1
|
Johnson MI, Paley CA, Jones G. Has long-standing uncertainty about the clinical efficacy of TENS finally been resolved? Pain Manag 2023; 13:201-204. [PMID: 37128902 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2023-0029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mark I Johnson
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK
| | - Carole A Paley
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Gareth Jones
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
The dose-dependent effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pain relief in individuals with fibromyalgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 2023:00006396-990000000-00263. [PMID: 36893318 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a nonpharmacological modality widely used to manage pain; however, its effectiveness for individuals with fibromyalgia (FM) has been questioned. In previous studies and systematic reviews, variables related to dose of TENS application have not been considered. The objectives of this meta-analysis were (1) to determine the effect of TENS on pain in individuals with FM and (2) determine the dose-dependent effect of TENS dose parameters on pain relief in individuals with FM. We searched the PubMed, PEDro, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases for relevant manuscripts. Data were extracted from 11 of the 1575 studies. The quality of the studies was assessed using the PEDro scale and RoB-2 assessment. This meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model that, when not considering the TENS dosage applied, showed that the treatment had no overall effect on pain (d+ = 0.51, P > 0.050, k = 14). However, the moderator analyses, which were performed assuming a mixed-effect model, revealed that 3 of the categorical variables were significantly associated with effect sizes: the number of sessions (P = 0.005), the frequency (P = 0.014), and the intensity (P = 0.047). The electrode placement was not significantly associated with any effect sizes. Thus, there is evidence that TENS can effectively reduce pain in individuals with FM when applied at high or at mixed frequencies, a high intensity, or in long-term interventions involving 10 or more sessions. This review protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021252113).
Collapse
|
3
|
Buchanan SKO, Cook AE, Flannery JF. Second-Order Peer Reviews of Clinically Relevant Articles for the Physiatrist: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Reduces Movement-Evoked Pain and Fatigue: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2022; 101:e120-e124. [PMID: 35302534 DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000002010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha K O Buchanan
- From the University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (SKOB); The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (AEC); and University Health Network Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (JFF)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Johnson MI, Paley CA, Wittkopf PG, Mulvey MR, Jones G. Characterising the Features of 381 Clinical Studies Evaluating Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Relief: A Secondary Analysis of the Meta-TENS Study to Improve Future Research. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2022; 58:medicina58060803. [PMID: 35744066 PMCID: PMC9230499 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58060803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Characterising the features of methodologies, clinical attributes and intervention protocols, of studies is valuable to advise directions for research and practice. This article reports the findings of a secondary analysis of the features from studies screened as part of a large systematic review of TENS (the meta-TENS study). Materials and Methods: A descriptive analysis was performed on information associated with methodology, sample populations and intervention protocols from 381 randomised controlled trials (24,532 participants) evaluating TENS delivered at a strong comfortable intensity at the painful site in adults with pain, irrespective of diagnosis. Results: Studies were conducted in 43 countries commonly using parallel group design (n = 334) and one comparator group (n = 231). Mean ± standard deviation (SD) study sample size (64.05 ± 58.29 participants) and TENS group size (27.67 ± 21.90 participants) were small, with only 13 of 381 studies having 100 participants or more in the TENS group. Most TENS interventions were ‘high frequency’ (>10 pps, n = 276) and using 100 Hz (109/353 reports that stated a pulse frequency value). Of 476 comparator groups, 54.2% were active treatments (i.e., analgesic medication(s), exercise, manual therapies and electrophysical agents). Of 202 placebo comparator groups, 155 used a TENS device that did not deliver currents. At least 216 of 383 study groups were able to access other treatments whilst receiving TENS. Only 136 out of 381 reports included a statement about adverse events. Conclusions: Clinical studies on TENS are dominated by small parallel group evaluations of high frequency TENS that are often contaminated by concurrent treatment(s). Study reports tended focus on physiological and clinical implications rather than the veracity of methodology and findings. Previously published criteria for designing and reporting TENS studies were neglected and this should be corrected in future research using insights gleaned from this analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark I. Johnson
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK; (C.A.P.); (P.G.W.); (G.J.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-113-812-30-83
| | - Carole A. Paley
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK; (C.A.P.); (P.G.W.); (G.J.)
- Research & Development Department, Airedale NHS Foundation Trust, Steeton, Keighley BD20 6TD, UK
| | - Priscilla G. Wittkopf
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK; (C.A.P.); (P.G.W.); (G.J.)
| | - Matthew R. Mulvey
- Academic Unit of Primary and Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NL, UK;
| | - Gareth Jones
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK; (C.A.P.); (P.G.W.); (G.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Püsküllüoğlu M, Tomaszewski KA, Grela-Wojewoda A, Pacholczak-Madej R, Ebner F. Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Pain and Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review. Medicina (B Aires) 2022; 58:medicina58020284. [PMID: 35208610 PMCID: PMC8876365 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58020284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is the usage of a mild electrical current through electrodes that stimulate nerves. Patients with malignancies experience pain and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. A systematic review was performed to find research evaluating the effect of TENS on these two common symptoms decreasing the quality of life in cancer patients. PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE were searched. Original studies, namely randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials, published between April 2007 and May 2020, were considered. The quality of the selected studies was assessed. Seven papers were incorporated in a qualitative synthesis, with 260 patients in total. The studies varied in terms of design, populations, endpoints, quality, treatment duration, procedures and follow-up period. Based on the results, no strict recommendations concerning TENS usage in the cancer patient population could be issued. However, the existing evidence allows us to state that TENS is a safe procedure that may be self-administered by the patients with malignancy in an attempt to relieve different types of pain. There is a need for multi-center, randomized clinical trials with a good methodological design and adequate sample size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirosława Püsküllüoğlu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow Branch, 00-001 Krakow, Poland; (A.G.-W.); (R.P.-M.)
- Labcorp (Polska) Sp. z o.o., 05-825 Warsaw, Poland
- Correspondence:
| | - Krzysztof A. Tomaszewski
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Kraków University, 30-705 Kraków, Poland;
- Scanmed St. Raphael Hospital, 30-693 Krakow, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Grela-Wojewoda
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow Branch, 00-001 Krakow, Poland; (A.G.-W.); (R.P.-M.)
| | - Renata Pacholczak-Madej
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow Branch, 00-001 Krakow, Poland; (A.G.-W.); (R.P.-M.)
- Department of Anatomy, Medical College, Jagiellonian University, 31-008 Krakow, Poland
| | - Florian Ebner
- Helios Amper-Klinikum Dachau, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 85221 München, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Johnson MI, Paley CA, Jones G, Mulvey MR, Wittkopf PG. Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study). BMJ Open 2022; 12:e051073. [PMID: 35144946 PMCID: PMC8845179 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for relief of pain in adults. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Medline, Cochrane Central, Embase (and others) from inception to July 2019 and updated on 17 May 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing strong non-painful TENS at or close to the site of pain versus placebo or other treatments in adults with pain, irrespective of diagnosis. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Reviewers independently screened, extracted data and assessed risk of bias (RoB, Cochrane tool) and certainty of evidence (Grading and Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Mean pain intensity and proportions of participants achieving reductions of pain intensity (≥30% or >50%) during or immediately after TENS. Random effect models were used to calculate standardised mean differences (SMD) and risk ratios. Subgroup analyses were related to trial methodology and characteristics of pain. RESULTS The review included 381 RCTs (24 532 participants). Pain intensity was lower during or immediately after TENS compared with placebo (91 RCTs, 92 samples, n=4841, SMD=-0·96 (95% CI -1·14 to -0·78), moderate-certainty evidence). Methodological (eg, RoB, sample size) and pain characteristics (eg, acute vs chronic, diagnosis) did not modify the effect. Pain intensity was lower during or immediately after TENS compared with pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments used as part of standard of care (61 RCTs, 61 samples, n=3155, SMD = -0·72 (95% CI -0·95 to -0·50], low-certainty evidence). Levels of evidence were downgraded because of small-sized trials contributing to imprecision in magnitude estimates. Data were limited for other outcomes including adverse events which were poorly reported, generally mild and not different to comparators. CONCLUSION There was moderate-certainty evidence that pain intensity is lower during or immediately after TENS compared with placebo and without serious adverse events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019125054.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark I Johnson
- Centre for Pain Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Carole A Paley
- Centre for Pain Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
- Research & Development, Airedale NHS Foundation Trust, Keighley, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Gareth Jones
- Centre for Pain Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Matthew R Mulvey
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Priscilla G Wittkopf
- Centre for Pain Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Foundational Research Could Improve Future Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Evaluations. Medicina (B Aires) 2022; 58:medicina58020149. [PMID: 35208473 PMCID: PMC8880732 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58020149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives: There is a lack of good quality evidence regarding the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic musculoskeletal pain, including chronic low back pain. High quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been called for to establish effectiveness over and above placebo and some guidance has already been offered regarding the design of such trials. This article expands the discussion regarding the design of future TENS trials. There is qualitative evidence of the complexity of TENS as an intervention which should be considered in future TENS evaluations. This complexity includes multiple benefits reported by patients, depending on their chosen contexts of TENS use. The ideal content and delivery of support for patients to optimise TENS use also lacks consensus. There is no evidence that a TENS education package has been designed to support the complex set of behaviours and choices which experienced users suggest are required to optimise TENS benefits. Finally, clinical and research outcomes have not been contextualised and related to the specific strategies of use. Conclusions: We suggest that research is required to develop consensus about the content and delivery of training in TENS use for patients who live with pain, informed by the experience of patients, clinicians, and researchers. Once a consensus about the content of TENS training has been reached, there is then a need to develop a TENS training course (TTC) based on this content. An effective and acceptable TTC is needed to develop the knowledge and skills required to optimise TENS use, supporting patients to build confidence in using TENS in everyday life situations with the aim of reducing the impact of chronic pain on function and quality of life. Further research is required to extend the evidence base regarding appropriate, contextualised TENS patient-reported outcomes.
Collapse
|
8
|
Paley CA, Wittkopf PG, Jones G, Johnson MI. Does TENS Reduce the Intensity of Acute and Chronic Pain? A Comprehensive Appraisal of the Characteristics and Outcomes of 169 Reviews and 49 Meta-Analyses. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2021; 57:1060. [PMID: 34684097 PMCID: PMC8539683 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57101060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Uncertainty about the clinical efficacy of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) to alleviate pain spans half a century. There has been no attempt to synthesise the entire body of systematic review evidence. The aim of this comprehensive review was to critically appraise the characteristics and outcomes of systematic reviews evaluating the clinical efficacy of TENS for any type of acute and chronic pain in adults. Materials and Methods: We searched electronic databases for full reports of systematic reviews of studies, overviews of systematic reviews, and hybrid reviews that evaluated the efficacy of TENS for any type of clinical pain in adults. We screened reports against eligibility criteria and extracted data related to the characteristics and outcomes of the review, including effect size estimates. We conducted a descriptive analysis of extracted data. Results: We included 169 reviews consisting of eight overviews, seven hybrid reviews and 154 systematic reviews with 49 meta-analyses. A tally of authors' conclusions found a tendency toward benefits from TENS in 69/169 reviews, no benefits in 13/169 reviews, and inconclusive evidence in 87/169 reviews. Only three meta-analyses pooled sufficient data to have confidence in the effect size estimate (i.e., pooled analysis of >500 events). Lower pain intensity was found during TENS compared with control for chronic musculoskeletal pain and labour pain, and lower analgesic consumption was found post-surgery during TENS. The appraisal revealed repeated shortcomings in RCTs that have hindered confident judgements about efficacy, resulting in stagnation of evidence. Conclusions: Our appraisal reveals examples of meta-analyses with 'sufficient data' demonstrating benefit. There were no examples of meta-analyses with 'sufficient data' demonstrating no benefit. Therefore, we recommend that TENS should be considered as a treatment option. The considerable quantity of reviews with 'insufficient data' and meaningless findings have clouded the issue of efficacy. We offer solutions to these issues going forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole A. Paley
- Centre for Pain Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK; (C.A.P.); (P.G.W.); (G.J.)
