Optimize CA19-9 in detecting pancreatic cancer by Lewis and Secretor genotyping

Current Approaches of Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance in High-Risk Individuals

Currently, those recommended to undergo pancreatic cancer (PC) surveillance include appropriately aged individuals at high risk of PC due to an identifiable genetic susceptibility or those without identifiable genetic susceptibility who nonetheless have a strong family history of PC. With increases in identification of individuals at high risk for PC and increased use of PC surveillance in clinical practice, there has been increasing debate about who should undergo surveillance as well as how surveillance should be performed including use of imaging and blood-based testing. Furthermore, there is increasing interest in the outcomes of PC surveillance in high-risk individuals with some studies demonstrating that surveillance leads to downstaging of PC and improvements in survival. In this review, we summarize the current state of PC surveillance in high-risk individuals, providing an overview of the risk factors associated with PC, selection of high-risk individuals for PC surveillance, and the current, but non-uniform, recommendations for performing PC surveillance. Additionally, we review approaches to apply various imaging and blood-based tests to surveillance and the outcomes of PC surveillance.

DUPAN-2 in pancreatic cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis and high mortality rate. Identifying reliable biomarkers for the early diagnosis and treatment is urgently needed. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of DUPAN-2 in PC through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and other databases for studies related to DUPAN-2 and its prognostic and diagnostic relevance in PC, covering publications up to August 2024. We used pooled hazard ratios (HRs) to evaluate the prognostic value of DUPAN-2 in PC, the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) to assess diagnostic performance, while pooled odds ratios (ORs) analyzed associations with clinicopathological features.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies involving 4765 patients were included in this meta-analysis, with 11 studies focusing on diagnostic analysis, 10 on prognostic analysis, and 3 on clinicopathological features. The diagnostic meta-analysis revealed a pooled sensitivity of 0.63 (95 % CI: 0.56-0.69), a pooled specificity of 0.98 (95 % CI: 0.95-0.99), and an AUC of 0.83 (95 % CI: 0.79-0.86). Subgroup analysis indicated that a DUPAN-2 threshold at 150 U/mL achieved the highest diagnostic performance. The prognostic meta-analysis demonstrated that elevated DUPAN-2 levels were associated with poorer OS (HR = 1.70, 95 % CI: 1.36-2.14) and PFS (HR = 1.33, 95 % CI: 1.14-1.56). Additionally, the clinicopathological features meta-analysis showed that elevated DUPAN-2 levels were associated with vascular invasion (OR = 3.48, 95 % CI: 1.26-9.59), while normalized DUPAN-2 levels were associated with higher resectability (OR = 0.57, 95 % CI: 0.36-0.90) and lower N-stage (OR = 0.39, 95 % CI: 0.24-0.63) CONCLUSION: Serum DUPAN-2 demonstrates significant potential as a biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis in patients with PC.

Nanoparticle-protein corona enhances accuracy of Ca-19.9-based pancreatic cancer classification

Among the various types of pancreatic cancers, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most lethal and aggressive, due to its tendency to metastasize quickly and has a particularly low five-year survival rate. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) is the only biomarker approved by the Food and Drug Administration for PDAC and has been a focal point in diagnostic strategies, but its sensitivity and specificity are not sufficient for early and accurate detection. To address this issue, we introduce a synergistic approach combining CA 19-9 levels with a graphene oxide (GO)-based blood test. This non-invasive technique relies on the analysis of personalized protein corona formed on GO sheets once they are embedded in human plasma. Pairing CA 19-9 values with GO protein patterns from N = 106 donors significantly improved the ability to differentiate between non-oncological and PDAC patients (up to 92%), also boosting the classification of PDAC subjects by 50% compared to CA 19-9 testing alone. Overall, this study sought to bridge the existing gaps in PDAC detection by exploiting the complementary strengths of conventional biomarkers and cutting-edge nanotechnology. Exploration of this combined strategy holds promise for advancing the early detection of PDAC, ultimately contributing to improved patient prognosis and treatment outcomes.

Aptamer-Conjugated Multi-Quantum Dot-Embedded Silica Nanoparticles for Lateral Flow Immunoassay

Lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) are widely used for their low cost, simplicity, and rapid results; however, enhancing their reliability requires the meticulous selection of ligands and nanoparticles (NPs). SiO2@QD@SiO2 (QD2) nanoparticles, which consist of quantum dots (QDs) embedded in a silica (SiO2) core and surrounded by an outer SiO2 shell, exhibit significantly higher fluorescence intensity (FI) compared to single QDs. In this study, we prepared QD2@PEG@Aptamer, an aptamer conjugated with QD2 using succinimidyl-[(N-maleimidopropionamido)-hexaethyleneglycol]ester, which is 130 times brighter than single QDs, for detecting carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 through LFIA. For LFIA optimization, we determined the optimal conditions as a 1.0:2.0 × 10-2 ratio of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to aptamer by adjusting the amounts of PEG and aptamer, phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5% Tween® 20 as a developing solution, and 0.15 μg NPs by setting the NP weight during development. Under these conditions, QD2@PEG@Aptamer selectively detected CA19-9, achieving a detection limit of 1.74 × 10-2 mg·mL-1. Moreover, FI remained stable for 10 days after detection. These results highlight the potential of QD2 and aptamer conjugation technology as a reliable and versatile sensing platform for various diagnostic applications.

The Past, Present, and Future of Biomarkers for the Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive cancers with a very poor 5-year survival rate and reduced therapeutic options when diagnosed in an advanced stage. The dismal prognosis of pancreatic cancer has guided significant efforts to discover novel biomarkers in order to anticipate diagnosis, increasing the population of patients who can benefit from curative surgical treatment. CA 19-9 is the reference biomarker that supports the diagnosis and guides the response to treatments. However, it has significant limitations, a low specificity, and is inefficient as a screening tool. Several potential biomarkers have been discovered in the serum, urine, feces, and pancreatic juice of patients. However, most of this evidence needs further validation in larger cohorts. The advent of advanced omics sciences and liquid biopsy techniques has further enhanced this field of research. The aim of this review is to analyze the historical evolution of the research on novel biomarkers for the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, focusing on the current evidence for the most promising biomarkers from different body fluids and the novel trends in research, such as omics sciences and liquid biopsy, in order to favor the application of modern personalized medicine.

