Validation of the 2010 WHO classification and a new prognostic proposal: A single centre retrospective study of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

Controversy Over Liver Transplantation or Resection for Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis: Tumor Biology Cuts the Deal

BACKGROUND

In patients with neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM), liver transplantation (LT) is an alternative to liver resection (LR), although the choice of therapy remains controversial. In this multicenter study, we aim to provide novel insight in this dispute.

METHODS

Following a systematic literature search, 15 large international centers were contacted to provide comprehensive data on their patients after LR or LT for NELM. Survival analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method, while multivariable Cox regression served to identify factors influencing survival after either transplantation or resection. Inverse probability weighting and propensity score matching was used for analyses with balanced and equalized baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Overall, 455 patients were analyzed, including 230 after LR and 225 after LT, with a median follow-up of 97 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 85-110 months]. Multivariable analysis revealed G3 grading as a negative prognostic factor for LR [hazard ratio (HR)=2.22, 95% CI: 1.04-4.77, P =0.040], while G2 grading (HR=2.52, 95% CI: 1.15-5.52, P =0.021) and LT outside Milan criteria (HR=2.40, 95% CI: 1.16-4.92, P =0.018) were negative prognostic factors in transplanted patients. Inverse probability-weighted multivariate analyses revealed a distinct survival benefit after LT. Matched patients presented a median overall survival (OS) of 197 months (95% CI: 143-not reached) and a 73% 5-year OS after LT, and 119 months (95% CI: 74-133 months) and a 52.8% 5-year OS after LR (HR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.3-0.9, P =0.022). However, the survival benefit after LT was lost if patients were transplanted outside Milan criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicentric study in patients with NELM demonstrates a survival benefit of LT over LR. This benefit depends on adherence to selection criteria, in particular low-grade tumor biology and Milan criteria, and must be balanced against potential risks of LT.

Enhanced computed tomography features predict pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm with Ki-67 index less than 5

BACKGROUND

Several studies have suggested that patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (pNEN) with the Ki-67 index of < 5% are more likely to show better prognosis after clinical intervention. Moreover, the Ki-67 index at 5% has also been suggested as a potential threshold by the 2016 European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

Based on preoperative enhanced computed tomography (CT), this study aimed to investigate imaging characteristics eligible to discriminate the ≤ 5% Ki-67 group from the > 5% Ki-67 group of patients with nonmetastatic pNEN.

METHODS

Patients with pathologically diagnosed pNEN and preoperative multiphase CT were enrolled. Their Ki-67 index was calculated and grouped according to the 5% cutoff value. The following CT imaging characteristics and some serum biomarkers were assessed between the two groups: the diameter, location, tumor margin, calcification, pancreatic atrophy, distal pancreatic duct dilation, vessel involvement, and enhancement pattern characteristics of both arterial phase (AP) and portal vein phase (PVP).

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients with pNEN were enrolled in this study, comprising 104 in the low (Ki-67, 1%-5%) and 38 in the high index group (Ki-67, >5%). Alpha fetoprotein and cancer antigen 125 were significantly different between the two groups (P-values, 0.030 and 0.049, respectively). The diameter (P < 0.0001), margin (P = 0.003), distal main ductal dilation (P = 0.021), vessel involvement (P = 0.002), AP hypoenhancement (P < 0.0001), PVP hypoenhancement (P = 0.003), AP ratio (P = 0.0001), and PVP ratio (P = 0.0003) were significantly different between the low and high index groups. The area under the curve of the multivariate logistic regression model was 0.853.

CONCLUSION

Nonmetastatic pNENs with larger diameter, ill-defined margin, distal main ductal dilation, and tumor hypoenhancement in AP in preoperative enhanced CT tend to have a Ki-67 index of > 5%.The results of this study provide an alternative method to clinicians to decide whether surgery is appropriate.

Prognostic factors for relapse in resected gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastroenteropancreatic neoplasms (GEP-NENs)can potentially be cured through surgical resection, but only 42-57% achieve 5-year disease-free survival.There is a lack of consensus regarding the factorsassociated withrelapse followingresection ofGEP-NENs.

METHODS

Asystematic review identified studies reporting factors associated with relapse in patients with GEP-NENs following resection of a primary tumour. Meta-analysis was performed to identify the factors prognostic for relapse-free survival (RFS)oroverall survival (OS).

