1
|
Vilela A, Quingalahua E, Vargas A, Hawa F, Shannon C, Carpenter ES, Shi J, Krishna SG, Lee UJ, Chalhoub JM, Machicado JD. Global Prevalence of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions in the General Population on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22:1798-1809.e6. [PMID: 38423346 PMCID: PMC11344691 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Understanding the burden of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) in the general population is important for clinicians and policymakers. In this systematic review, we sought to estimate the global prevalence of PCLs using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to investigate factors that contribute to its variation. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central, from database inception through February 2023. We included full-text articles that reported the prevalence of PCLs using MRI in the general population. A proportional meta-analysis was performed, and the prevalence of PCLs was pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS Fifteen studies with 65,607 subjects were identified. The pooled prevalence of PCLs was 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13%-18%; I2 = 99%), most of which were under 10 mm. Age-specific prevalence of PCLs increased from 9% (95% CI, 7%-12%) at 50 to 59 years, to 18% (95% CI, 14%-22%) at 60 to 69 years, 26% (95% CI, 20%-33%) at 70 to 79 years, and 38% at 80 years and above (95% CI, 25%-52%). There was no difference in prevalence between sexes. Subgroup analysis showed higher PCL prevalence when imaging findings were confirmed by independent radiologist(s) (25%; 95% CI, 16%-33%) than when chart review alone was used (5%; 95% CI, 4%-7%; P < .01). There was no independent association of PCL prevalence with geographic location (Europe, North America, or Asia), MRI indication (screening vs evaluation of non-pancreatic pathology), enrollment period, sample size, magnet strength (1.5 vs 3 tesla), and MRI sequence (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography vs no magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography). CONCLUSION In this systematic review, the global prevalence of PCLs using a highly sensitive noninvasive imaging modality ranged between 13% and 18%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Vilela
- Department of Internal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia
| | - Elit Quingalahua
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Alejandra Vargas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia
| | - Fadi Hawa
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Carol Shannon
- Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Eileen S Carpenter
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jiaqi Shi
- Department of Pathology & Clinical Labs, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Somashekar G Krishna
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Un-Jung Lee
- Biostatistics Unit, Office of Academic Affairs, Northwell Health, Staten Island, New York
| | - Jean M Chalhoub
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital, Northwell Health, Staten Island, New York
| | - Jorge D Machicado
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grigorescu RR, Husar-Sburlan IA, Gheorghe C. Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Risk Factors. Life (Basel) 2024; 14:980. [PMID: 39202722 PMCID: PMC11355429 DOI: 10.3390/life14080980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Revised: 07/28/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is one of the most lethal types of gastrointestinal cancer despite the latest medical advances. Its incidence has continuously increased in recent years in developed countries. The location of the pancreas can result in the initial symptoms of neoplasia being overlooked, which can lead to a delayed diagnosis and a subsequent reduction in the spectrum of available therapeutic options. The role of modifiable risk factors in pancreatic cancer has been extensively studied in recent years, with smoking and alcohol consumption identified as key contributors. However, the few screening programs that have been developed focus exclusively on genetic factors, without considering the potential impact of modifiable factors on disease occurrence. Thus, fully understanding and detecting the risk factors for pancreatic cancer represents an important step in the prevention and early diagnosis of this type of neoplasia. This review reports the available evidence on different risk factors and identifies the areas that could benefit the most from additional studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raluca Roxana Grigorescu
- Gastroenterology Department, “Sfanta Maria” Hospital, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | | | - Cristian Gheorghe
- Center for Digestive Disease and Liver Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reeve R, Foster C, Brindle L. Exploring patient experiences of surveillance for pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a qualitative study. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2024; 11:e001264. [PMID: 38969363 PMCID: PMC11227750 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) are considered premalignant conditions to pancreatic adenocarcinoma with varying degrees of cancerous potential. Management for individuals who do not require surgical treatment involves surveillance to assess for cancerous progression. Little is known about patients' experience and the impact of living with surveillance for these lesions. AIMS To explore the experiences of patients living with surveillance for PCNs. METHODS Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with patients under surveillance for pancreatic cystic neoplasms in the UK. Age, gender, time from surveillance and surveillance method were used to purposively sample the patient group. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS A PCN diagnosis is incidental and unexpected and for some, the beginning of a disruptive experience. How patients make sense of their PCN diagnosis is influenced by their existing understanding of pancreatic cancer, explanations from clinicians and the presence of coexisting health concerns. A lack of understanding of the diagnosis and its meaning for their future led to an overarching theme of uncertainty for the PCN population. Surveillance for PCN could be seen as a reminder of fears of PCN and cancer, or as an opportunity for reassurance. CONCLUSIONS Currently, individuals living with surveillance for PCNs experience uncertainty with a lack of support in making sense of a prognostically uncertain diagnosis with no immediate treatment. More research is needed to identify the needs of this population to make improvements to patient care and reduce negative experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Reeve
- University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Underhill-Blazey ML, Zhang Y, Stanek S, Norton S. The Experience of Uncertainty in Individuals With High Risk for Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Nurs 2024; 47:E10-E17. [PMID: 36480347 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals with a strong family history of pancreatic cancer or a known hereditary cancer syndrome that is associated with pancreatic cancer are considered at high risk for developing pancreatic cancer. Living with a high risk for often fatal cancer is accompanied by high levels of uncertainty. Uncertainty is also independently associated with negative health outcomes. By understanding issues, sources, and responses to uncertainty, targeted supportive care strategies can be provided. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to examine how uncertainty manifests in the experience of being at high risk to develop pancreatic cancer and to describe issues, sources of, and responses to uncertainty. METHODS In this secondary qualitative descriptive study, we analyzed 19 interviews with persons living with inherited pancreatic cancer risk. Analysis was guided by a conceptual framework of uncertainty and responses to uncertainty. RESULTS Participants described multiple personal, practical, and scientific issues of uncertainty, centering on what to expect for their future health. Participants also expressed positive and negative cognitive, emotional, and behavioral responses to uncertainty, including engaging in surveillance. Uncertainty sources were both individual experiences as well as perceptions of healthcare provider uncertainty with managing pancreatic cancer risk. CONCLUSION Pancreatic cancer risk includes issues of uncertainty related to personal mortality, defining and managing risk, and experiencing surveillance. Positive and negative responses to this uncertainty could be targeted through interventions. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE The oncology nurse should assess for sources of and responses to uncertainty in persons at risk for pancreatic cancer and offer psychosocial and educational support.
