Hardin J, Forshier B. Adult Perianesthesia Do Not Resuscitate Orders: A Systematic Review.
J Perianesth Nurs 2019;
34:1054-1068.e18. [PMID:
31230930 DOI:
10.1016/j.jopan.2019.03.009]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/23/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE
The purpose of this systematic review is to assess if Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders should be routinely rescinded during anesthesia, determine if consensus on retaining DNR orders exists in the literature, and explore the current state of clinical practice.
DESIGN
This systematic review followed preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines.
METHODS
In June 2018, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and PubMed databases were systematically searched using defined inclusion/exclusion criteria.
FINDINGS
Ninety-one articles from the databases were pooled with 16 works identified as formative to the research questions. Forty-nine articles were analyzed and included in this study.
CONCLUSIONS
It is unethical to automatically rescind DNR orders during anesthesia. Patients have the right to retain their DNR orders unaltered or modify them for the perianesthesia period. Sufficient evidence exists to create meaningful policy at every level. A consensus exists among professional organizations that the standard of care is a required reconsideration of DNR orders before anesthesia.
Collapse