- Research and Development Department, Airedale National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Skipton Road, Steeton, Keighley BD20 6TD, UK
| | - Priscilla G. Wittkopf
- Centre for Pain Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK; (C.A.P.); (P.G.W.); (G.J.)
| | - Gareth Jones
- Centre for Pain Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK; (C.A.P.); (P.G.W.); (G.J.)
| | - Mark I. Johnson
- Centre for Pain Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK; (C.A.P.); (P.G.W.); (G.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jamison RN, Edwards RR, Curran S, Wan L, Ross EL, Gilligan CJ, Gozani SN. Effects of Wearable Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pain Res 2021; 14:2265-2282. [PMID: 34335055 PMCID: PMC8318714 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s316371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Fibromyalgia is a chronic condition characterized by widespread pain and interference with daily activities. The aim of this study is to assess the benefit of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for persons diagnosed with fibromyalgia. Patients and Methods Adults meeting diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia were randomized in a double-blind trial to receive either an active (n=62) or sham (n=57) wearable TENS device for 3-months. Subjects were classified as having lower or higher pain sensitivity by Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST). Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC, primary outcome) and secondary efficacy measures including Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ) were assessed at baseline, 6-weeks and 3-months. Treatment effects were determined by a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis of the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (N=119). A pre-specified subgroup analysis of pain sensitivity was conducted using an interaction term in the model. Results No differences were found between active and sham treatment on PGIC scores at 3-months (0.34, 95% CI [−0.37, 1.04], p=0.351) in the ITT population. However, in subjects with higher pain sensitivity (n=60), PGIC was significantly greater for active treatment compared to sham (1.19, 95% CI [0.24, 2.13], p=0.014). FIQR total score (−7.47, 95% CI [−12.46, −2.48], p=0.003), FIQR pain item (−0.62, 95% CI [−1.17, −0.06], p=0.029), BPI Interference (−0.70, 95% CI [−1.30, −0.11], p=0.021) and PDQ (−1.69, 95% CI [−3.20, −0.18], p=0.028) exhibited significant improvements for active treatment compared to sham in the ITT population. Analgesics use was stable and comparable in both groups. Conclusion This study demonstrated modest treatment effects of reduced disease impact, pain and functional impairment from wearable TENS in individuals with fibromyalgia. Subjects with higher pain sensitivity exhibited larger treatment effects than those with lower pain sensitivity. Wearable TENS may be a safe treatment option for people with fibromyalgia. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration NCT03714425.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert N Jamison
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
| | - Robert R Edwards
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
| | - Samantha Curran
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
| | - Limeng Wan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
| | - Edgar L Ross
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
| | - Christopher J Gilligan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Johnson MI. Resolving Long-Standing Uncertainty about the Clinical Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) to Relieve Pain: A Comprehensive Review of Factors Influencing Outcome. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2021; 57:378. [PMID: 33919821 PMCID: PMC8070828 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57040378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Pain is managed using a biopsychosocial approach and pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a technique whereby pulsed electrical currents are administered through the intact surface of the skin with the intention of alleviating pain, akin to 'electrically rubbing pain away'. Despite over 50 years of published research, uncertainty about the clinical efficacy of TENS remains. The purpose of this comprehensive review is to critically appraise clinical research on TENS to inform future strategies to resolve the 'efficacy-impasse'. The principles and practices of TENS are described to provide context for readers unfamiliar with TENS treatment. The findings of systematic reviews evaluating TENS are described from a historical perspective to provide context for a critical evaluation of factors influencing the outcomes of randomized controlled trials (RCTs); including sample populations, outcome measures, TENS techniques, and comparator interventions. Three possibilities are offered to resolve the impasse. Firstly, to conduct large multi-centered RCTs using an enriched enrolment with randomized withdrawal design, that incorporates a 'run-in phase' to screen for potential TENS responders and to optimise TENS treatment according to individual need. Secondly, to meta-analyze published RCT data, irrespective of type of pain, to determine whether TENS reduces the intensity of pain during stimulation, and to include a detailed assessment of levels of certainty and precision. Thirdly, to concede that it may be impossible to determine efficacy due to insurmountable methodological, logistical and financial challenges. The consequences to clinicians, policy makers and funders of this third scenario are discussed. I argue that patients will continue to use TENS irrespective of the views of clinicians, policy makers, funders or guideline panel recommendations, because TENS is readily available without prescription; TENS generates a pleasant sensory experience that is similar to easing pain using warming and cooling techniques; and technological developments such as smart wearable TENS devices will improve usability in the future. Thus, research is needed on how best to integrate TENS into existing pain management strategies by analyzing data of TENS usage by expert-patients in real-world settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark I Johnson
- Centre for Pain Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Leemans L, Elma Ö, Nijs J, Wideman TH, Siffain C, den Bandt H, Van Laere S, Beckwée D. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and heat to reduce pain in a chronic low back pain population: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Braz J Phys Ther 2021; 25:86-96. [PMID: 32434666 PMCID: PMC7817858 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide. The therapeutic management of patients with chronic LBP is challenging. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of heat and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation combined on pain relief in participants with chronic low back pain. METHODS Fifty participants with chronic (≥3 months) low back pain were randomly assigned to two groups: HeatTens (n=25) and control group (n=25). Primary outcome was pain. Secondary outcomes were pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation, conditioned pain modulation, fear-avoidance and beliefs questionnaire, central sensitization inventory, quality of life, and medication use. The control group received no treatment and continued usual care. After four weeks of treatment, all measurements were repeated. RESULTS Fifty individuals participated in this study. Significant higher pressure pain threshold measures after both 30min and 4 weeks for the lower back region and the second plantar toe were found only in the experimental group. CONCLUSION The combination of heat and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation does not reduce pain scores in patients with chronic low back pain. Pressure pain threshold values significantly improved, showing beneficial effects of the experimental treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03643731 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03643731).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Leemans
- Rehabilitation Research Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group, Belgium.
| | - Ömer Elma
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Belgium
| | - Jo Nijs
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Belgium; Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Belgium
| | - Timothy H Wideman
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Canada
| | - Carolie Siffain
- Rehabilitation Research Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group, Belgium
| | - Hester den Bandt
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Belgium; Department of Physiotherapy, University of Applied Sciences Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sven Van Laere
- Interfaculty Center Data Processing and Statistics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
| | - David Beckwée
- Rehabilitation Research Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Frailty in Ageing Research Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Siemens W, Boehlke C, Bennett MI, Offner K, Becker G, Gaertner J. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for advanced cancer pain inpatients in specialist palliative care-a blinded, randomized, sham-controlled pilot cross-over trial. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:5323-5333. [PMID: 32128614 PMCID: PMC7547037 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05370-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a treatment option for cancer pain, but the evidence is inconclusive. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TENS. METHODS A blinded, randomized, sham-controlled pilot cross-over trial (NCT02655289) was conducted on an inpatient specialist palliative care ward. We included adult inpatients with cancer pain ≥ 3 on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). Intensity-modulated high TENS (IMT) was compared with placebo TENS (PBT). Patients used both modes according to their preferred application scheme during 24 h with a 24-h washout phase. The primary outcome was change in average pain intensity on the NRS during the preceding 24 h. Responders were patients with at least a "slight improvement." RESULTS Of 632 patients screened, 25 were randomized (sequence IMT-PBT = 13 and PBT-IMT = 12). Finally, 11 patients in IMT-PBT and 9 in PBT-IMT completed the study (N = 20). The primary outcome did not differ between groups (IMT minus PBT: - 0.2, 95% confidence interval - 0.9 to 0.6). However, responder rates were higher in IMT (17/20 [85%] vs. 10/20 [50%], p = 0.0428). Two patients experienced an uncomfortable feeling caused by the current, one after IMT and one after PBT. Seven patients (35%) desired a TENS prescription. Women and patients with incident pain were most likely to benefit from TENS. CONCLUSION TENS was safe, but IMT was unlikely to offer more analgesic effects than PBT. Even though many patients desired a TENS prescription, 50% still reported at least "slight pain relief" from PBT. Differences for gender and incident pain aspects demand future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waldemar Siemens
- Clinic for Palliative Care, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Christopher Boehlke
- Clinic for Palliative Care, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael I Bennett
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences (LIHS), School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Klaus Offner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Gerhild Becker
- Clinic for Palliative Care, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jan Gaertner
- Center for Palliative Care Hildegard, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Thuvarakan K, Zimmermann H, Mikkelsen MK, Gazerani P. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation As A Pain-Relieving Approach in Labor Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Neuromodulation 2020; 23:732-746. [PMID: 32691942 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a non-invasive electrophysical pain-relieving modality that also can be used in labor pain. Compared to other methods, TENS is not commonly practiced in intrapartum care due to a lack of knowledge about its clinical efficacy. Hence, a comprehensive overview of all types of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on TENS can provide a better insight into this method and its efficacy in labor pain. OBJECTIVES To perform a systematic review to assess the efficacy of TENS for labor pain control compared to other treatments. SEARCH STRATEGY PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies using keywords "TENS" combined with "labor pain" and "labor." SELECTION CRITERIA Eligible criteria included RCTs, full-text studies, English, and Danish literature, whereas exclusion criteria included animal studies and abstracts. DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS The selection of eligible items and assessment of methodological quality were performed independently by two researchers (KT and PG). A meta-analysis was performed to analyze the treatment effects on pain intensity reduction, additional analgesia, and satisfaction of TENS. MAIN RESULTS Twenty-six RCTs were included in this review involving a total of 3348 parturients. TENS showed significant efficacy in the reduction of pain intensity (pooled RR 1.52, 95% CI [1.35; 1.70]). Most of the studies had a high risk of bias, and the average grade of the studies indicated low quality. CONCLUSIONS The forest plot showed a small, but statistically significant efficacy of TENS on the reduction of pain intensity. However, it is not clear if the results were affected by the poor quality of the studies. This systematic review is the first that shows the application of TENS has significant efficacy in lowering labor pain. Findings from this review encourage the application of qualified methods for future and prospective studies with TENS applied in labor pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenoja Thuvarakan
- Viewcare A/S, Soborg, Denmark.,Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | | | - Parisa Gazerani