Collapse
|
5
|
Machicado JD, Napoleon B, Akshintala V, Bazarbashi AN, Bilal M, Corral JE, Dugum M, Han S, Hussain FS, Johnson AM, Jovani M, Kolb JM, Leonor P, Lee PJ, Mulki R, Shah H, Singh H, Sánchez-Luna SA, Shah SL, Singla A, Vargas EJ, Tielleman T, Nikahd M, Fry M, Culp S, Krishna SG. Structured training program on confocal laser endomicroscopy for pancreatic cystic lesions: a multicenter prospective study among early-career endosonographers (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:953-964. [PMID: 37473969 PMCID: PMC10771632 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Data on how to teach endosonographers needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE)-guided histologic diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are limited. Hence, we developed and tested a structured educational program to train early-career endosonographers in nCLE-guided diagnosis of PCLs. METHODS Twenty-one early-career nCLE-naïve endosonographers watched a teaching module outlining nCLE criteria for diagnosing PCLs. Participants then reviewed 80 high-yield nCLE videos, recorded diagnoses, and received expert feedback (phase 1). Observers were then randomized to a refresher feedback session or self-learning at 4 weeks. Eight weeks after training, participants independently assessed the same 80 nCLE videos without feedback and provided histologic predictions (phase 2). Diagnostic performance of nCLE to differentiate mucinous versus nonmucinous PCLs and to diagnose specific subtypes were analyzed using histopathology as the criterion standard. Learning curves were determined using cumulative sum analysis. RESULTS Accuracy and diagnostic confidence for differentiating mucinous versus nonmucinous PCLs improved as endosonographers progressed through nCLE videos in phase 1 (P < .001). Similar trends were observed with the diagnosis of PCL subtypes. Most participants achieved competency interpreting nCLE, requiring a median of 38 assessments (range, 9-67). During phase 2, participants independently differentiated PCLs with high accuracy (89%), high confidence (83%), and substantial interobserver agreement (κ = .63). Accuracy for nCLE-guided PCL subtype diagnoses ranged from 82% to 96%. The learned nCLE skills did not deteriorate at 8 weeks and were not impacted by a refresher session. CONCLUSIONS We developed a practical, effective, and durable educational intervention to train early-career endosonographers in nCLE-guided diagnosis of PCLs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge D Machicado
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Bertrand Napoleon
- Gastroenterology Department, Hopital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay Generale de Sante, Lyon, France
| | - Venkata Akshintala
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Mohammad Bilal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Juan E Corral
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Presbyterian Hospital, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | | | - Samuel Han
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Alyson M Johnson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Manol Jovani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Maimonides Medical Center, SUNY Downstate University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Jennifer M Kolb
- Division of Digestive Diseases, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Paul Leonor
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Peter J Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ramzi Mulki
- Basil I. Hirschowitz Endoscopic Center of Excellence, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Hamza Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Harkirat Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sergio A Sánchez-Luna
- Basil I. Hirschowitz Endoscopic Center of Excellence, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Shawn L Shah
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Anand Singla
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Eric J Vargas
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Thomas Tielleman
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Melica Nikahd
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Megan Fry
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Stacey Culp
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Somashekar G Krishna
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Song YJ, Huh G, Kim EH, Lee JB, Park DH. Comparison of outcomes of EUS-guided ablation and surveillance only for pancreatic cystic lesions: a propensity score-matching study (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:585-596.e3. [PMID: 37211286 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.05.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS EUS-guided ethanol ablation is a recently introduced treatment approach for pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs), including branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs). However, the utility of this procedure is limited because of its relatively low efficacy in treating PCLs. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients with PCLs, including those with enlarging suspected BD-IPMNs or those with PCLs measuring >3 cm, who were suboptimal candidates for surgery and had been managed using EUS-guided rapid ethanol lavage (EUS-REL; immediate ethanol lavage performed 4 times, 2015-2022) or surveillance only (SO; 2007- 2022). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize bias. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence rate of BD-IPMN progression. Secondary outcomes were the efficacy and safety of EUS-REL, surgical resection rate (SR), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) in both groups. RESULTS Overall, 169 and 610 patients were included in the EUS-REL and SO groups, respectively. PSM created 159 matched pairs. The radiologic complete resolution rate after EUS-REL was 74%. Procedure-related pancreatitis in the EUS-REL group was 13.0% (n = 22; 19 mild and 3 moderate grade); no severe adverse events were reported. The 10-year cumulative incidence rate of BD-IPMN progression was significantly lower in the EUS-REL group than in the SO group (1.6% vs 21.2%; hazard ratio, 12.35; P = .003). EUS-REL showed a lower tendency of SR compared with that associated with SO. The rates of 10-year OS and 10-year DSS were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS EUS-REL was associated with a significantly lower 10-year cumulative incidence rate of BD-IPMN progression and a lower tendency of SR, whereas its 10-year OS and DSS rates were similar to those of SO for PCLs. EUS-REL may be a viable alternative to SO for managing patients with enlarging suspected BD-IPMNs or those with PCLs >3 cm who are suboptimal candidates for surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Je Song
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Gunn Huh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eun Ha Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jung Bok Lee
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Do Hyun Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Marchegiani G, Pollini T, Burelli A, Han Y, Jung HS, Kwon W, Rocha Castellanos DM, Crippa S, Belfiori G, Arcidiacono PG, Capurso G, Apadula L, Zaccari P, Noia JL, Gorris M, Busch O, Ponweera A, Mann K, Demir IE, Phillip V, Ahmad N, Hackert T, Heckler M, Lennon AM, Afghani E, Vallicella D, Dall'Olio T, Nepi A, Vollmer CM, Friess H, Ghaneh P, Besselink M, Falconi M, Bassi C, Goh BKP, Jang JY, Fernández-Del Castillo C, Salvia R. Surveillance for Presumed BD-IPMN of the Pancreas: Stability, Size, and Age Identify Targets for Discontinuation. Gastroenterology 2023; 165:1016-1024.e5. [PMID: 37406887 PMCID: PMC10548445 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Currently, most patients with branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMN) are offered indefinite surveillance, resulting in health care costs with questionable benefits regarding cancer prevention. This study sought to identify patients in whom the risk of cancer is equivalent to an age-matched population, thereby justifying discontinuation of surveillance. METHODS International multicenter study involving presumed BD-IPMN without worrisome features (WFs) or high-risk stigmata (HRS) at diagnosis who underwent surveillance. Clusters of individuals at risk for cancer development were defined according to cyst size and stability for at least 5 years, and age-matched controls were used for comparison using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for pancreatic cancer. RESULTS Of 3844 patients with presumed BD-IPMN, 775 (20.2%) developed WFs and 68 (1.8%) HRS after a median surveillance of 53 (interquartile range 53) months. Some 164 patients (4.3%) underwent surgery. Of the overall cohort, 1617 patients (42%) remained stable without developing WFs or HRS for at least 5 years. In patients 75 years or older, the SIR was 1.12 (95% CI, 0.23-3.39), and in patients 65 years or older with stable lesions smaller than 15 mm in diameter after 5 years, the SIR was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.11-3.42). The all-cause mortality for patients who did not develop WFs or HRS for at least 5 years was 4.9% (n = 79), and the disease-specific mortality was 0.3% (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS The risk of developing pancreatic malignancy in presumed BD-IPMN without WFs or HRS after 5 years of surveillance is comparable to that of the general population depending on cyst size and patient age. Surveillance discontinuation could be justified after 5 years of stability in patients older than 75 years with cysts <30 mm, and in patients 65 years or older who have cysts ≤15 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Marchegiani
