJAP changed significantly after TKA from 15.0±6.1̊ to 2.6̊±3.5̊, from 10.8̊±5.7̊ to 4.7̊±3.9̊, from 2.3̊±5.5̊ to -2.5̊±4.5̊, from 0.2̊±1.3̊ to -0.5̊±1.4̊, and from 29.3±23.3 to 54.3±20.6, respectively. Correlations were noted between the preoperative HKA and the preoperative TPIA (r=0.58), HA (r=0.36), and MAJAP (r=-0.59), and between the postoperative HKA and the postoperative TPIA (r=0.54) and MAJAP (r=-0.38).

DISCUSSION

TKA for varus knee osteoarthritis altered radiological parameters beyond the ankle, with the weight-bearing line at the ankle joint level passing more laterally. The weight-bearing line at the ankle joint level was correlated with lower extremity alignment both preoperatively and postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; single-centre retrospective observational study.

Large multiplanar changes to native alignment have no apparent impact on clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

This study sought to examine if achieved postoperative alignment when compared to the native anatomy would lead to a difference in Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), and whether the achieved alignment could be broadly categorised by an accepted alignment strategy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data on patients undergoing single primary or bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was carried out. CT scans were used to determine the mean change ("delta values") between the pre and postoperative; hip-knee-ankle angle, lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle and femoral implant rotation. Femoral implant flexion and tibial implant slope were measured postoperatively. The primary outcome was the relationship of the variables to the change in KOOS pain subscale after one year. The secondary outcome was the number of knees which could be categorised postoperatively to an alignment strategy, and the mean PROMs in each cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 296 knees in 261 patients were available for analysis. With regards to the primary outcome, the delta values for each variable did not demonstrate any association with the change in knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) pain score. Approximately 46% of knees could not be categorised to an alignment strategy based on postoperatively measured alignment, with no significant difference between each cohort with regards to the change in KOOS Pain score.

CONCLUSION

Achieved alignment does not consistently match accepted alignment strategies, and appears to confer no benefit to clinical outcomes when the native anatomy is most closely approximated, nor results in poorer outcomes in outliers. This study highlights the importance of routine three dimensional pre and postoperative imaging in clinical practice and for the valid analysis of outcomes in studies on alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

A Radiographic Analysis of Coronal Morphological Parameters of Lower Limbs in Chinese Non-knee Osteoarthritis Populations

OBJECTIVES

Analyzing the lower limb coronal morphological parameters in populations without knee osteoarthritis (KOA) holds significant value in predicting, diagnosing, and formulating surgical strategies for KOA. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the variability in these parameters among Chinese non-KOA populations, employing a substantial sample size.

METHODS

A cross-sectional retrospective analysis was performed on the Chinese non-KOA populations (n = 407; 49.9% females). The study employed an in-house developed artificial intelligence software to meticulously assess the coronal morphological parameters of all 814 lower limbs. The parameters evaluated included the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), weight-bearing line ratio (WBLR), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), mechanical lateral-proximal-femoral angle (mLPFA), mechanical lateral-distal-femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial-proximal-tibial angle (mMPTA), and mechanical lateral-distal-tibial angle (mLDTA). Differences in these parameters were compared between left and right limbs, different genders, and different age groups (with 50 years as the cut-off point).

RESULTS

HKAA and JLCA exhibited left-right differences (left vs. right: 178.2° ± 3.0° vs. 178.6° ± 2.9° for HKAA, p = 0.001; and 1.8° ± 1.5° vs. 1.4° ± 1.6° for JLCA, p < 0.001); except for the mLPFA, all other parameters show gender-related differences (male vs. female: 177.9° ± 2.8° vs. 179.0° ± 3.0° for HKAA, p < 0.001; 1.5° ± 1.5° vs. 1.8° ± 1.7° for JLCA, p = 0.003; 87.1° ± 2.1° vs. 88.1° ± 2.1° for mMPTA, p < 0.001; 90.2° ± 4.0° vs. 91.1° ± 3.2° for mLDTA, p < 0.001; 38.7% ± 12.9% vs. 43.6% ± 14.1% for WBLR, p < 0.001; and 87.7° ± 2.3° vs. 87.4° ± 2.7° for mLDTA, p = 0.045); mLPFA increase with age (younger vs. older: 90.1° ± 7.2° vs. 93.4° ± 4.9° for mLPFA, p < 0.001), while no statistical difference exists for other parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

There were differences in lower limb coronal morphological parameters among Chinese non-KOA populations between left and right sides, different genders, and age.

Three-dimensional biometrics using weight-bearing imaging shows relationship between knee and hindfoot axial alignment

BACKGROUND

Existence of a relationship between knee and hindfoot alignments is commonly accepted, but not clearly proven. While studied in the coronal plane using 2D imaging, axial alignment has not been studied yet, likely requiring 3D measurements. We aimed to investigate how knee and hindfoot rotational alignments are related using 3D biometrics and modern 3D weight-bearing technologies.

