1
|
Beger HG, Mayer B, Poch B. Long-Term Oncologic Outcome following Duodenum-Preserving Pancreatic Head Resection for Benign Tumors, Cystic Neoplasms, and Neuroendocrine Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4637-4653. [PMID: 38578553 PMCID: PMC11164799 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15222-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) has a considerable surgical risk for complications and late metabolic morbidity. Parenchyma-sparing resection of benign tumors has the potential to cure patients associated with reduced procedure-related short- and long-term complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries were searched for studies reporting surgery-related complications following PD and duodenum-preserving total (DPPHRt) or partial (DPPHRp) pancreatic head resection for benign tumors. A total of 38 cohort studies that included data from 1262 patients were analyzed. In total, 729 patients underwent DPPHR and 533 PD. RESULTS Concordance between preoperative diagnosis of benign tumors and final histopathology was 90.57% for DPPHR. Cystic and neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNETs) and periampullary tumors (PATs) were observed in 497, 89, and 31 patients, respectively. In total, 34 of 161 (21.1%) patients with intraepithelial papillar mucinous neoplasm exhibited severe dysplasia in the final histopathology. The meta-analysis, when comparing DPPHRt and PD, revealed in-hospital mortality of 1/362 (0.26%) and 8/547 (1.46%) patients, respectively [OR 0.48 (95% CI 0.15-1.58); p = 0.21], and frequency of reoperation of 3.26 % and 6.75%, respectively [OR 0.52 (95% CI 0.28-0.96); p = 0.04]. After a follow-up of 45.8 ± 26.6 months, 14/340 patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms/mucinous cystic neoplasms (IPMN/MCN, 4.11%) and 2/89 patients with PNET (2.24%) exhibited tumor recurrence. Local recurrence at the resection margin and reoccurrence of tumor growth in the remnant pancreas was comparable after DPPHR or PD [OR 0.94 (95% CI 0.178-5.34); p = 0.96]. CONCLUSIONS DPPHR for benign, premalignant neoplasms provides a cure for patients with low risk of tumor recurrence and significantly fewer early surgery-related complications compared with PD. DPPHR has the potential to replace PD for benign, premalignant cystic and neuroendocrine neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans G Beger
- c/o University Hospital Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
| | - Benjamin Mayer
- Institute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Bertram Poch
- Centre for Oncologic, Endocrine and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Donau-Klinikum Neu-Ulm, Neu-Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kazmi SZ, Jung HS, Han Y, Yun WG, Cho YJ, Lee M, Kwon W, Castillo CFD, Del Chiaro M, Marchegiani G, Goh BKP, Hijioka S, Majumder S, Nakai Y, Shin A, Jang JY. Systematic review on surveillance for non-resected branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2024; 24:463-488. [PMID: 38480047 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of branch-duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMN) varies in existing guidelines. This study investigated the optimal surveillance protocol and safe discontinuation of surveillance considering natural history in non-resected IPMN, by systematically reviewing the published literature. METHODS This review was guided by PRISMA. Research questions were framed in PICO format "CQ1-1: Is size criteria helpful to determine surveillance period? CQ1-2: How often should surveillance be carried out? CQ1-3: When should surveillance be discontinued? CQ1-4: Is nomogram predicting malignancy useful during surveillance?". PubMed was searched from January-April 2022. RESULTS The search generated 2373 citations. After screening, 83 articles were included. Among them, 33 studies were identified for CQ1-1, 19 for CQ1-2, 26 for CQ1-3 and 12 for CQ1-4. Cysts <1.5 or 2 cm without worrisome features (WF) were described as more indolent, and most studies advised an initial period of surveillance. The median growth rate of cysts <2 cm ranged from 0.23 to 0.6 mm/year. Patients with cysts <2 cm showing no morphological changes and no WF after 5-years of surveillance have minimal malignancy risk of 0-2%. Two nomograms created with over 1000 patients had AUCs of around 0.8 and appear to be feasible in a real-world practice. CONCLUSIONS For patients with suspected BD-IPMN <2 cm and no other WF, less frequent surveillance is recommended. Surveillance may be discontinued for cysts that remain stable during 5-year surveillance, with consideration of patient condition and life expectancy. With this updated surveillance strategy, patients with non-worrisome BD-IPMN should expect more streamlined management and decreased healthcare utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sayada Zartasha Kazmi
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hye-Sol Jung
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Youngmin Han
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Won-Gun Yun
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Young Jae Cho
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mirang Lee
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Singapore General Hospital & National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Susumu Hijioka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Japan
| | - Shounak Majumder
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Aesun Shin