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy; Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Tommaso Pollini
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Anna Burelli
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Youngmin Han
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye-Sol Jung
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Stefano Crippa
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulio Belfiori
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endoscopic Ultrasound, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Capurso
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endoscopic Ultrasound, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Apadula
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endoscopic Ultrasound, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Piera Zaccari
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endoscopic Ultrasound, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - José Lariño Noia
- Endoscopy and Pancreatic Unit, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Myrte Gorris
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Kulbir Mann
- Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Ihsan Ekin Demir
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Veit Phillip
- Department of Gastroenterology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nuzhat Ahmad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Max Heckler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anne Marie Lennon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Elham Afghani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Davide Vallicella
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Tommaso Dall'Olio
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Angelica Nepi
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Charles M Vollmer
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Helmut Friess
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Paula Ghaneh
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Marc Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Brian Kim-Poh Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Roberto Salvia
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Levink IJM, Jaarsma SC, Koopmann BDM, van Riet PA, Overbeek KA, Meziani J, Sprij MLJA, Casadei R, Ingaldi C, Polkowski M, Engels MML, van der Waaij LA, Carrara S, Pando E, Vornhülz M, Honkoop P, Schoon EJ, Laukkarinen J, Bergmann JF, Rossi G, van Vilsteren FGI, van Berkel A, Tabone T, Schwartz MP, Tan ACITL, van Hooft JE, Quispel R, van Soest E, Czacko L, Bruno MJ, Cahen DL. The additive value of CA19.9 monitoring in a pancreatic cyst surveillance program. United European Gastroenterol J 2023; 11:601-611. [PMID: 37435855 PMCID: PMC10493362 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surveillance of pancreatic cysts focuses on the detection of (mostly morphologic) features warranting surgery. European guidelines consider elevated CA19.9 as a relative indication for surgery. We aimed to evaluate the role of CA19.9 monitoring for early detection and management in a cyst surveillance population. METHODS The PACYFIC-registry is a prospective collaboration that investigates the yield of pancreatic cyst surveillance performed at the discretion of the treating physician. We included participants for whom at least one serum CA19.9 value was determined by a minimum follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS Of 1865 PACYFIC participants, 685 met the inclusion criteria for this study (mean age 67 years, SD 10; 61% female). During a median follow-up of 25 months (IQR 24, 1966 visits), 29 participants developed high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or pancreatic cancer. At baseline, CA19.9 ranged from 1 to 591 kU/L (median 10 kU/L [IQR 14]), and was elevated (≥37 kU/L) in 64 participants (9%). During 191 of 1966 visits (10%), an elevated CA19.9 was detected, and these visits more often led to an intensified follow-up (42%) than those without an elevated CA19.9 (27%; p < 0.001). An elevated CA19.9 was the sole reason for surgery in five participants with benign disease (10%). The baseline CA19.9 value was (as continuous or dichotomous variable at the 37 kU/L threshold) not independently associated with HGD or pancreatic cancer development, whilst a CA19.9 of ≥ 133 kU/L was (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.1-13, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS In this pancreatic cyst surveillance cohort, CA19.9 monitoring caused substantial harm by shortening surveillance intervals (and performance of unnecessary surgery). The current CA19.9 cutoff was not predictive of HGD and pancreatic cancer, whereas a higher cutoff may decrease false-positive values. The role of CA19.9 monitoring should be critically appraised prior to implementation in surveillance programs and guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris J. M. Levink
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Sanne C. Jaarsma
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Brechtje D. M. Koopmann
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Public HealthErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Priscilla A. van Riet
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Kasper A. Overbeek
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Jihane Meziani
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Marloes L. J. A. Sprij
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marcin Polkowski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Clinical OncologyCenter of Postgraduate Medical EducationWarsawPoland
- Department of Oncological GastroenterologyThe Maria Sklodowska‐Curie National Research Institute of OncologyWarsawPoland
| | - Megan M. L. Engels
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyMayo ClinicJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Silvia Carrara
- Department of GastroenterologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalMilanItaly
| | - Elizabeth Pando
- Department of SurgeryVall d’Hebron Institute of ResearchBarcelonaSpain
| | - Marlies Vornhülz
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyLudwig‐Maximilians‐University of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Pieter Honkoop
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyAlbert Schweitzer HospitalDordrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Erik J. Schoon
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyCatharina HospitalEindhovenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Jilling F. Bergmann
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyHaga ZiekenhuisThe HagueThe Netherlands
| | - Gemma Rossi
- Pancreato‐Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography DivisionPancreas Translational and Clinical Research CenterSan Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCSVita Salute San Raffaele UniversityMilanItaly
| | | | | | - Trevor Tabone
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyMater dei HospitalMsidaMalta
| | - Matthijs P. Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyMeander Medical CenterAmersfoortThe Netherlands
| | - Adriaan C. I. T. L. Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyCanisius Wilhelmina HospitalNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E. van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Rutger Quispel
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyReinier de GraafDelftThe Netherlands
| | - Ellert van Soest
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologySpaarne GasthuisHaarlemThe Netherlands
| | - Laszlo Czacko
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyUniversity of SzegedSzegedHungary
| | - Marco J. Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Djuna L. Cahen
