1
|
Kim SH, Lee YC, Chon HK. Challenges for clinicians treating autoimmune pancreatitis: Current perspectives. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:30-46. [PMID: 36687190 PMCID: PMC9846983 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i1.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare disease clinically characterized by obstructive jaundice, unintentional weight loss, acute pancreatitis, focal pancreatic mass, and diabetes. AIP is classified into two subtypes - type 1 and type 2 - according to pathological findings, clinical features, and serology test results, but some cases may be defined as type not otherwise in the absence of pathological findings and inflammatory bowel disease. To address the differences in diagnostic criteria by country, standard diagnostic criteria for AIP were proposed in 2011 by an international consensus of expert opinions. Differential diagnosis of AIP from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is important but remains challenging for clinicians. Fortunately, all subtypes of AIP show dramatic response to steroid treatment. This review discusses the current perspectives on the diagnosis and management of AIP in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seong-Hun Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju 54907, South Korea
| | - Yun Chae Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju 54907, South Korea
| | - Hyung Ku Chon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institution of Wonkwang Medical Science, Wonkwang University School of Medicine and Hospital, Iksan 54538, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nista EC, De Lucia SS, Manilla V, Schepis T, Pellegrino A, Ojetti V, Pignataro G, Zileri dal Verme L, Franceschi F, Gasbarrini A, Candelli M. Autoimmune Pancreatitis: From Pathogenesis to Treatment. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms232012667. [PMID: 36293522 PMCID: PMC9604056 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232012667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare disease. The diagnosis of AIP is difficult and should be made by a comprehensive evaluation of clinical, radiological, serological, and pathological findings. Two different types of AIP have been identified: autoimmune pancreatitis type 1 (AIP-1), which is considered a pancreatic manifestation of multiorgan disease related to IgG4, and autoimmune pancreatitis type 2 (AIP-2), which is considered a pancreas-specific disease not related to IgG4. Although the pathophysiological conditions seem to differ between type 1 and type 2 pancreatitis, both respond well to steroid medications. In this review, we focused on the pathogenesis of the disease to develop a tool that could facilitate diagnosis and lead to the discovery of new therapeutic strategies to combat autoimmune pancreatitis and its relapses. The standard therapy for AIP is oral administration of corticosteroids. Rituximab (RTX) has also been proposed for induction of remission and maintenance therapy in relapsing AIP-1. In selected patients, immunomodulators such as azathioprine are used to maintain remission. The strength of this review, compared with previous studies, is that it focuses on the clear difference between the two types of autoimmune pancreatitis with a clearly delineated and separate pathogenesis. In addition, the review also considers various therapeutic options, including biologic drugs, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy, a well-tolerated and effective second-line therapy for AIP type 2 relapses or steroid dependence. Other biologic therapies are also being explored that could provide a useful therapeutic alternative to corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, which are poorly tolerated due to significant side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Celestino Nista
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Sofia De Lucia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Vittoria Manilla
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Tommaso Schepis
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Pellegrino
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Veronica Ojetti
- Department of Emergency, Anesthesiological, and Reanimation Sciences, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Pignataro
- Department of Emergency, Anesthesiological, and Reanimation Sciences, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Zileri dal Verme
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Franceschi
- Department of Emergency, Anesthesiological, and Reanimation Sciences, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Candelli
- Department of Emergency, Anesthesiological, and Reanimation Sciences, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moon SH, Kim MH. Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Immunoglobulin G4-related Sclerosing Cholangitis: Past, Present, and Future. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY = TAEHAN SOHWAGI HAKHOE CHI 2022; 80:107-114. [PMID: 36156034 DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2022.102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The emergence of glucocorticoid-responsive autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis (IgG4-SC), a new disease entity, has attracted considerable interest within the international gastroenterology community. The typical manifestations of AIP/IgG4-SC are obstructive jaundice and pancreatic enlargement in the elderly, which may mimic the presentations of pancreatobiliary malignancies. The timely diagnosis of AIP/IgG4-SC can lead to adequate glucocorticoid treatment, whereas a misdiagnosis can result in unnecessary major surgery. The diagnostic criteria used to diagnose AIP include several cardinal features of AIP that can be detected via pancreatic parenchymal imaging, ductal imaging, serum IgG4 levels, histopathology, other organ involvement, and response to glucocorticoid therapy. The differential diagnosis of AIP/IgG4-SC may include pancreatobiliary malignancies and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Although most patients with AIP/IgG4-SC respond well to glucocorticoid therapy, there is a frequent relapse of the disease in the long term. This review describes the evolution of the concept of AIP and IgG4-related disease, including the development of diagnostic criteria, discusses the current practice for diagnosis and treatment, and suggests prospects for research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung-Hoon Moon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea
| | - Myung-Hwan Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Changwon Hanmaeum Hospital, Changwon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nikolic S, Panic N, Hintikka ES, Dani L, Rutkowski W, Hedström A, Steiner C, Löhr JM, Vujasinovic M. Efficacy and safety of rituximab in autoimmune pancreatitis type 1: our experiences and systematic review of the literature. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:1355-1362. [PMID: 34410885 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1963837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a special form of pancreatitis that responds well to glucocorticoid (GC) treatment. Relapses of AIP are common. The anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (RTX) has shown promising results in GC refractory cases, but long-term data are scarce. The study aims to determine the clinical and imaging response to RTX and summarize the existing data on RTX therapy in patients with AIP type 1 in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of electronic medical records was conducted. Additionally, we conducted a systematic review of the literature concerning RTX use in AIP type 1. RESULTS Twelve (11.7%) of 103 patients with AIP type 1 were treated with RTX during the study period: eight (66.7%) achieved complete and four (33.3%) partial remission. RTX was discontinued in one patient who developed fever and reactivation of latent tuberculosis. None of the remaining 11 patients relapsed during a median follow-up of 17 months. No significant differences were detected in baseline clinical characteristics or history of relapse between the patients who obtained complete and partial remission. Altogether, eight studies with 110 AIP type-1 patients treated with RTX were analyzed. Adverse effects ranged from 11-43% and the relapse-free period during follow-up (range 2-173 months) ranged from 38-94%. CONCLUSIONS Our results confirm that RTX is efficacious in the treatment of AIP type 1 by inducing remission and preventing relapse. In addition, there are few adverse effects of the treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Nikolic
- Department of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Gastroenterology, Division of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Nikola Panic
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Lara Dani
- Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Wiktor Rutkowski
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Aleksandra Hedström
- Department of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Corinna Steiner
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J-Matthias Löhr
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Miroslav Vujasinovic
- Department of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|