Risk factors and prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula after insulinoma enucleation:a retrospective study from a high-volume center

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided ethanol ablation versus surgical resection of insulinomas

PURPOSE

Insulinoma is a rare tumor of the pancreas that can lead to hypoglycemia. To date, the standard therapy is surgical resection. After the first case report of successful endoscopic ultrasound-guided (EUS) ethanol injection 16 years ago, the need for establishing an alternative treatment method remains unchanged given the high morbidity rates of surgery and its unsuitability in some patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Here, we provide retrospective data from 33 insulinoma patients that were treated at our center between 2010 and 2021. Of these, 9 patients were treated with EUS-guided ethanol injection and 24 underwent pancreatic surgery.

RESULTS

The ethanol group was older (ethanol: mean ± SE 67.8±11.2 years vs. surgery: 52.3±15.7, p=0.014) with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.0 (1.0;4.0) vs. 1.0 (0.0;2.0), p=0.008). The lowest glucose values were similar between groups before (ethanol: 2.09±0.17 mmol/l vs. surgery: 1.81±0.08, p=0.158) and after (4.95±0.74 vs. 5.41±0.28, p=0.581) the respective treatments. Complications occurred more frequently in the surgery group (11 % vs. 54 %, p=0.026). One patient after prior partial pancreatectomy died postoperatively. The hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the ethanol group (4.78±0.78 days vs. 19.88±4.07, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

EUS-guided ethanol injection can be similarly effective for the treatment of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia compared with pancreatic surgery but seems to be associated with less severe complications. This implies the need for prospective randomized trials in insulinoma patients with a low risk for malignancy.

Preoperative pancreatic stent placement before the enucleation of insulinoma located in the head and neck of the pancreas in proximity to the main pancreatic duct: study protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical trial in Chinese tertiary medical centres

INTRODUCTION

The surgical intervention approach to insulinomas in proximity to the main pancreatic duct remains controversial. Standard pancreatic resection is recommended by several guidelines; however, enucleation (EN) still attracts surgeons with less risk of late exocrine/endocrine insufficiency, despite a higher postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate. Recently, the efficacy and safety of preoperative pancreatic stent placement before the EN have been demonstrated. Thus, a multicentre open-label study is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stent placement in improving the outcome of EN of insulinomas in proximity to the main pancreatic duct.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a prospective, randomised, open-label, superiority clinical trial conducted at multiple tertiary centres in China. The major eligibility criterion is the presence of insulinoma located in the head and neck of the pancreas in proximity (≤2 mm) to the main pancreatic duct. Blocked randomisation will be performed to allocate patients into the stent EN group and the direct EN group. Patients in the stent EN group will go through stent placement by the endoscopist within 24 hours before the EN surgery, whereas other patients will receive EN surgery directly. The primary outcome is the assessment of the superiority of stent placement in reducing POPF rate measured by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery standard. Both interventions will be performed in an inpatient setting and regular follow-up will be performed. The primary outcome (POPF rate) will be tested for superiority with the Χ2 test. The difference in secondary outcomes between the two groups will be analysed using appropriate tests.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the Peking Union Medical College Hospital Institutional Review Board (K23C0195), Ruijin Hospital Ethics Committee (2023-314), Peking University First Hospital Ethics Committee (2024033-001), Institutional Review Board of Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University (2023223-002), Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (XJTU1AF2023LSK-473), Institutional Review Board of Tongji Medical College Tongji Hospital (TJ-IRB202402059), Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College Union Hospital (2023-0929) and Shanghai Cancer Center Institutional Review Board (2309282-16). The results of the study will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05523778.

[Robotic enucleation of pancreatic insulinoma]

We demonstrate robot-assisted treatment of a patient with benign pancreatic insulinoma. A 31-year-old patient suffered from attacks of weakness, numbness of the fingertips and «turbidity of consciousness» for 2 years. These symptoms occurred on an empty stomach and regressed after eating. We found pancreatic insulinoma. The patient underwent robotic enucleation of pancreatic tumor. Surgery time was 145 min. Postoperative period proceeded without complications. Hyperglycemia up to 10.5 mmol/l on the first postoperative day was followed by normalization after 4 days. The patient was discharged in 6 days after surgery. Minimally invasive robotic enucleation of insulinoma minimizes surgical trauma and provides precise resection of tumor. The key aspect of safe enucleation is localization of tumor at a distance of at least 2 mm from the pancreatic duct.