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyAmstellandAmstelveenThe Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pollini T, Marchegiani G, Facciorusso A, Balduzzi A, Biancotto M, Bassi C, Maker AV, Salvia R. It is not necessary to resect all mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: current guidelines do not reflect the actual risk of malignancy. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:747-757. [PMID: 37003852 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms (MCN) of the pancreas are premalignant cysts for which current guidelines support pancreatic resection. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to define the pooled rate of malignancy for MCN. METHODS A systematic review of eligible studies published between 2000 and 2021 was performed on PubMed and Embase. Primary outcome was rate of malignancy. Data regarding high-risk features, including cyst size and mural nodules, were collected and analyzed. RESULTS A total of 40 studies and 3292 patients with resected MCN were included in the final analysis. The pooled rate of malignancy was 16.1% (95%CI 13.1-19.0). The rate of malignant MCN in studies published before 2012 was significantly higher than that of studies published after recent guidelines were published (21.0% vs 14.9%, p < 0.001). Malignant MCN were larger than benign (mean difference 25.9 mm 95%CI 14.50-37.43, p < 0.001) with a direct correlation between size and presence of malignant MCN (R2 = 0.28, p = 0.020). A SROC identified a threshold of 65 mm to be associated with the diagnosis of malignant MCN. Presence of mural nodules was associated with the diagnosis of a malignant MCN (OR = 4.34, 95%CI 3.00-6.29, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Whereas guidelines recommend resection of all MCN, the rate of malignancy in resected MCN is 16%, implying that surveillance has a role in most cases, and that surgical selection criteria are warranted. Size and presence of mural nodules are significantly associated with an increased risk of malignant degeneration, small MCN and without mural nodules can be considered for surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso Pollini
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA; The Pancreas Institute, Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- The Pancreas Institute, Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Alberto Balduzzi
- The Pancreas Institute, Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Biancotto
- The Pancreas Institute, Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Bassi
- The Pancreas Institute, Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Ajay V Maker
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Roberto Salvia
- The Pancreas Institute, Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chhoda A, Schmidt J, Farrell JJ. Surveillance of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2023; 33:613-640. [PMID: 37245939 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2023.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) are increasingly detected because of the widespread use of cross-sectional imaging and overall aging population. While the majority of these cysts are benign, some can progress to advanced neoplasia (defined as high-grade dysplasia and invasive cancer). As the only widely accepted treatment for PCNs with advanced neoplasia is surgical resection, accurate preoperative diagnosis, and stratification of malignant potential for deciding about surgery, surveillance or doing nothing remains a clinical challenge. Surveillance strategies for pancreatic cysts (PCNs) combine clinical evaluation and imaging to assess changes in cyst morphology and symptoms that may indicate advanced neoplasia. PCN surveillance heavily relies on various consensus clinical guidelines that focus on high-risk morphology, surgical indications, and surveillance intervals and modalities. This review will focus on current concepts in the surveillance of newly diagnosed PCNs, especially on low-risk presumed intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (those without worrisome features and high-risk stigmata), and appraise current clinical surveillance guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit Chhoda
- Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julie Schmidt
- Yale Multidisciplinary Pancreatic Cyst Clinic (Yale MPaCC), Yale Center for Pancreatic Disease, Section of Digestive Disease, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - James J Farrell
- Yale Multidisciplinary Pancreatic Cyst Clinic (Yale MPaCC), Yale Center for Pancreatic Disease, Section of Digestive Disease, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Romutis S, Brand R. Burden of New Pancreatic Cyst Diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2023; 33:487-495. [PMID: 37245931 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2023.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cysts are an increasingly identified entity with significant health care implications. Although some cysts present with concurrent symptoms that often require operative intervention, the advent of improved cross-sectional imaging has heralded an era of increased incidentally detected pancreatic cysts. Although the rate of malignant progression in pancreatic cysts remains low, the poor prognosis of pancreatic malignancy has driven recommendations for ongoing surveillance. A uniform consensus has not been reached on the management and surveillance of pancreatic cysts leading clinicians to grapple with the burden of how best to approach pancreatic cysts from a health, psychosocial, and cost perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Romutis
- UPMC Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, 200 Lothrop Street, Mezzanine Level C-wing, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
| | - Randall Brand
- UPMC Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, 200 Lothrop Street, Mezzanine Level C-wing, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Papaefthymiou A, Johnson GJ, Maida M, Gkolfakis P, Ramai D, Facciorusso A, Arvanitakis M, Ney A, Fusai GK, Saftoiu A, Tabacelia D, Phillpotts S, Chapman MH, Webster GJ, Pereira SP. Performance and Safety of EUS Ablation Techniques for Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092627. [PMID: 37174092 PMCID: PMC10177078 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) represent an increasingly diagnosed condition with significant burden to patients' lives and medical resources. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) ablation techniques have been utilized to treat focal pancreatic lesions. This systematic review with meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy of EUS ablation on PCL in terms of complete or partial response and safety. METHODS A systematic search in Medline, Cochrane and Scopus databases was performed in April 2023 for studies assessing the performance of the various EUS ablation techniques. The primary outcome was complete cyst resolution, defined as cyst disappearance in follow-up imaging. Secondary outcomes included partial resolution (reduction in PCL size), and adverse events rate. A subgroup analysis was planned to evaluate the impact of the available ablation techniques (ethanol, ethanol/paclitaxel, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and lauromacrogol) on the results. Meta-analyses using a random effects model were conducted and the results were reported as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS Fifteen studies (840 patients) were eligible for analysis. Complete cyst resolution after EUS ablation was achieved in 44% of cases (95%CI: 31-57; 352/767; I2 = 93.7%), and the respective partial response rate was 30% (95%CI: 20-39; 206/767; I2 = 86.1%). Adverse events were recorded in 14% (95%CI: 8-20; 164/840; I2 = 87.2%) of cases, rated as mild in 10% (95%CI: 5-15; 128/840; I2 = 86.7%), and severe in 4% (95%CI: 3-5; 36/840; I2 = 0%). The subgroup analysis for the primary outcome revealed rates of 70% (95%CI: 64-76; I2 = 42.3%) for ethanol/paclitaxel, 44% (95%CI: 33-54; I2= 0%) for lauromacrogol, 32% (95%CI: 27-36; I2 = 88.4%) for ethanol, and 13% (95%CI: 4-22; I2 = 95.8%) for RFA. Considering adverse events, the ethanol-based subgroup rated the highest percentage (16%; 95%CI: 13-20; I2 = 91.0%). CONCLUSION EUS ablation of pancreatic cysts provides acceptable rates of complete resolution and a low incidence of severe adverse events, with chemoablative agents yielding higher performance rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolis Papaefthymiou
- Pancreaticobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH), London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Gavin J Johnson
- Pancreaticobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH), London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Marcello Maida
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, S. Elia-Raimondi Hospital, 93100 Caltanissetta, Italy
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Nea Ionia "Konstantopoulio-Patision", 14233 Athens, Greece
