Endoscopic ultrasound-guided antegrade stone removal in a patient with pancreatic stones and anastomotic stricture after end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy

Longitudinal Pancreaticojejunostomy for Pancreaticodigestive Tract Anastomotic Stricture After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Aim

Pancreaticodigestive tract anastomotic stricture is a long-term complication of pancreticoduodenectomy (PD). However, optimal treatment has not yet been defined. We conducted longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy (LPJ) in symptomatic patients with anastomotic stricture after PD. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of this procedure.

Methods

Pancreticoduodenectomy was performed in 605 patients at our institution between January 2005 and April 2020. Of these, 15 patients (2.5%) developed symptomatic pancreaticodigestive tract anastomotic stricture after PD. Three patients were referred to our institution owing to recurrent pancreatitis with anastomotic stricture after PD. LPJ was indicated for these 18 patients, and they were enrolled in this study.

Results

The median time from the initial operation to LPJ was 2.0 y. Preoperative clinical presentations included obstructive pancreatitis in 10 patients, a rapid deterioration of glucose tolerance in nine, and severe steatorrhea in two. Surgical morbidity ≥grade III defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification was not observed. After LPJ, preoperative symptoms improved in 16 patients (89%) during a median follow-up of 39 mo. Nine of the 10 patients with obstructive pancreatitis achieved complete pain relief. All nine patients with a rapid deterioration of glucose tolerance showed improved endocrine function. Daily insulin requirement was significantly decreased after LPJ (11.6 ± 3.3 vs 3.4 ± 4.3 units, P = .0239). Four of the seven patients who required insulin injections were free of insulin after LPJ.

Conclusion

LPJ is a safe and effective surgical procedure for symptomatic patients with stricture of the pancreaticodigestive tract anastomosis after PD.

Biliopancreatic Endoscopy in Altered Anatomy

Background and Objectives: Anatomical post-surgical alterations of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract have always been challenging for performing diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy, especially when biliopancreatic diseases are involved. Esophagectomy, gastrectomy with various reconstructions and pancreaticoduodenectomy are among the most common surgeries causing upper GI tract alterations. Technological improvements and new methods have increased the endoscopic success rate in these patients, and the literature has been rapidly increasing over the past few years. The aim of this systematic review is to identify evidence on the available biliopancreatic endoscopic techniques performed in the altered post-surgical anatomy of upper GI tract. Materials and Methods: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS databases. Study-level variables extracted were the last name of the first author, publication year, study design, number of patients, type of post-surgical anatomical alteration, endoscopic technique, success rate and endoscopic-related adverse events. Results: Our primary search identified 221 titles, which was expanded with studies after the citation search. The final full-text review process identified 52 articles (31 retrospective studies, 8 prospective studies and 13 case reports). We found several different techniques developed over the years for biliopancreatic diseases in altered anatomy, in order to perform both endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). They included enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (double and single balloon enteroscopy-ERCP, spiral enteroscopy-ERCP) laparoscopic assisted ERCP, EUS-Directed transgastric ERCP, EUS-directed transgastric intervention, gastric access temporary for endoscopy, and percutaneous assisted trans prosthetic endoscopic therapy. The success rate was high (most of the techniques showed a success rate over 90%) and a low rate of adverse events were reported. Conclusions: We suggest the considerationof the novel techniques when approaching patients with altered anatomy who require biliopancreatic endoscopy, focusing on the surgery type, success rate and adverse events reported in the literature.

Late Pancreatic Anastomosis Stricture Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

With an increasing postoperative survival and prolonged follow-up, late complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) have yet to be thoroughly described and analyzed. Among those, pancreatic anastomosis stricture may lead to severe consequences.

METHODS

A systematic review focusing on pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis (PJA) stricture.

RESULTS

PJA stricture incidence reached 1.4-11.4% with a median time interval of 34 months after PD. No risk factor was identified. PJA stricture repercussions were inconsistent but postprandial abdominal pain and recurrent acute pancreatitis were the most common symptoms, followed by impaired pancreatic function. To confirm diagnosis, secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (SMRCP) sensitivity reached 56-100%. As impaired pancreatic function is not improved by any procedure, only PJA stricture leading to abdominal pain or acute pancreatitis should be considered for treatment. Endoscopic techniques (mainly ultrasound-assisted "rendezvous") should be proposed prior to surgical repair, with a morbidity, an overall technical and clinical success reaching 16.5-33% and 28.6-100% and 33-100%, respectively. Regarding surgical repair, overall morbidity varied between 14.3 and 33%, with a clinical success reaching 26.1-100%. Finally, total pancreatectomy with islet auto-transplantation should be considered only for pain intractable to medical management and recurrent acute pancreatitis which has failed medical, endoscopic, and traditional surgical management strategies.