The diagnostic value of combining preoperative serum CA19-9, ALBI score, and 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging in preoperative resectability of pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic cancer is an increasing cause of cancer-related mortality, with persistently low survival rates. We investigated the clinical diagnostic value of the combination of preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, and 18 F-fluoro-2-deoxy- d -glucose PET integrated with computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET/CT) imaging in pancreatic cancer preoperative resectability.

METHODS

This study included 143 pancreatic cancer patients, including 68 preoperative resectable and 75 preoperative unresectable pancreatic cancer patients. Meanwhile, 67 patients with non-pancreatic cancer were included as the control group. The clinical data were collected. Serum CA19-9 level was measured by ELISA. The levels of total bilirubin and albumin were determined using a biochemical analyzer, with the ALBI score calculated. All patients underwent 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging. The consistency of the diagnosis was evaluated by the Kappa test. Logistic univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed. The diagnostic efficacy of these parameters was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the optimal ROC curve thresholds were obtained using the Youden index.

RESULTS

The preoperative serum CA19-9 and ALBI score of patients with preoperative resectable pancreatic cancer were increased, which helped diagnose preoperative resectable pancreatic cancer. 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging had diagnostic value for preoperative resectable pancreatic cancer. Preoperative serum CA19-9, ALBI score, and 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging were independent influencing factors for pancreatic cancer preoperative resectability, and their combination had higher diagnostic value for preoperative resectable pancreatic cancer than any single of these indexes.

CONCLUSION

The combination of preoperative serum CA19-9, ALBI score, and 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging had high diagnostic value for pancreatic cancer preoperative resectability.

Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the process of CA19-9 production and dynamics of the immune microenvironment between CA19-9 (+) and CA19-9 (-) PDAC

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the main types of malignant tumor of the digestive system, and patient prognosis is affected by difficulties in early diagnosis, poor treatment response, and a high postoperative recurrence rate. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) has been widely used as a biomarker for the diagnosis and postoperative follow-up of PDAC patients. Nevertheless, the production mechanism and potential role of CA19-9 in PDAC progression have not yet been elucidated.

METHODS

We performed single-cell RNA sequencing on six samples pathologically diagnosed as PDAC (three CA19-9-positive and three CA19-9-negative PDAC samples) and two paracarcinoma samples. We also downloaded and integrated PDAC samples (each from three CA19-9-positive and CA19-9-negative patients) from an online database. The dynamics of the proportion and potential function of each cell type were verified through immunofluorescence. Moreover, we built an in vitro coculture cellular model to confirm the potential function of CA19-9.

RESULTS

Three subtypes of cancer cells with a high ability to produce CA19-9 were identified by the markers TOP2A , AQP5 , and MUC5AC . CA19-9 production bypass was discovered on antigen-presenting cancer-associated fibroblasts (apCAFs). Importantly, the proportion of immature ficolin-1 positive (FCN1+) macrophages was high in the CA19-9-negative group, and the proportion of mature M2-like macrophages was high in the CA19-9-positive group. High proportions of these two macrophage subtypes were associated with an unfavourable clinical prognosis. Further experiments indicated that CA19-9 could facilitate the transformation of M0 macrophages into M2 macrophages in the tumor microenvironment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study described CA19-9 production at single-cell resolution and the dynamics of the immune atlas in CA19-9-positive and CA19-9-negative PDAC. CA19-9 could promote M2 polarization of macrophage in the pancreatic tumor microenvironment.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: the latest on diagnosis, molecular profiling, and systemic treatments

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is currently the fourth leading cause of death in the United States and is expected to be ranked second in the next 10 years due to poor prognosis and a rising incidence. Distant metastatic PDAC is associated with the worst prognosis among the different phases of PDAC. The diagnostic options for PDAC are convenient and available for staging, tumor response evaluation, and management of resectable or borderline resectable PDAC. However, imaging is crucial in PDAC diagnosis, monitoring, resectability appraisal, and response evaluation. The advancement of medical technologies is evolving, hence the use of imaging in PDAC treatment options has grown as well as the utilization of ctDNA as a tumor marker. Treatment options for metastatic PDAC are minimal with the primary goal of therapy limited to symptom relief or palliation, especially in patients with low functional capacity at the point of diagnosis. Molecular profiling has shown promising potential solutions that would push the treatment boundaries for patients with PDAC. In this review, we will discuss the latest updates from evidence-based guidelines regarding diagnosis, therapy response evaluation, prognosis, and surveillance, as well as illustrating novel therapies that have been recently investigated for PDAC, in addition to discussing the molecular profiling advances in PDAC.

Tumor biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and targeted therapy

Tumor biomarkers, the substances which are produced by tumors or the body's responses to tumors during tumorigenesis and progression, have been demonstrated to possess critical and encouraging value in screening and early diagnosis, prognosis prediction, recurrence detection, and therapeutic efficacy monitoring of cancers. Over the past decades, continuous progress has been made in exploring and discovering novel, sensitive, specific, and accurate tumor biomarkers, which has significantly promoted personalized medicine and improved the outcomes of cancer patients, especially advances in molecular biology technologies developed for the detection of tumor biomarkers. Herein, we summarize the discovery and development of tumor biomarkers, including the history of tumor biomarkers, the conventional and innovative technologies used for biomarker discovery and detection, the classification of tumor biomarkers based on tissue origins, and the application of tumor biomarkers in clinical cancer management. In particular, we highlight the recent advancements in biomarker-based anticancer-targeted therapies which are emerging as breakthroughs and promising cancer therapeutic strategies. We also discuss limitations and challenges that need to be addressed and provide insights and perspectives to turn challenges into opportunities in this field. Collectively, the discovery and application of multiple tumor biomarkers emphasized in this review may provide guidance on improved precision medicine, broaden horizons in future research directions, and expedite the clinical classification of cancer patients according to their molecular biomarkers rather than organs of origin.

Using a CA19-9 Tumor Marker Gene Test to Assess Outcome After Pancreatic Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND

Cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is widely used as a marker of pancreatic cancer tumor burden and response to therapy. Synthesis of CA19-9 and its circulating levels are determined by variants encoding the fucosyltransferases, FUT2 and FUT3. Individuals can be grouped into one of four functional FUT groups (FUT3-null, FUT-low, FUT-intermediate, FUT-high), each with its own CA19-9 reference range based on its predicted capacity to produce CA19-9. The authors hypothesized that a FUT variant-based CA19-9 tumor marker gene test could improve the prognostic performance of CA19-9.

