Mortality and costs related to severe acute pancreatitis in the intensive care units of Australia and New Zealand (ANZ), 2003-2020

The epidemiology of acute pancreatitis in Tasmania over a 12-year period: Is this a disease of disadvantage?

BACKGROUND

The global incidence of acute pancreatitis (AP) is increasing, but little information exists about trends in Australia. This study aimed to describe incidence trends, along with clinical and socio-demographic associations, in the state of Tasmania over a recent 12-year period.

METHODS

The study cohort was obtained by linking clinical and administrative datasets encompassing the whole Tasmanian population between 2007 and 2018, inclusive. Pancreatitis case definition was based on relevant ICD-10 hospitalization codes, or elevated serum lipase or amylase in pathology data. Age-standardised incidence rates were estimated, overall and stratified by sex, aetiology, and Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (IRSD).

RESULTS

In the study period, 4905 public hospital AP episodes were identified in 3503 people. The age-standardised person-based incidence rate across the entire period was 54 per 100,000 per year. Incidence was inversely related to IRSD score; 71 per 100,000 per year in the most disadvantaged quartile compared to 32 in the least disadvantaged. Biliary AP incidence was higher than that of alcohol-related AP, although the greatest incidence was in "unspecified" cases. There was an increase in incidence for the whole cohort (average annual percent change 3.23 %), largely driven by the two most disadvantaged IRSD quartiles; the least disadvantaged quartile saw a slight overall decrease.

CONCLUSION

This is the first Australian study providing robust evidence that AP incidence is increasing and is at the upper limit of population-based studies worldwide. This increased incidence is greatest in socio-economically disadvantaged areas, meriting further research to develop targeted, holistic management strategies.

Diagnostic accuracy of abdominal contrast-enhanced multi-slice spiral CT after oral diluted iodide in a time segment for gastrointestinal fistula in patients with severe acute pancreatitis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal contrast-enhanced multi-slice spiral CT after oral diluted iodide in a time segment (post-ODI ACE-MSCT) for gastrointestinal fistula (GIF) in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with SAP who underwent both post-ODI ACE-MSCT and endoscopy/surgery from 2017 to 2023 were continuously retrospectively involved. Their demographic information and clinical features were recorded prospectively in an in-hospital database. Using endoscopy/surgery results as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of post-ODI ACE-MSCT for diagnosing GIF in SAP were calculated by a four-cell table. The consistency of the two diagnostic methods was evaluated by the Kappa test and McNemar's test.

RESULTS

Using endoscopy/surgery as the reference standard, a total of 86 cases were divided into the GIF group (N = 52) and the non-GIF group (N = 34). Among the 52 cases of GIF, 88.5% (46/52) cases had a positive result and 11.5% (5/52) cases had a negative result of post-ODI ACE-MSCT for GIF. Among the 34 cases of non-GIF, 2.9% (1/34) case had a positive result and 97.1% (33/34) cases had a negative result of post-ODI ACE-MSCT for GIF. Post-ODI ACE-MSCT had a sensitivity of 88.5% (95% CI 75.9%-95.2%), a specificity of 97.1% (95% CI 82.9%-99.8%), a positive predictive value of 97.9% (95% CI 87.3%-99.9%), a negative predictive value of 84.6% (95% CI 68.8%-93.6%), and an accuracy of 91.9% (83.4%-96.4%). The kappa value was 0.834, and P < 0.001 by McNemar's test. There were no significant differences in diagnostic test characteristics between the two modalities.

CONCLUSION

Post-ODI ACE-MSCT can diagnose GIF in SAP in a simple, noninvasive, and accurate way, and can provide earlier imaging evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Incidence, implications and predictors of abdominal compartment syndrome in acute pancreatitis: A nationwide analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis (AP) often presents with varying severity, with a small fraction evolving into severe AP, and is associated with high mortality. Complications such as intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) are intricately associated with AP.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical implications and predictors of ACS in AP patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database on adult AP patients, further stratified by the presence of concurrent ACS. The data extraction included demographics, underlying comorbidities, and clinical outcomes. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were performed using STATA (v.14.2).