CONCLUSION

PJA stricture following PD is a late, unusual, and potentially serious complication. When there is currently no clear consensus, PJA stricture leading to abdominal pain or acute pancreatitis should be considered treatment. With increasing survival after PD, further studies should focus on late complications.

CORE TIP

Stricture of pancraticojejunostomy is a late and potentially serious complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Incidence reaches 1.4-11.4% and no risk factor is identified. Symptoms are inconsistent but postprandial abdominal pain, recurrent acute pancreatitis, and impaired pancreatic function are the most frequent. To confirm diagnosis, secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is the best modality. Only PJA stricture leading to abdominal pain or acute pancreatitis should be considered for treatment. Endoscopic techniques (mainly ultrasound-assisted "rendezvous") should be proposed prior to surgical repair. Finally, total pancreatectomy with islet auto-transplantation should be considered only for pain intractable to medical management and recurrent acute pancreatitis which has failed medical, endoscopic, and traditional surgical management strategies.

Management of delayed stenosis of pancreatico-enteric anastomosis following pancreatoduodenectomy

Stenosis of the pancreatico-enteric anastomosis following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), a late post-operative complication that is seen mainly after PD for diseases with good prognosis, has been reported in less than 3% of cases in the literature. Most often asymptomatic, pancreatic-enteric anastomotic stenosis can lead to pancreatitis, pain or pancreatic insufficiency. Symptomatic stenosis is difficult to treat and its management is not standardized. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is the best investigation to confirm the diagnosis of stenosis. The Endoscopic UltraSonography (EUS) « rendezvous » technique, associating an endoscopic approach and EUS-guided puncture of the main pancreatic duct, has been available since 2010. Of note, however, the failure rate of the EUS series is as high as 25%, leading to repeat procedures. Surgical reconstruction of the anastomosis has been reported with good results in terms of morbidity. Surgical re-do of the pancreatico-enteric anastomosis for stenosis following PD carries a low risk of pancreatic fistula (around 5%) and an overall morbidity rate of around 20%.

Gastro-pancreaticojejunostomy for treatment of pancreatic ductal obstruction in a post-Whipple procedure patient

We report a case of a woman with a medical history of classic Whipple surgery who underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided pancreatic drainage due to smouldering acute pancreatitis secondary to an obstructing pancreatic ductal stone. A gastro-pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis was created anterogradely, with dilation of both the anastomoses in the same procedure, with subsequent decompression of the pancreatic duct. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) is often impossible to perform in patients with post-Whipple procedure anatomy due to inaccessibility to the pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis. EUS-guided pancreatic drainage may be offered in these patients in whom the pancreatic duct cannot be accessed at ERP. It has been used as a platform for access to and drainage of the pancreatic duct either by rendezvous or transmural drainage. However, only one of four patients achieve successful completion of the rendezvous procedure. There are limited data regarding safety and long-term outcome of this procedure, as well as scant guidelines on the optimal time for leaving stents in place. We believe definitive endoscopic therapy should be attempted, whenever possible, after relief of obstruction. In our case, we expect that stent occlusion is inevitable and that long-term drainage is possible due to drainage occurring between the stent and the stone.

Endoscopic ultrasound guided interventional procedures

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has emerged as an important diagnostic and therapeutic modality in the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy. EUS provides access to many organs and lesions which are in proximity to the gastrointestinal tract and thus giving an opportunity to target them for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes. This modality also provides a real time opportunity to target the required area while avoiding adjacent vascular and other structures. Therapeutic EUS has found role in management of pancreatic fluid collections, biliary and pancreatic duct drainage in cases of failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, drainage of gallbladder, celiac plexus neurolysis/blockage, drainage of mediastinal and intra-abdominal abscesses and collections and in targeted cancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Infact, therapeutic EUS has emerged as the therapy of choice for management of pancreatic pseudocysts and recent innovations like fully covered removable metallic stents have improved results in patients with organised necrosis. Similarly, EUS guided drainage of biliary tract and pancreatic duct helps drainage of these systems in patients with failed cannulation, inaccessible papilla as with duodenal/gastric obstruction or surgically altered anatomy. EUS guided gall bladder drainage is a useful emergent procedure in patients with acute cholecystitis who are not fit for surgery. EUS guided celiac plexus neurolysis and blockage is more effective and less morbid vis-à-vis the percutaneous technique. The field of interventional EUS is rapidly advancing and many more interventions are being continuously added. This review focuses on the current status of evidence vis-à-vis the established indications of therapeutic EUS.