Bilateral pallidal stimulation improves cervical dystonia for more than a decade

Connecting the dots - A systematic review on coherence analysis in dystonia

BACKGROUND

Increased 4-12 Hz oscillatory activity in the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical (CBGTC) loop is reported in dystonia. Coherence analysis is a measure of linear coupling between two signals, revealing oscillatory activity drives that are common across motor units. By performing coherence analysis, activity of the CBGTC-loop can be measured with modalities like local field potentials (LFPs), electromyography (EMG), and electro-encephalography (EEG). The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review on the use of coherence analysis for clinical assessment and treatment of dystonia.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed on a search in Embase and PubMed on June 28th, 2023. All studies incorporating coherence analysis and an adult dystonia cohort were included. Three authors evaluated the eligibility of the articles. Quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 checklist.

RESULTS

A total of 41 articles were included, with data of 395 adult dystonia patients. In the selected records, six different types of coherence were investigated: corticocortical, corticopallidal, corticomuscular, pallidopallidal, pallidomuscular, and intermuscular coherence. Various types of 4-12 coherence were found to be increased in all dystonia subtypes.

CONCLUSION

There is increased 4-12 Hz coherence found between the cortex, basal ganglia, and affected muscles in all dystonia subtypes. However, the relationship between 4-12 Hz coherence and the dystonic clinical state has not been established. DBS treatment leads to a reduction of 4-12 Hz coherence. In combination with the results of this review, the 4-12 Hz frequency band can be used as a promising phenomenon for the development of a biomarker.

Deep brain stimulation for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has shown promise in effectively treating chronic pain. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of DBS in this context.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature search using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, following the PRISMA guidelines. A well-constructed search strategy was utilized. Our literature search identified two groups of subjects: one group underwent DBS specifically for chronic pain treatment (DBS-P), while the second group received DBS for other indications (DBS-O), such as Parkinson's disease or dystonia, with pain perception investigated as a secondary outcome in this population. Meta-analysis was performed using R version 4.2.3 software. Heterogeneity was assessed using the tau^2 and I^2 indices, and Cochran's Q-test was conducted.

Results

The analysis included 966 patients in 43 original research studies with chronic pain who underwent DBS (340 for DBS-P and 625 for DBS-O). Subgroup analysis revealed that DBS-P exhibited a significant effect on chronic pain relief, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 1.65 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of [1.31; 2.00]. Significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies, with an I^2 value of 85.8%. However, no significant difference was found between DBS-P and DBS-O subgroups. Subgroup analyses based on study design, age, pain diseases, and brain targets demonstrated varying levels of evidence for the effectiveness of DBS across different subgroups. Additionally, meta-regression analyses showed no significant relationship between age or pain duration and DBS effectiveness for chronic pain.

Conclusion

These findings significantly contribute to the expanding body of knowledge regarding the utility of DBS in the management of chronic pain. The study underscores the importance of conducting further research to enhance treatment outcomes and elucidate patient-specific factors that are associated with treatment response.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=428442, identifier CRD42023428442.

PAllidal versus SubThalamic deep brain Stimulation for Cervical Dystonia (PASTS-CD): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been validated as a safe and effective treatment for refractory cervical dystonia (CD). Globus pallidus internus (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) are the two main stimulating targets. However, there has been no prospective study to clarify which target is the better DBS candidate for CD. The objective of this trial is to compare directly the efficacy and safety of GPi-DBS and STN-DBS, thereby instructing the selection of DBS target in clinical practice.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled study plans to enrol 98 refractory CD patients. Eligible CD patients will be randomly allocated to GPi-DBS group or STN-DBS group, with the DBS electrodes implanted into the posteroventral portion of GPi or the dorsolateral portion of STN, respectively. The primary outcome will be the improvement of symptomatic severity, measured by the changes in the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale and the Tsui scale at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery. The secondary outcomes include the improvement of the TWSTRS-disability subscale, TWSTRS-pain subscale, quality of life, mental and cognitive condition, as well as the differences in stimulation parameters and adverse effects. In addition, this study intends to identify certain predictors of DBS efficacy for CD.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital (S2022-613-01). The results of this study will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and shared in professional medical conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05715138.

