Diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis with the Unifying-Autoimmune-Pancreatitis-Criteria

What Is the Latest in Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a steroid-responsive fibroinflammatory disorder with 2 clinically distinct subtypes known as type 1 autoimmune and type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis. Type 1 AIP is considered the pancreatic manifestation of immunoglobulin G4-related disease, a systemic disease often presenting with other organ involvement. Advances in understanding the unique clinical presentation, imaging findings, histopathology, and clinical course of this relatively uncommon disease have led to international consensus regarding diagnosis and treatment. While corticosteroids remain the mainstay of treatment, several emerging novel therapies have been explored primarily in the context or relapsing and refractory cases.

Pancreas 2000. My journey with the central organ

The European Pancreatic Club Lifetime Achievement Award is a distinction awarded for research on the pancreas and service to European Pancreatology. It comes with the obligation to submit a review article to our society's journal, Pancreatology. It was awarded to me 2023 and I take this opportunity to highlight my journey with the central organ AKA the pancreas, that is inseparatable from "Pancreas 2000" - an educational program for future pancreatologists, inaugurated by Karolinska Institutet.

Type 1 Autoimmune Pancreatitis in Europe: Clinical Profile and Response to Treatment

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an immune-mediated disease of the pancreas with distinct pathophysiology and manifestations. Our aims were to characterize type 1 AIP in a large pan-European cohort and study the effectiveness of current treatment regimens.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed adults diagnosed since 2005 with type 1 or not-otherwise-specified AIP in 42 European university hospitals. Type 1 AIP was uniformly diagnosed using specific diagnostic criteria. Patients with type 2 AIP and those who had undergone pancreatic surgery were excluded. The primary end point was complete remission, defined as the absence of clinical symptoms and resolution of the index radiologic pancreatic abnormalities attributed to AIP.

RESULTS

We included 735 individuals with AIP (69% male; median age, 57 years; 85% White). Steroid treatment was started in 634 patients, of whom 9 (1%) were lost to follow-up. The remaining 625 had a 79% (496/625) complete, 18% (111/625) partial, and 97% (607/625) cumulative remission rate, whereas 3% (18/625) did not achieve remission. No treatment was given in 95 patients, who had a 61% complete (58/95), 19% partial (18/95), and 80% cumulative (76/95) spontaneous remission rate. Higher (≥0.4 mg/kg/day) corticosteroid doses were no more effective than lower (<0.4 mg/kg/day) doses (odds ratio, 0.428; 95% confidence interval, 0.054-3.387) and neither was a starting dose duration >2 weeks (odds ratio, 0.908; 95% confidence interval, 0.818-1.009). Elevated IgG4 levels were independently associated with a decreased chance of complete remission (odds ratio, 0.639; 95% confidence interval, 0.427-0.955). Relapse occurred in 30% of patients. Relapses within 6 months of remission induction were independent of the steroid-tapering duration, induction treatment duration, and total cumulative dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with type 1 AIP and elevated IgG4 level may need closer monitoring. For remission induction, a starting dose of 0.4 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks followed by a short taper period seems effective. This study provides no evidence to support more aggressive regimens.

[Autoimmune pancreatitis versus pancreatic cancer]

CLINICAL ISSUE

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is classified as a distinct form of pancreatitis according to the guidelines. It is characterized by imaging morphologic and histologic features and is associated with extrapancreatic manifestations in type 1 IgG 4-associated disease. Symptoms and findings almost always improve with administration of steroids. Differentiation from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is required, particularly in the presence of AIP with focal parenchymal involvement.

STANDARD RADIOLOGIC PROCEDURES

If AIP is suspected, abdominal ultrasound and/or endosonography, computed tomography (CT), and preferably magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are indicated. A distinction is made between parenchymal and ductal changes that specifically indicate the presence of AIP.

METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS AND EVALUATION

The diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis should be made based on the International Consensus Criteria (ICDC), in which the five main features (imaging, serology, histology, other organ involvement, response to steroid medication) are assessed. In type 1 AIP, typical imaging changes are sufficient to establish the diagnosis even with negative histology, whereas for type 2 AIP, histologic evidence is required. Imaging changes help in the differential diagnosis from pancreatic cancer.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

The following article addresses and evaluates crucial imaging diagnostic CT and MRI criteria for correct classification of findings, description of results, and differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer.

Autoimmune pancreatitis type 2 (idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis): A comprehensive review

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an uncommon fibro-inflammatory disorder precipitated by autoimmune/inflammatory reactions. Currently, there are two clinical subtypes of AIP (type 1 [AIP-1] and type 2 [AIP-2]) that correspond to two histologic descriptors (lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis, respectively). While our understanding of AIP-1 has evolved considerably over the years, little is known about AIP-2 due to its rarity, often leading to misdiagnosis, delayed treatment, and even unnecessary surgical resection. Compared to AIP-1, AIP-2 exhibits distinct clinical and histologic features. Because AIP-2 is a pancreas-restricted disease without a specific serum marker, the evaluation of histologic features (e.g., granulocytic epithelial lesions) is essential for an accurate diagnosis. Patients with AIP-2 respond well to glucocorticoids, with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibodies as a promising alternative therapy. The prognosis of AIP-2 is generally favorable and relapse is uncommon. Here, we provide an overview of our current knowledge on the clinical features, diagnosis, therapeutic regimens, prognosis, and putative mechanisms underlying AIP-2. Notably, the diagnostic differentiation between AIP-2, especially the mass-forming/focal type, and pancreatic cancer is important, but challenging. In this regard, endoscopic ultrasound-guided core biopsy has a key role, but novel diagnostic markers and modalities are clearly needed.

Main Diagnostic Criteria Usually Does Not Work for Autoimmune Pancreatitis Wrongly Presuming Malignancy

Background

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) usually responds dramatically to steroid therapy. Occasionally, however, misdiagnosed patients have undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy. This study is aimed at providing useful information to improve the accuracy of diagnosis before surgery and thus avoid unnecessary resections in patients with AIP.

Methods

From January 2015 to February 2020, a series of patients were enrolled, having undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy for presumed malignancy. AIP diagnoses were confirmed by postoperative pathology. The demographic and clinical data of the AIP patients were evaluated. The main diagnostic criteria (HISORt, Asian, and ICDC) for AIP were applied to assess whether and how unnecessary surgery could have been avoided.

Results

A total of 124 cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy were performed for presumed malignancy. Six patients were diagnosed with benign disease and five with AIP. The prevalences of benign disease and AIP were 4.8% and 4%, respectively. Four patients were female and 1 male, with a mean age of 60.0 years old. Jaundice, pain, and weight loss were observed in 100%, 20%, and 40% of AIP patients, respectively. The radiologic features of the AIP patients were a diffusely enlarged gland (40.0%), a focally enlarged gland (40.0%), pancreatic ductal dilatation (60.0%), upstream parenchymal atrophy (20.0%), bile duct thickening (66.0%), and bile duct stricture (40.0%). Based on the diagnostic criteria for AIP, surgery could have been avoided in two cases.

Conclusions

IgG4 measurement and integrated use of major diagnostic criteria should be emphasized in every patient eligible for pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Case report: Induction and maintenance of steroid-free remission with vedolizumab in a case of steroid-dependent autoimmune pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis responds well to corticosteroids in most instances. Additional immunosuppression or low-dose maintenance steroids may be necessary upon relapse. There is limited data on alternative strategies when these regiments fail or cause adverse reactions. We report a case of a middle-aged woman with autoimmune pancreatitis in whom tapering of prednisolone below the dose of 25mg per day resulted in relapse of symptoms and long-term steroid use led to development of steroid induced hyperglycaemia. Induction and maintenance of steroid-free remission was ultimately successful under vedolizumab therapy. Remission has been stable for over one year with reduced need for antidiabetic intervention. This is the first reported case of treatment of refractory autoimmune pancreatitis with vedolizumab. It highlights the overlap of immunological mechanisms within inflammatory diseases of the digestive tract and how knowledge of biological data can inform treatment decisions for individual cases. The demonstrated efficacy of vedolizumab and low risk of severe side effects warrant further investigation into its use in autoimmune pancreatitis.