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dailey DL, Vance CGT, Rakel BA, Zimmerman MB, Embree J, Merriwether EN, Geasland KM, Chimenti R, Williams JM, Golchha M, Crofford LJ, Sluka KA. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Reduces Movement-Evoked Pain and Fatigue: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020; 72:824-836. [PMID: 31738014 PMCID: PMC7188591 DOI: 10.1002/art.41170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Objective Fibromyalgia (FM) is characterized by pain and fatigue, particularly during physical activity. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) activates endogenous pain inhibitory mechanisms. This study was undertaken to investigate if using TENS during activity would improve movement‐evoked pain and other patient‐reported outcomes in women with FM. Methods Participants were randomly assigned to receive active TENS (n = 103), placebo TENS (n = 99), or no TENS (n = 99) and instructed to use it at home during activity 2 hours each day for 4 weeks. TENS was applied to the lumbar and cervicothoracic regions using a modulated frequency (2–125 Hz) at the highest tolerable intensity. Participants rated movement‐evoked pain (primary outcome measure) and fatigue on an 11‐point scale before and during application of TENS. The primary outcome measure and secondary patient‐reported outcomes were assessed at baseline (time of randomization) and at 4 weeks. Results After 4 weeks, a greater reduction in movement‐evoked pain was reported in the active TENS group versus the placebo TENS group (group mean difference –1.0 [95% confidence interval –1.8, –0.2]; P = 0.008) and versus the no TENS group (group mean difference –1.8 [95% confidence interval –2.6, –1.0]; P < 0.0001). A reduction in movement‐evoked fatigue was also reported in the active TENS group versus the placebo TENS group (group mean difference –1.4 [95% confidence interval –2.4, –0.4]; P = 0.001) and versus the no TENS group (group mean difference –1.9 [95% confidence interval –2.9, –0.9]; P = <0.0001). A greater percentage of the patients in the active TENS group reported improvement on the global impression of change compared to the placebo TENS group (70% versus 31%; P < 0.0001) and the no TENS group (9%; P < 0.0001). There were no TENS‐related serious adverse events, and <5% of participants experienced minor adverse events from TENS. Conclusion Among women who had FM and were on a stable medication regimen, 4 weeks of active TENS use compared to placebo TENS or no TENS resulted in a significant improvement in movement‐evoked pain and other clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to examine effectiveness in a real‐world setting to establish the clinical importance of these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana L Dailey
- University of Iowa, Iowa City, and St. Ambrose University, Davenport, Iowa
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pal S, Dixit R, Moe S, Godinho MA, Abas ABL, Ballas SK, Ram S, Yousuf UAM. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain management in sickle cell disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 3:CD012762. [PMID: 32124977 PMCID: PMC7059961 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012762.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sickle cell disease (SCD), one of the most common inherited disorders, is associated with vaso-occlusive pain episodes and haemolysis leading to recurrent morbidity, hospital admissions and work or school absenteeism. The crises are conventionally treated with opioids, non-opioids and other adjuvants with the risk of developing complications, addictions and drug-seeking behaviour. Different non-pharmacological treatments, such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) have been used for managing pain in other painful conditions. Hence, the efficacy of TENS for managing pain in SCD needs to be reviewed. OBJECTIVES To assess the benefits and harms of TENS for managing pain in people with SCD who experience pain crises or chronic pain (or both). SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Haemoglobinopathies Register, comprising of references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We also searched online trial registries and the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. Date of the last search: 26 Febraury 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs, where TENS was evaluated for managing pain in people with SCD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of the trials identified by the literature searches according to the inclusion criteria. Two review authors then independently extracted data, assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane standard tool and rated the quality of evidence using the GRADE guidelines. MAIN RESULTS One double-blind cross-over RCT with 22 participants with SCD (aged 12 to 27 years) was eligible for inclusion. Following stratification into four pain crises severity grades, participants were then randomised to receive TENS or placebo (sham TENS). The trial was concluded after 60 treatment episodes (30 treatment episodes of each treatment group). There is a lack of clarity regarding the trial design and the analysis of the cross-over data. If a participant was allocated to TENS treatment for an episode of pain and subsequently returned with a further episode of a similar degree of pain, they would then receive the sham TENS treatment (cross-over design). For those experiencing a pain episode of a different severity, it is not clear whether they were re-randomised or given the alternate treatment. Reporting and analysis was based on the total number pain events and not on the number of participants. It is unclear how many participants were crossed over from the TENS group to the sham TENS group and vice versa. The trial had a high risk of bias regarding random sequence generation and allocation concealment; an unclear risk regarding the blinding of participants and personnel; and a low risk regarding the blinding of the outcome assessors and selective outcome reporting. The trial was small and of very low quality; furthermore, given the issue with trial design we were unable to quantitatively analyse the data. Therefore, we present only a narrative summary and caution is advised in interpreting the results. In relation to our pre-defined primary outcomes, the included trial did not report pain relief at two to four weeks post intervention. The trial authors reported that no difference was found in the changes in pain ratings (recorded at one hour and four hours post intervention) between the TENS and the placebo groups. In relation to our secondary outcomes, the analgesic usage during the trial also did not show any difference between groups. Given the quality of the evidence, we are uncertain whether TENS improves overall satisfaction as compared to sham TENS. The ability to cope with activities of daily living was not evaluated. Regarding adverse events, although one case of itching was reported in the TENS group, the site and nature of itching was not clearly stated; hence it cannot be clearly attributed to TENS. Also, two participants receiving 'sham' TENS reported a worsening of pain with the intervention. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Since we have only included one small and very low-quality trial, with a high risk of bias across several domains, we are unable to conclude whether TENS is harmful or beneficial for managing pain in people with SCD. There is a need for a well-designed, adequately-powered, RCT to evaluate the role of TENS in managing pain in people with SCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudipta Pal
- Melaka‐Manipal Medical College (Manipal Academy of Higher Education)Department of Community MedicineJalan Batu HamparBukit BaruMelakaMalaysia75150
| | - Ruchita Dixit
- Melaka‐Manipal Medical College (Manipal Academy of Higher Education)Department of Community MedicineJalan Batu HamparBukit BaruMelakaMalaysia75150
| | - Soe Moe
- Melaka‐Manipal Medical College (Manipal Academy of Higher Education)Department of Community MedicineJalan Batu HamparBukit BaruMelakaMalaysia75150
| | - Myron Anthony Godinho
- University of New South WalesSchool of Public Health and Community MedicineKensingtonNSWAustralia2052
| | - Adinegara BL Abas
- Melaka‐Manipal Medical College (Manipal Academy of Higher Education)Department of Community MedicineJalan Batu HamparBukit BaruMelakaMalaysia75150
| | - Samir K Ballas
- Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson UniversityCardeza Foundation for Hematologic Research, Department of Medicine1015 Walnut StreetPhiladelphiaPAUSA19107‐5099
| | - Shanker Ram
- Melaka‐Manipal Medical College (Manipal Academy of Higher Education)Department of PsychiatryJalan Batu Hampar, Bukit BaruMelakaMelakaMalaysia75150
| | - Uduman Ali M Yousuf
- Melaka‐Manipal Medical College (Manipal Academy of Higher Education)Department of MedicineJalan Batu Hampar, Bukit BaruMelakaMelakaMalaysia75150
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Koutsojannis C, Andrikopoulos A, Seimenis I, Adamopoulos A. MAGNETO-THERAPY IN PHYSIOTHERAPY UNITS: INTRODUCTION OF QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURE DUE TO LACK OF MAINTENANCE. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2019; 185:532-541. [PMID: 31329986 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncz049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Rehabilitation practice for many patients consisting of a combined use of magneto therapy resulting emission of low frequency magnetic fields to the patient, elicit concerns about occupational exposure to electromagnetic radiation (EMR) for the operators. The time extended use of the device periodically leads to mechanical failures or troubleshooting of the machine which, in most cases, are not perceived by the operator of the device. All device's efficient functionality have a major impact on the completion of the treatment procedure in a large percentage of specific clinical conditions. If the device's operating condition is technically out of order or in a mode of over-activity, operators are mainly seeking solutions by reviewing the clinical case of the patient. This eliminates their contribution during the primary therapeutic plan or increases the treatment sessions. In this work, an extended survey is presented including 75 physiotherapy centres concerning usability and maintenance issues of magneto therapy devices throughout Greek territory combined with extended measurements of Electromagnetic Radiation in the unit room were performed. Physiotherapists' perceptions revealed lack of technical support, maintenance and safe use of magneto therapy devices that extract auxiliary observations upon their clinical practice routines. Additionally safety measurements have not revealed field strengths over International Reference Levels which could result health risks for users and coexisting patients. The pilot survey that conducted in Attica and Western Greece confirms that magnetic fields strength that are measured are in accordance with the statutory legislation but will, at the same time, revealed lack of maintenance of the devices. Deficiency in topics such as proper equipment function will necessitate the creation of quality safety protocols, concerning the use of magneto-therapy, with the main aim the improvement of treatment procedures for the higher performance of therapeutic rehabilitation services to patients. Finally in this work, the proposal of a QC protocol for magnetotherapy devices is proposed for evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Koutsojannis
- Laboratory of Health Physics, Department of Physiotherapy, Technological and Educational Institute of Western Greece, 251 00 Aigion, Greece
| | - Andreas Andrikopoulos
- Laboratory of Health Physics, Department of Physiotherapy, Technological and Educational Institute of Western Greece, 251 00 Aigion, Greece
| | - Ioannis Seimenis
- Laboratory of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 681 00 Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Adam Adamopoulos
- Laboratory of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 681 00 Alexandroupolis, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gozani SN. Remote Analgesic Effects Of Conventional Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation: A Scientific And Clinical Review With A Focus On Chronic Pain. J Pain Res 2019; 12:3185-3201. [PMID: 31819603 PMCID: PMC6885653 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s226600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 11/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a safe, noninvasive treatment for chronic pain that can be self-administered. Conventional TENS involves stimulation of peripheral sensory nerves at a strong, non-painful level. Following the original gate-control theory of pain, stimulation is typically near the target pain. As another option, remote stimulation may also be effective and offers potential advantages. OBJECTIVE This narrative review examines mechanisms underlying the remote analgesic effects of conventional TENS and appraises the clinical evidence. METHODS A literature search for English-language articles was performed on PubMed. Keywords included terms related to the location of TENS . Citations from primary references and textbooks were examined for additional articles. RESULTS Over 30 studies reported remote analgesic effects of conventional TENS. The evidence included studies using animal models of pain, experimental pain in humans, and clinical studies in subjects with chronic pain. Three types of remote analgesia were identified: at the contralateral homologous site, at sites distant from stimulation but innervated by overlapping spinal segments, and at unrelated extrasegmental sites. CONCLUSION There is scientific and clinical evidence that conventional TENS has remote analgesic effects. This may occur through modulation of pain processing at the level of the dorsal horn, in brainstem centers mediating descending inhibition, and within the pain matrix. A broadening of perspectives on how conventional TENS produces analgesia may encourage researchers, clinicians, and medical-device manufacturers to develop novel ways of using this safe, cost-effective neuromodulation technique for chronic pain.
