Multiphase evaluation of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions

The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound and Ancillary Techniques in the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Comprehensive Review

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a unique form of chronic pancreatitis with a multifactorial pathogenesis. Historically, it has been classified as type 1 and type 2, according to its clinical and histological features. The diagnosis of AIP is challenging and relies on a combination of clinical, histopathologic, serologic, and imaging characteristics. In the available guidelines, the imaging hallmarks of AIP are based on cross-sectional imaging and cholangiopancreatography retrograde endoscopic findings. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is generally used for pancreatic tissue acquisition to rule out pancreatic cancer and diagnose AIP with limited accuracy. Several papers reported the reliability of EUS for providing informative morphologic features of AIP. Nowadays, the improvement in the resolution of EUS conventional images and the development of new ancillary technologies have further increased the diagnostic yield of EUS: contrast-enhanced EUS and EUS elastography are non-invasive and real-time techniques that strongly support the diagnosis and management of pancreatic diseases. In this review article, we will present the role of conventional EUS and ancillary diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of AIP to support clinicians and endosonographers in managing this condition.

Cutting edge of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions

This article provides an extensive review of the advancements and future perspectives related to endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs). EUS-TA, including fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB), has revolutionized the collection of specimens from intra-abdominal organs, including the pancreas. Improvements in the design of needles, collection methods, and specimen processing techniques have improved the diagnostic performance. This review highlights the latest findings regarding needle evolution, actuation number, sampling methods, specimen evaluation techniques, application of artificial intelligence (AI) for diagnostic purposes, and use of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). It acknowledges the rising use of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-FNB and emphasizes that the optimal number of actuations requires further study. Methods such as the door-knocking and fanning techniques have shown promise for increasing diagnostic performance. Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) is presented as a practical rapid specimen evaluation method, and the integration of AI is identified as a potentially impactful development. The study also underscores the importance of optimal sampling for CGP, which can enhance the precision of cancer treatment. Ongoing research and technological innovations will further improve the accuracy and efficacy of EUS-TA.

Use of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) provides high spatial and contrast resolution and is a useful tool for evaluating the pancreato-biliary regions. Recently, contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) has been used to evaluate lesion vascularity, especially for the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. CH-EUS adds two major advantages when diagnosing pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL). First, it can differentiate between mural nodules and mucous clots, thereby improving the accurate classification of PCL. Second, it helps with evaluation of the malignant potential of PCL, especially of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms by revealing the vascularity in the mural nodules and solid components. This review discusses the use and limitations of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PCL.

Development and validation of a combined nomogram model based on deep learning contrast-enhanced ultrasound and clinical factors to predict preoperative aggressiveness in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop and validate a combined nomogram model based on deep learning (DL) contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and clinical factors to preoperatively predict the aggressiveness of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, consecutive patients with histologically proven PNENs underwent CEUS examination at the initial work-up between January 2010 and October 2020. Patients were randomly allocated to the training and test sets. Typical sonographic and enhanced images of PNENs were selected to fine-tune the SE-ResNeXt-50 network. A combined nomogram model was developed by incorporating the DL predictive probability with clinical factors using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The utility of the proposed model was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic, calibration, and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients were evaluated, including 80 (mean age ± standard deviation, 47 years ± 12; 56 males) in the training set and 24 (50 years ± 12; 14 males) in the test set. The DL model displayed effective image recognition with an AUC of 0.81 (95%CI: 0.62-1.00) in the test set. The combined nomogram model that incorporated independent clinical risk factors, such as tumor size, arterial enhancement level, and DL predictive probability, showed strong discrimination, with an AUC of 0.85 (95%CI: 0.69-1.00) in the test set with good calibration. Decision curve analysis verified the clinical usefulness of the combined nomogram.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined nomogram model could serve as a preoperative, noninvasive, and precise evaluation tool to differentiate aggressive and non-aggressive PNENs.