Spastic dystonia: Still a valid term

Hypertonia in childhood may arise because of a variable combination of neuronal and non-neuronal factors. Involuntary muscle contraction may be due to spasticity or dystonia, which represent disorders of the spinal reflex arch and of central motor output respectively. Whilst consensus definitions for dystonia have been established, definitions of spasticity vary, highlighting the lack of a single unifying nomenclature in the field of clinical movement science. The term spastic dystonia refers to involuntary tonic muscle contraction in the context of an upper motor neuron (UMN) lesion. This review considers the utility of the term spastic dystonia, exploring our understanding of the pathophysiology of dystonia and the UMN syndrome. An argument is advanced that spastic dystonia is a valid construct that warrants further exploration. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: There is no single universally accepted definitions for terms commonly used to describe motor disorders. Spasticity and dystonia are phenomenologically and pathophysiologically distinct entities. Spastic dystonia represents a subset of dystonia, but with pathophysiological mechanisms more in common with spasticity.

Deep Brain Stimulation Before Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for a Patient With Cervical Dystonia and Cervical Myelopathy: A Case Report

Cervical dystonia with concurrent cervical myelopathy is a challenging pathology that requires thoughtful management. A 46-year-old female was referred to our center with this presentation. We elected to perform bilateral globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation (DBS-GPi) prior to C5 to C7 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to avoid the potential for dystonic movements to negatively impact cervical fusion. The patient was followed up at three months post C5 to C7 ACDF and nine months post DBS-GPi with complete control of tremor and no radiographic evidence of hardware loosening or malalignment. Though this strategy was successful in treating both our patient's cervical myelopathy and cervical dystonia, larger studies need to be conducted to optimize the treatment of patients presenting with these concurrent pathologies.

Pallidal Recordings in Chronically Implanted Dystonic Patients: Mitigation of Tremor-Related Artifacts

Low-frequency oscillatory patterns of pallidal local field potentials (LFPs) have been proposed as a physiomarker for dystonia and hold the promise for personalized adaptive deep brain stimulation. Head tremor, a low-frequency involuntary rhythmic movement typical of cervical dystonia, may cause movement artifacts in LFP signals, compromising the reliability of low-frequency oscillations as biomarkers for adaptive neurostimulation. We investigated chronic pallidal LFPs with the Percept^TM PC (Medtronic PLC) device in eight subjects with dystonia (five with head tremors). We applied a multiple regression approach to pallidal LFPs in patients with head tremors using kinematic information measured with an inertial measurement unit (IMU) and an electromyographic signal (EMG). With IMU regression, we found tremor contamination in all subjects, whereas EMG regression identified it in only three out of five. IMU regression was also superior to EMG regression in removing tremor-related artifacts and resulted in a significant power reduction, especially in the theta-alpha band. Pallido-muscular coherence was affected by a head tremor and disappeared after IMU regression. Our results show that the Percept PC can record low-frequency oscillations but also reveal spectral contamination due to movement artifacts. IMU regression can identify such artifact contamination and be a suitable tool for its removal.

Surgical Site Infections Associated With Implanted Pulse Generators for Deep Brain Stimulation: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify and systematically analyze relevant literature on surgical site infections (SSIs) associated with implantable pulse generator (IPG) procedures for deep brain stimulation (DBS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses of 58 studies that reported SSI rates of 11,289 patients and 15,956 IPG procedures. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed to estimate the pooled proportion of SSIs across DBS procedures in general and to estimate the proportion of SSIs that occur at the IPG pocket. Moreover, a meta-analysis of odds ratio (OR) was conducted on those studies that reported their results of applying topical vancomycin powder during closure of the IPG wound. Results are presented as rates and OR with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

The pooled proportion of SSIs was 4.9% (95% CI, 4.1%-6.1%) among all DBS procedures. The dominant SSI localization was the IPG pocket in 61.2% (95% CI, 53.4%-68.5%). A trend toward a beneficial effect of vancomycin powder over standard wound closure was found with an OR of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.21-1.02). Most studies (79.1%) that reported their treatment strategy in case of SSI had a strict protocol of removal of the IPG, followed by antimicrobial treatment and reimplantation of the IPG once the SSI had been eradicated.

CONCLUSIONS

The IPG pocket was identified as the main site of SSI after DBS procedures. Most studies recommend complete IPG removal, antimicrobial treatment, and reimplantation of an IPG once the SSI has been eradicated. Future studies are needed to clarify the role of alternative approaches (eg, topical vancomycin powder) in the prevention of SSI associated with IPG.

Eligibility criteria in clinical trials for cervical dystonia

INTRODUCTION

Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most common form of adult-onset focal dystonia. Because of a heterogeneous clinical presentation, the diagnosis rests on clinical opinion. During the last decades, several clinical trials have tested safety and efficacy of medical and surgical treatments for CD. We analyzed all the published CD trials and reviewed the strategies adopted for patient enrollment.