Collapse
|
18
|
Govil M, Mukhopadhyay N, Holwerda T, Sluka K, Rakel B, Schutte DL. Effects of genotype on TENS effectiveness in controlling knee pain in persons with mild to moderate osteoarthritis. Eur J Pain 2019; 24:398-412. [PMID: 31661578 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Revised: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study examined the extent to which genetic variability modifies Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) effectiveness in osteoarthritic knee pain. METHODS Seventy-five participants with knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to either: (a) High-frequency TENS, (b) Low-frequency TENS or (c) Transient Placebo TENS. Pain measures were collected pre- and post-treatment. Participants were genotyped on genes implicated in central or peripheral pain pathways: NGFB, NTRK1, EDNRA, EDNRB, EDN1, OPRM1, TAC1, TACR1, BDNF, BDKRB1, 5HTT, COMT, ESR2, IL6 and IL1B. Genetic association using linear regression modelling was performed separately for the transient placebo TENS subjects, and within the High-frequency TENS + Low-frequency TENS participants, including TENS level as a covariate. RESULTS In the placebo group, SNPs rs165599 (COMT) was significantly associated with an increased heat pain threshold (β = -1.87; p = .003) and rs6827096 (EDNRA) with an increased resting pain (β = 2.68; p = .001). Within the treatment groups, TENS effectiveness was reduced by the SNP rs6537485 (EDNRA) minor allele in relationship to mechanical sensation (β = 184.13; p = 5.5E-9). Individuals with the COMT rs4680 minor allele reported lowered pain at rest after TENS (β = -42.30; p = .001), with a higher magnitude of pain reduction (28 unit difference) in the low-frequency TENS group compared to the high-frequency TENS group (β = 28.37; p = .0004). CONCLUSIONS EDNRA and COMT are implicated in osteoarthritic knee pain and provide a basis for tailoring TENS interventions according to individual characteristics. SIGNIFICANCE Findings from this study demonstrate that genetic variation within the COMT and EDNRA genes influences the effectiveness of TENS, a non-pharmacologic pain-reduction intervention, in the context of osteoarthritic knee pain. Evidence such as this may contribute to risk models that provide a clinically useful tool for personalizing TENS interventions according to individual characteristics in order to best control pain and maximize functional status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manika Govil
- Department of Oral Biology, Center for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nandita Mukhopadhyay
- Department of Oral Biology, Center for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Teri Holwerda
- Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Spine Center, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Kathleen Sluka
- Graduate Program in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Barbara Rakel
- The University of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Johnson MI, Jones G, Paley CA, Wittkopf PG. The clinical efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain: a protocol for a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). BMJ Open 2019; 9:e029999. [PMID: 31662366 PMCID: PMC6830670 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Revised: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for any type of acute and chronic pain in adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We intend to search electronic databases (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LILACS, PEDRO, Web of Science, AMED and SPORTDiscus) from inception to the present day to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCT) on the use of TENS in adults for any type of pain including acute pain, chronic pain and cancer-related pain. We will screen the RCTs against eligibility criteria for inclusion in our review. Two reviewers will independently undertake RCT selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Primary outcomes will be: (i) participant-reported pain relief of ≥30% expressed as frequency (dichotomous) data; and (ii) participant-reported pain intensity expressed as mean (continuous) data. We will conduct meta-analyses to determine risk ratio for dichotomous data, and mean difference (MD) or standardised MD for continuous data for TENS versus placebo TENS, no treatment or waiting list control, standard of care, and other treatments. Subgroup analyses will include different pain conditions (eg, acute vs chronic), TENS intensity, during versus after TENS, TENS as a sole treatment versus TENS in combination with other treatments and TENS administered as a single dose versus repetitive dose. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This systematic review will not use data from individual participants, and the results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed publication and presented at a conference. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019125054.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark I Johnson
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Clinical and Applied Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Gareth Jones
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Clinical and Applied Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Carole A Paley
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Clinical and Applied Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
- Research and Development Department, Airedale NHS Foundation Trust, Keighley, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Priscilla G Wittkopf
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Clinical and Applied Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Li Y, Chu L, Li X, Zhai W, Ma Y, He Y, Xu Y, Ding S, Gao H, Zhang J, Ye B, Wang J, Yao J, Wu C, Xiao L. Efficacy of different-frequency TEAS on acute pain after the total knee arthroplasty: a study protocol for a parallel group randomized trial. Trials 2019; 20:306. [PMID: 31142359 PMCID: PMC6542097 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3379-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an optimal option for patients with middle-to-end-stage knee osteoarthritis. However, the management of postoperative acute pain remains inefficient. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) is a nonpharmacological method to manage postoperative acute pain. Different frequencies of TEAS have been tested using varying parameters, but the optimal analgesic frequency remains controversial. The aim of this study was to explore the optimal analgesic frequency of TEAS for treating acute pain after the primary unilateral TKA. METHODS/DESIGN This is a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. A total of 156 patients are randomly assigned to: G1, 5 Hz TEAS; G2, 100 Hz TEAS; G3, mixed TEAS (alternative use of daily 5 Hz and 100 Hz TEAS) and G4, placebo TEAS. In the G1, G2 and G3 groups, TEAS is conducted at acupoints SP9 and GB34 of the leg that was operated on (at a wave of continuous, balanced and asymmetrical biphasic square, with a pulse width of 200 μs, and a strong but comfortable current) for 30 min prior to a 30-min rehabilitation session per day for 2 weeks. In G4 group, TEAS is delivered at a strong but comfortable current for 30 s, then the current is gradually decreased to none over the next 15 s. The primary outcomes are measured before surgery, at baseline (POD 3, before TEAS intervention), week 1 and 2 after TEAS intervention with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and The American Knee Society Score. The secondary outcomes include: (1) Active range of motion of the knee that was operated on; (2) Surface electromyography of both quadriceps; (3) Modified 30-s sit to stand test; (4) Additional usage of analgesia; and (5) SF-36. The additional outcomes include: (1) Patients' satisfaction rate; (2) Patient's expectation rate; and (3) Incidence of analgesia-related side effects. To test the blinding of participants and assessors, they are asked to guess whether the subjects received active or placebo TEAS within 5 min after the latest intervention. The safety and financial cost of TEAS are assessed. DISCUSSION Mixed TEAS has more favorable effect on acute pain control than the placebo or 5 Hz or 100 Hz TEAS. TRIAL REGISTRATION ChiCTR1800016347 . Date of registration was 26 May 2018. Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulin Li
- Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
| | - Lixi Chu
- Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
| | - Xiangming Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, The Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
| | - Weitao Zhai
- Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
- Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
| | - Yinghui Ma
- Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
- Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
| | - Yong He
- Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
- Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
| | - Yuelin Xu
- Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
- Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
| | - Sheng Ding
- Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
- Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
| | - Huali Gao
- Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
- Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
- Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
| | - Bowen Ye
- Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
- Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
| | - Jingchao Wang
- Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
- Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
| | - Jie Yao
- Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
- Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
| | - Chonggui Wu
- Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
- Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
| | - Lianbo Xiao
- Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200000 China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gibson W, Wand BM, Meads C, Catley MJ, O'Connell NE. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain - an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 4:CD011890. [PMID: 30941745 PMCID: PMC6446021 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011890.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain, considered to be pain lasting more than three months, is a common and often difficult to treat condition that can significantly impact upon function and quality of life. Treatment typically includes pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is an adjunct non-pharmacological treatment commonly recommended by clinicians and often used by people with pain. OBJECTIVES To provide an overview of evidence from Cochrane Reviews of the effectiveness of TENS to reduce pain in adults with chronic pain (excluding headache or migraine).To provide an overview of evidence from Cochrane Reviews of the safety of TENS when used to reduce pain in adults with chronic pain (excluding headache or migraine).To identify possible sources of inconsistency in the approaches taken to evaluating the evidence related to TENS for chronic pain (excluding headache or migraine) in the Cochrane Library with a view to recommending strategies to improve consistency in methodology and reporting.To highlight areas of remaining uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of TENS for chronic pain (excluding headache or migraine) with a view to recommending strategies to reduce any uncertainty. METHODS Search methodsWe searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), in the Cochrane Library, across all years up to Issue 11 of 12, 2018.Selection of reviewsTwo authors independently screened the results of the electronic search by title and abstract against inclusion/exclusion criteria. We included all Cochrane Reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of TENS in people with chronic pain. We included reviews if they investigated the following: TENS versus sham; TENS versus usual care or no treatment/waiting list control; TENS plus active intervention versus active intervention alone; comparisons between different types of TENS; or TENS delivered using different stimulation parameters.Data extraction and analysisTwo authors independently extracted relevant data, assessed review quality using the AMSTAR checklist and applied GRADE judgements where required to individual reviews. Our primary outcomes included pain intensity and nature/incidence of adverse effects; our secondary outcomes included disability, health-related quality of life, analgesic medication use and participant global impression of change. MAIN RESULTS We included nine reviews investigating TENS use in people with defined chronic pain or in people with chronic conditions associated with ongoing pain. One review investigating TENS for phantom or stump-associated pain in people following amputation did not have any included studies. We therefore extracted data from eight reviews which represented 51 TENS-related RCTs representing 2895 TENS-comparison participants entered into the studies.The included reviews followed consistent methods and achieved overall high scores on the AMSTAR checklist. The evidence reported within each review was consistently rated as very low quality. Using review authors' assessment of risk of bias, there were significant methodological limitations in included studies; and for all reviews, sample sizes were consistently small (the majority of studies included fewer than 50 participants per group).Six of the eight reviews presented a narrative synthesis of included studies. Two reviews reported a pooled analysis.Primary and secondary outcomes One review reported a beneficial effect of TENS versus sham therapy at reducing pain intensity on a 0 to 10 scale (MD -1.58, 95% CI -2.08 to -1.09, P < 0.001, I² = 29%, P = 0.22, 5 studies, 207 participants). However the quality of the evidence was very low due to significant methodological limitations and imprecision. A second review investigating pain intensity performed a pooled analysis by combining studies that compared TENS to sham with studies that compared TENS to no intervention (SMD -0.85, 95% CI -1.36 to -0.34, P = 0.001, I² = 83%, P < 0.001). This pooled analysis was judged as offering very low quality evidence due to significant methodological limitations, large between-trial heterogeneity and imprecision. We considered the approach of combining sham and no intervention data to be problematic since we would predict these different comparisons may be estimating different true effects. All remaining reviews also reported pain intensity as an outcome measure; however the data were presented in narrative review form only.Due to methodological limitation and lack of useable data, we were unable to offer any meaningful report on the remaining primary outcome regarding nature/incidence of adverse effects, nor for the remaining secondary outcomes: disability, health-related quality of life, analgesic medication use and participant global impression of change for any comparisons.We found the included reviews had a number of inconsistencies when evaluating the evidence from TENS studies. Approaches to assessing risk of bias around the participant, personnel and outcome-assessor blinding were perhaps the most obvious area of difference across included reviews. We also found wide variability in terms of primary and secondary outcome measures, and inclusion/exclusion criteria for studies varied with respect to including studies which assessed immediate effects of single interventions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found the methodological quality of the reviews was good, but quality of the evidence within them was very low. We were therefore unable to conclude with any confidence that, in people with chronic pain, TENS is harmful, or beneficial for pain control, disability, health-related quality of life, use of pain relieving medicines, or global impression of change. We make recommendations with respect to future TENS study designs which may meaningfully reduce the uncertainty relating to the effectiveness of this treatment in people with chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Gibson
- The University of Notre Dame AustraliaSchool of Physiotherapy19 Mouat Street (PO Box 1225)FremantleWestern AustraliaAustralia6959
| | - Benedict M Wand
- The University of Notre Dame AustraliaSchool of Physiotherapy19 Mouat Street (PO Box 1225)FremantleWestern AustraliaAustralia6959
| | - Catherine Meads
- Anglia Ruskin UniversityFaculty of Health, Social Care and EducationEast Road CampusYoung Street SiteCambridgeUKCB1 1PT
| | - Mark J Catley
- University of South AustraliaSchool of Health SciencesGPO Box 2471AdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia5001
| | - Neil E O'Connell
- Brunel University LondonHealth Economics Research Group, Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Department of Clinical SciencesKingston LaneUxbridgeMiddlesexUKUB8 3PH
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gozani SN, Ferree TC, Moynihan M, Kong X. Impact of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on sleep in chronic low back pain: a real-world retrospective cohort study. J Pain Res 2019; 12:743-752. [PMID: 30881088 PMCID: PMC6394244 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s196129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The purpose of this study was to determine if transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) improves sleep in chronic low back pain (CLBP). Background There is uncertainty over the effectiveness of TENS in CLBP. In most studies, pain intensity has been the primary outcome measure. Although sleep abnormalities are common in CLBP, sleep outcomes have not been evaluated in most studies of TENS effectiveness. Subjective and objective sleep measures are often inconsistent in CLBP, suggesting that perception of sleep and actual sleep may differ. Methods This retrospective cohort study evaluated TENS for CLBP over 10 weeks. The source database included demographics, pain characteristics, pain intensity and interference on an 11-point numerical rating scale, adherence and actigraphic sleep data from real-world TENS users. Key inclusion criteria were CLBP with self-reported history of back injury and baseline pain interference with sleep ≥4. Study participants were stratified into improved and unimproved groups based on changes in pain interference with sleep (improved ≥1-point decrease). Actigraphic sleep metrics were compared between the two groups for weeks 1–2 and weeks 9–10. Results The inclusion criteria were met by 554 TENS users. There were 282 (50.9%) participants in the improved group and 272 (49.1%) in the unimproved group. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics and high TENS adherence. At the weeks 1–2 assessment, there were no differences among actigraphic sleep. At the weeks 9–10 assessment, there was a difference in total sleep time, with the improved group sleeping 29 minutes longer. In addition, the periodic leg movement (PLM) index was lower in the improved group. Conclusion Regular TENS improved self-reported and objective sleep measures in individuals with CLBP. When compared to the unimproved group, the improved group had longer total sleep time and fewer PLMs. Sleep may be an important outcome for TENS effectiveness in CLBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Xuan Kong
