Evaluation of circulating cell-free KRAS mutational status as a molecular monitoring tool in patients with pancreatic cancer

DNA methylation markers in esophageal cancer

Background

Esophageal cancer (EC) is a prevalent malignancy characterized by a low 5-year survival rate, primarily attributed to delayed diagnosis and limited therapeutic options. Currently, early detection of EC heavily relies on endoscopy and pathological examination, which pose challenges due to their invasiveness and high costs, leading to low patient compliance. The detection of DNA methylation offers a non-endoscopic, cost-effective, and secure approach that holds promising prospects for early EC detection.

Methods

To identify improved methylation markers for early EC detection, we conducted a comprehensive review of relevant literature, summarized the performance of DNA methylation markers based on different input samples and analytical methods in EC early detection and screening.

Findings

This review reveals that blood cell free DNA methylation-based method is an effective non-invasive method for early detection of EC, although there is still a need to improve its sensitivity and specificity. Another highly sensitive and specific non-endoscopic approach for early detection of EC is the esophageal exfoliated cells based-DNA methylation analysis. However, while there are substantial studies in esophageal adenocarcinoma, further more validation is required in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Conclusion

In conclusion, DNA methylation detection holds significant potential as an early detection and screening technology for EC.

Circulating tumor DNA in unresectable pancreatic cancer is a strong predictor of first-line treatment efficacy: The KRASCIPANC prospective study

BACKGROUND

There is no robust predictor of response to chemotherapy (CT) in unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinomas (UPA). The objective of the KRASCIPANC study was to analyze the kinetics of cell-free DNA (cfDNA)/circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a predictor of response to CT in UPA.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected just before first CT and at day 28. The primary endpoint was the kinetics of KRAS-mutated ctDNA by digital droplet PCR between D0 and D28 as a predictor of progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

We analyzed 65 patients with a KRAS-mutated tumor. A high level of cfDNA and KRAS-mutated ctDNA at D0, as well as the presence of KRAS-mutated ctDNA at D28, were strongly associated with lower centralized disease control rate (cDCR), shorter cPFS and OS in multivariate analysis. A score combining cfDNA level at diagnosis ≥ or <30 ng/mL and presence or not of KRAS-mutated ctDNA at D28 was an optimal predictor of cDCR (OR=30.7, IC95% 4.31-218 P=.001), PFS (HR=6.79, IC95% 2.76-16.7, P<.001) and OS (HR=9.98, IC95% 4.14-24.1, P<.001).

CONCLUSION

A combined score using cfDNA level at diagnosis and KRAS-mutated ctDNA at D28 is strongly associated with patient survival/response to chemotherapy in UPA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04560270.

Monitoring of circulating tumour DNA in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma predicts clinical outcome and reveals disease progression earlier than radiological imaging

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal disease with a need for better tools to guide treatment selection and follow-up. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the prognostic value and treatment monitoring potential of longitudinal circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) measurements in patients with advanced PDAC undergoing palliative chemotherapy. Using KRAS peptide nucleic acid clamp-PCR, we measured ctDNA levels in plasma samples obtained at baseline and every 4 weeks during chemotherapy from 81 patients with locally advanced and metastatic PDAC. Cox proportional hazard regression showed that ctDNA detection at baseline was an independent predictor of progression-free and overall survival. Joint modelling demonstrated that the dynamic ctDNA level was a strong predictor of time to first disease progression. Longitudinal ctDNA measurements during chemotherapy successfully revealed disease progression in 20 (67%) of 30 patients with ctDNA detected at baseline, with a median lead time of 23 days (P = 0.01) over radiological imaging. Here, we confirmed the clinical relevance of ctDNA in advanced PDAC with regard to both the prediction of clinical outcome and disease monitoring during treatment.

Peripheral and Portal Venous KRAS ctDNA Detection as Independent Prognostic Markers of Early Tumor Recurrence in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

KRAS circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown biomarker potential for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) but has not been applied in clinical routine yet. We aim to improve clinical applicability of ctDNA detection in PDAC and to study the impact of blood-draw site and time point on the detectability and prognostic role of KRAS mutations.

