Monitoring and predicting disease activity in autoimmune pancreatitis with the M-ANNHEIM-AiP-Activity-Score

The M-ANNHEIM-AiP-Activity-Score is useful for predicting relapse in patients with type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Proper assessment of disease activity and prediction of relapse are crucial for the management of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). The M-ANNHEIM-AiP-Activity-Score (MAAS) has been proposed to determine disease activity and predict relapse in German and Swedish patients with AIP. MAAS is calculated using six categories: pain report, pain control, exocrine insufficiency, endocrine insufficiency, imaging, and complications. This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of MAAS to predict relapse in Japanese patients with type 1 AIP.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 117 patients with type 1 AIP undergoing initial and maintenance steroid treatments at our institute between April 2006 and March 2021. AIP was diagnosed according to the Japanese Diagnostic Criteria for AIP 2018. We examined the association of MAAS with relapse during and after maintenance treatment.

RESULTS

MAAS (median, 8 points) at the start of the initial treatment was reduced after treatment (median, 4 points; P < 0.001). A MAAS ≥11 points at the start of the initial treatment was associated with relapse. The initial treatment-induced reduction of MAAS<60% was more frequent in patients with relapse (75.0%) than in patients without relapse (37.6%; P = 0.007). MAAS at the start of maintenance treatment was higher for patients with relapse (median, 5 points) than that for patients without relapse (median, 4 points; P = 0.007). MAAS ≥4 points at the start of maintenance treatment was associated with subsequent relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

MAAS is useful for predicting relapse in patients with type 1 AIP undergoing maintenance therapy.

IgG4-related diseases of the digestive tract

IgG4-related conditions affecting the digestive tract are part of a multi-organ fibro-inflammatory disorder termed IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD), with autoimmune pancreatitis and IgG4-related cholangitis being the most prominent manifestations. Gastrointestinal symptoms include jaundice, weight loss, abdominal pain, biliary strictures, and pancreatic and hepatic masses that mimic malignant diseases. IgG4-RD manifestations occur less frequently elsewhere in the digestive tract, namely in the oesophagus, retroperitoneum or intestine. Evidence-based European guidelines frame the current state-of-the-art in the diagnosis and management of IgG4-related digestive tract disease. Diagnosis is based on histology (if available), imaging, serology, other organ involvement and response to therapy (HISORt criteria). Few biomarkers beyond serum IgG4 concentrations are reliable. The first-line therapy (glucocorticoids) is swiftly effective but disease flares are common at low doses or after tapering. Second-line therapy might consist of other immunosuppressive drugs such as thiopurines or rituximab. Further trials, for example, of anti-CD19 drugs, are ongoing. Although an association between IgG4-RD and the development of malignancies has been postulated, the true nature of this relationship remains uncertain at this time.

Chronic Pancreatitis: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management Updates

Chronic pancreatitis is a clinical entity that results from the progressive inflammation and irreversible fibrosis of the pancreas resulting from the cumulative injury sustained by the pancreas over time. It is an illness with variable presentations that can severely impact quality of life, while its long-term complications such as exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI), diabetes mellitus, and risk of pancreatic cancer can become life threatening. The diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis can be challenging as despite the recent advancements in imaging technology, the radiographic findings do not become prominent until late stages of disease. Thus, the physicians' clinical acumen in obtaining thorough history taking focusing on risk factors, clinical symptoms, in addition to high-quality imaging, often guide to the accurate diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy also plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis and management of chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is believed to be the most sensitive modality for diagnosing chronic pancreatitis. Despite efforts, however, natural history studies have demonstrated that 61% of individuals with chronic pancreatitis will require at least one endoscopic intervention, while 31% will require a surgical procedure as part of their management strategy. Recent advancements in genomic studies have furthered our understanding of the genetic polymorphisms that are associated with the pathogenesis of chronic pancreatitis. Genetic testing offers the potential to reveal treatable pancreatitis-related disorders, and can inform decision making with regard to radical therapies for persistent or severe disease such as total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT). The management of patients suffering from chronic pancreatitis often requires a multi-disciplinary approach, addressing pertinent symptoms as well as the sequelae of chronic inflammation and fibrosis. Abdominal pain is the prevailing symptom and most common complication of chronic pancreatitis, and impairs quality of life. Although heavily dependent on a wide range of analgesia, endoscopic treatment such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and surgical intervention can offer long-lasting relief of symptoms. For EPI, treatment with pancreatic enzyme supplements offers marginal-to-moderate relief. The most feared complication of chronic pancreatitis-the development of pancreatic cancer-has no known prevention measure to date.