Autoimmune Pancreatitis: From Pathogenesis to Treatment

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare disease. The diagnosis of AIP is difficult and should be made by a comprehensive evaluation of clinical, radiological, serological, and pathological findings. Two different types of AIP have been identified: autoimmune pancreatitis type 1 (AIP-1), which is considered a pancreatic manifestation of multiorgan disease related to IgG4, and autoimmune pancreatitis type 2 (AIP-2), which is considered a pancreas-specific disease not related to IgG4. Although the pathophysiological conditions seem to differ between type 1 and type 2 pancreatitis, both respond well to steroid medications. In this review, we focused on the pathogenesis of the disease to develop a tool that could facilitate diagnosis and lead to the discovery of new therapeutic strategies to combat autoimmune pancreatitis and its relapses. The standard therapy for AIP is oral administration of corticosteroids. Rituximab (RTX) has also been proposed for induction of remission and maintenance therapy in relapsing AIP-1. In selected patients, immunomodulators such as azathioprine are used to maintain remission. The strength of this review, compared with previous studies, is that it focuses on the clear difference between the two types of autoimmune pancreatitis with a clearly delineated and separate pathogenesis. In addition, the review also considers various therapeutic options, including biologic drugs, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy, a well-tolerated and effective second-line therapy for AIP type 2 relapses or steroid dependence. Other biologic therapies are also being explored that could provide a useful therapeutic alternative to corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, which are poorly tolerated due to significant side effects.

Incidence of endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis at diagnosis and after treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare form of pancreatitis that may lead to endocrine and exocrine insufficiency if left untreated. AIP clinically responds to glucocorticoids (GCs) therapy, but multiple GCs courses are often required to maintain remission with detrimental effects on glycaemic control.

OBJECTIVE

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the rate of endocrine and of exocrine insufficiency at diagnosis and at follow up in patients with AIP as well as the impact of GC therapy on pancreatic function in the long-term.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to August 2021 to identify studies reporting data on endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in patients with AIP. Pooled events were calculated using a random-effect model and expressed in terms of pooled prevalence rates.

RESULTS

A total of 6522 AIP patients and sixty-two studies were included in the analysis. The pooled estimate rate for the overall prevalence of diabetes in AIP at baseline was 37% (95% CI 32-42, I² 96%). The pooled prevalence rate of exocrine insufficiency was 45% (95%CI 32.9-57.4; I² 97%). The pooled estimate rate of diabetes at follow-up was 44% (95%CI 26.1-62.4) in studies where GCs were given to 100% of patients and 42% (95%CI 30.6-52.9) in studies where GCs were given to less than 100% of patients.

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of patients with AIP displays concomitant exocrine and endocrine insufficiency at the time of diagnosis. The incidence of diabetes at the longest available follow up tends to increase in patients treated with GCs.

IgG4-related diseases of the digestive tract

IgG4-related conditions affecting the digestive tract are part of a multi-organ fibro-inflammatory disorder termed IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD), with autoimmune pancreatitis and IgG4-related cholangitis being the most prominent manifestations. Gastrointestinal symptoms include jaundice, weight loss, abdominal pain, biliary strictures, and pancreatic and hepatic masses that mimic malignant diseases. IgG4-RD manifestations occur less frequently elsewhere in the digestive tract, namely in the oesophagus, retroperitoneum or intestine. Evidence-based European guidelines frame the current state-of-the-art in the diagnosis and management of IgG4-related digestive tract disease. Diagnosis is based on histology (if available), imaging, serology, other organ involvement and response to therapy (HISORt criteria). Few biomarkers beyond serum IgG4 concentrations are reliable. The first-line therapy (glucocorticoids) is swiftly effective but disease flares are common at low doses or after tapering. Second-line therapy might consist of other immunosuppressive drugs such as thiopurines or rituximab. Further trials, for example, of anti-CD19 drugs, are ongoing. Although an association between IgG4-RD and the development of malignancies has been postulated, the true nature of this relationship remains uncertain at this time.