RESULTS

63 studies comprising 13,715 patients were included; 56 studies reported on pancreatic NENs (12,418 patients), 24 reported on patients with grade 1-2 tumours (4,735 patients). Median follow-up was 44.2 months, median RFS was 32 months. Pooling of multivariable analyses of GEP-NENs (all sites and grades) found the following factors predicted worse RFS (all p values < 0.05): vascular resection performed, metastatic disease resected, grade 2 disease, grade 3 disease, tumour size > 20 mm, R1 resection, microvascular invasion, perineural invasion, Ki-67 > 5% and any lymph node positivity. In a subgroup of studies comprising exclusively of grade 1-2 GEP-NENs, R1 resection, perineural invasion, grade 2 disease, any lymph node positivity and tumour size > 20 mm predicted worse RFS (all p values < 0.05). Few OSdata were available for pooling; in univariableanalysis(entire cohort), grade 2 predicted worse OS (p = 0.007), whileR1 resectiondid not (p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

The factors prognostic for worse RFS following resection of a GEP-NEN identified in this meta-analysis could be included in post-curative treatment surveillance clinical guidelines and inform the stratification and inclusion criteria of future adjuvant trials.

Prognostic Assessment of Non-functioning Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Neoplasms as a Basis for Risk-Adapted Resection Strategies

BACKGROUND

In contrast to exocrine pancreatic carcinomas, prognosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNEN) are significantly different. The variable growth pattern and associated clinical situation of functioning and non-functioning PNEN demand an individualized surgical approach. However, due to the scarce evidence associated with the rare disease, guidelines lack detailed recommendations for indication and for the required extent of surgical resection.

METHODS

In a retrospective single-center study from 1990 to 2018, 239 patients with PNEN were identified. Clinical data were collected in the MaDoc database of the University Medical Center Mainz. A total of 155 non-functional PNEN were selected for further analysis.

RESULTS

According to the classification of NET by the WHO in 2017, 28.8% (n = 40) of the tumors were G1, 61.9% (n = 86) G2, and 9.4% (n = 13) G3. In 73 patients, hepatic metastases were present. Sixty patients had lymph node metastasis. An R0 resection was achieved in 98 cases, an R1 situation in 10 cases. Five times, a tumor debulking was carried out (R2) and 5 times the operation was aborted without any resection because of the advanced tumor stage. A relapse occurred in 29 patients. Different prognostic factors (grade, tumor size, age) were analyzed. Grade-dependent 10-year overall survival rates were 79.5% (grade 1) and 60.1% (grade 2), respectively. The survival rate of grade 3 patients was limited to 66.7% after 13 months.

CONCLUSION

In our study, patients with non-functioning PNEN had a longer overall survival after successful R0 resection. The risk analysis confirmed a Ki-67 cutoff value of 5%, which divided a high- and low-risk group. Patients with a PNEC G3 (Ki-67 index > 50%) had a very poor prognosis.

Grading Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors of the Pancreas: the Fudan Prognostic Index

BACKGROUND

Ki-67 has been shown to predict outcome of patients with solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas (SPTP) but has not been incorporated into a formal classification system to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS).

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with histologically confirmed diagnosis of SPTP who had at least 1 year of follow-up at two tertiary academic centers. Survival data were assessed by Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression model. Prognostic performance was compared among various systems.

RESULTS

A total of 193 consecutive patients were included, ranging in age from 12 to 70 years (median 33 years). Seven patients (3.6%) developed tumor recurrence. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year RFS rates were estimated at 96.9%, 96.1%, and 94.8%, respectively. For the AJCC staging system, patients with stage I had similar prognosis to those with stage II. For the ENETS staging system, patients with stage I to III had similar prognosis. Grade based on Ki-67 was superior to both the AJCC and ENETS systems for predicting survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that large tumor size [> 10 cm; hazard ratio (HR), 6.177 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.289-29.603; P = 0.023] and Ki-67 (HR, 17.199 95% CI, 4.001-73.930; P < 0.001) were independent predictors for RFS. The Fudan Prognostic Index based on the combination of Ki-67 and tumor size showed excellent discrimination for RFS and was more accurate and informative than other grading/staging systems.