METHODS

221 blood samples from 108 PDAC patients (65 curative, 43 palliative) were analyzed. Baseline peripheral and tumor-draining portal venous (PV), postoperative, and follow-up blood were analyzed and correlated with prognosis.

RESULTS

Significantly higher KRAS mutant detection rates and copy numbers were observed in palliative compared to curative patients baseline blood (58.1% vs 24.6%; P = 0.002; and P < 0.001). Significantly higher KRAS mutant copies were found in PV blood compared to baseline (P < 0.05) samples. KRAS detection in pre- and postoperative and PV blood were significantly associated with shorter recurrence-free survival (all P < 0.015) and identified as independent prognostic markers. KRAS ctDNA status was also an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for shorter overall survival in both palliative and curative cohorts (hazard ratio [HR] 4.9, P = 0.011; HR 6.9, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS ctDNA detection is an independent adverse prognostic marker in curative and palliative PDAC patients-at all sites of blood draw and a strong follow-up marker. The most substantial prognostic impact was seen for PV blood, which could be an effective novel tool for identifying prognostic borderline patients-guiding future decision-making on neoadjuvant treatment despite anatomical resectability. In addition, higher PV mutant copy numbers contribute to an improved technical feasibility.

KRAS Mutations in Solid Tumors: Characteristics, Current Therapeutic Strategy, and Potential Treatment Exploration

Kristen rat sarcoma (KRAS) gene is one of the most common mutated oncogenes in solid tumors. Yet, KRAS inhibitors did not follow suit with the development of targeted therapy, for the structure of KRAS has been considered as being implausible to target for decades. Chemotherapy was the initial recommended therapy for KRAS-mutant cancer patients, which was then replaced by or combined with immunotherapy. KRAS G12C inhibitors became the most recent breakthrough in targeted therapy, with Sotorasib being approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) based on its significant efficacy in multiple clinical studies. However, the subtypes of the KRAS mutations are complex, and the development of inhibitors targeting non-G12C subtypes is still at a relatively early stage. In addition, the monotherapy of KRAS inhibitors has accumulated possible resistance, acquiring the exploration of combination therapies or next-generation KRAS inhibitors. Thus, other non-target, conventional therapies have also been considered as being promising. Here in this review, we went through the characteristics of KRAS mutations in cancer patients, and the prognostic effect that it poses on different therapies and advanced therapeutic strategy, as well as cutting-edge research on the mechanisms of drug resistance, tumor development, and the immune microenvironment.

Prediction of response to systemic treatment by kinetics of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic pancreatic cancer

Introduction

Pretherapeutic detectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a promising prognostic biomarker for predicting relapse and overall survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. However, the prognostic value of ctDNA dynamics during treatment has not been studied thus far. We aimed to investigate the correlation between the change of ctDNA levels and response to treatment in patients treated by systemic therapy.

Material and methods

CtDNA detection using liquid biopsy (droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) utilizing KRAS G12/13 and, if negative, Q61 commercial test kits) was prospectively performed on patients with stage IV pancreatic cancer i) prior to initiation of systemic chemotherapy and ii) serially every 2 weeks until restaging. Detection rates, levels of ctDNA, and the course of the relative ctDNA change (ctDNA kinetics) were correlated to treatment response and clinical outcome.

Results

The detection rate at baseline was 64.3% (45/70), and complete serial measurement records were available for 32 ctDNA-positive patients. Reduction of ctDNA levels below 57.9% of its baseline value at week 2 after treatment initiation was significantly predictive of response to treatment (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.918, sensitivity 91.67%, and specificity 100%) and was associated with prolonged overall survival (OS) (5.7 vs. 11.4 months, p = 0.006) and progression-free survival (PFS) (2.5 vs. 7.7 months, p < 0.000) regardless of treatment line. Pretherapeutic ctDNA detection was independently associated with worse OS in patients receiving a first-line regimen (7 vs. 11.3 months, p = 0.046) and regardless of treatment line (11.4 vs. 15.9 months, p = 0.045) as well as worse PFS (3.4 vs. 10.8 months, p = 0.018).

Conclusion

The change in magnitude of ctDNA during systemic treatment allows the prediction of treatment response and is associated with both OS and PFS. This finding adds significant clinical potential to the already established prognostic value of ctDNA positivity in metastatic pancreatic cancer.