A Follow-Up Study of a European IgG4-Related Disease Cohort Treated with Rituximab

OBJECTIVES

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a chronic fibro-inflammatory disorder affecting virtually any organ. Type 1 autoimmune (type 1 AIP) is its pancreatic manifestation. To date, steroids are considered the first-line pancreatitis treatment. The CD20-binding antibody rituximab (RTX) appears a promising steroid-sparing therapy, although long-term data are lacking. We aimed to bridge this gap with a cohort of IgG4-RD patients treated with RTX and to assess the potential value of the Responder Index (RI) as a discriminatory score for disease activity.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 46 patients from a tertiary referral centre who were diagnosed with IgG4-RD and/or type 1 AIP according to the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria or Unifying-AIP criteria between June 2006 and August 2019.

RESULTS

Patients resembled previous cohorts in terms of characteristics, diagnosis, and therapeutic response. Thirteen of the 46 patients with IgG4-RD/type 1 AIP were treated with RTX pulse therapy due to relapse, adverse reactions to steroids, or high-risk constellations predicting a severe course of disease with multi-organ involvement. Median follow-up after diagnosis was 52 months for all subjects, and 71 months in IgG4-RD patients treated with RTX. While patients in the RTX group showed no significant response to an initial steroid pulse, clinical activity as measured by the RI significantly decreased in the short-term after RTX induction. Within 16 months, 61% of patients relapsed in the RTX group but responded well to re-induction. Clinical and laboratory parameters improved equally in response to RTX.

CONCLUSION

RTX therapy in patients with IgG4-RD is an effective and safe treatment to induce treatment response and possible long-term remission. Repeated RTX administration after 6-9 months may be of value in reducing the risk of relapse. The RI appears to be a reasonable index to assess disease activity and to identify patients with IgG4-related disease who may benefit from B-cell-depleting therapy.

[Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Pancreatitis]

Chronic pancreatitis is a complex chronic inflammatory condition that results in pancreas fibrosis and calcification with subsequent exocrine and endocrine insufficiency. Alcohol and nicotine are the most prevalent risk factors, however, recent studies have increasingly discovered genetic associations that increase the risk to develop chronic pancreatitis. Here, we discuss different etiologies of the disease including autoimmune pancreatitis, and present evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. In particular, we highlight the interdisciplinary and interventional management of local complications such as pseudocysts, pancreatic duct stones, biliary duct and pancreatic duct stenosis and persistent pain.

PrescrAIP: A Pan-European Study on Current Treatment Regimens of Auto-Immune Pancreatitis

Introduction: Treatment of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is based solely on consensus and has yet to become standardized. Consequently, therapeutic regimens vary greatly between countries and centers, and largely depend on the experience of the physician. At this moment, the optimal regimen for inducing disease remission and preventing relapse is unknown. Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to describe current treatment regimens used in Europe, and to compare their effectiveness in inducing remission and preventing and treating relapse. The secondary objectives are: to identify risk factors for relapse; to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the Unified-AIP criteria; to assess the performance of the M-ANNHEIM score for predicting relapse; and to assess long-term outcomes including pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and pancreatic cancer. Methods: This is an international, retrospective, observational cohort study, performed in over 40 centers from 16 European countries. Eligible are all patients diagnosed with AIP from 2005 onwards, regardless of the used diagnostic criteria. Data on study subjects will be retrieved from the hospital's electronic medical records and registered with a standardized, web-based, electronic case report form (eCRF). To compare the effectiveness of treatment regimens in inducing remission, preventing relapse, and treating relapse, subjects will be stratified in groups based on: type of therapy; initial therapy dose; cumulative therapy dose; therapy tapering speed and duration; and having received maintenance therapy or not. Ethics and Dissemination: Ethical and/or institutional review board approvals are obtained by all participating centers according to local regulations. The study complies with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). All manuscripts resulting from the study will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals. Conclusion: This is the first pan-European retrospective registry for AIP. It will produce the first large-scale data on treatment of European patients with AIP, providing answers on the use and effectiveness of treatment regimens. In the future, this collaboration may provide a network for continuation into a prospective European registry.