METHODS

The review included clinical trials in patients with CD published in PubMed. Studies were excluded if reviews, meta-analyses, post-hoc analyses on pooled data, or if not reporting a treatment for CD.

RESULTS

A total of 174 articles were identified; 134 studies met inclusion criteria. Diagnosis of CD varied among studies and in most cases was based on clinical judgement, using different descriptors such as "cervical dystonia" (37 studies), "idiopathic or isolated CD" (35), "primary CD" (13), and "torticollis" (40). Clinical judgement was supported by a phenomenological description of dystonia in four studies, and by a specific diagnostic strategy in other four. Finally, one study adopted general diagnostic criteria for dystonia. Inclusion and exclusion criteria proved heterogeneous across trials and were defined only in 108 studies, mainly considering age or the phenomenological pattern of muscle involvement.

CONCLUSION

The review showed lack of consolidated diagnostic criteria and non-uniformity of eligibility criteria for CD across clinical trials. There is need to move beyond clinical judgement as diagnostic criterion for selecting participants. New trials assessing specific CD patient subgroups or comparing medical and surgical procedures will need grounds that are more consistent.

Long-term efficacy with deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus in cervical dystonia: a retrospective monocentric study

BACKGROUND

Cervical dystonia (CD) is characterized by involuntary contractions of the cervical muscles. Data on long-term effectiveness of deep brain stimulation (DBS) are rare. The aim of this study was to evaluate the longitudinal ten years treatment efficacy of DBS in the globus pallidus internus (GPI).

METHODS

A retrospective single-center data analysis was performed on patients with idiopathic CD, who were treated with GPI DBS for at least 10 years. TWSTR severity score and individual sub-items were compared between pre and post DBS surgery (n = 15) over time.

RESULTS

There was a significant and persistent positive effect regarding the severity of TWSTRS between the conditions immediately before and 1, 5, and 10 years after establishment of GPI DBS (mean difference: 6.6-7 ± 1.6). Patients with increasing CD complexity showed a poorer response to established treatment forms, such as injection of botulinum toxin and were thus DBS candidates. Especially a predominant torticollis was significantly improved by DBS.

CONCLUSION

GPI DBS is an effective procedure especially in severely affected patients with a positive 10-year outcome. It should be considered in more complex CD-forms or predominant torticollis.

Adjuvant medical therapy in cervical dystonia after deep brain stimulation: A retrospective analysis

Background

There is limited information on optimization of symptomatic management of cervical dystonia (CD) after implantation of pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS).

Objectives

To describe the long-term, “real-world” management of CD patients after DBS implantation and the role of reintroduction of pharmacologic and botulinum toxin (BoNT) therapy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients with focal cervical or segmental craniocervical dystonia implanted with DBS was conducted.

Results

Nine patients were identified with a mean follow-up of 41.7 ± 15.7 months. All patients continued adjuvant oral medication(s) to optimize symptom control post-operatively. Three stopped BoNT and four reduced BoNT dose by an average of 22%. All patients remained on at least one medication used to treat dystonia post-operatively.

Conclusion

Optimal symptom control was achieved with DBS combined with either BoNT and/or medication. We suggest utilization of adjuvant therapies such as BoNT and/or medications if DBS monotherapy does not achieve optimal symptom control.

A practical guide to troubleshooting pallidal deep brain stimulation issues in patients with dystonia

High frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the internal portion of the globus pallidus has, in the last two decades, become a mainstream therapy for the management of medically-refractory dystonia syndromes. Such increasing uptake places an onus on movement disorder physicians to become familiar with this treatment modality, in particular optimal patient selection for the procedure and how to troubleshoot problems relating to sub-optimal efficacy and therapy-related side effects. Deep brain stimulation for dystonic conditions presents some unique challenges. For example, the frequent lack of immediate change in clinical status following stimulation alterations means that programming often relies on personal experience and local practice rather than real-time indicators of efficacy. Further, dystonia is a highly heterogeneous disorder, making the development of unifying guidelines and programming algorithms for DBS in this population difficult. Consequently, physicians may feel less confident in managing DBS for dystonia as compared to other indications e.g. Parkinson's disease. In this review, we integrate our years of personal experience of the programming of DBS systems for dystonia with a critical appraisal of the literature to produce a practical guide for troubleshooting common issues encountered in patients with dystonia treated with DBS, in the hope of improving the care for these patients.