1
|
Bouchard TJ, Johnson W. Keith Hayes' experience-producing drives: An appreciation and extension. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
2
|
Condon DM, Wood D, Mõttus R, Booth T, Costantini G, Greiff S, Johnson W, Lukaszewski A, Murray A, Revelle W, Wright AGC, Ziegler M, Zimmermann J. Bottom Up Construction of a Personality Taxonomy. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 2020. [DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Abstract. In pursuit of a more systematic and comprehensive framework for personality assessment, we introduce procedures for assessing personality traits at the lowest level: nuances. We argue that constructing a personality taxonomy from the bottom up addresses some of the limitations of extant top-down assessment frameworks (e.g., the Big Five), including the opportunity to resolve confusion about the breadth and scope of traits at different levels of the organization, evaluate unique and reliable trait variance at the item level, and clarify jingle/jangle issues in personality assessment. With a focus on applications in survey methodology and transparent documentation, our procedures contain six steps: (1) identification of a highly inclusive pool of candidate items, (2) programmatic evaluation and documentation of item characteristics, (3) test-retest analyses of items with adequate qualitative and quantitative properties, (4) analysis of cross-ratings from multiple raters for items with adequate retest reliability, (5) aggregation of ratings across diverse samples to evaluate generalizability across populations, (6) evaluations of predictive utility in various contexts. We hope these recommendations are the first step in a collaborative effort to identify a comprehensive pool of personality nuances at the lowest level, enabling subsequent construction of a robust hierarchy – from the bottom up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M. Condon
- Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
| | - Dustin Wood
- Department of Management/Culverhouse College of Business, University of Alabama, USA
| | - René Mõttus
- Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, UK
- Institute of Psychology, University of Tartu, Estonia
| | - Tom Booth
- Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Samuel Greiff
- Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Wendy Johnson
- Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Aaron Lukaszewski
- Department of Psychology, California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA
| | - Aja Murray
- Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Matthias Ziegler
- Department of Psychology, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
|