Diagnostic rapide des infections à rotavirus : étude prospective comparative de deux techniques de détection d'antigènes dans les selles

[Sensitivity and specificity of the VIKIA Rota-Adeno immuno-chromatographic test (bioMérieux) and the ELISA IDEIA Rotavirus kit (Dako) compared to genotyping]

The performances of two diagnostic tests for rotavirus infection in stool samples were evaluated during a prospective study in children of less than 36 months in child-care centers of Lyon from November 2004 to May 2005. The VIKIA Rota-Adeno immuno-chromatographic test (bioMérieux) and the ELISA IDEIA Rotavirus kit (Dako) were compared with a referral method, the genotyping. Fifty-seven stool samples were collected and analyzed by RT-PCR. The virus genome was detected in 29 samples. The most frequent genotypic combinations were G9P[8] with a prevalence of 75.9%. Sensitivity and specificity of the VIKIA Rota-Adeno test and the ELISA IDEIA Rotavirus kit were strictly comparable and very good: 96.6% (83.0; 99.9) and 96.4% (81.6; 99.9), respectively. The immuno-chromatographic technique were in concordance with the ELISA tests in 93.6% of cases. Thus, the VIKIA Rota-Adeno test is a good alternative for the occasional analysis of stool samples in ambulatory practice.

Évaluation de sept réactifs d'immunochromatographie pour détecter les rotavirus humains dans les selles

Seven commercially available immunochromatographic assays were tested for the rapid detection of group A rotaviruses in fecal samples compared to a enzyme immunoassay (Argene). Detection of rotaviruses in 80 ELISA positive frozen stool samples showed rates superior to 90% for three reagents (Rota Strip (Cypress Diagnostics), 98.8%; Rotascreen (Microgen), 95.0%; VIKIA Rota/Adeno (bioMérieux), 92.5%); from 82.5% to 88.8% for three others (Diarlex with centrifugation (Orion Diagnostica), 88.8%; Combo Rota/Adeno (All Diag), 87.5%; Rota/Adeno Combi Stick (bmd), 82.5%) and only 70.0% for Diarlex with filtration vial (Orion Diagnostica). The evaluation of the specificity, performed on one hundred fresh rotavirus negative stools, did not show any false positives with any assay. Analysis of the different technical features of these tests showed that they are quick and suitable for a clinical laboratory and do not require expensive equipment.