METHODS

Preoperative and pre-treatment CA19-9 levels were measured, and FUT variants were determined in 449 patients who underwent surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at Johns Hopkins Hospital between 2010 and 2020, including 270 patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy. Factors associated with recurrence-free and overall survival were determined in Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Higher preoperative CA19-9 levels were associated with recurrence and mortality for patients in the higher-FUT groups (FUT-intermediate, FUT-high for mortality, with adjustment for other prognostic factors; hazard ratio [HR], 1.34 and 1.58, respectively; P < 0.001), but not for those in the lower-FUT groups (FUT3-null, FUT-low). As a tumor marker, CA19-9 levels of 100 U/ml or lower after neoadjuvant therapy and normalization of CA19-9 based on FUT group were more sensitive but less specific predictors of evidence for a major pathologic response to therapy (little/no residual tumor) and of early recurrence (within 6 months).

CONCLUSION

Among patients undergoing pancreatic cancer resection, a CA19-9 tumor marker gene test modestly improved the prognostic performance of CA19-9.

Extracellular vesicles long RNA profiling identifies abundant mRNA, circRNA and lncRNA in human bile as potential biomarkers for cancer diagnosis

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are bilayered membrane vesicles produced by living cells and secreted into the extracellular matrix. Bile is a special body fluid that is secreted by the liver cells, and extracellular vesicles long RNAs (exLRs) have not been explored in bile. In this study, exLR sequencing (exLR-seq) was performed on 19 bile samples from patients with malignant cancer or patients with biliary stones. A total of 8649 mRNAs, 13 823 circRNAs and 1105 lncRNAs were detected. The KEGG pathway analysis revealed that differentially expressed exLRs were enriched in mTOR and AMPK signaling pathway. We identified five mRNAs (EID2, LLPH, ATP6V0A2, RRP9 and MTRNR2L10), three lncRNAs (AC015922.2, AL135905.1 and LINC00921) and six circRNAs (circASH1L, circATP9A, circCLIP1, circRNF138, circTIMMDC1 and circANKRD12) were enriched in bile EV samples with cancer, and these exLRs may be potential markers used to distinguish malignant cancers from benign biliary diseases. Moreover, the tissue/cellular source components of EVs were analyzed using the EV-origin algorithm. The absolute abundance of CD4_naive and Th1 cell source in bile EVs from cancer patients were significantly increased. In summary, our study presented abundant exLRs in human bile EVs and provides some basis for the selection of tumor diagnostic markers.

Diagnostic Performance of a Tumor Marker Gene Test to Personalize Serum CA19-9 Reference Ranges

PURPOSE

CA19-9 synthesis is influenced by common variants in the fucosyltransferase (FUT) enzymes FUT3 and FUT2. We developed a clinical test to detect FUT variants, and evaluated its diagnostic performance for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A representative set of controls from the Cancer of the Pancreas Screening study was identified for each FUT functional group. Diagnostic sensitivity was determined first in a testing set of 234 PDAC cases, followed by a 134-case validation set, all of whom had undergone resection with curative intent without neoadjuvant therapy. Tumor marker gene testing was performed in the Johns Hopkins Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory. CA19-9 levels were measured in the Hopkins Clinical Chemistry lab. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the discriminative ability of CA19-9 alone versus with the gene test.

RESULTS

Applying the CA19-9 standard cutoff (<36 U/mL) to all 716 subjects yielded a 68.8% sensitivity in the test set of cases, 67.2% in the validation set, at 91.4% specificity. Applying 99th percentile cutoffs according to each individual's FUT group (3, 34.9, 41.8, and 89.2, for the FUT3-null, FUT-low, FUT-intermediate, and FUT-high groups, respectively) yielded a diagnostic sensitivity for CA19-9 in the first set of cases of 66.7%, 65.7% in the validation set, at 98.9% specificity. ROC analysis for CA19-9 alone yielded an AUC of 0.84; with the tumor marker gene test, AUC improved to 0.92 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Using a tumor marker gene test to personalize an individual's CA19-9 reference range significantly improves diagnostic accuracy.

Relationship between ABO Blood Group Alleles and Pancreatic Cancer Is Modulated by Secretor (FUT2) Genotype, but Not Lewis Antigen (FUT3) Genotype

BACKGROUND

In Western populations, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) risk has been found to be greater among individuals with non-O blood types than those with O blood type. However, the association has not been fully evaluated with respect to FUT2 (determining secretor status) and FUT3 (determining Lewis antigens) status, two biologically important genes in the expression of ABO blood groups with PDAC.

METHODS

We examined interactions in data from 8,027 cases and 11,362 controls in large pancreatic cancer consortia (PanScan I-III and PanC4) by using genetic variants to predict ABO blood groups (rs505922 and rs8176746), secretor status (rs601338), and Lewis antigens (rs812936, rs28362459, and rs3894326). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the risk of PDAC adjusted for age and sex. We examined multiplicative interactions of ABO with secretor status and Lewis antigens by considering each product term between ABO and secretor and between ABO and Lewis antigens individually.

RESULTS

We found that the increased risk associated with non-O blood groups was somewhat stronger among secretors than nonsecretors [ORs, 1.28 (95% CI, 1.15-1.42) and 1.17 (95% CI, 1.03-1.32) respectively; Pinteraction = 0.002]. We did not find any interactions between ABO and Lewis antigens.

CONCLUSIONS

Our large consortia data provide evidence of effect modification in the association between non-O blood type and pancreatic cancer risk by secretor status.

IMPACT

Our results indicate that the association between ABO blood type and PDAC risk may vary by secretor status, but not by Lewis antigens.

Exploration of Risk Factors for Pancreatic Cancer and Development of a Clinical High-Risk Group Rating Scale

(1) Background: There are few studies on people at high risk for clinical pancreatic cancer (PC). We aimed to explore the risk factors of PC and establish a scale for identifying high-risk populations of clinical PC. (2) Methods: We conducted a matched case-control study, retrospectively collecting demographic data and common clinical indicators from all subjects. Logistic regression was used to explore the risk factors of PC. Based on these factors, we created a high-risk population rating scale, which showed a higher diagnostic value. (3) Results: 385 cases and 428 controls were finally enrolled in our study. Multivariate analysis showed that body mass index (BMI) below 18.5 kg/m2 (OR 5.944, 95%CI: 1.759~20.084), smoking (OR 2.745, 95%CI: 1.555~4.844), new-onset diabetes (OR 5.239, 95%CI: 2.091~13.125), low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (OR 1.790, 95%CI: 1.044~3.069), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels no less than 35 U/mL (OR 160.328, 95%CI: 83.392~308.243) were associated with an increased risk of PC, whereas high total cholesterol (TC) levels were related to a lower risk of PC (OR 0.392, 95%CI: 0.211~0.730). The high-risk population scale, whose area under the receiver operating curve reached 0.948 (p < 0.001), showed a greater clinical diagnostic value. (4) Conclusions: Smoking history, new-onset diabetes, BMI, TC, HDL-C, and CA19-9 levels were associated with the risk of PC. The high-risk population rating scale might be used for early clinical PC screening.