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, 37920 Foggia, Italy
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexander Ney
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Giuseppe K Fusai
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2QG, UK
| | - Adrian Saftoiu
- Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 4192910 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Daniela Tabacelia
- Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 4192910 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Simon Phillpotts
- Pancreaticobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH), London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Michael H Chapman
- Pancreaticobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH), London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - George J Webster
- Pancreaticobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH), London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Stephen P Pereira
- Pancreaticobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH), London NW1 2BU, UK
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nieminen H, Roine R, Ristimäki A, Lantto E, Välimaa N, Kirveskari E, Sintonen H, Haglund C, Seppänen H. Health-related quality of life and anxiety levels among patients under surveillance for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:14. [PMID: 36647007 PMCID: PMC9841613 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02639-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because of the premalignant nature of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), patients should undergo surveillance as long as they remain fit for surgery. This surveillance, with imaging and laboratory tests every 6 to 12 months, is expensive and may psychologically burden patients. This study aimed to determine the effects of IPMN surveillance on patients´ health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and anxiety levels. METHODS We included a random subgroup of all IPMN patients undergoing a follow-up check-up at Helsinki University Hospital (HUH) between August 2017 and November 2018. Patients were asked to complete the 15D HRQoL and state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) questionnaires just before and three months after an IPMN control. RESULTS Among 899 patients in IPMN follow-up, 232 participated. The 15D HRQoL results showed differences in some IPMN patients' 15 analyzed dimensions compared to a sex- and age-standardized general population cohort, but the clinical relevance of these differences appear doubtful. We detected no significant difference in the anxiety levels determined using the STAI questionnaires before or three months after the IPMN control. CONCLUSION Surveillance should be less harmful than the risk of disease. Among our patients, the recommended IPMN follow-up carried minimal negative impact on patients' HRQoL or anxiety levels. This result is important, because the number of patients under IPMN surveillance is rapidly increasing and the cancer risk among the majority of these patients remains small. TRIAL REGISTRATION The Surgical Ethics Committee of Helsinki University Hospital approved this study (Dnro HUS 475/2017) and it was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03131076) before patient enrollment began.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heini Nieminen
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 4, PL340, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Risto Roine
- grid.9668.10000 0001 0726 2490Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland ,grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ari Ristimäki
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland ,grid.15485.3d0000 0000 9950 5666HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland ,grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Translational Cancer Medicine, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eila Lantto
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland ,grid.440346.10000 0004 0628 2838Department of Radiology, Paijat-Hame Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland
| | - Norma Välimaa
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Erika Kirveskari
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071HUS Diagnostic Center, Clinical Neurophysiology, Clinical Neurosciences, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Harri Sintonen
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Caj Haglund
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 4, PL340, Helsinki, Finland ,grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Translational Cancer Medicine, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hanna Seppänen
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 4, PL340, Helsinki, Finland ,grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Translational Cancer Medicine, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Paniccia A, Polanco PM, Boone BA, Wald AI, McGrath K, Brand RE, Khalid A, Kubiliun N, O'Broin-Lennon AM, Park WG, Klapman J, Tharian B, Inamdar S, Fasanella K, Nasr J, Chennat J, Das R, DeWitt J, Easler JJ, Bick B, Singh H, Fairley KJ, Sarkaria S, Sawas T, Skef W, Slivka A, Tavakkoli A, Thakkar S, Kim V, Vanderveldt HD, Richardson A, Wallace MB, Brahmbhatt B, Engels M, Gabbert C, Dugum M, El-Dika S, Bhat Y, Ramrakhiani S, Bakis G, Rolshud D, Millspaugh G, Tielleman T, Schmidt C, Mansour J, Marsh W, Ongchin M, Centeno B, Monaco SE, Ohori NP, Lajara S, Thompson ED, Hruban RH, Bell PD, Smith K, Permuth JB, Vandenbussche C, Ernst W, Grupillo M, Kaya C, Hogg M, He J, Wolfgang CL, Lee KK, Zeh H, Zureikat A, Nikiforova MN, Singhi AD. Prospective, Multi-Institutional, Real-Time Next-Generation Sequencing of Pancreatic Cyst Fluid Reveals Diverse Genomic Alterations That Improve the Clinical Management of Pancreatic Cysts. Gastroenterology 2023; 164:117-133.e7. [PMID: 36209796 PMCID: PMC9844531 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of pancreatic cyst fluid is a useful adjunct in the assessment of patients with pancreatic cyst. However, previous studies have been retrospective or single institutional experiences. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate NGS on a multi-institutional cohort of patients with pancreatic cyst in real time. METHODS The performance of a 22-gene NGS panel (PancreaSeq) was first retrospectively confirmed and then within a 2-year timeframe, PancreaSeq testing was prospectively used to evaluate endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration pancreatic cyst fluid from 31 institutions. PancreaSeq results were correlated with endoscopic ultrasound findings, ancillary studies, current pancreatic cyst guidelines, follow-up, and expanded testing (Oncomine) of postoperative specimens. RESULTS Among 1933 PCs prospectively tested, 1887 (98%) specimens from 1832 patients were satisfactory for PancreaSeq testing. Follow-up was available for 1216 (66%) patients (median, 23 months). Based on 251 (21%) patients with surgical pathology, mitogen-activated protein kinase/GNAS mutations had 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity for a mucinous cyst (positive predictive value [PPV], 100%; negative predictive value [NPV], 77%). On exclusion of low-level variants, the combination of mitogen-activated protein kinase/GNAS and TP53/SMAD4/CTNNB1/mammalian target of rapamycin alterations had 88% sensitivity and 98% specificity for advanced neoplasia (PPV, 97%; NPV, 93%). Inclusion of cytopathologic evaluation to PancreaSeq testing improved the sensitivity to 93% and maintained a high specificity of 95% (PPV, 92%; NPV, 95%). In comparison, other modalities and current pancreatic cyst guidelines, such as the American Gastroenterology Association and International Association of Pancreatology/Fukuoka guidelines, show inferior diagnostic performance. The sensitivities and specificities of VHL and MEN1/loss of heterozygosity alterations were 71% and 100% for serous cystadenomas (PPV, 100%; NPV, 98%), and 68% and 98% for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PPV, 85%; NPV, 95%), respectively. On follow-up, serous cystadenomas with TP53/TERT mutations exhibited interval growth, whereas pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with loss of heterozygosity of ≥3 genes tended to have distant metastasis. None of the 965 patients who did not undergo surgery developed malignancy. Postoperative Oncomine testing identified mucinous cysts with BRAF fusions and ERBB2 amplification, and advanced neoplasia with CDKN2A alterations. CONCLUSIONS PancreaSeq was not only sensitive and specific for various pancreatic cyst types and advanced neoplasia arising from mucinous cysts, but also reveals the diversity of genomic alterations seen in pancreatic cysts and their clinical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Patricio M Polanco