Multicentric Italian survey on daily practice for autoimmune pancreatitis: Clinical data, diagnosis, treatment, and evolution toward pancreatic insufficiency

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare, and relatively new, form of chronic pancreatitis. The management of AIP can vary considerably among different centres in daily clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to present a picture of epidemiological, clinical characteristics, outcomes, and the real-life practice in terms of management in several academic and non-academic centres in Italy.

METHODS

Data on the clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, treatments, frequency of relapses, and long-term outcomes were retrospectively collected in a cohort of AIP patients diagnosed at 14 centres in Italy.

RESULTS

One hundred and six patients were classified as type 1 AIP, 48 as type 2 AIP, and 19 as not otherwise specified. Epidemiological, clinical, radiological, and serological characteristics, and relapses were similar to those previously reported for different types of AIP. Endoscopic cytohistology was available in 46.2% of cases, and diagnostic for AIP in only 35.2%. Steroid trial to aid diagnosis was administered in 43.3% cases, and effective in 93.3%. Steroid therapy was used in 70.5% of cases, and effective in 92.6% of patients. Maintenance therapy with low dose of steroid (MST) was prescribed in 25.4% of cases at a mean dose of 5 (±1.4) mg/die, and median time of MST was 60 days. Immunosuppressive drugs were rarely used (10.9%), and rituximab in 1.7%. Faecal elastase-1 was evaluated in only 31.2% of patients, and was pathological in 59.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of AIP patients, diagnosis and classification for subtype was frequently possible, confirming the different characteristics of AIP1 and AIP2 previously reported. Nevertheless, we observed a low use of histology and steroid trial for a diagnosis of AIP. Steroid treatment was the most used therapy in our cohort. Immunosuppressants and rituximab were rarely used. The evaluation of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency is underemployed considering its high prevalence.

Immunoglobulin G subtypes-1 and 2 differentiate immunoglobulin G4-associated sclerosing cholangitis from primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis is a special form of chronic pancreatitis with strong lymphocytic infiltration and two histopathological distinct subtypes, a lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis and idiopathic duct centric pancreatitis. Immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis may be present at the time of autoimmune pancreatitis type 1 diagnosis or occur later over the course of the disease. Immunoglobulin G4 is considered reliable but not an ideal marker for diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis type 1 with reported sensitivity between 71-81%. It is essential to differentiate sclerosing cholangitis with autoimmune pancreatitis from primary sclerosing cholangitis as the treatment and prognosis of the two diseases are totally different. It was the aim of the study to find a marker for immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis that would distinguish it from primary sclerosing cholangitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with autoimmune pancreatitis at our outpatient clinic. Patients from the primary sclerosing cholangitis registry were taken as a control group. Blood samples for the measurement of immunoglobulin subclasses were analysed at the time of diagnosis.

RESULTS

Patients with autoimmune pancreatitis and immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis had higher values of immunoglobulin G2 when compared to autoimmune pancreatitis alone or primary sclerosing cholangitis with a high specificity (97%) and high positive predictive value (91%). In patients with normal or low immunoglobulin G2 or immunoglobulin G4, a high level of immunoglobulin G1 indicated primary sclerosing cholangitis.

CONCLUSION

Immunoglobulin G1 and immunoglobulin G2 can distinguish patients with immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis from those with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Diagnosis, treatment and long-term outcome of autoimmune pancreatitis in Sweden

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a pancreatic inflammatory process characterized by a strong inflammatory cell infiltration and two histopathologically distinct subtypes: type 1 and type 2. Diagnosis is often challenging and requires a combination of clinical, laboratory and imaging data. AIP can mimic pancreatic tumours leading to unnecessary resections if not correctly diagnosed. Short- and long-term outcomes of AIP have been poorly investigated so far and no large series have been previously reported from Sweden.

