A single center randomized double blind controlled trial of pentoxifylline in acute pancreatitis: Challenges and opportunities

Trends and recent developments in pharmacotherapy of acute pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis (AP), a complex inflammatory disease of the pancreas, is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Currently, no specific therapies are approved for its treatment, and management is primarily based on supportive care. Despite enhanced understanding of AP pathogenesis, patients remain at significant risk owing to a lack of targeted drug treatments. Therefore, there is an urgent need for effective pharmacological therapeutic measures which may inhibit the early systemic inflammation, thereby preventing subsequent organ failure. This narrative review summarizes the available treatment options for AP and highlights the potential drug classes and pharmacologic therapies including those under clinical development. Although, several therapies targeting different aspects of AP pathogenesis have been investigated, some therapies with promising preclinical activity have been rendered ineffective in clinical trials. Other novel drug classes or molecules including dabigatran (anticoagulant), ulinastatin (protease inhibitor), infliximab (monoclonal antibody), spautin-A41 (autophagy inhibitor), and CM4620-Injectible Emulsion (calcium channel inhibitor) await further clinical assessment. Alternative treatment options using stem cells and nanoparticles are also being explored and may hold promise for AP therapy. However, challenges for exploring targeted treatment approaches include disease complexity, timing of therapeutic intervention, and establishing appropriate clinical endpoints. Understanding the role of specific biomarkers may help in identifying appropriate targets for drug discovery and facilitate determining relevant clinical study endpoints to monitor disease severity and progression, thereby aiding in design of more precise therapies with improved clinical outcomes.

Impact of abdominal imaging on the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in patients with painless lipase elevation

Abdominal pain is considered a cardinal feature of acute pancreatitis (AP), and abdominal imaging is only required to diagnose AP when the pain is atypical, or serum enzyme elevation does not match the clinical picture. While painless lipase elevation is being increasingly associated with worse outcomes in various diseases, the diagnostic approach to such elevation is so-far unclear. We thus aimed to learn the impact of pain on the diagnosis of AP.

METHODS

All patients presenting to the Mayo Clinic Arizona Hospital emergency department with a serum lipase ≥3x upper limit of normal between April 2016 and January 2020 were prospectively followed. Their charts were reviewed for the nature of pain, serum lipase levels on presentation, abdominal imaging, and whether a diagnosis of AP was made. Chronic pancreatitis was excluded.

RESULTS

Among 320 patients, 85 (26.5%) had painless lipase elevation. These patients had abdominal imaging less often (56/85, 66%) than in those with abdominal pain (201/235, 83%; p = 0.001). The diagnosis of AP increased overall from 31/63 (49%) without imaging to 198/257 (77%) with imaging (P < 0.001). Imaging increased the diagnosis of AP in patients with painless lipase elevation from 2/29 (7%) without imaging to 16/56 (29%; p = 0.025) among those who were imaged.

CONCLUSIONS

Painless lipase elevation >3-fold the upper limit of normal is common in emergency department patients. 1/3 to 1/4 of these may have AP. Abdominal imaging increases the diagnosis of AP in patients with painless lipase elevation. Therefore, abdominal imaging in such patients may help detect AP that otherwise eludes diagnosis.