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Brian A Boone
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Abigail I Wald
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kevin McGrath
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Randall E Brand
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Asif Khalid
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Nisa Kubiliun
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Anne Marie O'Broin-Lennon
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Walter G Park
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Jason Klapman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Benjamin Tharian
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Sumant Inamdar
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Kenneth Fasanella
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - John Nasr
- Department of Medicine, Wheeling Hospital, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Jennifer Chennat
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Rohit Das
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - John DeWitt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Health Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Jeffrey J Easler
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Health Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Benjamin Bick
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Health Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Harkirat Singh
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kimberly J Fairley
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Savreet Sarkaria
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Tarek Sawas
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Wasseem Skef
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California
| | - Adam Slivka
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Anna Tavakkoli
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Shyam Thakkar
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Victoria Kim
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Michael B Wallace
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida; Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Bhaumik Brahmbhatt
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Megan Engels
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Charles Gabbert
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mohannad Dugum
- Digestive Health Center, Essentia Health-Duluth Clinic, Duluth, Minnesota
| | - Samer El-Dika
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Yasser Bhat
- Department of Gastroenterology, Palo Alto Medical Foundation (PAMF), Mountain View, California
| | - Sanjay Ramrakhiani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Palo Alto Medical Foundation (PAMF), Mountain View, California
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Tielleman
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Carl Schmidt
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - John Mansour
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Wallis Marsh
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Melanie Ongchin
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Barbara Centeno
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Sara E Monaco
- Department of Pathology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - N Paul Ohori
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sigfred Lajara
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Elizabeth D Thompson
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Phoenix D Bell
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Katelyn Smith
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer B Permuth
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Christopher Vandenbussche
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Wayne Ernst
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Maria Grupillo
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Cihan Kaya
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Melissa Hogg
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jin He
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Herbert Zeh
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Amer Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Marina N Nikiforova
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Balduzzi A, Salvia R, Löhr M. Risk stratification tools for branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. United European Gastroenterol J 2022; 10:145-146. [PMID: 35122677 PMCID: PMC8911533 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Balduzzi
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and GynaecologyUnit of General and Pancreatic SurgeryThe Pancreas Institute VeronaUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and GynaecologyUnit of General and Pancreatic SurgeryThe Pancreas Institute VeronaUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
| | - Matthias Löhr
- Department for Digestive DiseasesKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sioulas A, Spinou M, Schizas D, Megapanou M, Frountzas M, Papadaki K, Scotiniotis I. Pancreatic cystic neoplasms: Adherence to management recommendations and associated endosonographic cyst characteristics. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:122-126. [PMID: 35142657 PMCID: PMC9007072 DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_505_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study is to assess patients' compliance to recommendations after evaluation of pancreatic cystic neoplasm (PCN) with EUS and investigate how the presence of "worrisome" characteristics including cyst's size, main pancreatic duct dilation and presence of mural nodules might affect the adherence rates of management recommendations. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients at a private tertiary hospital who were referred for evaluation with EUS over a 5-year period (2015-2019), after the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasm during radiological imaging. RESULTS We included 111 patients (mean age 64.1 years, SD = 13.9) with PCN. After the EUS examination, 16 patients were referred for surgical resection, 4 patients needed no further follow up and 91 patients were recommended to follow imaging surveillance. In total, 70 (63.1%) subjects adhered to surveillance recommendations. In the group of subjects who adhered to surveillance, cyst size ≥3cm was found in 27 (38.6%) patients, main pancreatic duct diameter ≥5mm in 12 (17.1%) subjects and only 3 (4.3%) pancreatic cysts demonstrated mural nodules. However, none of the aforementioned cystic "worrisome features" was significantly correlated with increased adherence to follow up (p = 0.709, P = 0.642 and P = 0.630, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Although the majority of patients with PCN adhered to given recommendations after EUS examination, the number of noncompliant subjects was noticeable. The presence of cystic "worrisome" features did not correlate with an increased compliance rate to suggested management plan. Further prospective studies are needed to elucidate the factors that may enhance patients' adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athanasios Sioulas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece,Address for correspondence: Dr. Athanasios Sioulas, Department of Gastroenterology, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece 4 Erythrou Stavrou Str. & Kifisias Av, 151 23 Marousi, Athens, Greece. E-mail:
| | - Marianna Spinou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Schizas
- Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Megapanou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Maximos Frountzas
- Propaedeutic Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippocration General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Salvia R, Burelli A, Perri G, Marchegiani G. State-of-the-art surgical treatment of IPMNs. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 406:2633-2642. [PMID: 34738168 PMCID: PMC8803623 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02349-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Background A “pandemic” of incidentally discovered pancreatic cyst neoplasms (PCNs) is ongoing. Among PCNs, intraductal papillary mucinous cystic neoplasms (IPMNs) are the most common and with their complex biology could represent a precursor lesion of pancreatic cancer. Although multiple guidelines exist to guide their treatment, there are still many “gray areas” on indications for surgery for IPMNs. Methods The current indications for surgery of IPMNs were reappraised, considering potential discrepancies between available evidence and guidelines policies. The practice at a high-volume center for the diagnosis and treatment of PCN was presented and discussed. Results Most IPMNs do not and will never require surgery, as they won’t progress to malignancy. The current literature is solid in identifying high-grade dysplasia (HGD) as the right and timely target for IPMN resection, but how to precisely assess its presence remains controversial and guidelines lack of accuracy in this regard. Multiple tumorigenic pathways of progression of IPMNs exist, and their knowledge will likely lead to more accurate tests for malignancy prediction in the future. Conclusions The surgical management of IPMNs still is a matter of debate. Indication for resection should be considered only in highly selected cases with the ideal target of HGD. Clinicians should critically interpret the guidelines’ indications, refer to a multidisciplinary team discussion, and always consider the outcome of an adequate counselling with the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Salvia