Levels of tumor markers CEA/CA 19-9 in serum and peritoneal lavage predict postoperative recurrence in patients with pancreatic cancer

Aim

This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of tumor markers from peritoneal lavage in selecting patients with a high risk of recurrence and predicting site-specific recurrence in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Methods

The levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 (sCEA/sCA 19-9) and paired peritoneal lavage CEA and CA 19-9 (pCEA/pCA 19-9) were measured in 90 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent surgery. Using the cutoff values determined by maximally selected rank statistics for disease-free survival (DFS), the risk of recurrence and its patterns were evaluated in combination with different markers and different test specimens.

Results

In univariate and multivariate analysis, an elevated pCA 19-9 level (>1.3 U/mL) was an independent prognostic marker for both DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.391; P = .018) and overall survival (HR, 3.194; P = .033). Combination analyses contributed to further stratification of a very high risk of recurrence. Of the 58 patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who underwent curative resection, elevated pCA19-9 was also associated with inferior DFS and overall survival (OS). Patients with elevated pCA 19-9 levels were more likely to have an earlier onset of peritoneal recurrence than those with normal pCA 19-9 levels (P = .048, Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test).

Conclusion

pCA 19-9 is a reliable marker for predicting postoperative recurrence in patients with pancreatic cancer after surgery. Further risk stratification can be achieved by using combination assays. The combination of pCA 19-9 and sCA19-9 also serves as a predictor of recurrence site-specific recurrence.

Diagnostic value of serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is the most widely used serum biomarker for detecting pancreatic cancer (PC). Since early diagnosis is important for improving PC prognosis, a comprehensive understanding of the diagnostic performance of CA19-9 is critical. This study focused on comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy of CA19-9 in PC diagnosis. Literature research was based on the seven databases. Studies released from January 2002 to January 2022 focused on the efficacy of CA19-9 in the detection of PC were included. Summarized sensitivity, specificity, and sROC/accuracy of discrimination (AUC) were estimated. Potential publication bias was measured with Funnel plot and Egger's test. Meta-regression was performed to detect possible causes of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was used to assess the diagnostic efficacy of CA19-9 under different conditions. The study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021253861). Seventy-nine studies containing 20 991 participants who met the criteria were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of CA19-9 in diagnose PC were 72% (95% CI, 71-73%), 86% (95% CI, 85-86%), and 0.8474 (95% CI, 0.8272-0.8676). Subgroup analysis suggested that the diagnostic efficiency of CA19-9 in studies with healthy controls was the highest, followed by intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, in pancreatitis and diabetes were consistent with the overall result. Our analysis showed that serum CA19-9 had high and stable diagnostic efficacy for PC (not affected by diabetes). Subgroup analysis showed that serum CA19-9 yielded highest effectiveness in the diagnosis of pancreatic precancerous lesions, which indicated an irreplaceable clinical value in the early detection and warning value for PC.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes in carbohydrate antigen 19-9 negative pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading cause of death from cancer worldwide. Tumor markers like carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) have been proven valuable as a diagnostic tool and a predictor for tumor staging and response to therapy.

AIM

To delineate the phenotype of normal CA 19-9 PDAC according to clinical features, disease staging and prognosis as compared with high CA 19-9 PDAC cases.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-center analysis of all PDAC cases admitted in our Gastroenterology department over a period of 30 mo that were diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Patients were divided into two groups according to CA 19-9 levels over a threshold of 37 U/mL. We performed a comparison between the two groups with regard to demographic and clinical data, biomarkers, tumor staging and 6-mo survival.

RESULTS

Altogether 111 patients were recruited with 29 having documented normal CA 19-9 (< 37 U/mL). In the CA 19-9 negative group of patients, 20.68% had elevated levels of both CEA and CA 125, 13.79% for CA 125 only whilst 17.24% for CEA only. The two groups had similar demographic characteristics. Abdominal pain was more frequently reported in positive vs negative CA 19-9 PDAC cases (76.83% vs 55.17%), while smoking was slightly more prevalent in the latter group (28.04% vs 31.03%). Tumors over 2 cm were more frequently seen in the positive CA 19-9 group, reflecting a higher proportion of locally advanced and metastatic neoplasia (87.7% vs 79.3%). Six-month survival was higher for the negative CA 19-9 group (58.62% vs 47.56%).

CONCLUSION

Elevated CA 19-9 at diagnosis seems to be associated with a more pronounced symptomatology, high tumor burden and poor prognosis compared to negative CA 19-9 PDAC cases. CEA and CA 125 can be adjunctive useful markers for PDAC, especially in CA 19-9 negative cases.

Low Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) Levels in a Patient Highly Suspected of Having Caput Pancreas Tumor

Pancreatic cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide and the eleventh most common cause of cancer-related death in Indonesia. In pancreatic cancer, rapid and early diagnosis is crucial. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), the most sensitive and specific tumor marker for pancreatic cancer, may help in diagnosing and determining prognosis; however, some populations do not express CA 19-9. Cases of low CA 19-9 may occur in populations with Lewis⍺-β- genotype. These populations are not able to express Lewis antigen and CA 19-9; therefore, CA 19-9 investigation cannot be used for diagnostic and therapeutic measures. In patients highly suspicious of pancreatic cancer where CA 19-9 levels are low, alternative tumor markers such as CA 125 and carcinoembryonic antigen or a combination of various tumor markers can be used to increase sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing pancreatic cancer. A 70-year-old man presented with a complaint of worsening abdominal pain for the last two days. The patient had dark-yellow urine and pale stool. Abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography scan showed a mass on the head of the pancreas, which was highly suspicious of pancreatic cancer.