- NeuroMetrix, Inc., Waltham, MA 02451, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gibson W, Wand BM, Meads C, Catley MJ, O'Connell NE. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain - an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 2:CD011890. [PMID: 30776855 PMCID: PMC6379178 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011890.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain, considered to be pain lasting more than three months, is a common and often difficult to treat condition that can significantly impact upon function and quality of life. Treatment typically includes pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is an adjunct non-pharmacological treatment commonly recommended by clinicians and often used by people with pain. OBJECTIVES To provide an overview of evidence from Cochrane Reviews of the effectiveness of TENS to reduce pain in adults with chronic pain (excluding headache or migraine).To provide an overview of evidence from Cochrane Reviews of the safety of TENS when used to reduce pain in adults with chronic pain (excluding headache or migraine).To identify possible sources of inconsistency in the approaches taken to evaluating the evidence related to TENS for chronic pain (excluding headache or migraine) in the Cochrane Library with a view to recommending strategies to improve consistency in methodology and reporting.To highlight areas of remaining uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of TENS for chronic pain (excluding headache or migraine) with a view to recommending strategies to reduce any uncertainty. METHODS Search methodsWe searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), in the Cochrane Library, across all years up to Issue 11 of 12, 2018.Selection of reviewsTwo authors independently screened the results of the electronic search by title and abstract against inclusion/exclusion criteria. We included all Cochrane Reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of TENS in people with chronic pain. We included reviews if they investigated the following: TENS versus sham; TENS versus usual care or no treatment/waiting list control; TENS plus active intervention versus active intervention alone; comparisons between different types of TENS; or TENS delivered using different stimulation parameters.Data extraction and analysisTwo authors independently extracted relevant data, assessed review quality using the AMSTAR checklist and applied GRADE judgements where required to individual reviews. Our primary outcomes included pain intensity and nature/incidence of adverse effects; our secondary outcomes included disability, health-related quality of life, analgesic medication use and participant global impression of change. MAIN RESULTS We included nine reviews investigating TENS use in people with defined chronic pain or in people with chronic conditions associated with ongoing pain. One review investigating TENS for phantom or stump-associated pain in people following amputation did not have any included studies. We therefore extracted data from eight reviews which represented 51 TENS-related RCTs representing 2895 TENS-comparison participants entered into the studies.The included reviews followed consistent methods and achieved overall high scores on the AMSTAR checklist. The evidence reported within each review was consistently rated as very low quality. Using review authors' assessment of risk of bias, there were significant methodological limitations in included studies; and for all reviews, sample sizes were consistently small (the majority of studies included fewer than 50 participants per group).Six of the eight reviews presented a narrative synthesis of included studies. Two reviews reported a pooled analysis.Primary and secondary outcomes One review reported a beneficial effect of TENS versus sham therapy at reducing pain intensity on a 0 to 10 scale (MD -1.58, 95% CI -2.08 to -1.09, P < 0.001, I² = 29%, P = 0.22, 5 studies, 207 participants). However the quality of the evidence was very low due to significant methodological limitations and imprecision. A second review investigating pain intensity performed a pooled analysis by combining studies that compared TENS to sham with studies that compared TENS to no intervention (SMD -0.85, 95% CI -1.36 to -0.34, P = 0.001, I² = 83%, P < 0.001). This pooled analysis was judged as offering very low quality evidence due to significant methodological limitations, large between-trial heterogeneity and imprecision. We considered the approach of combining sham and no intervention data to be problematic since we would predict these different comparisons may be estimating different true effects. All remaining reviews also reported pain intensity as an outcome measure; however the data were presented in narrative review form only.Due to methodological limitation and lack of useable data, we were unable to offer any meaningful report on the remaining primary outcome regarding nature/incidence of adverse effects, nor for the remaining secondary outcomes: disability, health-related quality of life, analgesic medication use and participant global impression of change for any comparisons.We found the included reviews had a number of inconsistencies when evaluating the evidence from TENS studies. Approaches to assessing risk of bias around the participant, personnel and outcome-assessor blinding were perhaps the most obvious area of difference across included reviews. We also found wide variability in terms of primary and secondary outcome measures, and inclusion/exclusion criteria for studies varied with respect to including studies which assessed immediate effects of single interventions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found the methodological quality of the reviews was good, but quality of the evidence within them was very low. We were therefore unable to conclude with any confidence that, in people with chronic pain, TENS is harmful, or beneficial for pain control, disability, health-related quality of life, use of pain relieving medicines, or global impression of change. We make recommendations with respect to future TENS study designs which may meaningfully reduce the uncertainty relating to the effectiveness of this treatment in people with chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Gibson
- The University of Notre Dame AustraliaSchool of Physiotherapy19 Mouat Street (PO Box 1225)FremantleAustralia6959
| | - Benedict M Wand
- The University of Notre Dame AustraliaSchool of Physiotherapy19 Mouat Street (PO Box 1225)FremantleAustralia6959
| | - Catherine Meads
- Anglia Ruskin UniversityFaculty of Health, Social Care and EducationEast Road CampusYoung Street SiteCambridgeUKCB1 1PT
| | - Mark J Catley
- University of South AustraliaSchool of Health SciencesGPO Box 2471AdelaideAustralia5001
| | - Neil E O'Connell
- Brunel University LondonHealth Economics Research Group, Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Department of Clinical SciencesKingston LaneUxbridgeUKUB8 3PH
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Matching the perceived benefits of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for chronic musculoskeletal pain against Patient Reported Outcome Measures using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Physiotherapy 2019; 106:128-135. [PMID: 30930052 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2019.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no consensus regarding the effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for chronic musculoskeletal or low back pain. A review of previous trial methodology identified problems with treatment fidelity. Qualitative research with experienced TENS users identified specific contexts for TENS use, leading to individualised outcomes. There is little information available to guide the selection of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) appropriate for TENS evaluation. OBJECTIVE To determine the capability of previously used PROMs to capture the perceived benefits of TENS reported by secondary care Pain Clinic patients who successfully used TENS to manage chronic musculoskeletal pain. DESIGN The World Health Organisation International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was used to match the perceived benefits of TENS against previously used PROMS. METHODS Semi-structured interviews conducted with nine patients (6 women) as well as three other qualitative datasets (88 patients in total) generated patient-reported benefits which were matched against previously used PROMs using the ICF. FINDINGS There were 18 items in the final list of benefits, and none of the four functional outcome measures used in previous RCTs captured more than 8 of these 18 items. The data analysis complemented the inductive thematic analysis but could not replace it, indicating the value of both forms of analysis. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights a low level of match between outcome measures used in previous TENS studies, and the benefits perceived by experienced TENS users. This suggests that further work is required if the patient-reported benefits of TENS are to be evaluated.
Collapse
|
25
|
Wu LC, Weng PW, Chen CH, Huang YY, Tsuang YH, Chiang CJ. Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Treating Chronic Back Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2019; 43:425-433. [PMID: 29394211 PMCID: PMC5916478 DOI: 10.1097/aap.0000000000000740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Supplemental digital content is available in the text. Background and Objectives This study is a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) to a control and to other nerve stimulation therapies (NSTs) for the treatment of chronic back pain. Methods Citations were identified in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov through June 2014 using the following keywords: nerve stimulation therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, back pain, chronic pain. Control treatments included sham, placebo, or medication only. Other NSTs included electroacupuncture, percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and percutaneous neuromodulation therapy. Results Twelve randomized controlled trials including 700 patients were included in the analysis. The efficacy of TENS was similar to that of control treatment for providing pain relief (standardized difference in means [SDM] = −0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.58 to 0.18; P = 0.293). Other types of NSTs were more effective than TENS in providing pain relief (SDM = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.15–1.57; P = 0.017). Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation was more effective than control treatment in improving functional disability only in patients with follow-up of less than 6 weeks (SDM = −1.24; 95% CI, −1.83 to −0.65; P < 0.001). There was no difference in functional disability outcomes between TENS and other NSTs. Conclusions These results suggest that TENS does not improve symptoms of lower back pain, but may offer short-term improvement of functional disability.
Collapse
|
26
|
María V, Beltrame M, Cirio S, Gorganchian F. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and analgesia following inguinal hernioplasties – Preliminary report. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ABDOMINAL WALL AND HERNIA SURGERY 2019. [DOI: 10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_7_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
27
|
Wittkopf PG, Lloyd DM, Johnson MI. Managing limb pain using virtual reality: a systematic review of clinical and experimental studies. Disabil Rehabil 2018; 41:3103-3117. [PMID: 30182760 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1485183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effect of virtual representation of body parts on pain perception in patients with pain and in pain-free participants exposed to experimentally induced pain.Methods: Databases searched: Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Studies investigating participants with clinical pain or those who were pain free and exposed to experimentally induced pain were analysed separately.Results: Eighteen clinical studies and seven experimental studies were included. Randomised controlled clinical trials showed no significant difference between intervention and control groups for pain intensity. Clinical studies with a single group pretest-posttest design showed a reduction in pain after intervention. In the studies including a sample of pain free participants exposed to experimentally induced pain there was an increase in pain threshold when the virtual arm was collocated with the real arm, when it moved in synchrony with the real arm, and when the colour of the stimulated part of the virtual arm became blue. Observing a virtual arm covered with iron armour reduced pain.Conclusions: The use of virtual representations of body parts to reduce pain is promising. However, due to the poor methodological quality and limitations of primary studies, we could not find conclusive evidence.Implications for rehabilitationVirtual reality has been increasingly used in the rehabilitation of painful and dysfunctional limbs.Virtual reality can be used to distract attention away from acute pain and may also provide corrective psychological and physiological environments.Virtual representation of body parts has been used to provide a corrective re-embodiment of painful dysmorphic body parts, and primary research shows promising results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Donna M Lloyd
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Mark I Johnson
- Centre for Pain Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Khalifeh S, Rezaee E, Azizi A, Ebrahimi H. Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Clinical Trial. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN DENTAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SCIENCES 2018. [DOI: 10.29252/jrdms.3.3.33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
|
29
|
Alter KE, Acevedo AT, Jackson A. Regional Rheumatic Disorders and Rehabilitation in Older Adults: An Update. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2018; 44:453-473. [PMID: 30001786 DOI: 10.1016/j.rdc.2018.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Musculoskeletal problems are the most frequently reported complaints among older adults living in the community. The impact of the aging process on skeletal muscles and joints can have a profound effect on the ability of individuals to function. This article reviews the rehabilitation medicine approach to the evaluation of older adults with regional rheumatic disorders and the rehabilitation medicine considerations for clinical intervention. Future research is required to gain a greater understanding of the subject matter and its impact on the provision of care and patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine E Alter
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 10 Center Drive, Building 10, CRC, Room 1-1469, Bethesda, MD 20892-1604, USA.
| | - Ana T Acevedo
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 10 Center Drive, Building 10, CRC, Room 1-1469, Bethesda, MD 20892-1604, USA
| | - Adrienne Jackson
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 10 Center Drive, Building 10, CRC, Room 1-1469, Bethesda, MD 20892-1604, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kong X, Gozani SN. Effectiveness of fixed-site high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in chronic pain: a large-scale, observational study. J Pain Res 2018; 11:703-714. [PMID: 29670397 PMCID: PMC5898590 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s156610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of fixed-site high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (FS-TENS) in a real-world chronic pain sample. Background There is a need for nonpharmacological treatment options for chronic pain. FS-TENS improved multisite chronic pain in a previous interventional study. Large observational studies are needed to further characterize its effectiveness. Methods This retrospective observational cohort study examined changes in chronic pain measures following 60 days of FS-TENS use. The study data were obtained from FS-TENS users who uploaded their device utilization and clinical data to an online database. The primary outcome measures were changes in pain intensity and pain interference with sleep, activity, and mood on an 11-point numerical rating scale. Dose-response associations were evaluated by stratifying subjects into low (≤30 days), intermediate (31-56 days), and high (≥57 days) utilization subgroups. FS-TENS effectiveness was quantified by baseline to follow-up group differences and a responder analysis (≥30% improvement in pain intensity or ≥2-point improvement in pain interference domains). Results Utilization and clinical data were collected from 11,900 people using FS-TENS for chronic pain, with 713 device users meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study subjects were generally older, overweight adults. Subjects reported multisite pain with a mean of 4.8 (standard deviation [SD] 2.5) pain sites. A total of 97.2% of subjects identified low back and/or lower extremity pain, and 72.9% of subjects reported upper body pain. All pain measures exhibited statistically significant group differences from baseline to 60-day follow-up. The largest changes were pain interference with activity (-0.99±2.69 points) and mood (-1.02±2.78 points). A total of 48.7% of subjects exhibited a clinically meaningful reduction in pain interference with activity or mood. This proportion increased to 57.1% for the high utilization subgroup. Conclusion FS-TENS is a practical option for treating multisite chronic pain. The greatest impact is on pain interference with activity and mood. FS-TENS utilization and effectiveness exhibit a dose-response association, suggesting that daily use maximizes pain relief.