HYPOTHESIS

Hindfoot alignment is correlated with femoral and tibial torsions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent both weight-bearing CT (WBCT) and low dose biplanar radiographs (LDBR) were selected in this retrospective observational study, resulting in a cohort of 157 lower limbs from 99 patients. Patients' pathologies were stratified in subgroups and those with a history of trauma or surgery affecting lower limb alignment were excluded. Foot Ankle Offset was calculated from WBCT; femoral and tibial torsions and coronal alignment were calculated from LDBR, respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, mean Foot Ankle Offset was 1.56% (SD 7.4), mean femoral anteversion was 15.6° (SD 9.5), and mean external tibial torsion was 32.6° (SD 7.6). Moderate negative correlation between Tibial Torsion and Foot Ankle Offset was found in the whole series (rho=-0.23, p=0.003) and for non-pathologic patients (rho=-0.27, p=0.01). Linear models to estimate Tibial Torsion with Foot Ankle Offset and conversely were found, with a low adjusted R2 (3%

DISCUSSION

External tibial rotation was associated with varus hindfoot configuration in the group without pathologies, suggesting that compensatory mechanisms may occur between knee and hindfoot alignments. In pathological cases, however, the same relationship wasn't found, raising concerns about compensatory failure in spite of the numbers available. We didn't find similar correlations with the femur possibly because the hip has a degree of liberty in the axial plane.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative study.

Collapse

Key Words

• 3D biometrics
• Foot Ankle Offset
• Hindfoot alignment
• Hip
• Knee alignment
• Weight bearing CT

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Retrospective Studies
• Lower Extremity
• Foot
• Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging
• Tibia
• Weight-Bearing
• Biometry
• Imaging, Three-Dimensional

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Maryama Dufrénot CNRS, institut des sciences du mouvement Étienne-Jules Marey, UMR 7287, Aix-Marseille université, 163, avenue de Luminy, 13009 Marseille, France; Institut du membre inférieur et de l'appareil locomoteur, APHM, hôpital Sainte-Marguerite, 270, boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France; Newclip Technics, PA de la Lande Saint-Martin, 45, rue des Garottières, 44115 Haute-Goulaine, France.
Louis Dagneaux Département de chirurgie orthopédique du membre inférieur, CHU de Montpellier, hôpital Lapeyronie, 371 avenue du Doyen Gaston-Giraud, 39295 Montpellier cedex 05, France; Laboratoire de mécanique et génie civil (LMGC), université de Montpellier, 860, rue de Saint-Priest, 34090 Montpellier, France
Celine Fernando Service de chirurgie du pied et de la cheville, Ramsay Santé - clinique de l'Union, boulevard de Ratalens, 31240 Saint-Jean, France
Patrick Chabrand CNRS, institut des sciences du mouvement Étienne-Jules Marey, UMR 7287, Aix-Marseille université, 163, avenue de Luminy, 13009 Marseille, France; Institut du membre inférieur et de l'appareil locomoteur, APHM, hôpital Sainte-Marguerite, 270, boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France
Matthieu Ollivier CNRS, institut des sciences du mouvement Étienne-Jules Marey, UMR 7287, Aix-Marseille université, 163, avenue de Luminy, 13009 Marseille, France; Institut du membre inférieur et de l'appareil locomoteur, APHM, hôpital Sainte-Marguerite, 270, boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France
François Lintz Service de chirurgie du pied et de la cheville, Ramsay Santé - clinique de l'Union, boulevard de Ratalens, 31240 Saint-Jean, France

Collapse

Automatic Assessment of Lower-Limb Alignment from Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND

Preoperative planning of lower-limb realignment surgical procedures necessitates the quantification of alignment parameters by using landmarks placed on medical scans. Conventionally, alignment measurements are performed on 2-dimensional (2D) standing radiographs. To enable fast and accurate 3-dimensional (3D) planning of orthopaedic surgery, automatic calculation of the lower-limb alignment from 3D bone models is required. The goal of this study was to develop, validate, and apply a method that automatically quantifies the parameters defining lower-limb alignment from computed tomographic (CT) scans.

METHODS

CT scans of the lower extremities of 50 subjects were both manually and automatically segmented. Thirty-two manual landmarks were positioned twice on the bone segmentations to assess intraobserver reliability in a subset of 20 subjects. The landmarks were also positioned automatically using a shape-fitting algorithm. The landmarks were then used to calculate 25 angles describing the lower-limb alignment for all 50 subjects.

RESULTS

The mean absolute difference (and standard deviation) between repeat measurements using the manual method was 2.01 ± 1.64 mm for the landmark positions and 1.05° ± 1.48° for the landmark angles, whereas the mean absolute difference between the manual and fully automatic methods was 2.17 ± 1.37 mm for the landmark positions and 1.10° ± 1.16° for the landmark angles. The manual method required approximately 60 minutes of manual interaction, compared with 12 minutes of computation time for the fully automatic method. The intraclass correlation coefficient showed good to excellent reliability between the manual and automatic assessments for 23 of 25 angles, and the same was true for the intraobserver reliability in the manual method. The mean for the 50 subjects was within the expected range for 18 of the 25 automatically calculated angles.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a method that automatically calculated a comprehensive range of 25 measurements that defined lower-limb alignment in considerably less time, and with differences relative to the manual method that were comparable to the differences between repeated manual assessments. This method could thus be used as an efficient alternative to manual assessment of alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.