Review—Progress in Electroanalysis of p53, CEA, and CA19–9

Screening tests for panels of biomarkers such as the panel comprising p53, CEA, and CA19–9 facilitated early diagnosis of cancers and improvement of the quality of life. In this review, diverse electrochemical sensors used for the assay of p53, CEA, and CA 19–9 in biological samples are shown. Different methods of analysis such as differential pulse voltammetry, electrochemical impendance spectroscopy, chronoamperometry, and stochastic method were used for the assay of one biomarker (differential pulse voltammetry, chronoamperometry) or for the assay of a panel of biomarkers comprising p53, CA19–9, and CEA using stochastic method. The lowest limits of determination were obtained using the stochastic method; they were of fg ml−1/fU ml−1 magnitude order.

The Impact of Biomarkers in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma on Diagnosis, Surveillance and Therapy

Simple Summary

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Due to the frequently late diagnosis, early metastasis and high therapy resistance curation is rare and prognosis remains poor overall. To provide early diagnostic and therapeutic predictors, various molecules from blood, tissue and other origin e.g., saliva, urine and stool, have been identified as biomarkers. This review summarizes current trends in biomarkers for diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is still difficult to treat due to insufficient methods for early diagnosis and prediction of therapy response. Furthermore, surveillance after curatively intended surgery lacks adequate methods for timely detection of recurrence. Therefore, several molecules have been analyzed as predictors of recurrence or early detection of PDAC. Enhanced understanding of molecular tumorigenesis and treatment response triggered the identification of novel biomarkers as predictors for response to conventional chemotherapy or targeted therapy. In conclusion, progress has been made especially in the prediction of therapy response with biomarkers. The use of molecules for early detection and recurrence of PDAC is still at an early stage, but there are promising approaches in noninvasive biomarkers, composite panels and scores that can already ameliorate the current clinical practice. The present review summarizes the current state of research on biomarkers for diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic cancer.

Early screening and diagnosis strategies of pancreatic cancer: a comprehensive review

Pancreatic cancer is a highly malignant digestive system tumor with a poor prognosis. Most pancreatic cancer patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage or even metastasis due to its highly aggressive characteristics and lack of typical early symptoms. Thus, an early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is crucial for improving its prognosis. Currently, screening is often applied in high‐risk individuals to achieve the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Fully understanding the risk factors of pancreatic cancer and pathogenesis could help us identify the high‐risk population and achieve early diagnosis and timely treatment of pancreatic cancer. Notably, accumulating studies have been undertaken to improve the detection rate of different imaging methods and the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) which is the golden standard for pancreatic cancer diagnosis. In addition, there are currently no biomarkers with sufficient sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer to be applied in the clinic. As the only serum biomarker approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, carbohydrate antigen 19‐9 (CA19‐9) is not recommended to be used in the early screening of pancreatic cancer because of its limited specificity. Recently, increasing numbers of studies focused on the discovering of novel serum biomarkers and exploring their combination with CA19‐9 in the detection of pancreatic cancer. Besides, the application of liquid biopsy involving circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), microRNAs (miRNAs), and exosomes in blood and biomarkers in urine, and saliva in pancreatic cancer diagnosis are drawing more and more attention. Furthermore, many innovative technologies such as artificial intelligence, computer‐aided diagnosis system, metabolomics technology, ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) associated technologies, and novel nanomaterials have been tested for the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and have shown promising prospects. Hence, this review aims to summarize the recent progress in the development of early screening and diagnostic methods, including imaging, pathological examination, serological examination, liquid biopsy, as well as other potential diagnostic strategies for pancreatic cancer.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis-associated cholangiocarcinoma: special considerations and best practices

Introduction: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare, heterogenous, chronic cholestatic liver disease that causes fibro-inflammatory destruction of the intra- and/or extrahepatic bile ducts. The disease course may be variable, though in many cases it ultimately leads to biliary cirrhosis and its associated complications. PSC is also associated with malignancies, in particular cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a dreaded neoplasm of the biliary tract with a poor prognosis. Risk stratification and surveillance for this malignancy are important components of the care of patients with PSC.Areas covered: In this review, we discuss important considerations in the clinical epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and surveillance of PSC-associated CCA.Expert opinion: Despite growing awareness of PSC, high-quality evidence regarding the management of PSC and its associated risk of CCA remains limited. Early diagnosis of PSC-associated CCA remains difficult, and treatment options are limited, especially when diagnosed at later stages. The recent introduction of recommendations for CCA surveillance will likely improve outcomes, though an optimal surveillance approach has yet to be validated prospectively. Further research is needed in the development of high-accuracy (and noninvasive) surveillance and diagnostic tools that may facilitate earlier diagnosis of CCA and potential disease cure.

Roles of CA19-9 in pancreatic cancer: Biomarker, predictor and promoter

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is the best validated biomarker and an indicator of aberrant glycosylation in pancreatic cancer. CA19-9 functions as a biomarker, predictor, and promoter in pancreatic cancer. As a biomarker, the sensitivity is approximately 80%, and the major challenges involve false positives in conditions of inflammation and nonpancreatic cancers and false negatives in Lewis-negative Individuals. Lewis antigen status should be determined when using CA19-9 as a biomarker. CA19-9 has screening potential when combined with symptoms and/or risk factors. As a predictor, CA19-9 could be used to assess stage, prognosis, resectability, recurrence, and therapeutic efficacy. Normal baseline levels of CA19-9 are associated with long-term survival. As a promoter, CA19-9 could be used to evaluate the biology of pancreatic cancer. CA19-9 can accelerate pancreatic cancer progression by glycosylating proteins, binding to E-selectin, strengthening angiogenesis, and mediating the immunological response. CA19-9 is an attractive therapeutic target for cancer, and strategies include therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, CA19-9-guided nanoparticles, and inhibition of CA19-9 biosynthesis.

α1,6-Fucosyltransferase contributes to cell migration and proliferation as well as to cancer stemness features in pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic carcinoma is one of the deadliest malignant diseases, in which the increased expression of α1,6-fucosyltransferase (FUT8), a sole enzyme responsible for catalyzing core fucosylation, has been reported. However, its pathological roles and regulatory mechanisms remain largely unknown. Here, we use two pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines, MIA PaCa-2 and PANC-1 cells, as cell models, to explore the relationship of FUT8 with the malignant transformation of PDAC.

METHODS

FUT8 knockout (FUT8-KO) cells were established by the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell migration was analyzed by transwell and wound-healing assays. Cell proliferation was examined by MTT and colony-formation assays. Cancer stemness markers and spheroid formations were used to analyzed cancer stemness features.