Collapse
|
31
|
Resende L, Merriwether E, Rampazo ÉP, Dailey D, Embree J, Deberg J, Liebano RE, Sluka KA. Meta-analysis of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for relief of spinal pain. Eur J Pain 2017; 22:663-678. [PMID: 29282846 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis analysing the existing data on transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) or interferential current (IFC) for chronic low back pain (CLBP) and/or neck pain (CNP) taking into account intensity and timing of stimulation, examining pain, function and disability. Seven electronic databases were searched for TENS or IFC treatment in non-specific CLBP or CNP. Four reviewers independently selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TENS or IFC intervention in adult individuals with non-specific CLBP or CNP. Primary outcomes were for self-reported pain intensity and back-specific disability. Two reviewers performed quality assessment, and two reviewers extracted data using a standardized form. Nine RCTs were selected (eight CLBP; one CNP), and seven studies with complete data sets were included for meta-analysis (655 participants). For CLBP, meta-analysis shows TENS/IFC intervention, independent of time of assessment, was significantly different from placebo/control (p < 0.02). TENS/IFC intervention was better than placebo/control, during therapy (p = 0.02), but not immediately after therapy (p = 0.08), or 1-3 months after therapy (p = 0.99). Analysis for adequate stimulation parameters was not significantly different, and there was no effect on disability. This systematic review provides inconclusive evidence of TENS benefits in low back pain patients because the quality of the studies was low, and adequate parameters and timing of assessment were not uniformly used or reported. Without additional high-quality clinical trials using sufficient sample sizes and adequate parameters and outcome assessments, the outcomes of this review are likely to remain unchanged. SIGNIFICANCE These data highlight the need for additional high-quality RCTs to examine the effects of TENS in CLBP. Trials should consider intensity of stimulation, timing of outcome assessment and assessment of pain, disability and function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Resende
- Physiological Science Graduate Program, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil
| | - E Merriwether
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Pain Research Program, University of Iowa, IA, USA
| | - É P Rampazo
- Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, SP, Brazil
| | - D Dailey
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Pain Research Program, University of Iowa, IA, USA
| | - J Embree
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Pain Research Program, University of Iowa, IA, USA
| | - J Deberg
- Hardin Library User Services, University of Iowa, IA, USA
| | - R E Liebano
- Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, SP, Brazil
| | - K A Sluka
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Pain Research Program, University of Iowa, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wittkopf PG, Lloyd DM, Johnson MI. The effect of visual feedback of body parts on pain perception: A systematic review of clinical and experimental studies. Eur J Pain 2017; 22:647-662. [PMID: 29271535 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of visual feedback techniques on pain perception by analysing the effect of normal-sized, magnified or minified visual feedback of body parts on clinical and experimentally-induced pain. Databases searched: Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, PEDro, CINAHL, CENTRAL and OpenSIGLE. Studies investigating pain patients and pain-free participants exposed to experimentally-induced pain were analysed separately. Risk of bias was assessed and data were meta-analysed. Thirty four studies were included. A meta-analysis of clinical data favoured mirror visual feedback (six trials; mean difference = -13.06 mm; 95% CI = -23.97, -2.16). Subgroup analysis favoured mirror visual feedback when used as a course of treatment (three trials; mean difference = -12.76 mm; 95% CI = -24.11, -1.40) and when used for complex regional pain syndrome for complex regional pain syndrome (three trials; standard mean difference = -1.44; 95% CI = -1.88, -0.99). There is insufficient evidence to determine differences between normal-sized view and a size-distorted view of the limb. Mirror visual feedback was not superior to object view or direct view of the hand for reducing experimental pain in pain-free participants. There were inconsistencies in study findings comparing normal-sized reflection of a body part and a reflection of an object, or a magnified or minified reflection. There is tentative evidence that mirror visual feedback can alleviate pain when delivered as a course of treatment, and for patients with complex regional pain syndrome. It was not possible to determine whether normal-sized, magnified or minified visual feedback of body parts affects pain perception because of contradictory findings in primary studies. SIGNIFICANCE It was not possible to determine whether normal-sized, magnified or minified visual feedback of body parts affected pain perception in clinical or experimental settings because of contradictory findings in primary studies. This emphasizes the need for higher quality studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P G Wittkopf
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Clinical and Applied Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - D M Lloyd
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - M I Johnson
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Clinical and Applied Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Johnson MI, Claydon LS, Herbison GP, Jones G, Paley CA. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for fibromyalgia in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 10:CD012172. [PMID: 28990665 PMCID: PMC6485914 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012172.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fibromyalgia is characterised by persistent, widespread pain; sleep problems; and fatigue. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is the delivery of pulsed electrical currents across the intact surface of the skin to stimulate peripheral nerves and is used extensively to manage painful conditions. TENS is inexpensive, safe, and can be self-administered. TENS reduces pain during movement in some people so it may be a useful adjunct to assist participation in exercise and activities of daily living. To date, there has been only one systematic review in 2012 which included TENS, amongst other treatments, for fibromyalgia, and the authors concluded that TENS was not effective. OBJECTIVES To assess the analgesic efficacy and adverse events of TENS alone or added to usual care (including exercise) compared with placebo (sham) TENS; no treatment; exercise alone; or other treatment including medication, electroacupuncture, warmth therapy, or hydrotherapy for fibromyalgia in adults. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following electronic databases up to 18 January 2017: CENTRAL (CRSO); MEDLINE (Ovid); Embase (Ovid); CINAHL (EBSCO); PsycINFO (Ovid); LILACS; PEDRO; Web of Science (ISI); AMED (Ovid); and SPORTDiscus (EBSCO). We also searched three trial registries. There were no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-randomised trials of TENS treatment for pain associated with fibromyalgia in adults. We included cross-over and parallel-group trial designs. We included studies that evaluated TENS administered using non-invasive techniques at intensities that produced perceptible TENS sensations during stimulation at either the site of pain or over nerve bundles proximal (or near) to the site of pain. We included TENS administered as a sole treatment or TENS in combination with other treatments, and TENS given as a single treatment or as a course of treatments. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently determined study eligibility by assessing each record and reaching agreement by discussion. A third review author acted as arbiter. We did not anonymise the records of studies before assessment. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies before entering information into a 'Characteristics of included studies' table. Primary outcomes were participant-reported pain relief from baseline of 30% or greater or 50% or greater, and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). We assessed the evidence using GRADE and added 'Summary of findings' tables. MAIN RESULTS We included eight studies (seven RCTs, one quasi-RCT, 315 adults (299 women), aged 18 to 75 years): six used a parallel-group design and two used a cross-over design. Sample sizes of intervention arms were five to 43 participants.Two studies, one of which was a cross-over design, compared TENS with placebo TENS (82 participants), one study compared TENS with no treatment (43 participants), and four studies compared TENS with other treatments (medication (two studies, 74 participants), electroacupuncture (one study, 44 participants), superficial warmth (one cross-over study, 32 participants), and hydrotherapy (one study, 10 participants)). Two studies compared TENS plus exercise with exercise alone (98 participants, 49 per treatment arm). None of the studies measured participant-reported pain relief of 50% or greater or PGIC. Overall, the studies were at unclear or high risk of bias, and in particular all were at high risk of bias for sample size.Only one study (14 participants) measured the primary outcome participant-reported pain relief of 30% or greater. Thirty percent achieved 30% or greater reduction in pain with TENS and exercise compared with 13% with exercise alone. One study found 10/28 participants reported pain relief of 25% or greater with TENS compared with 10/24 participants using superficial warmth (42 °C). We judged that statistical pooling was not possible because there were insufficient data and outcomes were not homogeneous.There were no data for the primary outcomes participant-reported pain relief from baseline of 50% or greater and PGIC.There was a paucity of data for secondary outcomes. One pilot cross-over study of 43 participants found that the mean (95% confidence intervals (CI)) decrease in pain intensity on movement (100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS)) during one 30-minute treatment was 11.1 mm (95% CI 5.9 to 16.3) for TENS and 2.3 mm (95% CI 2.4 to 7.7) for placebo TENS. There were no significant differences between TENS and placebo for pain at rest. One parallel group study of 39 participants found that mean ± standard deviation (SD) pain intensity (100-mm VAS) decreased from 85 ± 20 mm at baseline to 43 ± 20 mm after one week of dual-site TENS; decreased from 85 ± 10 mm at baseline to 60 ± 10 mm after single-site TENS; and decreased from 82 ± 20 mm at baseline to 80 ± 20 mm after one week of placebo TENS. The authors of seven studies concluded that TENS relieved pain but the findings of single small studies are unlikely to be correct.One study found clinically important improvements in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) subscales for work performance, fatigue, stiffness, anxiety, and depression for TENS with exercise compared with exercise alone. One study found no additional improvements in FIQ scores when TENS was added to the first three weeks of a 12-week supervised exercise programme.No serious adverse events were reported in any of the studies although there were reports of TENS causing minor discomfort in a total of 3 participants.The quality of evidence was very low. We downgraded the GRADE rating mostly due to a lack of data; therefore, we have little confidence in the effect estimates where available. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There was insufficient high-quality evidence to support or refute the use of TENS for fibromyalgia. We found a small number of inadequately powered studies with incomplete reporting of methodologies and treatment interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark I Johnson
- Leeds Beckett UniversityFaculty of Health and Social SciencesCity CampusCalverley StreetLeedsUKLS1 3HE
| | - Leica S Claydon
- Postgraduate Medical InstituteAnglia Ruskin UniversityBishops Hall LaneChelmsfordUKCM1 1SQ
| | - G Peter Herbison
- Dunedin School of Medicine, University of OtagoDepartment of Preventive & Social MedicinePO Box 913DunedinNew Zealand9054
| | - Gareth Jones
- Leeds Beckett UniversityFaculty of Health and Social SciencesCity CampusCalverley StreetLeedsUKLS1 3HE
| | - Carole A Paley
- Airedale NHS Foundation TrustResearch & Development DepartmentAiredale General HospitalSteetonKeighleyWest YorkshireUKBD20 6TD
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Elisei LMS, Parisi JR, Silva JRT, Silva ML. Opioidergic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain and inflammatory edema in a rat model of ankle sprain. FISIOTERAPIA E PESQUISA 2017. [DOI: 10.1590/1809-2950/16836724032017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Although transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has been proposed to modulate pain and the mechanisms underlying analgesia remain poorly understood, evidence of anti-inflammatory effect is more limited. The purpose of this study was to examine the opioidergic mechanisms of TENS effects in two different frequencies on pain and inflammatory edema in the ankle sprain model in rats. Threshold to mechanical stimulation was utilized to examine the changes produced by intraperitoneal injection of non-selective opioid antagonist naloxone on the antihyperalgesic effect induced by a 20-min period of 2Hz or 100Hz TENS in the ankle sprain model, produced by manually overextending the lateral ligaments. Ankle sprain induced a long-lasting reduction in paw withdrawn latency (PWL) after 30 minutes for up to 24 hours in sham TENS (SH-TENS) treated rats. The reduced PWL after the induction of ankle sprain was restored partially at 0,1,2,3 and 6, but not 24 hours, after the termination of 2 Hz-TENS (LF-TENS). In 100Hz (HF-TENS) the reduction in PWL was shorter than LF-TENS and both LF and HF effects were fully blocked in naloxone-treated rats. LF- and HF-TENS treated rats did not reach the elevation of edema and presented a progressive edema reduction for over 24 hours when compared to SH-TENS group. Both effects were reduced by naloxone. TENS-induced antihyperalgesic and anti-edematous effects observed in ankle sprain model were mediated by the endogenous opioid system.
