Does IgG4 level at the time of diagnosis correlate with disease outcome in IgG4-Related disease?

Successful remission induction of IgG4-related ophthalmic disease by obinutuzumab therapy: a retrospective study of 8 patients

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab in remission induction for IgG4-related ophthalmic disease (IgG4-ROD) patients.

METHODS

Eight IgG4-ROD patients were retrospectively enrolled. They were intravenously administered 1000 mg obinutuzumab at baseline and examined for changes in physical signs, orbital structure imaging parameters, IgG4-related disease responder index (IgG4-RD RI), serological index, and adverse events during treatment. The number of treatment sessions was based on treatment response.

RESULTS

The mean IgG4-RD RI scores of all patients at baseline (7.75 ± 2.92) and after treatment (2.00 ± 0.76) were highly significantly different (P < 0.001). Six patients achieved complete remission (CR) (75%) and two patients achieved partial remission (25%). The mean serum IgG4 levels at baseline (9.45 ± 6.95 g/L) and after treatment (1.55 ± 1.09 g/L) showed a mean decrease of 83% (P = 0.0079). The serum IgG4 level correlated well with IgG4-RD RI at baseline and that after each treatment (r = 0.852, P < 0.01; r = 0.78, P < 0.001). In patients with CR, the serum IgG4 levels at baseline correlated positively with dose numbers required for CR (r = 0.86, P < 0.05). Five patients (62.5%) experienced infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during the first obinutuzumab infusion, while only one (12.5%) experienced IRRs during all subsequent eight infusions.

CONCLUSION

Obinutuzumab is a safe and promising therapeutic option for IgG4-ROD. It rapidly reduces ocular inflammation and serum IgG4 levels to avoid excessive corticosteroid usage and reduce potential risk of adverse events.

Serum IgG4 level during initial treatment as a predictor of relapse in IgG4-related disease

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to investigate the predictors of relapse in immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD), focusing on the serum IgG4 levels during initial treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited 57 patients with IgG4-RD who were treated with immunosuppressants and elevated serum IgG4 levels in a tertiary hospital between January 2011 and December 2020. They were followed up for ≥ 6 months after initiation of immunosuppressive therapy. Clinical and laboratory findings including serum IgG4 levels (reference value: 6-121 mg/dL) were compared between relapsed (n = 13) and non-relapsed (n = 44) groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess the predictors for relapse. We performed a Kaplan-Meier analysis with a log-rank test to evaluate the cumulative relapse rate for two years.

RESULTS

Median serum IgG4 levels at baseline were 321 mg/dL in the relapsed group and 299 mg/dL in the non-relapsed group. Serum IgG4 levels were normalized after six months in five (38.5%) relapsed and 28 (63.6%) non-relapsed patients. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, the normalization of serum IgG4 levels at six months was associated with a lower risk of relapse, with a hazard ratio of 0.232 (p = 0.019). Central nervous system involvement was associated with the relapse, with a hazard ratio of 21.130 (p = 0.015). The cumulative relapse rate for two years was lower in the normal serum IgG4 group at six months than in the elevated serum IgG4 group at six months (p = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that normalization of serum IgG4 levels during immunosuppressive treatment for IgG4-RD independently predicts relapse-free outcomes. Thus, monitoring serum IgG4 levels might be used as a marker of prognosis.

Recent advances in the management of autoimmune pancreatitis in the era of artificial intelligence

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a type of immune-mediated pancreatitis subdivided into two subtypes, type 1 and type 2 AIP. Furthermore, type 1 AIP is considered to be the pancreatic manifestation of the immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related disease. Nowadays, AIP is increasingly researched and recognized, although its diagnosis represents a challenge for several reasons: False positive ultrasound-guided cytological samples for a neoplastic process, difficult to interpret levels of IgG4, the absence of biological markers to diagnose type 2 AIP, and the challenging clinical identification of atypical forms. Furthermore, 60% and 78% of type 1 and type 2 AIP, respectively, are retrospectively diagnosed on surgical specimens of resected pancreas for suspected cancer. As distinguishing AIP from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma can be challenging, obtaining a definitive diagnosis can therefore prove difficult, since endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration or biopsy of the pancreas are suboptimal. This paper focuses on recent innovations in the management of AIP with regard to the use of artificial intelligence, new serum markers, and new therapeutic approaches, while it also outlines the current management recommendations. A better knowledge of AIP can reduce the recourse to surgery and avoid its overuse, although such an approach requires close collaboration between gastroenterologists, surgeons and radiologists. Better knowledge on AIP and IgG4-related disease remains necessary to diagnose and manage patients.

Incidence of endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis at diagnosis and after treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare form of pancreatitis that may lead to endocrine and exocrine insufficiency if left untreated. AIP clinically responds to glucocorticoids (GCs) therapy, but multiple GCs courses are often required to maintain remission with detrimental effects on glycaemic control.

OBJECTIVE

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the rate of endocrine and of exocrine insufficiency at diagnosis and at follow up in patients with AIP as well as the impact of GC therapy on pancreatic function in the long-term.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to August 2021 to identify studies reporting data on endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in patients with AIP. Pooled events were calculated using a random-effect model and expressed in terms of pooled prevalence rates.