[Recent Updates of Immunoglobulin G4-related Pancreatobiliary Disease]

Type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis (IgG4-SC) are the pancreatobiliary manifestations of IgG4-related disease. IgG4-related disease is a newly named fibroinflammatory condition that is characterized by tumefactive lesions that contain dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates rich in IgG4-positive cells and often by elevated serum IgG4 concentrations. IgG4-related pancreatobiliary disease is often disguised as pancreatobiliary malignancies owing to its tumefactive nature and clinical presentations, such as obstructive jaundice. The differentiation of IgG4-SC from primary sclerosing cholangitis is also essential because of the significant differences in treatment responses and prognosis. A timely diagnosis of IgG4-related pancreatobiliary disease can lead clinicians to prescribe adequate glucocorticoid treatment that can reverse the pancreatobiliary duct strictures and obstructive jaundice. On the other hand, the diagnosis of IgG4-related pancreatobiliary disease is sometimes challenging because there is no single diagnostic clinical test. The diagnosis of IgG4-related pancreatobiliary disease rests on fulfilling the diagnostic criteria, including imaging, serology, other organ involvement, histology, and response to steroids. Approximately 50% of patients with IgG4-related pancreatobiliary disease experience relapse, despite IgG4-related pancreatobiliary disease showings a favorable short-term prognosis after glucocorticoid therapy. To reduce the relapse, long maintenance treatment for 3 years may be necessary. The purposes of this review were to emphasize the clinical problem of diagnosing IgG4-related pancreatobiliary disease as well as to highlight the use of the published guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IgG4-related pancreatobiliary disease.

Determination of the duration of glucocorticoid therapy in type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The indications for maintenance glucocorticoid therapy (MGT) and its duration after initial remission of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) remain controversial. In contrast to the Japanese treatment protocol, the Mayo protocol does not recommend MGT after initial remission. This study aimed to evaluate the relapse rate in patients with type 1 AIP according to the duration of glucocorticoid therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review up until November 30, 2020, and identified 40 studies reporting AIP relapse rates. The pooled relapse rates were compared between groups according to the protocol and duration of glucocorticoids (routine vs. no MGT; glucocorticoids ≤6 months vs. 6-12 months vs. 12-36 months vs. ≥ 36 months). The pooled rates of adverse events related to glucocorticoids were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis indicated calculated pooled relapse rates of 46.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 38.9-54.3%) with glucocorticoids for ≤ 6 months, 44.3% (95% CI, 38.8-49.8%) for 6-12 months, 34.1% (95% CI, 28.6-39.7%) for 12-36 months, and 27.0% (95% CI, 23.4-30.6%) for ≥ 36 months. The rate of relapse was also significantly lower in patients with routine-use protocol of MGT (31.2%; 95% CI, 27.5-34.8%) than in patients with no MGT protocol (44.1%; 95% CI, 35.8-52.4%). Adverse events were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of relapse tended to decrease with extended durations of glucocorticoid therapy up to 36 months. Clinicians may decide the duration of glucocorticoids according to patient condition, including comorbidities and risk of relapse.

Pain Management in Chronic Pancreatitis: Summary of Clinical Practice, Current Challenges and Potential Contribution of the M-ANNHEIM Classification

Abdominal pain, diarrhea with weight loss, and endocrine insufficiency represent the dominant symptoms of chronic pancreatitis (CP). High intensity of pain and constant pain have been shown to reduce quality of life in CP and may result in disability and increased health resource utilization. Various basic challenges and unanswered questions still exist regarding the treatment of pain in CP. Recently, limited evidence has been gained that early surgery for painful disease might be associated with better treatment results. Thus, timing of pancreatic surgery in painful disease represents a major issue that needs to be clarified in future studies. In this context, surveillance of patients is necessary in clinical practice. It appears that a generally accepted classification of the disease represents a major requirement for inter-institutional comparison of data with future progress in clinical research. Among recently proposed classification systems, the M-ANNHEIM classification system of CP with its recently presented M-ANNHEIM Surgery Score might be a useful tool to picture the course of the disease and to monitor treatment results. Future research is required to clarify the possible role of this system in the management of pain in CP. In the present article, we provide an overview of current status, challenges, and unanswered questions in the treatment of pain in CP, and we demonstrate the potential benefits of the M-ANNHEIM classification system in the management of painful CP.