RESULTS

Of the 1,099,175 adult AP patients, only 1,090 (0.001%) exhibited ACS. AP patients with ACS had elevated inpatient mortality and all major complications, including septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), requirement for total parenteral nutrition (TPN), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (P < 0.01). These patients also exhibited increased odds of requiring pancreatic drainage and necrosectomy (P < 0.01). Predictor analysis identified blood transfusion, obesity (BMI ≥30), and admission to large teaching hospitals as factors associated with the development of ACS in AP patients. Conversely, age, female gender, biliary etiology of AP, and smoking were found less frequently in patients with ACS.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare resource utilization associated with the concurrence of ACS in AP patients. We identified potential factors associated with ACS in AP patients. Significantly worse outcomes in ACS necessitate the need for early diagnosis, meticulous monitoring, and targeted therapeutic interventions for AP patients at risk of developing ACS.

Fluid resuscitation in the early management of acute pancreatitis - evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Third space fluid loss is one of the hallmarks of the pathophysiology of acute pancreatitis (AP) contributing to complications, including organ failure and death. We conducted a systematic review of literature to determine the ideal fluid resuscitation in the early management of AP, primarily comparing aggressive versus moderate intravenous fluid resuscitation (AIR vs MIR).

METHODS

A systematic review of major reference databases was undertaken. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects model. Bias was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias and ROBINS-I tools for randomized and non-randomised studies, respectively.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included in the analysis. Though there was no significant difference in mortality between AIR and MIR groups (8.3% versus 6.0%; p = 0.3), AIR cohort had significantly higher rates of organ failure (p = 0.009), including pulmonary (p = 0.02) and renal (p = 0.01) complications. Similarly, there was no difference in mortality between normal saline (NS) and Ringer's lactate (RL) (3.17% versus 3.01%; p = 0.23), though patients treated with NS had a significantly longer length of hospital stay (LOS) (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence appears to support moderate intravenous resuscitation (level of evidence, low) with RL (level of evidence, moderate) in the early management of AP.

Acute Pancreatitis-Drivers of Hospitalisation Cost-A Seven-Year Retrospective Study from a Large Tertiary Center

(1) Introduction: Acute pancreatitis (AP) remains a global burden of cost for healthcare services. We found a high degree of heterogeneity in cost-related reports and a scarcity of data regarding the cost of AP episodes in European and Asian populations. We aimed to estimate the median daily cost of hospitalisation (DCH) of AP in our population. Our secondary aims included estimating the total cost of hospitalisation (TCH) and the total cost of AP in Romania, as well as assessing the correlation between median DCH and ward, age, sex, length of stay (LoS), intensive care unit (ICU), outcome, severity, morphology, and aetiology of AP. (2) Material and methods: This retrospective cohort study included 1473 cases recruited from the electronic health records of the University Emergency Hospital of Bucharest. Statistical tests used included Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Kruskal-Wallis with post-hoc Dunn-Bonferroni, and Pearson correlation two-tailed. (3) Results: We found a median DCH of AP of USD 203.8 and a median TCH of USD 1360.5. The total yearly cost of AP in Romania was estimated at around USD 19 million. The majority of males with AP (61.8%) were mostly discharged as healed/ameliorated (83.8%); a majority had local complications (55.4%), which were mostly alcohol-related (35.1%). Regarding the aetiology, biliary-related AP was a cost driver, with significant statistical differences observed in all studied groups (p < 0.01). Morphology assessment revealed that acute necrotic collections were associated with high cost and meaningful disparities among the groups (p < 0.01). Cost was also associated with severity, with significant deviations among all groups (p < 0.01). Outcome-at-discharge as deceased correlated with higher costs, with substantial differences within groups (p < 0.01). The need for an intensive care unit was also a large driver of cost (p < 0.01). Females were prone to more expensive costs (p < 0.01). Surgical cases necessitated more financial resources (p < 0.01). (4) Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on the cost of AP in Romania. Our findings showed that the drivers of increased AP costs might be older age, ICU, intra-hospital mortality, severe AP, local complications such as acute necrotic collections, biliary aetiology, and female sex. We found large heterogeneity and scarcity regarding cost-related data in the literature.