A rare case of insulinoma presented with neurological manifestations: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Insulinoma is a rare, most commonly benign tumor with several manifestations that may be misattributed to psychiatric, cardiac, or neurological disorders.

CASE PRESENTATION

In this report, we describe the case of a 47-year-old woman who presented with neurological manifestations, including seizures, that were misdiagnosed initially as seizures due to small vessel ischemic disease and managed accordingly with various antiepileptic drugs without any benefit. An endocrinologist's assessment suggested measuring the levels of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide. The results were abnormal. Subsequently, an enhanced-contract CT scan followed by an MRI of the abdomen was requested, and it revealed a well-delineated lesion measuring about (3,2 × 2,1 × 2,2) cm located in the tail of the pancreas. On laparoscopic visualization, a partial pancreatectomy was accomplished using a stapler. Histopathology of the surgical specimen revealed a benign insulinoma with free margins. The follow-up after three months demonstrated that the patient was doing well.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Although insulinoma is mostly benign, conservative surgery such as enucleation or partial pancreatectomy is usually the cornerstone of treatment. If other indicators such as large size, multiplicity, proximity to the major pancreatic duct, association with MEN1, and malignancy were present, radical resection was considered.

CONCLUSION

A high index of suspicion is requested to establish the diagnosis of insulinoma, especially when presenting with severe neurological symptoms like seizures and coma. It should be kept in mind that insulinoma is the most common cause of hypoglycemia associated with endogenous hyperinsulinism.

Mind the tributary of the canal: Are stents necessary for insulinoma enucleation in proximity to a prominent Duct of Santorini: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

We describe a case of insulinoma located extremely close to the accessory pancreatic duct (APD), but away from the main pancreatic duct (MPD). Previous studies showed insulinoma enucleation is a safe procedure for small benign tumors >3 mm distant from the MPD. However, in this case enucleation of the tumor led to unanticipated APD injury and grade B post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF). We provide detailed records of clinical management and argue that enucleation of tumors near APD needs to be carefully weighed.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The patient experienced a sudden increase of abdominal drain fluid and prolonged drainage time after a regular insulinoma enucleation surgery.

DIAGNOSIS

APD damage during the enucleation.

INTERVENTIONS

Drain fluid amylase concentration were regularly recorded and prolonged somatostatin analogs were administered.

OUTCOMES

Amount of abdominal drain gradually decreased and the drain tube was removed on postoperative 37.

LESSONS

Benign pancreatic tumor close to the APD need to be evaluated carefully and clinical evidence is warranted to affirm the necessity of placing a pancreatic duct stent before the surgery.

Values of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy in well-differentiated non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a comparative study

Background

The feasibility of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) to treat well-differentiated non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs) located at the body and/or tail of the pancreas remains controversial. Distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (DPS) has been widely applied in the treatment of NF-pNETs; however, it may increase the post-operative morbidities. This study aimed to evaluate whether SPDP is inferior to DPS in post-operative outcomes and survivals when being used to treat patients with NF-pNETs in our institute.

Methods

Clinicopathological features of patients with NF-pNETs who underwent curative SPDP or DPS at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China) between January 2010 and January 2022 were collected. Short-term outcomes and 5-year survivals were compared between patients undergoing SPDP and those undergoing DPS.

Results

Sixty-three patients (SPDP, 27; DPS, 36) with well-differentiated NF-pNETs were enrolled. All patients had grade 1/2 tumors. After identifying patients with T1-T2 NF-pNETs (SPDP, 27; DPS, 15), there was no disparity between the SPDP and DPS groups except for tumor size (median, 1.4 vs 2.6 cm, P = 0.001). There were no differences in operation time (median, 250 vs 295 min, P = 0.478), intraoperative blood loss (median, 50 vs 100 mL, P = 0.145), post-operative major complications (3.7% vs 13.3%, P = 0.287), clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula (22.2% vs 6.7%, P = 0.390), or post-operative hospital stays (median, 9 vs 9 days, P = 0.750) between the SPDP and DPS groups. Kaplan-Meier curve showed no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival rate (100% vs 100%, log-rank P > 0.999) or recurrence-free survival (100% vs 100%, log-rank P > 0.999) between patients with T1-T2 NF-pNETs undergoing SPDP and those undergoing DPS.

Conclusions

In patients with T1-T2 well-differentiated NF-pNETs, SPDP could achieve comparable post-operative outcomes and prognosis compared with DPS.