Forecasting surgical costs: Towards informed financial consent and financial risk reduction

The Gap Between the Actual Cost and Tariffs of Global Surgical Procedures: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study in Qazvin Province, Iran

BACKGROUND

Iran's healthcare system has a significant discrepancy between the national tariff and the cost of global surgical procedures (GSPs). This study aimed to compare the actual costs of GSPs with national tariffs in Iran's public hospitals.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in 2017. Using the census method, 6126 GSPs performed in three public hospitals were investigated in this study. Additionally, national tariffs from the Supreme Council of Health Insurance were obtained. The tariff-cost gap was the discrepancy between a GSP's actual costs and tariff. Multiple linear regression analysis determined factors affecting the tariff-cost gap.

RESULTS

The average actual cost of GSPs was 637 USD, while the average tariff was 495 USD. The reimbursement covered only 78% of the costs. The gap was higher in older (B=1.05, 95% CI: 0.76-1.35, P<0.001), females (B=26.7, 95% CI: 15.5-37.9, P<0.001), patients with a longer stay (B=81.2, 95% CI: 77.5-84.8, P<0.001), and procedures performed by full-time surgeons (B=67.3, 95% CI: 56.9-77.5, P<0.001). Furthermore, neurosurgery had the highest effect on forecasting the gap between actual costs and tariffs among surgical specialties (B=346.9, 95% CI: 214.3-479.5, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Public hospitals suffer from large financial losses due to the national tariff for many GSPs not covering their actual costs. It is suggested that tariffs be increased for certain customer segments that can bear higher costs and global tariffs be adjusted to match actual service delivery costs.

Counting the cost: financial implications of complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has been reported to be about 30-53%. These complications can double hospital costs. We sought to explore the financial implications of complications after PD in a large institutional database.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing PD from 2010-2017 was performed. Costs for index hospitalization were divided into categories: operating room, postoperative ward, radiology and interventional radiology. Complications were categorized according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Univariable and mutivariable analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Median cost of index admission for 997 patients who underwent PD was $23,704 (range $10,988-$528,531). Patients with major complications incurred significantly greater median costs compared to those without ($40,005 vs $21,306, p < 0.001). Patients with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade A, B and C had progressively increasing costs ($32,164, $50,264 and $102,013, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis ileus/delayed gastric emptying, respiratory failure, clinically significant POPF, thromboembolic complications, reoperation, duration of surgery >240 minutes and male sex were associated with significantly increased costs.

CONCLUSION

Complications after PD significantly increase hospital costs. This study identifies the major contributors towards increased cost post-PD. Initiatives that focus on prevention of complications could reduce associated costs and ease financial burden on patients and healthcare organizations.

Enhancing the cost-effectiveness of surgical care in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and cost meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Clinical pathways (CP) based on Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) are increasingly utilised in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). This systematic review aimed to compare the impact of CPs versus conventional care (CC) on peri-PD costs.

METHODS

A systematic review of major reference databases was undertaken. Quality assessment was performed using the CHEERS checklist. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated as part of the cost-effectiveness analysis. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models and Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to assess the precision and conclusiveness of the results.

RESULTS

14 studies meeting inclusion criteria were included for full qualitative synthesis. All studies reported a reduction in overall costs, length of stay and overall complication rates for CPs when compared to CC. Meta-analysis performed on nine studies demonstrated significantly reduced costs in the CP group, with considerable heterogeneity (Pooled mean difference of $ 4.28 × 10³, p < 0.01, I² = 95%). Cost-effectiveness analysis in relation to complications demonstrated dominance of CPs over CC in being cheaper as well as more effective. TSA supported the cost benefit of enhanced-recovery CPs, displaying minimal type 1 error.

CONCLUSION

Peri-PD CPs result in significant cost-reduction in comparison to CC.