CONCLUSION

The Fudan Prognostic Index better predicts RFS compared with either Ki-67 alone or the current AJCC and ENETS TNM-based staging systems.

Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies

Introduction: Recent advances in diagnostic modalities and therapeutic agents have raised the importance of prognostic factors in predicting overall survival, as well as predictive factors for surgical outcomes, in tailoring therapeutic strategies of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs).Areas covered: Numerous recent studies of panNEN patients report the prognostic values of a number of clinically related factors (clinical, laboratory, imaging, treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological, classification, grading) and molecular factors on long-term survival. In addition, an increasing number of studies showed the usefulness of various factors, specifically biomarkers and molecular makers, in predicting recurrence and mortality related to surgical treatment. Recent findings (from the last 3 years) in each of these areas, as well as recent controversies, are reviewed.Expert commentary: The clinical importance of prognostic and predictive factors for panNENs is markedly increased for both overall outcome and post resection, as a result of recent advances in all aspects of the diagnosis, management and treatment of panNENs. Despite the proven prognostic utility of routinely used tumor grading/classification and staging systems, further studies are required to establish these novel prognostic factors to support their routine clinical use.

Life expectancy in pancreatic neuroendocrine cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognoses widely reported for pancreatic cancer reflect the very poor survival associated with the most common histological type, exocrine adenocarcinoma. We calculated life expectancies for patients with less common pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), and also for the subsets of these patients who survive 1 and 5 years post-diagnosis, all of which carry a significantly better prognosis. Results for 1- and 5-year PNET survivors appear not to have been previously reported, nor have life expectancies (average long-term survival times) been given.

METHODS

We identified 5287 cases of PNET in the SEER US national database, 1973-2013. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to compute empirical survival probabilities and median survival times for functioning (n = 279) and non-functioning PNET (n = 5008) cases. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to examine univariate associations of survival with covariates including patient age, sex, race, cancer stage, tumor grade, surgical treatment, and calendar year. A multivariate multiplicative hazard Poisson regression model estimated mortality rates for all combinations of the covariates. The rates were used to construct actuarial life tables, which gave life expectancies for male and female patients according to age, cancer stage, tumor grade, histology (functioning versus non-functioning), surgical treatment status, and time since diagnosis. These life expectancies were compared with age- and sex-specific figures from the US general population.

RESULTS

Life expectancy in PNET is lower than that of the US general population and varies significantly according to patient age, cancer stage, tumor grade, mode of treatment, and time since diagnosis. For example, it is near normal for persons aged 70 and older who undergo surgical resection of localized well-differentiated (i.e., grade I) tumors. By contrast, persons with metastatic high-grade tumors not amenable to surgery have life expectancies of only 1 to 4 years depending on patient age. Functioning PNETs were associated with somewhat lower mortality than non-functioning within the first few years after diagnosis, though no major differences were observed long-term. Positive factors for survival were younger age, localized stage, low tumor grade, and surgical treatment. Survival improved over the 1973-2013 study period: on average mortality rates fell by 1.2% per year after controlling for changes in the patient population. Life expectancy increased markedly with time since diagnosis: those surviving 1 and 5 years post-diagnosis had longer additional life expectancies.

CONCLUSIONS

Life expectancies of patients with PNETs may be markedly reduced from normal, but even in the worst cases their prognoses remain significantly better than that of patients with the more common pancreatic adenocarcinomas. In some very favorable cases, the life expectancy is near-normal, especially amongst 1- and 5-year survivors. This information can be used to counsel patients.

Intratumoral Hemorrhage of Liver Metastasis from a Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumor

A 56-year-old healthy woman was referred to our hospital for abdominal pain. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed a 14-cm-diameter liver tumor with intratumoral hemorrhage. We performed emergent transcatheter arterial embolization. She was referred to hepatic surgeon (M.M.) for resection. Preoperative colonoscopy showed an elevated lesion measuring 2 cm in diameter that was pathologically diagnosed as a rectal neuroendocrine tumor (NET). We performed low anterior resection of the rectum, followed by extended right hepatectomy for all hepatic lesions. Intratumoral hematoma was observed in the largest hepatic lesion (size: 150 mm×100 mm). Microscopy also indicated NET G2. We pathologically diagnosed a liver tumor from a rectal NET that bled spontaneously.