KEY POINTS

• Tumor size (odds ratio [OR], 1.58; p = 0.02), arterial enhancement level (OR, 0.04; p = 0.008), and deep learning predictive probability (OR, 288.46; p < 0.001) independently predicted aggressiveness of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms preoperatively. • The combined model predicted aggressiveness better than the clinical model (AUC: 0.97 vs. 0.87, p = 0.009), achieving AUC values of 0.97 and 0.85 in the training set and the test set, respectively.

The role of EUS elastography-guided fine needle biopsy in the histological diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: a prospective exploratory study

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of Endoscopic ultrasound elastography-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-EG-FNB) for the diagnosis of pancreatic mass lesions. EUS-EG images were classified into heterogeneous and homogeneous groups. For the heterogeneous group, EUS-FNB was separately performed in both hard areas and soft areas. Only samples obtained during the first two passes (hard/soft areas) were used to compare the diagnostic accuracy as well as the quality and quantity of the specimens. We investigated the association of EUS-EG findings using strain histogram analysis with the histological findings. Fifty-five patients were enrolled including 25 patients with heterogeneous group. The homogeneous group had significantly lower mean strain value (hard) lesions. The adequate sampling rates from hard and soft areas were 88 and 92%, respectively (P = 0.6374). Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy and the quality and quantity of the histological core between hard and soft areas showed no significant differences. In pancreatic adenocarcinoma cases, the proportion of fibrous stroma in the core tissue was significantly correlated with the elasticity of the region. (R² = 0.1226: P = 0.0022) EUS-EG may reflect tissue composition in pancreatic tumors, however, EUS-EG did not affect either the quality and quantity of the tissues obtained.

Clinical Trial Registry No: UMIN-000033073.

Comparison of contrast-enhanced transabdominal ultrasonography following endoscopic ultrasonography with GD-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for the sequential diagnosis of liver metastasis in patients with pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

To compare contrast-enhanced transabdominal ultrasonography (CE-US) following contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CH-EUS) with enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (EOB-MRI) in the diagnosis of liver metastases in patients with pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Patients who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography for possible pancreatic cancer and required further evaluation with CH-EUS were enrolled in this study, and the diagnostic performance of CE-US following CH-EUS for liver metastasis was compared with that of EOB-MRI.

RESULTS

A total of 228 patients were included in the final analysis. Two hundred thirty-four hepatic lesions were found in 81 patients, and 178 lesions were finally diagnosed as metastases. EOB-MRI had a higher sensitivity (0.837 vs 0.949), while CE-US had a higher specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) (0.982 and 0.993 vs 0.911 and 0.971, respectively) in the diagnosis of liver metastasis. CE-US with defect reperfusion imaging had a higher diagnostic performance than EOB-MRI (0.866 vs 0.667) in the differentiation between liver metastasis and abscess.

CONCLUSION

EOB-MRI had a higher sensitivity than CE-US for diagnosing liver metastasis in patients with pancreatic cancer, but CE-US following CH-EUS demonstrated a higher specificity and PPV than EOB-MRI and was especially useful in the differentiation between liver metastasis and abscess.

Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma with predominant extension into the main pancreatic duct: A case report

A 34‐year‐old male was referred to our hospital for a possible pancreatic mass detected by computed tomography (CT) that was performed to find the cause of acute pancreatitis. Multiple imaging tests, including contrast‐enhanced CT scan, magnetic resonance imaging, contrast‐enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography, and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography, revealed a solid mass occupying the head of the main pancreatic duct (MDP), and pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. In the resected specimen, the tumor showed expansive growth from the pancreatic parenchyma to the MDP and formed a tumor plug. Histopathological findings together with immunostaining findings led to the diagnosis of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC). The patient was alive and recurrence‐free for 11 years after surgery. Extension into the MDP is more common in PACC than in conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. PACC patients with MDP extension may have less aggressive clinicopathologic characteristics, and a relatively good prognosis can be expected.

Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Solid Tumors with a Combination of Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses: A Prospective Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

Image evaluation of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) and additional time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis enable qualitative and quantitative analyses of pancreatic tumor based on real-time perfusion imaging.