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Piazzale Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Anna Burelli
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Piazzale Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Perri
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Piazzale Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Piazzale Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology, Verona University Hospital (Policlinico G.B. Rossi), Piazzale Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Surci N, Marchegiani G, Andrianello S, Pollini T, Mühlbacher J, Jomrich G, Richwien P, Tamandl D, Schindl M, Bassi C, Salvia R, Sahora K. The faith of non-surveilled pancreatic cysts: a bicentric retrospective study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:89-94. [PMID: 34148825 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incidental discovery of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCLs) is a common and steadily increasing occurrence. The aim of this study was to investigate a cohort of patients presenting with incidentally detected PCLs which were not included in a surveillance protocol, and to compare their risk of malignant evolution with that of systematically surveilled lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS A population of PCLs which did not receive surveillance over a period >10 years (population A) was selected at the Medical University of Vienna. A group of "low risk" branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm ≤15 mm in size upon diagnosis undergoing a regular follow-up of at least 5 years at the University of Verona was selected as control (population B). The incidence of pancreatic cancer (PC), cumulative risk of PC and disease-specific survival were compared. RESULTS Overall, 376 patients with non-surveilled PCLs were included in study group A and compared to 299 patients in group B. This comparison resulted in similar incidence rates of PC (1.6% vs 1.7%, p = 0.938), a strong similarity in terms of disease-specific mortality rates (1.3% vs 0.3%, p = 0.171) and the 5- and 10-year cumulative risk of PC (≅ 1% and 2%, p = 0.589) and DSS (≅ 100% and 98%, p = 0.050). CONCLUSION The "price to pay" for a negligence-based policy in the population of non-surveilled PCLs was reasonable, and the incidence of PC was comparable to that reported for a population of low-risk cysts enrolled to a standardized surveillance protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Surci
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria; Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, "GB Rossi" Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - G Marchegiani
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, "GB Rossi" Hospital, Verona, Italy.
| | - S Andrianello
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, "GB Rossi" Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - T Pollini
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, "GB Rossi" Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - J Mühlbacher
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - G Jomrich
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - P Richwien
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - D Tamandl
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Schindl
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Bassi
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, "GB Rossi" Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - R Salvia
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, "GB Rossi" Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - K Sahora
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kariyawasam DS, D'Silva AM, Vetsch J, Wakefield CE, Wiley V, Farrar MA. " We needed this": perspectives of parents and healthcare professionals involved in a pilot newborn screening program for spinal muscular atrophy. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 33:100742. [PMID: 33842861 PMCID: PMC8020144 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Newborn screening (NBS) for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a recognised model through which health outcomes can be improved. However, perspectives of parents and healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in such programs are largely unknown. METHODS A pilot program for SMA ran from August 2018-July 2020. Using a mixed-methods convergent methodology, we used a self-administered questionnaire to understand parents' perceptions and psychological impact of the program from diagnosis to treatment. We thematically analysed successes/challenges encountered by HCPs and recommendations for service improvement from both participant groups. FINDINGS 202,388 infants were screened for SMA and the perceptions of 44 parents and HCPs affected by a positive result in eighteen newborns was ascertained. Parents (n=29, 100%) were satisfied with NBS for SMA. Although screen-positive result was distressing for all parents, quality of life improved over time [CarerQoL-7D baseline median score 4 (SD=1.4) vs six-month median score 8 (SD=1.3), p<0.001)]. Challenges for HCPs included managing the time-critical nature of the pathway whilst remaining cognisant of limitations associated with the predictive screening test. INTERPRETATION Interpretation: NBS for SMA fulfils criteria for population-wide screening. Net benefits are acknowledged by stakeholders to optimise lifelong outcomes. Harms including psychological distress associated with a screen-positive result may be managed by targeted psychosocial support, information provision and a personalised model of care together strengthening healthcare systems. FUNDING The NSW Pilot NBS study was funded by Luminesce Alliance. Dr Kariyawasam received funding from the RTP Scholarship, University of New South Wales and The Freedman Family Foundation Scholarship, Sydney Children's Hospital Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Didu S.T. Kariyawasam
- Department of Neurology, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales Medicine, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Arlene M. D'Silva
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales Medicine, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Janine Vetsch
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales Medicine, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - Claire E. Wakefield
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales Medicine, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - Veronica Wiley
- NSW Newborn Screening Program, Children's Hospital Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michelle A. Farrar
- Department of Neurology, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales Medicine, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Aristizábal-Linares JP, Quevedo-Vélez C, Sánchez-Zapata P. Quality of life analysis after Whipple procedure. Retrospective cohort study. COLOMBIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.5554/22562087.e946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Patient reported outcomes establish the patient’s own perception about his/her health and enable the development of policies designed to improve health/disease processes. These are particularly helpful in the case of diseases with a significant impact on the patient’s quality of life.
Objective: To compare the quality of life scores assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire in patients undergoing cephalic duodenopancreatectomy (Whipple procedure) and laparoscopic cholecystectomies in the same hospital.
Methodology: Retrospective cohort trial between July 2018 and February 2020. Patients programmed for cephalic duodenopancreatectomy were included, regardless of the type of pathology, and over 18 years old. Patients with carcinomatosis or vascular infiltration were excluded. The EQ-5D-5L was administered following Whipple surgery and compared against a control group (laparoscopic cholecystectomy). The demographic characteristics, the diagnosis, hospital stay and 60-day mortality were assessed.