RESULTS

A total of 6522 AIP patients and sixty-two studies were included in the analysis. The pooled estimate rate for the overall prevalence of diabetes in AIP at baseline was 37% (95% CI 32-42, I² 96%). The pooled prevalence rate of exocrine insufficiency was 45% (95%CI 32.9-57.4; I² 97%). The pooled estimate rate of diabetes at follow-up was 44% (95%CI 26.1-62.4) in studies where GCs were given to 100% of patients and 42% (95%CI 30.6-52.9) in studies where GCs were given to less than 100% of patients.

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of patients with AIP displays concomitant exocrine and endocrine insufficiency at the time of diagnosis. The incidence of diabetes at the longest available follow up tends to increase in patients treated with GCs.

CT Radiomics Features in Differentiation of Focal-Type Autoimmune Pancreatitis from Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the radiomics score (rad-score) for differentiating focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (fAIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

This retrospective review included 42 consecutive patients with fAIP diagnosed according to the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria between January 2011 and December 2018. Furthermore, 334 consecutive patients with PDAC confirmed by pathology were also reviewed during the same period. Patients with PDAC and fAIP were matched via propensity score matching (PSM). All patients underwent multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). For each patient, 1409 radiomics features of the portal phase were extracted and reduced using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression algorithm. The portal rad-score performance was assessed based on its discriminative ability.

RESULTS

After PSM, we matched 55 patients with PDAC to 42 patients with fAIP, based on clinical and CT characteristics (e.g., patient age, sex, body mass index, location, size, enhanced mode). A rad-score for discriminating fAIP from PDAC, which contained four CT derived radiomic features, was developed (area under the curve = 0.97). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the radiomics model were 95.24%, 92.73% and 0.94, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The portal rad-score can accurately and noninvasively differentiate fAIP from PDAC.

Update on classification, diagnosis, and management of immunoglobulin G4-related disease

Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a newly recognized chronic fibro-inflammatory autoimmune disease, and its recognition has been constantly increasing worldwide over the last few years. A correct and timely recognition, as well as appropriate intervention, is crucial for the treatment of IgG4-RD. For certain subtypes of IgG4-RD, organ-specific criteria are formulated to make the diagnosis more accurate. New biomarkers have emerged in the recent years to aid the disease diagnosis, its prognosis prediction, as well as therapy response monitoring. Although recurrence is very common in IgG4-RD, glucocorticoid is still the first-line treatment for the majority of patients. The factors that affect the likelihood of disease relapse are multifaceted. The selection strategy of various steroid-sparing agents is still being explored. Besides, when patients have special sites involvement leading to severe clinical conditions, surgical operation or interventional therapy should also be considered. An update on classification, diagnosis, and management of IgG4-RD is provided in the current study to fully elucidate the recommended clinical practice of this mysterious disease.

Determination of the duration of glucocorticoid therapy in type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The indications for maintenance glucocorticoid therapy (MGT) and its duration after initial remission of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) remain controversial. In contrast to the Japanese treatment protocol, the Mayo protocol does not recommend MGT after initial remission. This study aimed to evaluate the relapse rate in patients with type 1 AIP according to the duration of glucocorticoid therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review up until November 30, 2020, and identified 40 studies reporting AIP relapse rates. The pooled relapse rates were compared between groups according to the protocol and duration of glucocorticoids (routine vs. no MGT; glucocorticoids ≤6 months vs. 6-12 months vs. 12-36 months vs. ≥ 36 months). The pooled rates of adverse events related to glucocorticoids were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis indicated calculated pooled relapse rates of 46.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 38.9-54.3%) with glucocorticoids for ≤ 6 months, 44.3% (95% CI, 38.8-49.8%) for 6-12 months, 34.1% (95% CI, 28.6-39.7%) for 12-36 months, and 27.0% (95% CI, 23.4-30.6%) for ≥ 36 months. The rate of relapse was also significantly lower in patients with routine-use protocol of MGT (31.2%; 95% CI, 27.5-34.8%) than in patients with no MGT protocol (44.1%; 95% CI, 35.8-52.4%). Adverse events were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of relapse tended to decrease with extended durations of glucocorticoid therapy up to 36 months. Clinicians may decide the duration of glucocorticoids according to patient condition, including comorbidities and risk of relapse.

Autoimmune pancreatitis - An ongoing challenge

Autoimmune pancreatitis is a rare form of chronic pancreatitis. The first descriptions of the disease date back to the 1990s. Etiology is multifactorial, with the use of genetic, environmental and complex immunological mechanisms. It is classified into two subtypes. Type 1 is part of a group of diseases called IgG4-related disease. Clinically is autoimmune pancreatitis manifested by icterus and abdominal discomfort. It can rarely present as acute pancreatitis. There is also a completely asymptomatic form of the disease. The diagnosis is based on abnormalities in histology, imaging methods, serology, the involvement of other organs in relation to IgG4-related disease, and a significant positive response to corticosteroid therapy. Differential diagnosis between the focal form of autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer can be complicated, with endosonography playing an important role. In the treatment, we use corticosteroids and other immunosuppressants including biological therapy. Patients with the asymptomatic disease should also be treated to prevent late complications and exocrine and endocrine insufficiency. In addition to drug treatment, endoscopic and/or surgical treatment may be necessary. Even after recovery, the disease can relapse. The relationship between autoimmune pancreatitis and malignancies has not been clearly confirmed. The goal of this review is to provide a comprehensive look at autoimmune pancreatitis and translate latest scientific knowledge into clinical practice.