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of CEH-EUS with a combination of qualitative and quantitative analyses of pancreatic solid tumors.

METHODS

Patients were scheduled to undergo EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) for pancreatic solid tumors were prospectively enrolled between 11/2016 and 12/2018 and underwent CEH-EUS. The vascular and enhancement patterns were qualitatively evaluated and heterogeneous enhancement was defined to be indicative of malignancy. The echo intensity change during 60 s in the tumor was quantitatively evaluated by time intensity curve analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 100 patients were enrolled in this study. The final diagnoses were malignant lesions in 87 patients and benign legions in 13 patients. There were four categories of enhancement and patterns: hypovascular with heterogeneous, hypovascular with homogeneous, hypervascular heterogeneous, and hypervascular homogeneous enhancement. The diagnostic capability of qualitative analysis was the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 89%, 62%, and 85%, respectively. With respect to time intensity curve analysis, the time to peak of malignant lesions was significantly shorter than those of benign lesions (P = 0.0009) with an optimal cutoff value of 12.81 s on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. With the combination of qualitative and quantitative analyses, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were improved to 100%, 54%, and 94%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CEH-EUS with combined qualitative and quantitative analyses for pancreatic tumors might be useful as a complement for EUS-FNA. The UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000025192).

Differentiation Between Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas and Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Using Endoscopic Ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for differentiating between solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas (SPN) and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PanNEN).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 29 and 77 consecutive patients with pathologically proven SPN and nonfunctional PanNEN. In patients who underwent contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS), lesions were classified into 3 vascular patterns (hypoechoic/isoechoic/hyperechoic), and the presence of "the alveolus nest sign," which we previously reported as a characteristic feature of SPN on CH-EUS, was also assessed.

RESULTS

Conventional EUS findings showed that calcification echoes were significantly more frequent in SPN lesions than in PanNEN lesions (19/29 [66%] vs 21/77 [27%], P = 0.001) as was internal isoechogenicity or hyperechogenicity (10/29 [34%] vs 11/77 [14%], P = 0.029). Contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS findings showed that SPN lesions more frequently had the isoechoic or hypoechoic vascular pattern, and significantly more frequently had the alveolus nest sign (18/25 [72%] vs 4/60 [7%], P < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, the presence of the alveolus nest sign contributed the most to the SPN diagnosis (odds ratio, 70; 95% confidence interval, 6.2-786).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic ultrasound, particularly the presence of the alveolus nest sign on CH-EUS, is useful for differentiating SPN from PanNEN.

Imaging diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using endoscopic ultrasonography

The diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is challenging and should be achieved through the comprehensive evaluation of clinical, radiological, serological, and pathological evidence, as there is currently no single reliable diagnostic modality. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) can reveal pancreatic parenchymal and ductal features in much more detail than any other existing imaging modality. In this article, we focused on three applications of EUS, i.e., conventional EUS imaging, EUS elastography (EUS-EG), and contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CEH-EUS), for the diagnosis of AIP. Diffuse hypoechoic areas, diffuse enlargement, bile duct wall thickening, and peripancreatic hypoechoic margins on conventional EUS are characteristic features of AIP, and the frequencies of these findings are significantly higher in AIP than in pancreatic cancer (PC). EUS-EG of the pancreatic parenchyma in AIP showed homogenous stiffness and that the elasticity of the pancreas may change after steroid therapy. CEH-EUS revealed focal or diffuse iso-enhancement in most AIP cases and hypo-enhancement in most PC cases. However, some AIP cases show a contrast enhancement pattern similar to that of PC. It should be noted that EUS findings of AIP may differ depending on its stage or disease activity. Differentiation from PC has become an increasingly important issue in the process of diagnosing AIP, and EUS, including elastography and contrast enhancement, could be a promising imaging modality for this purpose.