METHODS

A single-centre, retrospective, cohort study of patients with histologically confirmed or highly probable diagnosis of AIP according to ICDC criteria. Demographic, clinical and radiological characteristics, type of treatment and its outcomes were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients with AIP (87% with type 1), were evaluated at Karolinska University Hospital between 2004 and 2018; 49% males, mean age 49 years (range 44-53). Among them, 28% were histologically confirmed, 35% presented with jaundice, 22% with acute pancreatitis, 39% had non-specific symptoms such as weight loss or abdominal pain, 84% showed other organ involvement (OOI). Radiologically, 76% showed a focal pancreatic enlargement, 27% diffuse enlargement, 27% signs of acute pancreatitis and 10% of chronic pancreatitis. Overall, 58 patients (81%) underwent treatment with different medications: 46 (79%) cortisone, 7 (12%) azathioprine, 5 (8%) other immunosuppressive drugs. Twenty-six (36%) underwent biliary stenting and 12 (16%) were given surgery. In total, 47% of patients developed pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI), of whom 76% had a severe form (faecal elastase-1 < 100 μg/g) and 21% of patients developed diabetes mellitus (pancreatic endocrine insufficiency), of whom 73% required insulin.

CONCLUSIONS

AIP is a challenging disease for diagnosis and treatment. Cortisone treatment is generally successful and provides clinical remission in the large majority of patients (>90%). In the further course of the disease, a considerable number of patients develop PEI and diabetes. Only one-quarter of patients exhibit on imaging the characteristic "sausage-like" pancreas (diffuse enlargement), approximately three-quarters had a focal mass that could be misdiagnosed as pancreatic malignancy.

MR Imaging of Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is characterized by autoimmune inflammatory destruction of the pancreatic tissue. Imaging plays an essential role in the diagnosis. AIP type 1 is the pancreatic manifestation of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related disease and is associated with IgG4-positive plasma cell infiltration and fibrosis of multiple organ systems. Type 2 is a related disease with pancreatic inflammation with or without concurrent inflammatory bowel disease. The authors demonstrate the imaging findings that are associated with the pancreatic and extra-pancreatic manifestations of AIP. They emphasize the common MR imaging and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography findings to help make the diagnosis of AIP.

Prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in alcoholic, non-alcoholic and autoimmune pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently reveal features of pancreatic inflammation. However, the prevalence of IBD in patients with alcoholic pancreatitis (AP) and nonalcoholic pancreatitis (NAP) has not yet been determined, and the prevalence of IBD in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AiP) from Germany is unknown.

AIMS

Thus, we aimed, first, to determine the prevalence of IBD in AP, NAP, and AiP from a tertiary center in Germany and, second, to characterize patients with AiP and IBD.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study to determine the prevalence of IBD in patients with different forms of pancreatitis presenting to our clinic.

RESULTS

Compared to the general population and to a control group with viral hepatitis from our clinic, we observed the most significant increase of IBD in patients with AiP (n = 3/28; p < 0.0001 vs. general population, binomial proportion test; p = 0.0112 vs. hepatitis group, Fisher's exact test), followed by a significant increase in subjects with NAP (n = 11/278; p < 0.0001 vs. general population, binomial proportion test; p = 0.0338 vs. hepatitis group, Fisher's exact test). A review of previous studies on the prevalence of IBD among patients with AiP revealed a combined prevalence of 12 % (n = 43/355). Type 2 AiP is significantly more often associated with IBD than type 1 AiP (n = 28/48, 58 % vs. n = 7/129, 5 %; combined patient cohort, p < 10E - 12; Fisher's exact test).

CONCLUSIONS

Immune-mediated mechanisms related to IBD may participate in the development of AiP, especially AiP type 2, and may also increase the risk for the development of other forms of pancreatic inflammation.