Systematic review of current prognostication systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are a heterogenous group of rare tumors whose natural history remains poorly defined. Accurate prognostication of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms is essential for guiding clinical decisions. This paper aims to summarize all the commonly utilized and recently proposed prognostication systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms published in the literature to date.

METHODS

A systematic review of Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase databases, of the period from January 1, 2000-November 29, 2016, was conducted to identify all published articles reporting on prognostication systems of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

RESULTS

A total of 23 articles were included in our review, and a total of 25 classification systems were identified. There were 2 modifications of the World Health Organization 2004 criteria, 4 modifications of the World Health Organization 2010 criteria, 2 modifications of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 2010 staging system, 3 modifications of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society 2006 tumor, node, metastasis staging system, 7 novel categorial classification systems, and 2 novel proposed continuous classifications. The most commonly included variables included age, size of tumor, presence of distant and lymph node metastases, Ki-67 index, and mitotic count.

CONCLUSION

Numerous prognostication systems have been proposed for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, of which the most commonly used systems presently include the World Health Organization 2010 criteria and the two tumor, node, metastasis staging systems by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society and the American Joint Commission on Cancer. However, prognostication systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms continue to evolve with time as more prognostication factors are identified. More validation and comparative studies are needed to identify the most effective prognostication system.

Higher Ki67 expression in fibroblast like cells at invasive front indicates better clinical outcomes in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients

Background: Ki67 has been a key role for the treatment options and prognosis evaluation in some kinds of tumors; however, the spatial expression of Ki67 in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has not been fully-evaluated. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to elucidate the prognosis value of Ki67 spatial expression including in different cell types and at different compartments of tumor in OSCC patients. Methods: Immunohistochemical expression of Ki67 in tumor cells (TCs) and fibroblast like cells (FLCs) at center of tumor (CT) and invasive front (IF) was evaluated in 109 OSCC patients. Then correlations of Ki67 expressions with clinicopathological parameters were analyzed by Chi-square test, and survival curves were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to assess the diagnostic values of Ki67 expression by the Cox regression model. Results: Ki67 expression in TCs was much higher than in FLCs both at CT and IF compartments, but Ki67 expression in TCs was simultaneously higher at CT than that at IF (P=0.0004), which was converse to Ki67 expression in FLCs (P<0.0001). Additionally, high Ki67 expression in FLCs at IF was significantly associated with poor tumor differentiation (P=0.003), worse depth of invasion (DOI, P=0.027) and worst pattern of invasion (WPOI, P=0.041), but Ki67 expression in TCs had no correlation with clinical parameters no matter at CT or IF. Moreover, patients with higher Ki67 expression in TCs at CT had significantly increased risk for OS (overall survival; HR:1.935, 95% CI: 1.181-4.823, P=0.0395) and DFS (disease-free survival; HR: 2.974, 95% CI:1.189-5.023, P=0.046). On contrary, higher Ki67 expression in FLCs at IF was correlated with better OS (HR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.018-0.846, P=0.0396) and DFS (HR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.018-0.947, P=0.0445). Whereas, Ki67 expression both at TCs in IF and at FLCs in CT had no significant prognostic value for OS and DFS. Furthermore, Cox multivariate analysis revealed that Ki67 expression in FLCs at IF could not be an independent prognostic factor for OSCC patients. Conclusion: These results show that higher Ki67 expression in FLCs at IF indicated better clinical outcomes for OSCC patients.

The use of Ki-67 labeling index to grade pulmonary well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms: current best evidence

Although Ki-67 labeling index (Ki-67%) is not a diagnostic or grading criterion in the World Health Organization classification of pulmonary carcinoid tumor, oncologists often request this test. A survey was administered at a North American Society for Neuroendocrine Tumors meeting to understand how Ki-67% is used in oncologic practices. A systematic literature review was performed to gather best evidence regarding the use of Ki-67%. Consecutive pulmonary carcinoids were stratified into pulmonary typical carcinoids with Ki-67% <5% (group A, n = 187), typical carcinoids with Ki-67% ≥5% (group B, n = 38) and atypical carcinoids irrespective of Ki-67% (group C, n = 31). Overall survival, progression-free survival, recurrence proportions and time to recurrence were compared, by group, using the log-rank test, chi-square statistics and ANOVA, respectively. Our survey confirmed that Ki-67% is frequently used by specialists caring for these patients. Ki-67% of 1-7% significantly correlated with overall survival in the literature but we found no information about Ki-67% cut-off values that would accurately distinguish pulmonary typical from atypical carcinoids or estimate the prognosis of patients stratified by World Health Organization diagnosis and Ki-67% cut-off. Overall survival was significantly different in our 3 patient groups (p < 0.001), with survival probabilities decreasing from groups A to C. Progression-free survival was significantly longer in group A than B (p < 0.007). Our results support the concept that by combining World Health Organization diagnosis and Ki-67%, pulmonary carcinoids can be stratified into 3 grades: G1 (typical carcinoids with Ki-67% <5), G2 (typical carcinoids with Ki-67% ≥5%) and G3 (atypical carcinoids) with different prognoses.

Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (cPNETs): a systematic review and meta-analysis of case series

Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors represent 13% of all neuroendocrine tumors. The aim of this study is to analyze the phenotype and biologic behavior of resected cystic neuroendocrine tumors. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted until September 2016 using a search in Medline, Scopus, and EMBASE with the terms "cystic pancreatic endocrine neoplasm", "cystic islets tumors" and "cystic islets neoplasms". From the 795 citations recovered 80 studies reporting on 431 patients were selected. 87.1% (n = 387) were sporadic tumors and 10.3% (n = 40) corresponded to multiple endocrine neoplasia endocrine type 1. Were diagnosed incidentally 44.6% (n = 135). Cytology was found to have a sensitivity of 78.5%. Were non-functional tumors 85% (n = 338), and among the functional tumors, insulinoma was the most frequent. According to the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society staging, 87.8% were limited to the pancreas (I-IIb), and 12.2% were advanced (III-IV). Disease-free survival at 5 years in stages (I-IIIa) and (IIIb-IV) was 91.5% and 54.2%, respectively; and was significantly lower (p = 0.0001) in functional tumors. In patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia there was a higher incidence of functional (62.5%) and multifocal (28.1%) tumors. Disease-free survival at 5 and 10 years was 60%. Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors exhibit phenotypical characteristics which are different to those of solid neuroendocrine tumors.

Fit-for-Purpose Immunohistochemical Biomarkers

There are two aspects of immunohistochemistry (IHC) that are relevant to practicing pathologist: (1) understanding of IHC biomarker panels that are suitable for diagnostic, prognostic and predictive testing, and (2) understanding of IHC quality assurance (QA), which makes sure that the tests in these panels work as they should. The two aspects are closely linked together and call for collaborative approach between pathologists and IHC laboratory technologists as both need to be involved in developing and maintaining IHC biomarkers that are "fit-for-purpose". This article reviews the most current IHC QA concepts that are imminently material to practicing pathologists with emphasis on challenges that are specific to endocrine pathology.

Recurrence of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Survival Predicted by Ki67

Background

Despite evidence of different malignant potentials, postoperative follow-up assessment is similar for G1 and G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) and adjuvant treatment currently is not indicated. This study investigated the role of Ki67 with regard to recurrence and survival after curative resection of panNET.

Methods

Patients with resected non-functioning panNET diagnosed between 1992 and 2016 from three institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who had G1 or G2 tumor without distant metastases or hereditary syndromes were included in the study. The patients were re-categorized into Ki67 0–5 and Ki67 6–20%. Cox regression analysis with log-rank testing for recurrence and survival was performed.

Results

The study enrolled 241 patients (86%) with Ki67 0–5% and 39 patients (14%) with Ki67 6–20%. Recurrence was seen in 34 patients (14%) with Ki67 0–5% after a median period of 34 months and in 16 patients (41%) with Ki67 6–20% after a median period of 16 months (p < 0.001). The 5-year recurrence-free and 10-year disease-specific survival periods were respectively 90 and 91% for Ki67 0–5% and respectively 55 and 26% for Ki67 6–20% (p < 0.001). The overall survival period after recurrence was 44.9 months, which was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.283). In addition to a Ki67 rate higher than 5%, tumor larger than 4 cm and lymph node metastases were independently associated with recurrence.

Conclusions

Patients at high risk for recurrence after curative resection of G1 or G2 panNET can be identified by a Ki67 rate higher than 5%. These patients should be more closely monitored postoperatively to detect recurrence early and might benefit from adjuvant treatment. A clear postoperative follow-up regimen is proposed.