Differentiation between pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm using endoscopic ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) often appear many years after treatment of the primary tumor, and differentiation from pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PanNEN) can be challenging due to their hypervascularity. Here, we investigated the utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for differentiation of these conditions.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed in 17 and 79 consecutive patients with pathologically proven PRCC and non-functional PanNEN who were examined by EUS. In cases examined by EUS elastography or contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS), the lesions were classified as stiff or soft, or into three vascular patterns as hypoechoic, isoechoic, and hyperechoic. CH-EUS images at 20 s, 40 s, 60 s, 3 min and 5 min were used for evaluation. EUS images were independently reviewed by two readers who were blinded to all clinical information.

RESULTS

The patients with PRCC were significantly older than those with PanNEN (median, 71 (range, 45-81) vs. 58 (22-76), P = 0.001) and more often had multiple tumors (6/17 (35%) vs. 7/79 (9%), P = 0.010). In EUS findings, PRCC lesions significantly more frequently had a marginal hypoechoic zone (MHZ) (11/17 (65%) vs. 27/79 (34%), P = 0.028), being classified as soft (12/13 (92%) vs. 26/58 (45%), P = 0.002), and showed sustained hyperechoic vascular patterns at 5 min (7/8 (88%) vs. 4/59 (7%), P < 0.001) compared to PanNEN lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a MHZ, a soft lesion, and a sustained hyperechoic vascular pattern in EUS may be useful for differentiating PRCC from PanNEN.

The Asian Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (AFSUMB) Guidelines for Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound

The Asian Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology aimed to provide information on techniques and indications for contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS), and to create statements including the level of recommendation. These statements are based on current scientific evidence reviewed by a Consensus Panel of 15 internationally renowned experts. The reliability of clinical questions was measured by agreement rates after voting. Six statements were made on techniques, including suitable contrast agents for CH-EUS, differences between contrast agents, setting of mechanical index, dual imaging and duration and phases for observation. Thirteen statements were made on indications, including pancreatic solid masses, pancreatic cancer staging, pancreatic cystic lesions and mural nodules, detection of subtle pancreatic lesions, gallbladder sludge and polyps, hepatic lesions, lymph nodes, subepithelial lesions, visceral vascular diseases, guidance of fine needle aspiration and evaluation for local therapy. These international expert consensus guidelines will assist endosonographers in conducting CH-EUS according to evidence-based information.

Utility of multiphase contrast enhancement patterns on CEH-EUS for the differential diagnosis of IPMN-derived and conventional pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is reported as a high-risk factor for pancreatic cancer (PC) that includes IPMN-derived cancers (IPMC) and the development of invasive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) concomitant with IPMN. Since invasive IPMC and PDAC exhibit different oncological behaviors, their differentiation is clinically important. We aimed to investigate the use of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) for the differential diagnosis between invasive IPMC and PDAC.

METHODS

This study involved 183 consecutive patients with PC (invasive IPMC: 42, PDAC concomitant with IPMN: 9, without IPMN: 132) who underwent CEH-EUS preoperatively. While investigating the patterns, enhanced effects in the solid part of the tumor were compared with those in the surrounding pancreatic parenchyma after administration of Sonazoid® and evaluated as hyperenhanced, isoenhanced, or hypoenhanced. We retrospectively compared the enhanced pattern of CEH-EUS by using multiphasic analysis and clinicopathological factors between invasive IPMC and PDAC.

RESULTS

In multiphase evaluations at 20, 40 and 60 s in CEH-EUS, 75.2% (106/141) of PDACs were hypoenhanced (-) at ≥2 of the 3 time points, with significant differences from those of invasive IPMC (P < 0.001). The solid tumor diameter was significantly larger in PDAC than in invasive IPMC, and the tumor stage and preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level were higher. After propensity score matching of stage and solid tumor diameter, contrast enhancement patterns were significantly more persistent in invasive IPMC than in PDAC (P = 0.0013).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiphase evaluation using CEH-EUS is a useful method for differentiating between invasive IPMC and PDAC.

Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for small solid pancreatic lesions with or without main pancreatic duct dilatation

BACKGROUND

/Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound elastography (EUS-EG) is useful for diagnosis of small solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs), particularly in excluding pancreatic cancer (PC), but its dependence on main pancreatic duct dilatation (MPDD) has not been examined. We aimed to investigate EUS-EG for diagnosis of small SPLs with and without MPDD.

METHODS

Patients with pathologically diagnosed SPLs of ≤20 mm were included and retrospectively analyzed. Using the blue:green ratio, an EUS-EG image was classified as blue-dominant, equivalent, or green-dominant. Using multiple EUS-EG images per patient, a lesion with a greater number of blue-dominant than green-dominant images was classified as stiff, and the others as soft. EUS-EG images in random order were judged by three raters. Considering stiff SPLs as PC, diagnostic performance of EUS-EG was examined for SPLs with and without MPDD.

RESULTS

Of 126 cases analyzed, 65 (52%) were diagnosed as PC, and 63 (50%) had MPDD. A total of 1077 EUS-EG images were examined (kappa coefficient = 0.783). Lesions were classified as stiff in 91 cases and soft in 35 (kappa coefficient = 0.932). The ratio of stiff to soft lesions was significantly higher in PC than in non-PC (62:3 vs. 29:32, P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of a stiff lesion with vs. without MPDD for diagnosis of PC were 94%, 23%, and 50% vs. 100%, 60%, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the EUS-EG stiffness classification for small SPLs, PC can be excluded with high confidence and concordance for a soft lesion without MPDD.

Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer has the poorest prognosis among all cancers, and early diagnosis is essential for improving the prognosis. Along with radiologic modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoscopic modalities play an important role in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. This review evaluates the roles of two of those modalities, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. EUS can detect pancreatic cancer with higher sensitivity and has excellent sensitivity for the diagnosis of small pancreatic cancer that cannot be detected by other imaging modalities. EUS may be useful for the surveillance of pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals. Contrast-enhanced EUS and EUS elastography are also useful for differentiating solid pancreatic tumors. In addition, EUS-guided fine needle aspiration shows excellent sensitivity and specificity, even for small pancreatic cancer, and is an essential examination method for the definitive pathological diagnosis and treatment decision strategy. On the other hand, ERCP is invasive and performed less frequently for the purpose of diagnosing pancreatic cancer. However, ERCP is essential in cases that require evaluation of pancreatic duct stricture that may be early pancreatic cancer or those that require differentiation from focal autoimmune pancreatitis.

Risks and characteristics of pancreatic cancer and pancreatic relapse in autoimmune pancreatitis patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We examined the differences in the risks and characteristics of pancreatic relapse (PR) and pancreatic cancer (PC) in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 123 type 1 AIP patients with a median follow-up of 55 months (interquartile range, 27-98). The following items were evaluated: (i) cumulative relapse rates and risk factors, (ii) the incidence of PC, (iii) PR versus PC, and (iv) outcomes after the appearance of morphological changes in the pancreas (focal enlargement, apparent mass lesions, or main pancreatic duct dilation).

RESULTS

(i) The cumulative PR rates were 1.7% within 1 year, 11.5% within 3 years, and 22.6% within 5 years. Lack of maintenance therapy, IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis, and IgG4-related kidney disease were identified as independent predictors of relapse. (ii) Two patients (1.6%) were diagnosed with PC at 17 and 22 months after initial AIP diagnosis. (iii) Thirteen (59.1%) and four (18.2%) patients with PR had focal enlargement and main pancreatic duct dilation, respectively. The median CA19-9 level at initial diagnosis was significantly higher in PC patients (21 vs 220.5 U/mL, P = 0.014). (iv) Eight PR patients underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration, none of whom had malignant findings. PC was diagnosed by ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in both cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the incidence of PC is low, it may mimic PR in AIP patients. Surveillance is important, and when morphological changes occur, biopsy and evaluation of serum IgG4 and CA19-9 levels (particularly if the levels were high before) should be considered.