Pancreatitis: TIGAR-O Version 2 Risk/Etiology Checklist With Topic Reviews, Updates, and Use Primers

The Toxic-metabolic, Idiopathic, Genetic, Autoimmune, Recurrent and severe acute pancreatitis and Obstructive (TIGAR-O) Pancreatitis Risk/Etiology Checklist (TIGAR-O_V1) is a broad classification system that lists the major risk factors and etiologies of recurrent acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, and overlapping pancreatic disorders with or without genetic, immunologic, metabolic, nutritional, neurologic, metaplastic, or other features. New discoveries and progressive concepts since the 2001 TIGAR-O list relevant to understanding and managing complex pancreatic disorders require an update to TIGAR-O_V2 with both a short (S) and long (L) form. The revised system is designed as a hierarchical checklist for health care workers to quickly document and track specific factors that, alone or in combinations, may contribute to progressive pancreatic disease in individual patients or groups of patients and to assist in treatment selection. The rationale and key clinical considerations are summarized for each updated classification item. Familiarity with the structured format speeds up the completion process and supports thoroughness and consideration of complex or alternative diagnoses during evaluation and serves as a framework for communication. The structured approach also facilitates the new health information technologies that required high-quality data for accurate precision medicine. A use primer accompanies the TIGAR-O_V2 checklist with rationale and comments for health care workers and industries caring for patients with pancreatic diseases.

PrescrAIP: A Pan-European Study on Current Treatment Regimens of Auto-Immune Pancreatitis

Introduction: Treatment of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is based solely on consensus and has yet to become standardized. Consequently, therapeutic regimens vary greatly between countries and centers, and largely depend on the experience of the physician. At this moment, the optimal regimen for inducing disease remission and preventing relapse is unknown. Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to describe current treatment regimens used in Europe, and to compare their effectiveness in inducing remission and preventing and treating relapse. The secondary objectives are: to identify risk factors for relapse; to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the Unified-AIP criteria; to assess the performance of the M-ANNHEIM score for predicting relapse; and to assess long-term outcomes including pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and pancreatic cancer. Methods: This is an international, retrospective, observational cohort study, performed in over 40 centers from 16 European countries. Eligible are all patients diagnosed with AIP from 2005 onwards, regardless of the used diagnostic criteria. Data on study subjects will be retrieved from the hospital's electronic medical records and registered with a standardized, web-based, electronic case report form (eCRF). To compare the effectiveness of treatment regimens in inducing remission, preventing relapse, and treating relapse, subjects will be stratified in groups based on: type of therapy; initial therapy dose; cumulative therapy dose; therapy tapering speed and duration; and having received maintenance therapy or not. Ethics and Dissemination: Ethical and/or institutional review board approvals are obtained by all participating centers according to local regulations. The study complies with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). All manuscripts resulting from the study will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals. Conclusion: This is the first pan-European retrospective registry for AIP. It will produce the first large-scale data on treatment of European patients with AIP, providing answers on the use and effectiveness of treatment regimens. In the future, this collaboration may provide a network for continuation into a prospective European registry.

European Guideline on IgG4-related digestive disease - UEG and SGF evidence-based recommendations

The overall objective of these guidelines is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related digestive disease in adults and children. IgG4-related digestive disease can be diagnosed only with a comprehensive work-up that includes histology, organ morphology at imaging, serology, search for other organ involvement, and response to glucocorticoid treatment. Indications for treatment are symptomatic patients with obstructive jaundice, abdominal pain, posterior pancreatic pain, and involvement of extra-pancreatic digestive organs, including IgG4-related cholangitis. Treatment with glucocorticoids should be weight-based and initiated at a dose of 0.6-0.8 mg/kg body weight/day orally (typical starting dose 30-40 mg/day prednisone equivalent) for 1 month to induce remission and then be tapered within two additional months. Response to initial treatment should be assessed at week 2-4 with clinical, biochemical and morphological markers. Maintenance treatment with glucocorticoids should be considered in multi-organ disease or history of relapse. If there is no change in disease activity and burden within 3 months, the diagnosis should be reconsidered. If the disease relapsed during the 3 months of treatment, immunosuppressive drugs should be added.