Is radical surgery always curative in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors? A cure model survival analysis

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant therapy after curative surgery for sporadic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNETs) is not currently recommended, assuming that all patients could be cured by a radical resection. The aim of our study is to establish how many and which kind of patients remained uncured after radical resection of pNET.

METHODS

Retrospective study involving 143 resected sporadic pNETs. The survival analysis was carried out using the cure model, describing the cure fraction and the excess of risk recurrence. Multivariate analyses were made in order to evaluate the non negligible effect of demographics, clinical and pathological factors on survival parameters. The results were reported as percentages, fractions, ORs and HRs with 95% confidence interval (95 CI %).

RESULTS

The cure fraction and the excess of hazard rate of the whole population were 57.1% (37.4-74.6, 95% CI) and 0.06 (0.03-0.07, 95% CI), respectively. Two independent factors were related to the cure fraction: TNM stage (OR 0.27 ± 0.17; P = 0.002) and grading (OR 0.11 ± 0.18; P = 0.004). Considering the excess of hazard rate, only two independent factors were related to an increased risk of recurrence: TNM stage (HR 3.49 ± 1.12; P = 0.004) and grading (HR 4.93 ± 1.82; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The radical surgery has a high probability of cure in stages I-II or in grading 1 while, in stages III-IV or in grading 3 tumors, surgery alone failed to achieve a "cure". A multimodal treatment should be employed in order to avoid a recurrence of the disease.

Neuroendocrine Tumor Heterogeneity Adds Uncertainty to the World Health Organization 2010 Classification: Real-World Data from the Spanish Tumor Registry (R-GETNE)

BACKGROUND

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are a complex family of tumors of widely variable clinical behavior. The World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 classification provided a valuable tool to stratify neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in three prognostic subgroups based on the proliferation index. However, substantial heterogeneity remains within these subgroups, and simplicity sometimes entails an ambiguous and imprecise prognostic stratification. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of histological differentiation within the WHO 2010 grade (G) 1/G2/G3 categories, and explore additional Ki-67 cutoff values in GEP-NENs.

SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS

A total of 2,813 patients from the Spanish National Tumor Registry (RGETNE) were analyzed. Cases were classified by histological differentiation as NETs (neuroendocrine tumors [well differentiated]) or NECs (neuroendocrine carcinomas [poorly differentiated]), and by Ki-67 index as G1 (Ki-67 <2%), G2 (Ki-67 3%-20%), or G3 (Ki-67 >20%). Patients were stratified into five cohorts: NET-G1, NET-G2, NET-G3, NEC-G2, and NEC-G3.

RESULTS

Five-year survival was 72%. Age, gender, tumor site, grade, differentiation, and stage were all independent prognostic factors for survival. Further subdivision of the WHO 2010 grading improved prognostic stratification, both within G2 (5-year survival: 81% [Ki-67 3%-5%], 72% [Ki-67 6%-10%], 52% [Ki-67 11%-20%]) and G3 NENs (5-year survival: 35% [Ki-67 21%-50%], 22% [Ki-67 51%-100%]). Five-year survival was significantly greater for NET-G2 versus NEC-G2 (75.5% vs. 58.2%) and NET-G3 versus NEC-G3 (43.7% vs. 25.4%).

CONCLUSION

Substantial clinical heterogeneity is observed within G2 and G3 GEP-NENs. The WHO 2010 classification can be improved by including the additive effect of histological differentiation and the proliferation index.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are tumors of widely variable clinical behavior, roughly stratified by the World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 classification into three subgroups based on proliferation index. Real-world data from 2,813 patients of the Spanish Registry RGETNE demonstrated substantial clinical heterogeneity within grade (G) 2 and G3 neuroendocrine neoplasms. Tumor morphology and further subdivision of grading substantially improves prognostic stratification of these patients and may help individualize therapy. This combined, additive effect shall be considered in future classifications of neuroendocrine tumors and incorporated for stratification purposes in clinical trials.