Gender difference in the transabdominal ultrasound findings of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm

BACKGROUND

Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a rare tumour that is mostly observed in young females. However, onset in males is also observed, and they do not necessarily present with typical findings. A comparison between male and female SPN patients focusing on the ultrasound findings was performed.

METHODS

Sixteen patients including 5 males who received transabdominal ultrasounds and were diagnosed with SPN based on their resected specimens were compared by sex in terms of the following: 1) age, 2) symptoms, 3) ultrasound findings, 4) preoperative ultrasound diagnoses, and 5) histology.

RESULTS

1) The age was significantly higher in males (43 vs. 31, P = 0.004). 2) Symptoms were not observed in any of the males while 4/11 females were symptomatic (P = 0.245). 3) Tumour size was significantly smaller in males (20 mm vs. 33 mm, P = 0.014), and there was a higher percentage of cystic components in females (0% vs. 73%, P = 0.026). 4) SPN was listed as the first differential diagnosis in 9/11 females as opposed to 2/5 males (P = 0.139). 5) Cystic areas on the ultrasound corresponded to necrosis and hemorrhage. All cases showed expression of progesterone and androgen receptors regardless of sex.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant differences between male and female SPN patients in terms of age, tumour size, and presence of cystic components. Attention should be paid to the finding that onset in males was more common from middle age onwards in comparison to females and that a cystic component was not observed.

Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Early Diagnosis of Small Pancreatic Cancer

This study aimed to assess whether contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CH-EUS), compared to multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is useful for early diagnosis of small pancreatic cancer (PC). Between March 2010 and June 2018, all three imaging modalities and surgery were performed for patients with a pancreatic solid lesion measuring ≤20 mm; diagnostic ability was compared among modalities. Fifty-one of 60 patients were diagnosed with PC (PC size in 41 patients: 11-20 mm; 10 patients: ≤10 mm). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CH-EUS, MDCT, and MRI for PC (11-20 mm) detection were 95%/83%/94%, 78%/83%/79%, and 73%/33%/68%, respectively. The diagnostic ability of CH-EUS was significantly superior compared with MDCT and MRI (p = 0.002 and p = 0.007, respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CH-EUS, MDCT, and MRI for PC (≤10 mm) detection were 70%/100%/77%, 20%/100%/38%, and 50%/100%/62%, respectively. The diagnostic ability of CH-EUS tended to be superior to that of MDCT (p = 0.025). The sensitivity of MDCT for PC (≤10 mm) detection was significantly lower than that for PC (11-20 mm) detection (20% vs. 78%; p = 0.001). CH-EUS, compared to MDCT and MRI, is useful for diagnosing small PCs.

Value of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography with enhancement pattern for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Current imaging modalities are limited in their ability to distinguish pancreatic cancer (PC) from non-neoplastic pancreatic lesions. The diagnostic use of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography (CE-EUS) has increased, and its utility has been reported. Recently, contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) was reported to facilitate imaging of parenchymal perfusion and microvessels in pancreatobiliary diseases, leading to a high diagnostic accuracy for PC. The present meta-analysis aims to investigate the usefulness of CH-EUS with enhancement pattern for PC diagnosis.

METHODS

A systematic meta-analysis of all potentially relevant articles identified in PubMed, the Cochrane library, and Medline was carried out. Fixed-effects or random-effects models were used to investigate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

The study enrolled 887 patients from nine eligible studies. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were 93% (95% CI, 0.91-0.95) and 80% (95% CI, 0.75-0.85), respectively. Subgroup analyses were carried out on the main results after excluding two outliers. Area under summary receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.97. No publication bias was found using funnel plots. No significant relationship was found between the diagnostic odds ratios and the characteristics of the studies including continent and contrast agent.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that CH-EUS with qualitative analysis of enhancement pattern is useful for the diagnosis of PC, and has high sensitivity and accuracy, regardless of the type of contrast agent used. This modality may provide improved diagnostic accuracy for PC in clinical practice.