Advances in IgG4-related pancreatobiliary diseases

Autoimmune pancreatitis is an unusual form of pancreatitis that is histologically characterised by a massive infiltration of lymphocytes and IgG4-positive plasma cells and storiform fibrosis. The disease is recognised as a pancreatic manifestation of IgG4-related disease. IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis is a biliary counterpart that is typically associated with autoimmune pancreatitis. Two parallel immunological responses are thought to underlie the pathophysiology of these diseases: a pro-inflammatory, tissue-destructive process and an anti-inflammatory feedback response, which probably relates to IgG4 production. These diseases should be differentiated from conditions with a similar presentation (eg, pancreatobiliary malignancy, primary sclerosing cholangitis) by comparison of serum IgG4 concentration, imaging features, other organ involvement, histology, and steroid responsiveness. Corticosteroids are first-line drugs, although rituximab has been shown to effectively deplete B cells in IgG4-related disease. Although the risk of relapse is high, no standardised treatment protocol exists for relapsed cases.

Kidney Involvement in Patients with Type 1 Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Introduction: Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) type 1 is a special form of chronic pancreatitis with a strong lymphocytic infiltration as the pathological hallmark and other organ involvement (OOI). IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) was first reported as an extrapancreatic manifestation of AIP in 2004. The aim of the present study was to determine the frequency and clinical impact of kidney lesions observed in patients with AIP type 1. Methods: We performed a single-centre retrospective study on a prospectively collected cohort of patients with a histologically proven or highly probable diagnosis of AIP according to the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC) classification. Results: Seventy-one patients with AIP were evaluated. AIP type 1 was diagnosed in 62 (87%) patients. Kidney involvement was present in 17 (27.4%) patients with AIP type 1: 15 (88.2%) males and 2 (11.8%) females. Laboratory and/or imaging signs of kidney involvement were presented at the time of AIP diagnosis in eight (47.1%) patients. In other patients, the onset of kidney involvement occurred between four months and eight years following diagnosis. At the time of the diagnosis of kidney involvement, eight (47.1%) patients showed elevated creatinine, and nine (52.9%) patients showed normal serum creatinine. None of the patients were treated with dialysis. Conclusions: IgG4-RKD was present in 27.4% of patients with AIP type 1, with male gender predominance. In cases of early diagnosis and cortisone treatment, the clinical course was mild in most cases. Regular laboratory control of renal function should be a part of the follow-up of patients with AIP type 1.

Diagnosis, treatment and long-term outcome of autoimmune pancreatitis in Sweden

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a pancreatic inflammatory process characterized by a strong inflammatory cell infiltration and two histopathologically distinct subtypes: type 1 and type 2. Diagnosis is often challenging and requires a combination of clinical, laboratory and imaging data. AIP can mimic pancreatic tumours leading to unnecessary resections if not correctly diagnosed. Short- and long-term outcomes of AIP have been poorly investigated so far and no large series have been previously reported from Sweden.

METHODS

A single-centre, retrospective, cohort study of patients with histologically confirmed or highly probable diagnosis of AIP according to ICDC criteria. Demographic, clinical and radiological characteristics, type of treatment and its outcomes were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients with AIP (87% with type 1), were evaluated at Karolinska University Hospital between 2004 and 2018; 49% males, mean age 49 years (range 44-53). Among them, 28% were histologically confirmed, 35% presented with jaundice, 22% with acute pancreatitis, 39% had non-specific symptoms such as weight loss or abdominal pain, 84% showed other organ involvement (OOI). Radiologically, 76% showed a focal pancreatic enlargement, 27% diffuse enlargement, 27% signs of acute pancreatitis and 10% of chronic pancreatitis. Overall, 58 patients (81%) underwent treatment with different medications: 46 (79%) cortisone, 7 (12%) azathioprine, 5 (8%) other immunosuppressive drugs. Twenty-six (36%) underwent biliary stenting and 12 (16%) were given surgery. In total, 47% of patients developed pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI), of whom 76% had a severe form (faecal elastase-1 < 100 μg/g) and 21% of patients developed diabetes mellitus (pancreatic endocrine insufficiency), of whom 73% required insulin.

CONCLUSIONS

AIP is a challenging disease for diagnosis and treatment. Cortisone treatment is generally successful and provides clinical remission in the large majority of patients (>90%). In the further course of the disease, a considerable number of patients develop PEI and diabetes. Only one-quarter of patients exhibit on imaging the characteristic "sausage-like" pancreas (diffuse enlargement), approximately three-quarters had a focal mass that could be misdiagnosed as pancreatic malignancy.