RESULTS

Deficiency of FUT8 inhibited cell migration and proliferation in both MIA PaCa-2 and PANC-1 cells compared with wild-type cells. Moreover, the expression levels of cancer stemness markers such as EpCAM, CXCR4, c-Met, and CD133 were decreased in the FUT8-KO cells compared with wild-type cells. Also, the spheroid formations in the KO cells were loose and unstable, which could be reversed by restoration with FUT8 gene in the KO cells. Additionally, FUT8-KO increased the chemosensitivity to gemcitabine, which is the first-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

FUT8-KO reduced the cell proliferation and migration. Our results are the first to suggest that the expression of FUT8 is involved in regulating the stemness features of pancreatic cancer cells.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

FUT8 could provide novel insights for the treatment of pancreatic carcinoma.

Correlation Between Baseline Serum Tumor Markers and Clinical Characteristic Factors in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE

In pancreatic cancer (PC), CA 19-9, CEA and CA 125 are the most widely used tumor markers. The aim of this study was to explore the prognostic significance of baseline levels of serum CA 19-9, CEA, and CA 125, and to evaluate the clinical significance of these markers in PC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 278 patients with advanced PC that had received first-line chemotherapy treatments were examined. Correlation analysis between the tumor markers and clinical characteristics was performed using a Pearson's Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. A Pearson's correlation test was utilized to investigate the relationship between tumor markers and peripheral blood parameters. Univariate analysis was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using a Log rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Both individually and collectively, the baseline CA 19-9, CEA and CA 125 levels were positively associated with the primary tumor site (p < 0.01), liver metastasis (p < 0.05), and number of organ metastases (p < 0.05). Furthermore, CA 19-9, CEA and CA 125 were correlated to baseline WBC (p < 0.001) and LDH (p < 0.01) levels. Additionally, CA 19-9 was correlated with years of smoking (p = 0.024); diabetes and years of diabetes (p = 0.012); baseline glycemic levels (p = 0.004); and neutrophil counts (p < 0.001). Moreover, CA 125 levels were associated with the baseline neutrophil counts (p < 0.001) and peritoneal metastasis (p = 0.008). When examining neutrophil, LDH, CA 19-9 and CA 125 levels were found to be associated with overall survival (OS) and shown to be independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

CA 19-9, CEA and CA 125 are correlated with multiple clinical factors. Baseline neutrophil, LDH, CA 19-9 and CA 125 levels are associated with OS and may potentially serve as prognostic factors.

Advances in the discovery of novel biomarkers for cancer: spotlight on protein N-glycosylation

Progress on glycosylation and tumor markers has not been extensively reported. Glycosylation plays an important part in post-translational modification. Previous research on glycosylation-modified biomarkers has lagged behind due to insufficient understanding of glycosylation-related regulations. However, some new methods and ideas illustrated in recent research may provide new inspirations in the field. This article aims to review current advances in revealing relationship between tumors and abnormal N-glycosylation and discuss leading-edge applications of N-glycosylation in developing novel tumor biomarkers.

Complementary Use of Carbohydrate Antigens Lewis a, Lewis b, and Sialyl-Lewis a (CA19.9 Epitope) in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Biological Rationale Towards A Personalized Clinical Application

Carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA19.9) is used as a tumor marker for clinical and research purposes assuming that it is abundantly produced by gastrointestinal cancer cells due to a cancer-associated aberrant glycosylation favoring its synthesis. Recent data has instead suggested a different picture, where immunodetection on tissue sections matches biochemical and molecular data. In addition to CA19.9, structurally related carbohydrate antigens Lewis a and Lewis b are, in fact, undetectable in colon cancer, due to the down-regulation of a galactosyltransferase necessary for their synthesis. In the pancreas, no differential expression of CA19.9 or cognate glycosyltransferases occurs in cancer. Ductal cells only express such Lewis antigens in a pattern affected by the relative levels of each glycosyltransferase, which are genetically and epigenetically determined. The elevation of circulating antigens seems to depend on the obstruction of neoplastic ducts and loss of polarity occurring in malignant ductal cells. Circulating Lewis a and Lewis b are indeed promising candidates for monitoring pancreatic cancer patients that are negative for CA19.9, but not for improving the low diagnostic performance of such an antigen. Insufficient biological data are available for gastric and bile duct cancer. Studying each patient in a personalized manner determining all Lewis antigens in the surgical specimens and in the blood, together with the status of the tissue-specific glycosylation machinery, promises fruitful advances in translational research and clinical practice.

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 elevation without evidence of malignant or pancreatobiliary diseases

Although carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) may be elevated in benign diseases, elevated CA 19-9 may cause a fear of cancer and unnecessary follow-up studies. Research on how to approach systematically in this case is very limited. The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical features and the causes of CA 19-9 elevation without evidence of malignant or pancreatobiliary diseases. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who had CA 19-9 elevation (≥80 U/mL) and were found to be unrelated to cancer after follow-up. After exclusion, 192 patients were included in this study. The median level of CA 19-9 was 136.5 U/mL. The causes of CA 19-9 elevation were determined in 147 (76.6%) patients, and that was unknown in 45 (23.4%). The estimated causative diseases were hepatic diseases in 63 patients, pulmonary diseases in 32, gynecologic diseases in 38, endocrine diseases in 13, and spleen disease in 1. Of 45 patients with unknown cause, 35 had normalization of CA 19-9 and 10 had persistently elevated CA 19-9. In conclusion, CA 19-9 elevation without malignancies or pancreatobiliary diseases should be systematically evaluated and followed up. We suggest an algorithm to investigate the causes and follow up these patients.

Gene Variants That Affect Levels of Circulating Tumor Markers Increase Identification of Patients With Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) in blood are used as markers to determine the response of patients with cancer to therapy, but are not used to identify patients with pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

We obtained blood samples from 504 patients undergoing pancreatic surveillance from 2002 through 2018 who did not develop pancreatic cancer and measured levels of the tumor markers CA19-9, CEA, CA-125, and thrombospondin-2. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in FUT3, FUT2, ABO, and GAL3ST2 that have been associated with levels of tumor markers were used to establish SNP-defined ranges for each tumor marker. We also tested the association between additional SNPs (in FUT6, MUC16, B3GNT3, FAM3B, and THBS2) with levels of tumor markers. To calculate the diagnostic specificity of each SNP-defined range, we assigned the patients under surveillance into training and validation sets. After determining the SNP-defined ranges, we determined the sensitivity of SNP-adjusted tests for the tumor markers, measuring levels in blood samples from 245 patients who underwent resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from 2010 through 2017.

