Management and surveillance of non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: Retrospective review

Prognostic Factors of Small Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and the Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis: A Population-Level Study

BACKGROUND

Small non-functional neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs) are a heterogeneous subset of tumors with controversy regarding their optimal management. We aimed to analyze the prognostic factors of patients with small NF-PNETs and create a risk score for lymph node metastasis (LNM).

METHODS

Data of 751 patients with NF-PNETs ≤ 2 cm were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Multivariate survival analysis was performed to analyze the prognostic factors. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for LNM.

RESULTS

Of the 751 patients, 99 (13.2%) were confirmed to have LNM. In multivariate survival analysis, LNM (hazard ratio [HR], 2.12; 95% CI, 1.04-4.32, p = 0.040) was independently associated with disease-specific survival. Logistic regression identified that tumor location in the head of the pancreas (odds ratio [OR], 4.33; 95% CI, 2.75-6.81; p < 0.001), size ≥ 1.5-2 cm (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.17-2.87; p = 0.009), and grade III-IV (OR, 7.90; 95% CI, 1.79-34.90; p = 0.006) were independent risk factors of LNM. According to the OR value, the risk of LNM was scored as follows: a score of 1 for tumors located in the body/tail of the pancreas and 4 for those located in the head; a score of 1 for tumors <1 cm and 2 for those ≥1.5-2 cm; and a score of 1 for tumors with grade I-II and 8 for those with grade III-IV. Finally, the median score for this cohort was 4, with an interquartile range of 3-6. Therefore, patients were classified as three groups based on the risk score system: a total score of 1-3 for low risk, 4-6 for intermediate risk (OR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.59-5.60; p = 0.001), and 7-14 for high risk (OR, 8.94; 95% CI, 4.50-17.7; p < 0.001), with an incidence of LNM 5.0%, 13.5%, and 31.8%, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection with regional lymphadenectomy is recommended for small NF-PNETs with malignant potential of LNM. A risk score for LNM based on tumor grade, location, and size may preoperatively predict LNM of small NF-PNETs and guide clinical practice.

The Landmark Series: Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) comprise a heterogeneous group of neoplasms arising from pancreatic islet cells that remain relatively rare but are increasing in incidence worldwide. While significant advances have been made in recent years with regard to systemic therapies for patients with advanced disease, surgical resection remains the standard of care for most patients with localized tumors. Although formal pancreatectomy with regional lymphadenectomy is the standard approach for most PNETs, pancreas-preserving approaches without formal lymphadenectomy are acceptable for smaller tumors at low risk for lymph node metastases. Furthermore, observation of small, asymptomatic, low-grade PNETs is a safe, initial strategy and is generally recommended for tumors < 1 cm in size. In this Landmark Series review, we highlight the critical studies that have defined the surgical management of PNETs.

Surgery Versus Surveillance for Well-Differentiated, Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: An 11-Year Analysis of the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) are a rare group of tumors that make up 2%-3% of pancreatic tumors. Recommended treatment for panNETs generally consists of resection for symptomatic or large asymptomatic tumors; however, optimal management for localized disease is still controversial, with conflicting recommendations in established guidelines. Our study aim is to compare surgical intervention versus active surveillance in nonmetastatic panNETs by size of primary tumor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, we identified 2,004 patients diagnosed with localized well-differentiated, nonfunctional panNETs (NF-panNETs) between 2004 and 2015. Patients' clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment modalities, and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using frequency statistics, chi-square, and Kaplan-Meier curves. The objective of the study is to assess the outcome of surgical resection versus nonoperative management in patients with panNETs with different tumor sizes.

RESULTS

Tumor sizes were divided into three categories: <1 cm, 1-2 cm, and >2 cm. The number of patients with tumor size <1 cm, 1-2 cm, and >2 cm was 220 (11%), 794 (39.6%), and 990 (49.4%), respectively. Overall, 1,781 underwent surgical resection, whereas 223 patients did not. Median follow-up was 25.9 months. After adjusting for covariates, surgical resection was associated with improved OS in patients with tumor size 1-2 cm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37) and >2c m (HR = 0.30) but not <1 cm (HR = 2.81). Independent prognostic factors were age at diagnosis, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, stage, tumor location, and surgical resection. Higher tumor grade was not associated with worse OS.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that active surveillance is potentially a safe approach for NF-panNETs <1 cm. Larger tumors likely need active intervention. Intermediate-grade tumors did not result in worse survival outcome compared with low-grade tumors. Future studies might consider prospective randomized clinical trials to validate our findings.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The present study seeks to address the discrepancy in treatment recommendations in the management of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-panNETs) by evaluating whether surgical resection is associated with improved overall survival in different tumor size groups as well as elucidating independent prognostic factors in patients with NF-panNETs. Data from the National Cancer Database were reviewed. This study's findings suggest that active surveillance is potentially a safe approach for NF-panNETs <1 cm. Larger tumors likely need active intervention. Independent prognostic factors include age at diagnosis, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, stage, tumor location, and surgical resection. These findings will help guide medical and surgical oncologists when formulating treatment plans for patients with small NF-panNETs.

lncRNA H19 binds VGF and promotes pNEN progression via PI3K/AKT/CREB signaling

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are endocrine tumors arising in pancreas and is the most common neuroendocrine tumors. Mounting evidence indicates lncRNA H19 could be a determinant of tumor progression. However, the expression and mechanism of H19 and the relevant genes mediated by H19 in pNENs remain undefined. Microarray analysis was conducted to identify the differentially expressed lncRNAs in pNENs. H19 expression was analyzed in 39 paired pNEN tissues by qPCR. The biological role of H19 was determined by functional experiments. RNA pulldown, mass spectroscopy and RNA immunoprecipitation were performed to confirm the interaction between H19 and VGF. RNA-seq assays were performed after knockdown H19 or VGF. H19 was significantly upregulated in pNEN tissues with malignant behaviors, and the upregulation predicted poor prognosis in pNENs. In vitro and in vivo data showed that H19 overexpression promoted tumor growth and metastasis, whereas H19 knockdown led to the opposite phenotypes. H19 interacted with VGF, which was significantly upregulated in pNENs, and higher VGF expression was markedly related to poor differentiation and advanced stage. Furthermore, VGF was downregulated when H19 was knocked down, and VGF promoted cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Mechanistic investigations revealed that H19 activated PI3K/AKT/CREB signaling and promoted pNEN progression by interacting with VGF. These findings indicate that H19 is a promising prognostic factor in pNENs with malignant behaviors and functions as an oncogene via the VGF-mediated PI3K/AKT/CREB pathway. In addition, our study implies that VGF may also serve as a candidate prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in pNENs.