Collapse
|
35
|
Johnson MI. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) as an adjunct for pain management in perioperative settings: a critical review. Expert Rev Neurother 2017; 17:1013-1027. [DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2017.1364158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mark I. Johnson
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Clinical and Applied Sciences, Leeds Beckett University City Campus, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain management in sickle cell disease. Hippokratia 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
37
|
Hazime FA, Baptista AF, de Freitas DG, Monteiro RL, Maretto RL, Hasue RH, João SMA. Treating low back pain with combined cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation: A randomized, double-blind, factorial clinical trial. Eur J Pain 2017; 21:1132-1143. [PMID: 28440001 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent evidence suggests that chronic low back pain is associated with plastic changes in the brain that can be modified by neuromodulation strategies. This study investigated the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined simultaneously with peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) for pain relief, disability and global perception in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS Ninety-two patients with CLBP were randomized to receive 12 sessions on nonconsecutive days of anodal tDCS (primary motor cortex, M1), 100 Hz sensory PES (lumbar spine), tDCS + PES or sham tDCS + PES. Pain intensity (11-point numerical rating scale), disability and global perception were applied before treatment and four weeks, three months and six months post randomization. RESULTS A two points reduction was achieved only by the tDCS + PES (mean reduction [MR] = -2.6, CI95% = -4.4 to -0.9) and PES alone (MR = -2.2, CI95% = -3.9 to -0.4) compared with the sham group, but not of tDCS alone (MR = -1.7, CI95% = -3.4 to -0.0). In addition to maintaining the analgesic effect for up to three months, tDCS + PES had a higher proportion of respondents in different cutoff points. Global perception was improved at four weeks and maintained three months after treatment only with tDCS + PES. None of the treatments improved disability and the affective aspect of pain consistently with pain reduction. CONCLUSION The results suggest that tDCS + PES and PES alone are effective in relieving CLBP in the short term. However, only tDCS + PES induced a long-lasting analgesic effect. tDCS alone showed no clinical meaningful pain relief. SIGNIFICANCE Transcranial direct current stimulation combined simultaneously with PES leads to a significant and clinical pain relief that can last up to three months in chronic low back pain patients. For this article, a commentary is available at the Wiley Online Library.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F A Hazime
- Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Piauí, Parnaíba, Brazil.,Department of Physical Therapy, Speech-Language and Hearing Science and Occupational Therapy of the Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.,Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences of the Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil
| | - A F Baptista
- Department of Biomorphology, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
| | - D G de Freitas
- Department of Physical Therapy, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - R L Monteiro
- Department of Physical Therapy, Speech-Language and Hearing Science and Occupational Therapy of the Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.,Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences of the Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.,Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Brazil
| | - R L Maretto
- Department of Physical Therapy, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - R H Hasue
- Department of Physical Therapy, Speech-Language and Hearing Science and Occupational Therapy of the Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.,Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences of the Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil
| | - S M A João
- Department of Physical Therapy, Speech-Language and Hearing Science and Occupational Therapy of the Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.,Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences of the Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Johnson MI, Jones G. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: current status of evidence. Pain Manag 2017; 7:1-4. [DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2016-0030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mark I Johnson
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Clinical & Applied Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, City Campus, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK
| | - Gareth Jones
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Clinical & Applied Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, City Campus, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Acevedo AT, Jackson A, Alter KE. Regional Rheumatic Disorders and Rehabilitation in Older Adults. Clin Geriatr Med 2016; 33:53-72. [PMID: 27886698 DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2016.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Musculoskeletal problems are the most frequently reported complaints among older adults living in the community. The impact of the aging process on skeletal muscles and joints can have a profound effect on the ability of individuals with and without disabilities to function. This article reviews the rehabilitation medicine approach to the evaluation of older adults with regional rheumatic disorders, and the rehabilitation medicine considerations for clinical interventions. Future research considerations are encouraged in order to gain a greater understanding of the subject matter and its impact on the provision of care and patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana T Acevedo
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 10 Center Drive, Building 10, CRC, Room 1-1469, Bethesda, MD 20892-1604, USA.
| | - Adrienne Jackson
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 10 Center Drive, Building 10, CRC, Room 1-1469, Bethesda, MD 20892-1604, USA
| | - Katharine E Alter
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 10 Center Drive, Building 10, CRC, Room 1-1469, Bethesda, MD 20892-1604, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hållstam A, Löfgren M, Benson L, Svensén C, Stålnacke BM. Assessment and treatment at a pain clinic: A one-year follow-up of patients with chronic pain. Scand J Pain 2016; 17:233-242. [PMID: 29229208 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2016] [Revised: 08/08/2016] [Accepted: 08/15/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Pain is one of the most common reasons for patients to seek primary health care. Pain relief is likely to be achieved for patients suffering from acute pain, but for individuals with chronic pain it is more likely that the condition will persist. These patients have the option of being referred to specialised pain clinics. However, the complexity surrounding chronic pain patients is not well studied in these settings. This study aimed to describe patients with chronic pain referred to a pain clinic by using the information submitted during their first visit and one year later and also to identify associations between baseline characteristics and improvements in health-related quality of life in the follow-up. METHODS This was a longitudinal observational study of a sample consisting of 318 patients referred to a pain clinic. One group of patients containing 271 individuals (median age 48, 64% females) was assessed and received conventional pain treatment (CPT group) and a second group of 47 patients (median age 53, 64% females) was assessed by a pain specialist and referred back to their physician with a treatment recommendation (assessment only, AO group). Patient-reported outcome measures in health-related quality of life (EQ-5D), pain intensity (VAS), mental health (HADS), insomnia (ISI), pain-related disability (PDI), kinesiophobia (TSK) and sense of coherence (SOC) were collected at the first visit and one year later. RESULTS At baseline, the CPT group reported a low EQ-5D Index (median (md) 0.157) and EQ VAS (md 40) as well as considerable high, current pain intensity VAS (md 58), HADS anxiety (md 8), ISI (md 17), PDI (md 36) and TSK (md 39). The AO group showed similar problems (no significant differences compared to the CPT group), except for ISI, where the AO group reported less severe problems. At the one-year follow-up, the CPT group had a statistically significant improvement in EQ-5D, VAS, ISI, PDI and TSK. In the AO group no significant changes were observed. In the CPT group there was an association between a high ISI level at baseline and an improved EQ-5D Index in the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The study describes rarely explored groups of patients with chronic pain at a pain clinic. Severe pain problems were present in both groups at their first visit. A statistically significant improvement could be seen in the group that was conventionally treated while this was not the case among those subjects who were assessed and referred. The results imply, that relatively limited treatment strategies were helpful for the patients' health-related quality of life. Despite these improvements, the patients were not fully recovered, pointing to the chronicity of pain conditions and the need of support for many patients. IMPLICATIONS Increased knowledge about assessment, selection and treatment at pain clinics is important to improve the quality of the work performed at these clinics. Despite limited resources, further efforts should be made to collect comparable, valid data on a regular base from pain clinics in order to develop recommendation models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Hållstam
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, and Unit of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, SE-11883 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Monika Löfgren
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, SE-18288 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Lina Benson
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, SE-11883 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christer Svensén
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, and Unit of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, SE-11883 Stockholm, Sweden; University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, UTMB Health, Department of Anaesthesiology, Galveston, TX, USA.
| | - Britt-Marie Stålnacke
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, SE-18288 Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine, Umeå University, SE-90185 Umeå, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Problems, Solutions, and Strategies Reported by Users of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Qualitative Exploration Using Patient Interviews. Phys Ther 2016; 96:1039-48. [PMID: 26678446 DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20150272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2015] [Accepted: 12/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) could offer a non-drug form of pain relief, but there is no consensus regarding its effectiveness for chronic musculoskeletal pain or chronic low back pain. A recent review of previous trial methods identified significant problems with low treatment fidelity. There is little information available to inform the development of a pragmatic implementation design for a TENS evaluation. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of patients who were receiving secondary care in a pain clinic and who had expertise in using TENS to manage chronic musculoskeletal pain. These key informants were selected because they had the potential to generate knowledge that could inform research design and clinical practice. DESIGN A qualitative method using individual semistructured interviews with open questions was selected for its capacity to generate rich data. METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted with 9 patients (6 women, 3 men). Thematic analysis was used as the primary data analysis method, and this analysis was enhanced by a case-level analysis of the context and processes of TENS use of each individual. RESULTS Data analysis indicated that patients learned to address a range of problems in order to optimize TENS use. Patients may need to personalize the positioning of electrodes and the TENS settings and to readjust them over time. Patients learned to use TENS in a strategic manner, and the outcomes of each strategy varied. CONCLUSIONS The findings indicated that a pragmatic TENS evaluation may need to incorporate a learning phase to allow patients to optimize this complex pattern of TENS usage, and evaluation may need to be sensitive to the outcomes of strategic use. These findings also have implications for clinical practice.
Collapse
|
42
|
Gozani SN. Fixed-site high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for treatment of chronic low back and lower extremity pain. J Pain Res 2016; 9:469-79. [PMID: 27418854 PMCID: PMC4935001 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s111035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to determine if fixed-site high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (FS-TENS) is effective in treating chronic low back and lower extremity pain. Background Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation is widely used for treatment of chronic pain. General-purpose transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation devices are designed for stimulation anywhere on the body and often cannot be used while the user is active or sleeping. FS-TENS devices are designed for placement at a pre-determined location, which enables development of a wearable device for use over extended time periods. Methods Study participants with chronic low back and/or lower extremity pain self-administered an FS-TENS device for 60 days. Baseline, 30-, and 60-day follow-up data were obtained through an online questionnaire. The primary outcome measure was the patient global impression of change. Pain intensity and interference were assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory. Changes in use of concomitant pain medications were evaluated with a single-item global self-rating. Results One hundred and thirty participants were enrolled, with 88 completing the 60-day follow-up questionnaire. Most participants (73.9%) were 50 years of age or older. At baseline, low back pain was identified by 85.3%, lower extremity pain by 71.6%, and upper extremity pain by 62.5%. Participants reported widespread pain, at baseline, with a mean of 3.4 (standard deviation 1.1) pain sites. At the 60-day follow-up, 80.7% of participants reported that their chronic pain had improved and they were classified as responders. Baseline characteristics did not differentiate non-responders from responders. There were numerical trends toward reduced pain interference with walking ability and sleep, and greater pain relief in responders. There was a large difference in use of concomitant pain medications, with 80.3% of responders reporting a reduction compared to 11.8% of non-responders. Conclusion FS-TENS is a safe and effective option for treating chronic low back and lower extremity pain. These results motivate the use of FS-TENS in development of wearable analgesic devices.
Collapse
|
43
|
Direct and Indirect Benefits Reported by Users of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Qualitative Exploration Using Patient Interviews. Phys Ther 2015; 95:1518-28. [PMID: 25929534 DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20140120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2014] [Accepted: 04/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no consensus regarding the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for management of chronic musculoskeletal pain or chronic low back pain. A recent review of previous trial methodology identified significant problems with low treatment fidelity. There is little information available to guide selection of patient-reported outcome measures appropriate for TENS evaluation. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of patients at a secondary care pain clinic who successfully used TENS to help manage chronic musculoskeletal pain. These key informants were selected because they had the potential to generate knowledge that could inform research design and clinical practice. DESIGN A qualitative method using individual semistructured interviews with open questions was selected for its capacity to generate rich data. METHODS A mini focus group informed the development of a discussion guide for semistructured interviews with 9 patients (6 women, 3 men). Thematic analysis was used as the primary data analysis method, and this analysis was enhanced by a case-level analysis of the context and processes of TENS use of each individual. RESULTS Data analysis indicated that distraction from pain and a reduction in the sensations associated with muscle tension or spasm should be considered as separate outcomes from pain relief. These direct benefits led to a wide range of indirect benefits dependent on patient decision making, including medication reduction, enhanced function, psychological benefits, and enhanced ability to rest. CONCLUSIONS The findings indicate that evaluating TENS using a unidimensional pain scale is likely to overlook potential benefits. The complex pattern of TENS usage, as well as multiple direct and indirect outcomes, indicates that TENS could be considered as a complex intervention.