RESULTS

A level of CA19-9 that identified patients with PDAC with 99% specificity had 52.7% sensitivity. When we set the cut-off levels of CA19-9 based on each SNP, the test for CA19-9 identified patients with PDAC with 60.8% sensitivity and 98.8% specificity. Among patients with FUT3 alleles that encode a functional protein, levels of CA19-9 greater than the SNP-determined cut-off values identified 66.4% of patients with PDAC, with 99.3% specificity. In the validation set, levels of CEA varied among patients with vs without SNP in FUT2, by blood group, and among smokers vs nonsmokers; levels of CA-125 varied among patients with vs without the SNP in GAL3ST2. The use of the SNPs to define the ranges of CEA and CA-125 did not significantly increase the diagnostic accuracy of the assays for these proteins. Combining data on levels of CA19-9 and CEA, CA19-9 and CA-125, or CA19-9 and thrombospondin-2 increased the sensitivity of detection of PDAC, but slightly reduced specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Including information on SNPs associated with levels of CA19-9, CEA, and CA-125 can improve the diagnostic accuracy of assays for these tumor markers in the identification of patients with PDAC. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT02000089.

Lewis antigen‑negative pancreatic cancer: An aggressive subgroup

Carbohydrate antigen 19‑9 (CA19‑9) is the most important biomarker for pancreatic cancer. Approximately 5‑10% of individuals are Lewis antigen negative with scarce secretion of CA19‑9 and fucosylation deficiency. However, the characteristics of Lewis‑negative pancreatic cancer are unidentified. Clinicopathological characteristics of 853 patients with pancreatic cancer were examined. Pancreatic cancer cell lines were sequenced for Lewis status. Morphological and molecular features of pancreatic cancer cells were compared. Orthotopic animal modes were established. Lewis‑negative patients had poorer outcome (P<0.001), higher metastatic rate (P=0.004), lower CA19‑9 expression (P<0.001) and higher MUC16 expression (P<0.001) than Lewis‑positive patients. Lewis‑negative cells (CaPan‑1, MiaPaCa‑2 and Panc‑1) showed a shuttle shape with scarce pseudopods. Overall, Lewis‑negative cells had higher proliferation rate, higher migration ability, lower fucosylation, lower CA19‑9 expression and higher MUC16 expression than Lewis‑positive cells (BxPC‑3, SU8686, SW1990). Lewis‑negative cell line MiaPaCa‑2 corresponded to larger orthotopic tumor than Lewis‑positive cells SU8686. Potential proteoglycans were identified in Lewis‑positive cancer, including EGFR, HSPG2, ADAM17, GPC1, ITGA2, CD40, IL6ST and GGT1. Therefore, Lewis‑negative pancreatic cancer is an aggressive subgroup with special clinical and molecular features.

CA19-9 for detecting recurrence of pancreatic cancer

CA19-9 values are regularly measured in patients with pancreatic cancer. Certainly, its potential as a biomarker has been compromised by false negative results in CA19-9 negative patients and false positive results in benign pancreatico-biliary diseases. For detection of PDAC recurrence, however, CA19-9 might play an important role. The aim of this study is to analyze the accuracy of CA19-9 for detecting recurrence of pancreatic cancer. All included patients were treated either at the University Medical Center Goettingen, or at the Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology and Pneumonology, DRK-Kliniken Nordhessen, Kassel. We analyzed data of 93 patients with pancreatic cancer in the training set and 41 in the validation set, both retrospectively. Pre- and postoperative CA19-9 values and results of imaging techniques were compared. We performed ROC-analysis. The association between longitudinally measured CA19-9 values and relapse was studied with a joint model between a random effects model for the longitudinal CA19-9 measurements and a Cox proportional hazards models for the survival data. In the test set (n = 93 patients) the median follow-up time was 644 days (22 months). Overall, 71 patients (76.3%) developed recurrence during follow-up. Patients with CA19-9 values of <10kU/l were considered as CA19-9 negative patients (n = 11) and excluded from further analysis. Among the rest, approximately 60% of the patients showed significantly elevated CA19-9 prior to detection of recurrence by imaging techniques. Recurrence was shown by 2.45 times elevated CA19-9 values with 90% positive predictive value. In the validation set, 2.45 times elevated CA19-9 values showed recurrence with 90% sensitivity and 83,33% specificity, with an area under the curve of 95%. Based on measured CA19-9 values during follow-up care, the joint model estimates in recurrence-free patients the probability of recurrence-free survival. CA19-9 elevation is an early and reliable sign for PDAC recurrence. On the strength of a very high accuracy in CA19-9 positive patients, it should be considered to use CA19-9 for therapy decision even without a correlate of imaging technics. Using the joint model, follow-up care of PDAC patients after curative therapy can be stratified.

SSEA3 and Sialyl Lewis a Glycan Expression Is Controlled by B3GALT5 LTR through Lamin A-NFYA and SIRT1-STAT3 Signaling in Human ES Cells

B3GALT5 is involved in the synthesis of embryonic stem (ES) cell marker glycan, stage-specific embryonic antigen-3 (SSEA3). This gene has three native promoters and an integrated retroviral long terminal repeat (LTR) promoter. We found that B3GALT5-LTR is expressed at high levels in human ES cells. B3GALT5-LTR is also involved in the synthesis of the cancer-associated glycan, sialyl Lewis a. Sialyl Lewis a is expressed in ES cells and its expression decreases upon differentiation. Retinoic acid induced differentiation of ES cells, decreased the short form of NFYA (NFYAs), increased phosphorylation of STAT3, and decreased B3GALT5-LTR expression. NFYAs activated, and constitutively-active STAT3 (STAT3C) repressed B3GALT5-LTR promoter. The NFYAs and STAT3C effects were eliminated when their binding sites were deleted. Retinoic acid decreased the binding of NFYA to B3GALT5-LTR promoter and increased phospho-STAT3 binding. Lamin A repressed NFYAs and SSEA3 expression. SSEA3 repression mediated by a SIRT1 inhibitor was reversed by a STAT3 inhibitor. Repression of SSEA3 and sialyl Lewis a synthesis mediated by retinoic acid was partially reversed by lamin A short interfering RNA (siRNA) and a STAT3 inhibitor. In conclusion, B3GALT5-LTR is regulated by lamin A-NFYA and SIRT1-STAT3 signaling that regulates SSEA3 and sialyl Lewis a synthesis in ES cells, and sialyl Lewis a is also a ES cell marker.