Determination of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Hyperactivation as Prognostic Factor in Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors

Purpose

To evaluate the role of the activation of mTOR (phosphorylated mTOR, p-mTOR) and the expression SSTR2A and IGF-1R as prognostic factor in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on data from patients with diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor originated from pancreas (pNET) or gastrointestinal tract (stomach, appendix, and ileus; GI-NET) made between January 2003 and December 2004 and followed up at our institution. Archival material should be available for revision according to WHO 2010 neuroendocrine tumor classification and for p-mTOR, SSTR2A, and IGF-1R immunostaining, calculating a quantitative score (QS). We evaluated clinical, pathological, and immunohistochemistry features for association with the presence of advanced disease at diagnosis and disease relapse in patients who have undergone radical surgery.

Results

Archival material from 64 patients was analyzed (37 pNETs and 27 GI-NETs). In these patients, G2 grading, low SSTR2A QS, and high p-mTOR QS were associated with advanced disease at diagnosis at multivariate analysis. Risk of recurrence in 49 patients with R0-resected tumors was higher for G2 grading, stage IIIB-IV, low IGF-1R QS, and high p-mTOR QS at univariate analysis.

Conclusions

With the limits of retrospective data, activation of m-TOR is correlated with advanced disease at diagnosis and with shorter disease-free survival after R0 resection. Validation through prospective studies is needed.

Neuroendocrine tumors of colon and rectum: validation of clinical and prognostic values of the World Health Organization 2010 grading classifications and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society staging systems

Background/Aims

This study evaluated and compared the clinical and prognostic values of the grading criteria used by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Neuroendocrine Tumors Society (ENETS). Moreover, this work assessed the current best prognostic model for colorectal neuroendocrine tumors (CRNETs).

Results

The 2010 WHO classifications and the ENETS systems can both stratify the patients into prognostic groups, although the 2010 WHO criteria is more applicable to CRNET patients. Along with tumor location, the 2010 WHO criteria are important independent prognostic parameters for CRNETs in both univariate and multivariate analyses through Cox regression (P<0.05).

Methods

Data from 192 consecutive patients histopathologically diagnosed with CRNETs and had undergone surgical resection from January 2009 to May 2016 in a single center were retrospectively analyzed.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that the WHO classifications are superior over the ENETS classification system in predicting the prognosis of CRNETs. Additionally, the WHO classifications can be widely used in clinical practice.

Is surgery the best treatment for sporadic small (≤2 cm) non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours? A single centre experience

BACKGOUND

There is currently there is substantial controversy regarding the best management of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours ≤2 cm.

METHODS

Retrospective study involving 102 surgically treated patients affected by non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Patients having small tumours (≤2 cm) (Group A) and those having large tumours (>2 cm) (Group B) were compared regarding demographics, clinical and pathological factors with the aim of evaluating the risk of malignancy and survival times.

RESULTS

The small tumours were T3-4 in 11% and G2-3 in 36.6% of cases; lymph node and distant metastases were present in 31% and 8% of the cases, respectively. When small and large tumours were compared, significant differences were found in relation to the presence of symptoms (P = 0.012), tumour status (P > 0.001), grading (P > 0.001) and years lost due to disability (P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis of the factors predicting malignancy and survival times showed that tumour size was related only to grading (P < 0.001). The years of life lost and disability adjusted life years were influenced by age at of diagnosis, the presence of symptoms and years lost due to disability only by grading.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumour size alone did not seem to be reliable in predicting malignancy because, first, small tumours (≤2 cm) could present lymph node or distant metastases, and could be G2-3 in a non-negligible percentage of cases and second, their risk of malignancy and survival time are similar to large tumours. Additional parameters have to be considered in order to establish the proper management of small tumours, such as age at diagnosis, presence of symptoms and grading.

The ENETS/WHO grading system for neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastroenteropancreatic system: a review of the current state, limitations and proposals for modifications

The understanding of neuroendocrine neoplasms has evolved significantly since their initial descriptions in the 1800s to early 1900s. In the gastroenteropancreatic system, this group of malignant tumors is subdivided into well and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms based on morphologic, proliferative and biologic differences. However, it has become increasingly apparent that well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors are not a homogeneous group. Attempting to better predict outcome of these tumors has been the motivation behind numerous proposed classification systems, the evolution of which culminated with the currently used system, the ENETS/WHO classification. Herein, we review the genesis of this classification system and some of its shortcomings. In addition, we discuss some of the most recent proposals that suggest modifications to the current system.