Collapse
|
44
|
Johnson MI, Mulvey MR, Bagnall AM. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for phantom pain and stump pain following amputation in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 8:CD007264. [PMID: 26284511 PMCID: PMC7209768 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007264.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is the first update of a Cochrane review published in Issue 5, 2010 on transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for phantom pain and stump pain following amputation in adults. Pain may present in a body part that has been amputated (phantom pain) or at the site of amputation (stump pain), or both. Phantom pain and stump pain are complex and multidimensional and the underlying pathophysiology remains unclear. The condition remains a severe burden for those who are affected by it. The mainstay treatments are predominately pharmacological, with increasing acknowledgement of the need for non-drug interventions. TENS has been recommended as a treatment option but there has been no systematic review of available evidence. Hence, the effectiveness of TENS for phantom pain and stump pain is currently unknown. OBJECTIVES To assess the analgesic effectiveness of TENS for the treatment of phantom pain and stump pain following amputation in adults. SEARCH METHODS For the original version of the review we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, AMED, CINAHL, PEDRO and SPORTDiscus (February 2010). For this update, we searched the same databases for relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from 2010 to 25 March 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA We only included RCTs investigating the use of TENS for the management of phantom pain and stump pain following an amputation in adults. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We planned that where available and appropriate, data from outcome measures were to be pooled and presented as an overall estimate of the effectiveness of TENS. MAIN RESULTS In the original review there were no RCTs that examined the effectiveness of TENS for the treatment of phantom pain and stump pain in adults. For this update, we did not identify any additional RCTs for inclusion. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There were no RCTs to judge the effectiveness of TENS for the management of phantom pain and stump pain. The published literature on TENS for phantom pain and stump pain lacks the methodological rigour and robust reporting needed to confidently assess its effectiveness. Further RCT evidence is required before an assessment can be made. Since publication of the original version of this review, we have found no new studies and our conclusions remain unchanged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark I Johnson
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, City Campus, Calverley Street, Leeds, UK, LS1 3HE
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is a second update of a Cochrane Review originally published in Issue 2, 2009. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) is a non-pharmacological agent, based on delivering low voltage electrical currents to the skin. TENS is used by people to treat a variety of pain conditions. OBJECTIVES To assess the analgesic effectiveness of TENS, as a sole treatment, for acute pain in adults. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases up to 3 December 2014: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE; EMBASE; CINAHL; and AMED. We also checked the reference lists of included trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults with acute pain (< 12 weeks) if they examined TENS given as a sole treatment and assessed pain with subjective pain scales. Trials were eligible if they compared TENS to placebo TENS, no treatment controls, pharmacological interventions or non-pharmacological interventions. We excluded trials on experimental pain, case reports, clinical observations, letters, abstracts or reviews. Also we excluded trials investigating the effect of TENS on pain during childbirth (labour), primary dysmenorrhoea or dental procedures. Studies where TENS was given with another treatment as part of the formal trial design were excluded. We did not restrict any articles based on language of publication. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility and carried out study selection, data extraction, 'Risk of bias' assessment and analyses of data. We extracted data on the following: types of participants and pain condition, trial design and methods, treatment parameters, adverse effects, and outcome measures. We contacted trial authors for additional information if necessary. MAIN RESULTS We included 12 trials in the original review (2009) and included no further trials in the first update (2011). An additional seven new trials met the inclusion criteria in this second update. In total, we included 19 RCTs involving 1346 participants at entry, with 11 trials awaiting classification either because the full text was unavailable or information in the full text failed to clarify eligibility. We excluded most trials because TENS was given in combination with another treatment as part of the formal study design or TENS was not delivered using appropriate TENS technique. The types of acute pain included in this Cochrane Review were procedural pain, e.g. cervical laser treatment, venepuncture, screening flexible sigmoidoscopy and non-procedural pain, e.g. postpartum uterine contractions and rib fractures. We pooled data for pain intensity for six trials (seven comparisons) comparing TENS with placebo but the I(2) statistic suggested substantial heterogeneity. Mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on a visual analogue scale (VAS, 100 mm) was -24.62 mm (95% CI -31.79 to -17.46) in favour of TENS. Data for the proportion of participants achieving ≥ 50% reduction in pain was pooled for four trials (seven comparisons) and relative risk was 3.91 (95% CI 2.42 to 6.32) in favour of TENS over placebo. We pooled data for pain intensity from five trials (seven comparisons) but the I(2) statistic suggested considerable heterogeneity. MD was -19.05 mm (95% CI -27.30 to -10.79) in favour of TENS using a random-effects model. It was not possible to pool other data. There was a high risk of bias associated with inadequate sample sizes in treatment arms and unsuccessful blinding of treatment interventions. Seven trials reported minor adverse effects, such as mild erythema and itching underneath the electrodes and participants disliking TENS sensation. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This Cochrane Review update includes seven new trials, in addition to the 12 trials reviewed in the first update in 2011. The analysis provides tentative evidence that TENS reduces pain intensity over and above that seen with placebo (no current) TENS when administered as a stand-alone treatment for acute pain in adults. The high risk of bias associated with inadequate sample sizes in treatment arms and unsuccessful blinding of treatment interventions makes definitive conclusions impossible. There was incomplete reporting of treatment in many reports making replication of trials impossible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark I Johnson
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, City Campus, Calverley Street, Leeds, UK, LS1 3HE
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Yokoyama L, Pires L, Ferreira EG, Casarotto R. Low- and high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation have no deleterious or teratogenic effects on pregnant mice. Physiotherapy 2015; 101:214-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2014.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2014] [Accepted: 06/27/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
47
|
Vitton V, Benezech A, Honoré S, Sudour P, Lesavre N, Auquier P, Baumstarck K. CON-COUR study: Interferential therapy in the treatment of chronic constipation in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015; 16:234. [PMID: 26012788 PMCID: PMC4486681 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0752-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2015] [Accepted: 05/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The prevalence of chronic constipation is about 15 % in Western countries with a significant impact on quality of life and health care costs. The first-line therapy, based on medical treatment combined with laxatives and dietary rules, is often disappointing. Interferential therapy is a new treatment that has demonstrated its efficiency in the treatment of chronic constipation in children and encouraging results in adults. The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of interferential therapy during 8 weeks in adult patients. The secondary objectives are to assess this new and noninvasive therapy in terms of persistence of the clinical efficacy, colonic transit time, ano-rectal manometry, patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL), and tolerance. Methods/Design Design: multicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind, two-parallel groups study. Setting: nine French adult gastroenterology centers. Inclusion criteria: adult patients with a history of chronic constipation refractory to medical treatment for at least 3 months. Treatment groups: (1) interferential-experimental group (effective stimulation); (2) placebo-control group (sham stimulation). Randomization: 1:1 allocation ratio. Evaluation times: inclusion (T0, randomization), baseline assessment (T1), start of stimulation (T2), intermediary assessment (T3, 4 weeks), end of stimulation (T4, 8 weeks), follow-up (T5 and T6, 1- and 6-month). Endpoints: (1) primary: short-term efficacy at T4 (treatment response defined as three or more spontaneous, complete bowel movements per week); (2) secondary: efficacy at T5 and T6, symptoms (Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms questionnaire), colonic transit time, anorectal manometry, patient satisfaction (analogical visual scale), patient QoL (Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire), side/unexpected effects. Sample size: 200 individuals to obtain 80 % power to detect a 20 % difference in treatment response at T4 between the two groups (15 % of lost to follow-up patients expected). Discussion The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design is the most appropriate to demonstrate the efficacy of a new experimental therapeutic (Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group classification). National and international recommendations could be updated based on the findings of this study. Trial registration Current controlled trials NCT02381665 (registration date: February 13, 2015).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Véronique Vitton
- Service de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France. .,Plateforme d'Interface Clinique, CRN2M, UMR 7286, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
| | - Alban Benezech
- Service de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.
| | - Stéphane Honoré
- Unité d'expertise pharmaceutique et recherche biomédicale, AP-HM, Marseille, France.
| | | | - Nathalie Lesavre
- Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1409, AP-HM, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
| | - Pascal Auquier
- EA3279 Self-perceived Health Assessment Research Unit and Department of Public Health, AP-HM, Aix-Marseille University, Méditerranée, 27 bd Jean Moulin, Marseille, Cedex 05, F-13385, France.
| | - Karine Baumstarck
- EA3279 Self-perceived Health Assessment Research Unit and Department of Public Health, AP-HM, Aix-Marseille University, Méditerranée, 27 bd Jean Moulin, Marseille, Cedex 05, F-13385, France.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tucker DL, Rockett M, Hasan M, Poplar S, Rule SA. Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) alleviate the pain experienced during bone marrow sampling in addition to standard techniques? A randomised, double-blinded, controlled trial. J Clin Pathol 2015; 68:479-83. [PMID: 25759407 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-202908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2015] [Accepted: 02/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Bone marrow aspiration and trephine (BMAT) biopsies remain important tests in haematology. However, the procedures can be moderately to severely painful despite standard methods of pain relief. To test the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in alleviating the pain from BMAT in addition to standard analgesia using a numerical pain rating scale (NRS). METHODS 70 patients requiring BMAT were randomised (1:1) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. -35 patients received TENS impulses at a strong but comfortable amplitude (intervention group) and 35 patients received TENS impulses just above the sensory threshold (control group) (median pulse amplitude 20 and 7 mA, respectively). Patients and operators were blinded to group allocation. Pain assessments were made using a numerical pain scale completed after the procedure. RESULTS No significant difference in NRS pain recalled after the procedure was detected (median pain score 5.7 (95% CI 4.8 to 6.6) in control vs 5.6 (95% CI 4.8 to 6.4) in the intervention group). However, 100% of patients who had previous experience of BMAT and >94% of participants overall felt they benefited from using TENS and would recommend it to others for this procedure. There were no side effects from the TENS device, and it was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS TENS is a safe, non-invasive adjunct to analgesia for reducing pain during bone marrow biopsy and provides a subjective benefit to most users; however, no objective difference in pain scores was detected when using TENS in this randomised controlled study. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02005354.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David L Tucker
- Department of Haematology, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Mark Rockett
- Department of Anaesthesia, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Mehedi Hasan
- Department of Haematology, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Sarah Poplar
- Department of Haematology, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Simon A Rule
- Department of Haematology, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Vance CGT, Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Sluka KA. Using TENS for pain control: the state of the evidence. Pain Manag 2015; 4:197-209. [PMID: 24953072 DOI: 10.2217/pmt.14.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 212] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a nonpharmacological intervention that activates a complex neuronal network to reduce pain by activating descending inhibitory systems in the central nervous system to reduce hyperalgesia. The evidence for TENS efficacy is conflicting and requires not only description but also critique. Population-specific systemic reviews and meta-analyses are emerging, indicating both HF and LF TENS being shown to provide analgesia, specifically when applied at a strong, nonpainful intensity. The purpose of this article is to provide a critical review of the latest basic science and clinical evidence for TENS. Additional research is necessary to determine if TENS has effects specific to mechanical stimuli and/or beyond reduction of pain and will improve activity levels, function and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol G T Vance
- The University of Iowa Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Science Department, IA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Nevasic audio program for the prevention of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting: A feasibility study using a randomized controlled trial design. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2014; 19:282-91. [PMID: 25534959 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2014] [Revised: 09/26/2014] [Accepted: 10/27/2014] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pharmacological therapy is only partially effective in preventing or treating chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Therefore, exploring the complementary role of non-pharmacological approaches used in addition to pharmacological agents is important. Nevasic uses specially constructed audio signals hypothesized to generate an antiemetic reaction. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness of Nevasic to control CINV. METHODS A mixed methods design incorporating an RCT and focus group interviews. For the RCT, female breast cancer patients were randomized to receive either Nevasic plus usual care, music plus usual care, or usual care only. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and linear mixed-effects models. Five focus group interviews were conducted to obtain participants' views regarding the acceptability of the interventions in the trial. RESULTS 99 participants were recruited to the RCT and 15 participated in focus group interviews. Recruitment targets were achieved. Issues of Nevasic acceptability were highlighted as weaknesses of the program. This study did not detect any evidence for the effectiveness of Nevasic; however, the results showed statistically significant less use of anti-emetics (p = 0.003) and borderline non-significant improvement in quality of life (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS Conducting a non-pharmacological intervention using such an audio program is feasible, although difficulties and limitations exist with its use. Further studies are required to investigate the effectiveness of Nevasic from perspectives such as anti-emetic use, as well as its overall effect on the levels of nausea and vomiting.
Collapse
|