Effects of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training on sarcopenia-related parameters in participants with Parkinson's disease: A 24-week randomized pilot trial substudy

Clinical usefulness of the SARC-F questionnaire to assess sarcopenia in patients with Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the accuracy of the SARC-F questionnaire to identify sarcopenia in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

We prospectively recruited patients with PD who had a score of 3 or lower on the Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) scale. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM), hand grip strength, and the SARC-F were used to assess sarcopenia. The cutoffs for the ASM index and hand grip strength to diagnose sarcopenia were based on the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 consensus. A score ≥4 on the SARC-F was considered at risk for sarcopenia.

RESULTS

A total of 365 patients with PD were included (mean age, 71.1 years; men, 53.2 %), and 73 (20.0 %) were diagnosed with sarcopenia. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the SARC-F was 0.702 (95 % confidence interval, 0.634-0.770). Using the recommended cutoff score of ≥4, the SARC-F showed a sensitivity of 38.4 %, specificity of 85.6 %, positive predictive value (PPV) of 40.0 %, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 84.7 %. The Youden's index was the highest at a cutoff score of ≥2, in which the SARC-F showed a sensitivity of 67.1 %, specificity of 65.4 %, PPV of 32.7 %, and NPV of 88.8 %. These predictive values were similar to those obtained using a cutoff score of ≥2.5 or 3 on the H&Y scale.

CONCLUSION

The application of the SARC-F to the mild-to moderate PD population is not appropriate as a first-step screening tool to diagnose sarcopenia. Given the comparable predictive values of the SARC-F and H&Y scale, this questionnaire may be considered only for ruling out sarcopenia in patients with similar disease severity.

Prevalence, Impact, and Screening Methods of Sarcopenia in Japanese Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Sarcopenia is a skeletal muscle disease manifesting as low muscle mass and impaired muscle function. It has been reported that sarcopenia correlates with a low quality of life (QOL) and an increased risk of falls in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Nevertheless, few studies have investigated the prevalence, impact, and screening methods of sarcopenia in Japanese patients with PD.

METHODS

Sarcopenia was diagnosed based on the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 consensus. We compared demographic characteristics, severity of PD, levodopa equivalent daily dose, QOL, fatigue, impulsive and compulsive behaviors, body mass index (BMI), calf circumference, skeletal muscle mass index (SMI), handgrip strength, a 4-meter gait speed, a five-time sit-to-stand test (FTSST), short physical performance battery, and SARC-F questionnaire scores between sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups. Furthermore, to investigate the best tool for screening sarcopenia in PD, the sensitivity and specificity of calf circumference, handgrip strength, FTSST, and SARC-F questionnaire were compared.

RESULTS

The prevalence of sarcopenia in PD was 31.9% (15/47). The sarcopenia group showed significantly higher age (77.3 ± 5.12 versus 70.3 ± 8.17, p = 0.0042), lower BMI (19.3 ± 2.99 versus 23.3 ± 3.18, p = 0.0002), higher rate of decreased calf circumference (86.6% versus 34.3%, p = 0.0013) and SMI (100% versus 6.25%, p < 0.0001), and worse FTSST (15.5 ± 5.57 versus 12.0 ± 4.12, p = 0.0219). The other parameters were not significantly different. Among screening tools, calf circumference had the highest sensitivity (86%) and specificity (65%). All screening tools had higher sensitivity and specificity in men than in women. The SARC-F questionnaire was not useful in distinguishing sarcopenia but was significantly correlated with the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part 3 (r = 0.41, p = 0.0037) and the 39-item Parkinson's Disease QOL Scale (r = 0.71, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This study investigated the characteristics of PD patients with sarcopenia in Japan. Calf circumference was found to be the most useful tool for screening sarcopenia in PD. Handgrip strength and FTSST also showed high sensitivities, particularly in men. Conversely, the SARC-F questionnaire is not suitable for diagnosing sarcopenia in PD.

Role of exercise in modulating prefrontal cortical activation for improved gait and cognition in Parkinson's disease patients

PURPOSE

This narrative review evaluated the impact of exercise on gait and cognitive functions in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), focusing on prefrontal cortical (PFC) activation assessed using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in the PubMed and Web of Science databases using keywords such as "Parkinson's disease," "gait," "cognitive functions," "exercise," and "NIRS," focusing on publications from the last decade. Studies measuring PFC activity using NIRS during gait tasks in patients with PD were selected.

RESULTS

The review indicated that patients with PD demonstrate increased PFC activity during gait tasks compared to healthy controls, suggesting a greater cognitive demand for movement control. Exercise has been shown to enhance neural efficiency, thus improving gait and cognitive functions.

CONCLUSION

Exercise is crucial for improving gait and cognitive functions in patients with PD through increased PFC activation. This emphasizes the importance of incorporating exercise into PD management plans and highlights the need for further studies on its long-term effects and the neurobiological mechanisms underlying its benefits, with the aim of optimizing therapeutic strategies and improving patients' quality of life.

Diagnostic Criteria and Measurement Techniques of Sarcopenia: A Critical Evaluation of the Up-to-Date Evidence

Sarcopenia, a geriatric syndrome characterized by progressive skeletal muscle mass and function decline, poses a significant health risk among the elderly, contributing to frailty, falls, hospitalization, loss of independence and mortality. The prevalence of sarcopenia varies significantly based on various factors, such as living status, demographics, measurement techniques and diagnostic criteria. Although the overall prevalence is reported at 10% in individuals aged 60 and above, disparities exist across settings, with higher rates in nursing homes and hospitals. Additionally, the differences in prevalence between Asian and non-Asian countries highlight the impact of cultural and ethnic factors, and variations in diagnostic criteria, cut-off values and assessment methods contribute to the observed heterogeneity in reported rates. This review outlines diverse diagnostic criteria and several measurement techniques supporting decision making in clinical practice. Moreover, it facilitates the selection of appropriate tools to assess sarcopenia, emphasizing its multifactorial nature. Various scientific groups, including the European Working Group of Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP), the International Working Group on Sarcopenia (IWGS), the Asian Working Group on Sarcopenia (AWGS), the American Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) and the Sarcopenia Definition and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC), have published consensus papers outlining diverse definitions of sarcopenia. The choice of diagnostic criteria should be aligned with the specific objectives of the study or clinical practice, considering the characteristics of the study population and available resources.