Effect of Perioperative CEA and CA24-2 on Prognosis of Early Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) show differential prognosis after radical resection. Currently, cancer grading and surgical criteria depend heavily on imaging and anatomical diagnosis. It's essential to set up a model with reliable prognostic factors during the perioperative period to assess prognosis in PDAC patients. In this study, 103 patients diagnosed with PDAC who underwent radical resection were recruited. The predictive value of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), postoperative CA24-2 and the combination of two for overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Both pre-CEA and post-CA24-2 were found to be independent prognostic factors for OS according to multivariate analyses. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that CEA and CA24-2 as well as the combination of two were correlated with poor OS. In addition, patients with both markers elevated have worse prognosis than patients with either pre-CEA or post-CA24-2 elevated. Thus, we concluded that the combination of CEA and CA24-2 can be used as a prognostic factor for stage I and II resectable PDAC patients.

Recent developments in the research on biomarkers of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is characterized by a chronic inflammatory process of the bile ducts of unclear aetiology. It is often complicated by cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) with a dismal prognosis. Early detection of CCA is important because treatment options for advanced disease are limited. Besides the established markers, like CA19-9, recent developments have been made using latest technologies. This review summarizes the recent advances and remaining limitations of biomarkers of CCA in PSC.

Biliary endoscopy in the management of primary sclerosing cholangitis and its complications

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic, idiopathic, cholestatic liver disease characterized by inflammation and fibrosis of the intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic bile ducts. It can affect individuals of all age groups and gender, has no established pharmacotherapy, and is associated with a variety of neoplastic (e.g. cholangiocarcinoma) and non-neoplastic (e.g. dominant strictures) hepatobiliary complications. Given these considerations, endoscopy plays a major role in the care of patients with PSC. In this review, we discuss and provide updates regarding endoscopic considerations in the management of hepatobiliary manifestations and complications of PSC. Where evidence is limited, we suggest pragmatic approaches based on currently available data and expert opinion.

Serum CA199 levels are significantly increased in patients suffering from liver, lung, and other diseases

CA199 is a sialic acid containing glycan antigen found in both glycoproteins and glycolipids, which is recognized by monoclonal antibodies generated by hybridoma technology. The increased serum CA199 levels measured by using the monoclonal antibodies have been used as diagnostic or prognostic biomarker for pancreatic cancer. Even though increased serum CA199 levels are also observed in other cancers and noncancer diseases, it is largely unknown if CA199 levels could serve as biomarkers for other diseases as well. Therefore, in our current study, serum CA199 levels from 45,645 patients with 47 clinically defined diseases and 14,783 healthy controls who attended their annual physical examination were collected and measured by the clinical laboratory in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University over the past 5 years. Based on the median, mean, and -Log₁₀p values, we found that patients with pancreatic cancer, lung fibrosis, cirrhosis, liver cancer, hepatitis, and pancreatitis had the highest media and mean serum CA199 levels with statistical significance based on the -Log₁₀p values. Unexpectedly, patients suffering from gout and anemia had significantly low CA199 levels compared to that of the healthy controls. These results showed that serum CA199 levels are not only increased in pancreatic and other cancer patients but also either increased or decreased in noncancer diseases. The overall data indicated that the abnormal serum CA199 level might be an indicator of system malfunction rather than a cancer biomarker in general.

New observations on the utility of CA19-9 as a biomarker in Lewis negative patients with pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is the best-validated biomarker for pancreatic cancer. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline asserts that "CA19-9 will be undetectable in Lewis antigen-negative individuals". However, reports of CA19-9 secretion and its significance in Lewis (-) patients with pancreatic cancer have been inconsistent. This study was to examine serum CA19-9 levels in patients with pancreatic cancer according to Lewis status.

METHODS

Patients with pancreatic cancer (1482 cases) were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Patients with benign pancreatic disease (210 cases) and normal subjects (315 cases) were used as controls. Lewis genotypes were examined by fucosyltransferase 3 (FUT3) sequencing.

RESULTS

In patients with pancreatic cancer, 8.4% of subjects were Lewis (-), but only 41.9% of Lewis (-) subjects had CA19-9 values ≤ 2 U/mL. CA19-9 was even elevated (>37 U/mL) in 27.4% of Lewis (-) patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for CA19-9 as a diagnostic biomarker was 0.842 in Lewis (-) patients with pancreatic cancer, which is closing to that of CA19-9 applied in all of patients with pancreatic cancer (0.898). Lewis (-) status was an independent prognostic factor for shorter survival in a multivariable analysis (hazard ratio (HR), 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-1.64; P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Not all Lewis (-) patients with pancreatic cancer are non-secretors of CA19-9. Contrary to general understanding, CA19-9 can retain its utility as a biomarker in these patients in spite of Lewis (-) genotype.

Patients with normal-range CA19-9 levels represent a distinct subgroup of pancreatic cancer patients

Pancreatic cancer remains a lethal disease that responds poorly to multiple types of treatment. Therefore, the identification of distinct subgroups that exhibit unique therapeutic responses is an urgent requirement. In the present multicenter study (1,912 cases), the differences between the therapeutic responses and clinical characteristics of two subgroups of pancreatic cancer, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9)-normal (baseline serum level, ≤37 U/ml) and CA19-9-elevated (baseline serum level, >37 U/ml), were analyzed. CA19-9-normal expression was identified to be an independent prognostic factor for patients with stage I-II [hazard ratio (HR)=0.77; P=0.037] and stage III-IV (HR=0.68; P<0.001) pancreatic cancer. The 5-year survival rate of the stage III-IV CA19-9-normal subgroup was increased compared with the stage I-II CA19-9-elevated subgroup (15.4 vs. 13.8%). In the stage I-II CA19-9-normal and CA19-9-elevated subgroups, gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was a significant positive prognostic factor for survival (CA19-9-normal, HR=0.54, P=0.013; CA19-9-elevated, HR=0.55, P<0.001). However, among stage III-IV patients, the CA19-9-normal subgroup exhibited a poor response to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy (HR=0.77; P=0.165), while the CA19-9-elevated subgroup exhibited a favorable response, resulting in a lower rate of mortality (HR=0.70; P<0.001) compared with no chemotherapy. It was concluded that CA19-9-normal pancreatic cancer is a less aggressive subgroup; however, advanced CA19-9-normal pancreatic cancer exhibits a poorer response to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.