Results: A total of 68 patients were included. The most frequent diagnosis was pancreatic cancer (30 %) in the Whipple group and lithiasis (100 %) in the control group. In the five dimensions assessed, there were no differences in terms of mobility (OR: 0.41, 95 % CI [0.30-0.57], p = 0.103) and in terms of personal care (OR: 0.42, 95 % CI [0.32-0.58], p = 0.254). There was a difference in daily life activities (OR: 0.38, 95 % CI [0.27-0.54], p = 0.017), pain/malaise (OR: 2.33, 95 % CI [0.99-5.48]), p = 0.013 and anxiety/depression (OR: 0.39, 95 % CI [0.28-0.55], p = 0.019). The overall health perception was 80 points for Whipple (IQR 60-90) vs. 100 points for the control group (IQR 90-100).
Conclusions: Patients undergoing a Whipple procedure experience a health perception slightly lower than patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This difference may be associated with increased pain, anxiety/depression and a reduction in their activities of daily life. The administration of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire to measure quality of life is a friendly tool that used be used routinely to plan activities aimed at improving medical care.
Collapse
|
21
|
Vaalavuo Y, Siiki A, Antila A, Rinta-Kiikka I, Sand J, Laukkarinen J. The European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) in clinical practice: The development of relative and absolute indications for surgery during prospective IPMN surveillance. Pancreatology 2020; 20:1393-1398. [PMID: 32938553 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The European evidence-based guidelines on PCN recommend surveillance for IPMN patients who are fit for surgery but who have no indication for immediate surgery. Our aim was to demonstrate the feasibility of the new guidelines in clinical practice. METHODS This is a prospective cohort study of patients included in the IPMN register in Tampere University Hospital, Finland. IPMN was diagnosed from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2018. Patients were analyzed for surveillance and indications for surgery according to the European guidelines on PCN. RESULTS Out of 128 patients in register 23 was decided to operate upfront and 105 patients were included in the surveillance programme. Invasive carcinoma was found in 4/23 of operated patients. Median follow-up time was 26 months (6-69). Median size of the cyst at the beginning and end of the surveillance was 16 mm (4-58 mm). During surveillance 0/105 (0.0%) patients had or developed an absolute indication for surgery. Relative indication for surgery was present in 8/105 (7.6%) patients in the beginning surveillance and 9/105 (8.6%) patients developed at least one relative indication for surgery during surveillance. From the surveillance cohort 2/105 patients were operated. Surveillance was abandoned in 15/105 (14.1%) patients all due to poor general condition or other medical conditions. CONCLUSIONS In clinical practice, surveillance of IPMN according to the European guidelines on PCN is feasible. Among our patients 16% were detected to have relative indications for surgery during the median 26 (range 3-135) months of surveillance. Nearly 15% became surgically unfit during surveillance period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yrjö Vaalavuo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Antti Siiki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Anne Antila
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Irina Rinta-Kiikka
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland; Dept. of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Juhani Sand
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Johanna Laukkarinen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
[Quality of indications in cystic lesions of the pancreas]. Chirurg 2020; 91:736-742. [PMID: 32642818 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-020-01217-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Cystic tumors of the pancreas (PCN) have increasingly gained importance in the clinical routine as they are frequently diagnosed as an incidental finding due to the continuous improvement in cross-sectional imaging. A differentiation is made between non-neoplastic and neoplastic cysts, whereby the latter has a tendency to malignant transformation to a varying extent. Therefore, they can be considered as precursor lesions of pancreatic cancer (PDAC). In addition to a detailed patient history and examination, imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine needle aspiration (FNA) are used for the differential diagnosis. The indications for surgical resection of these lesions are based on the current European guidelines from 2018; however, the content is not evidence-based but relies on knowledge and recommendations from experts. According to these consensus recommendations asymptomatic serous cystic neoplasms (SCN) are serous lesions with a low tendency for malignant transformation and can be monitored. In contrast resection is warranted for all mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) >4 cm and all solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN). Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), which are differentiated into main duct (MD-IPMN) and branch duct type (BD-IPMN) IPMN based on the position in the pancreatic duct system, should be resected as MD-IPMN and mixed type (MT)-IPMN. The risk of malignant transformation in BD-IPMN is variable and depends on risk factors, which are defined clinically and by imaging morphology. The treatment management is therefore carried out on an individual basis following risk estimation. In order to quantify the quality of indications in PCN and thereby also contributing to optimized medical care, prospective long-term studies are urgently needed.
Collapse
|
23
|
Paiella S, Marinelli V, Secchettin E, Mazzi MA, Ferretto F, Casolino R, Bassi C, Salvia R. The emotional impact of surveillance programs for pancreatic cancer on high-risk individuals: A prospective analysis. Psychooncology 2020; 29:1004-1011. [PMID: 32108397 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2019] [Revised: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Literature shows that emotional status can influence participation in screening/surveillance programs, and that screening/surveillance programs may alter the psychological well-being of subjects examined. This study aims to assess if participating in a surveillance program for pancreatic cancer early detection is associated with abnormal levels of psychological distress in high-risk individuals (HRIs), compared to the general population. METHODS Fifty-four HRIs participating in a magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)-based surveillance program completed several psychological assessment questionnaires, investigating global functioning, self-efficacy, perceived stress, coping abilities, and social support. The questionnaires were administered by a clinical psychologist after the MRCP but before the subjects were informed about the results of the scans. The HRIs were subjects with strong familiarity of pancreatic cancer and/or carriers of known genetic mutations related to cancer susceptibility. The psychological assessment was made at the time of the first examination. RESULTS The population was characterized by an overall good psychological status. Scoring of our sample was comparable to the general population norms. The HRIs showed decent global functioning, high self-efficacy levels, low perceived stress in the last month prior to examination, efficient emotion-focused coping strategies, and an adequate social support system. The younger subjects' subpopulation only revealed higher levels of stress. CONCLUSIONS From a psychological point of view, an MRCP-based pancreatic cancer annual surveillance seemed not to influence the HRIs' psychological well-being, unless in young people. Further studies are needed to better establish if there are any changes in distress levels over time and how emotional status influences participation in surveillance programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Paiella
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Veronica Marinelli
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Erica Secchettin
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Mazzi
- Clinical Psychology, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Ferretto
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Claudio Bassi
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|