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wood LD, Adsay NV, Basturk O, Brosens LAA, Fukushima N, Hong SM, Kim SJ, Lee JW, Luchini C, Noë M, Pitman MB, Scarpa A, Singhi AD, Tanaka M, Furukawa T. Systematic review of challenging issues in pathology of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Pancreatology 2023; 23:878-891. [PMID: 37604731 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are a cystic precursor to pancreatic cancer. IPMNs deemed clinically to be at high-risk for malignant progression are frequently treated with surgical resection, and pathological examination of the pancreatectomy specimen is a key component of the clinical care of IPMN patients. METHODS Systematic literature reviews were conducted around eight topics of clinical relevance in the examination of pathological specimens in patients undergoing resection of IPMN. RESULTS This review provides updated perspectives on morphological subtyping of IPMNs, classification of intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms, nomenclature for high-grade dysplasia, assessment of T stage, distinction of carcinoma associated or concomitant with IPMN, role of molecular assessment of IPMN tissue, role of intraoperative assessment by frozen section, and preoperative evaluation of cyst fluid cytology. CONCLUSIONS This analysis provides the foundation for data-driven approaches to several challenging issues in the pathology of IPMNs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura D Wood
- Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - N Volkan Adsay
- Department of Pathology, Koç University Hospital and Koç University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Olca Basturk
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lodewijk A A Brosens
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Noriyoshi Fukushima
- Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Seung-Mo Hong
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Joo Kim
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae W Lee
- Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Claudio Luchini
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy; ARC-Net Research Center, University of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Michaël Noë
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Martha B Pitman
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy; ARC-Net Research Center, University of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mariko Tanaka
- Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toru Furukawa
- Department of Investigative Pathology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Djordjevic V, Grubor N, Kovac JD, Micev M, Milic N, Knezevic D, Gregoric P, Lausevic Z, Kerkez M, Knezevic S, Radenkovic D. Comparison of Preoperative Evaluation with the Pathological Report in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: A Single-Center Experience. J Clin Med 2021; 10:678. [PMID: 33578680 PMCID: PMC7916322 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10040678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The key to the successful management of pancreatic cystic neoplasm (PCN), among which intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is the one with the highest risk of advanced neoplasia in resected patients, is a careful combination of clinical, radiological, and histopathological findings. This study aims to perform the comparison of a preoperative evaluation with pathological reports in IPMN and further, to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms (EEBGPCN) and Fukuoka Consensus guidelines (FCG). We analyzed 106 consecutive patients diagnosed with different types of PCN, among whom 68 had IPMN diagnosis, at the Clinical Center of Serbia. All the patients diagnosed with IPMNs were stratified concerning the presence of the absolute and relative indications according to EEBGPCN and high-risk stigmata and worrisome features according to FCG. Final histopathology revealed that IPMNs patients were further divided into malignant (50 patients) and benign (18 patients) groups, according to the pathological findings. The preoperative prediction of malignancy according to EEBGPCN criteria was higher than 70% with high sensitivity of at least one absolute or relative indication for resection. The diagnostic performance of FCG was shown as comparable to EEBGPCN. Nevertheless, the value of false-positive rate for surgical resection showed that in some cases, overtreating patients or treating them too early cannot be prevented. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to adequately select patients for the resection considering at the same time both the risks of surgery and malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir Djordjevic
- Clinic for Digestive Surgery, First Surgical Clinic, Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (N.G.); (D.K.); (M.K.); (S.K.); (D.R.)
| | - Nikica Grubor
- Clinic for Digestive Surgery, First Surgical Clinic, Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (N.G.); (D.K.); (M.K.); (S.K.); (D.R.)
- Department for Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (P.G.); (Z.L.)
| | - Jelena Djokic Kovac
- Centre for Radiology and Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;
- Department for Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Marjan Micev
- Department of Histopathology, Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;
| | - Natasa Milic
- Institute for Medical Statistics and Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; or
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY 55905, USA
| | - Djordje Knezevic
- Clinic for Digestive Surgery, First Surgical Clinic, Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (N.G.); (D.K.); (M.K.); (S.K.); (D.R.)
- Department for Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (P.G.); (Z.L.)
| | - Pavle Gregoric
- Department for Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (P.G.); (Z.L.)
- Centre for Emergency Surgery, Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Zeljko Lausevic
- Department for Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (P.G.); (Z.L.)
- Centre for Emergency Surgery, Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Mirko Kerkez
- Clinic for Digestive Surgery, First Surgical Clinic, Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (N.G.); (D.K.); (M.K.); (S.K.); (D.R.)
- Department for Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (P.G.); (Z.L.)
| | - Srbislav Knezevic
- Clinic for Digestive Surgery, First Surgical Clinic, Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (N.G.); (D.K.); (M.K.); (S.K.); (D.R.)
- Department for Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (P.G.); (Z.L.)
| | - Dejan Radenkovic
- Clinic for Digestive Surgery, First Surgical Clinic, Clinical Centre of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (N.G.); (D.K.); (M.K.); (S.K.); (D.R.)
- Department for Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; (P.G.); (Z.L.)
| |
Collapse
|