Monitoring and predicting disease activity in autoimmune pancreatitis with the M-ANNHEIM-AiP-Activity-Score

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AiP) is treated by immunosuppressive therapy. Exact description of disease activity of AiP is essential in clinical practice and research, but a score to describe the disease activity is missing. Thus, we aimed to establish an activity score of AiP.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied long-term disease courses of 29 patients with AiP (Mannheim, Germany), receiving corticosteroid treatment (CST) by analyzing 613 treatment appointments. Two assumptions were made: First, disease activity is higher at emergency treatments; second, disease activity drops under CST. In all patients, we evaluated established activity- and classification-systems of chronic pancreatitis (cP). Based on the most suitable system, we established an activity score of AiP by including AiP-specific parameters identified from our long-term disease courses and the literature. The new AiP-specific activity score was validated in an external cohort of 14 patients with AiP (Stockholm, Sweden).

RESULTS

Within published activity indexes of cP, the M-ANNHEIM-classification most significantly correlated with emergency- and treatment-dependent disease activities (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, conditional-logistic-regression-analysis). Significant correlations of disease activity were found for several clinical parameters (biliary involvement, extrapancreatic lesions, acute pancreatitis, focal pancreatic mass, pancreatic sausage/mass, focal enlargement, ascites; p < 0.05, Wilcoxon-signed-rank-test). Based on these data and disease features from the literature, the M-ANNHEIM-AiP-Activity-Score (MAAS) was established. CST-induced reduction of MAAS disease activity of more than 60% was associated with lower relapse rates (p < 0.05; Chi-Square-test). The results were validated in the external patient cohort.

CONCLUSION

The MAAS might represent a useful tool to monitor AiP.

Gastrointestinal Manifestations of Autoimmune Diseases Requiring Critical Care

Proper functioning within the gastrointestinal (GI) system is essential to immune integrity. Autoimmune diseases (ADs) can disrupt GI integrity and cause serious derangements of organ function. ADs exist on a continuum of mild to severe. Life-threatening presentations of ADs can lead to rapid clinical demise. Additionally, the medications used to control ADs can precipitate gastric bleeding and predispose patients to sepsis in critical care. AD treatment focuses on diminishing symptoms through reducing autoantibody production that leads to cytokine release. This article details common and rare presentations of acute ADs associated with GI manifestations in critically ill patients.

Prevalence and Incidence of Autoimmune Pancreatitis in the Population Living in the Southwest of Germany

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The prevalence and incidence of autoimmune pancreatitis (AiP) in those living in western countries are largely unknown. We aimed to determine the prevalence of AiP among patients with pancreatitis presenting to our tertiary referral center in Mannheim, Germany; and to estimate the incidence of AiP in the Southwest of Germany.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis and determined the prevalence of AiP in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) or chronic pancreatitis (CP). Patients (n = 704; alcoholic pancreatitis n = 373, nonalcoholic pancreatitis n = 331) were stratified into the Retrospective-Pancreas-Cohort (RPC, period 1998-2008, n = 534) and the Pancreas-Clinic-Cohort (PCC, periods 2008-2010 and 2013-2014, n = 170, with detailed investigation for features of AiP). Diagnosis of AiP was established by International-Consensus-Diagnostic-Criteria and Unifying-Autoimmune-Pancreatitis-Criteria.

RESULTS

In the RPC, the prevalence of AiP was 5.9% (n = 13/221) among individuals with nonalcoholic pancreatitis (n = 1/61 with AP, 1.6%; n = 12/160 with CP, 7.5%). In the PCC, the prevalence of AiP was 9.1% (n = 10/110) among patients with nonalcoholic pancreatitis (n = 2/24 with AP, 8.3%; n = 8/86 with CP, 9.3%), and 1.7% (n = 1/60) among subjects with alcoholic pancreatitis. We estimated the incidence of AiP with 0.29 per 100,000 population each year.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence rate of AiP may account for 9% of patients with nonalcoholic pancreatitis but is almost never observed in patients with alcoholic pancreatitis. The incidence of AiP in Germany appears lower than 1 per 100,000 population.