Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Early Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Surgical margins in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A narrative review

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a prevalent and frequently recurring malignancy, often necessitates surgical intervention. The surgical margin (SM) plays a pivotal role in determining the postoperative treatment strategy and prognostic evaluation of HNSCC. Nonetheless, the process of clinical appraisal and assessment of the SMs remains a complex and indeterminate endeavor, thereby leading to potential difficulties for surgeons in defining the extent of resection. In this regard, we undertake a comprehensive review of the suggested surgical distance in varying circumstances, diverse methods of margin evaluation, and the delicate balance that must be maintained between tissue resection and preservation in head and neck surgical procedures. This review is intended to provide surgeons with pragmatic guidance in selecting the most suitable resection techniques, and in improving patients' quality of life by achieving optimal functional and aesthetic restoration.

Paradigm Change for Intraoperative Surgical Margin Assessment for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Achieving clear surgical margins is one of the primary surgical goals in treating oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and thus aiming to improve overall and disease-specific survival. Therefore, we developed the Goal-Oriented Assessment for Intraoperative Margin ('GAIM') protocol, a novel intraoperative approach for margin assessment, and present here our 5-year experience and outcomes.

METHODS

'GAIM' is a 7-step procedure comprising systematic ruler-aided resection of labeled tumor-bed margins, frozen section (FS) co-produced by both pathologists and operating surgeons, and immediate extension of resection according to FS findings. Data from all patients operated using the 'GAIM' protocol at a single tertiary center between 2018 to 2022 were analyzed, including margin status on FS and final pathology (FP) records, recurrence, and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 196 patients were included, 56.6% (n = 111) stages I-II, and 43.4% (n = 85) stages III-IV. Using the 'GAIM' protocol, we achieved an overall 94.4% of clean and revised clean surgical margins. Patients with a 2-year and longer follow-up (n = 141) had local recurrence in 3.5% when both FS and final margins were clean, 8.1% when FP margins were clean, and 16.7% with close/positive final margins.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed 'GAIM' protocol is a novel, effective, reproducible, and safe approach for margin evaluation that can be systematically applied. It can increase the rate of final clean surgical margins and potentially improve patients' outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:1725-1732, 2024.

Margin Assessment Methods in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Recurrence: Tumor Bed vs Resection Specimen Sampling

Importance

Positive margins and margin clearance are risk factors for recurrence in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC), and these features are used to guide decisions regarding adjuvant radiation treatment. However, the prognostic value of intraoperative tumor bed vs resection specimen sampling is not well defined.

Objective

To determine the prognostic implications of intraoperative margin assessment methods (tumor bed vs resection specimen sampling) with recurrence among patients who undergo surgical resection for OCSCC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a retrospective study of patients who had undergone surgical resection of OCSCC between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2021, at a tertiary-level academic institution. Patients were grouped by margin assessment method (tumor bed [defect] or resection specimen sampling). Of 223 patients with OCSCC, 109 patients had localized tumors (pT1-T2, cN0), 154 had advanced tumors, and 40 were included in both cohorts. Disease recurrence after surgery was estimated by the cumulative incidence method and compared between cohorts using hazard ratios (HRs). Data analyses were performed from January 5, 2023, to April 30, 2023.

Main Outcome and Measures

Recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Results

The study population comprised 223 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.7 [12.0] years; 88 (39.5%) female and 200 [90.0%] White individuals) of whom 158 (70.9%) had defect-driven and 65 (29.1%) had specimen-driven margin sampling. Among the 109 patients with localized cancer, intraoperative positive margins were found in 5 of 67 (7.5%) vs 8 of 42 (19.0%) for defect- vs specimen-driven sampling, respectively. Final positive margins were 3.0% for defect- (2 of 67) and 2.4% for specimen-driven (1 of 42) margin assessment. Among the 154 patients with advanced cancer, intraoperative positive margins were found in 29 of 114 (25.4%) vs 13 of 40 (32.5%) for defect- and specimen-driven margins, respectively. Final positive margins were higher in the defect-driven group (9 of 114 [7.9%] vs 1 of 40 [2.5%]). When stratified by margin assessment method, the 3-year rates of local recurrence (9.7% vs 5.1%; HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.51-3.66), regional recurrence (11.0% vs 10.4%; HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.37-1.94), and distant recurrence (6.4% vs 5.0%; HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.36-3.35) were not different for defect- vs specimen-driven sampling cohorts, respectively. The 3-year rate of any recurrence was 18.9% in the defect- and 15.2% in the specimen-driven cohort (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.48-1.81). There were no differences in cumulative incidence of disease recurrence when comparing defect- vs specimen-driven cases.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this retrospective cohort study indicate that margin assessment methods using either defect- or specimen-driven sampling did not demonstrate a clear association with the risk of recurrence after OCSCC resection. Specimen-driven sampling may be associated with reduced surgical margin positivity rates, which often necessitate concurrent chemotherapy with adjuvant radiation therapy.

Margins in Stage I and II Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Review From the American Head and Neck Society

Importance

The assessment and management of surgical margins in stage I and II oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma is one of the most important perioperative aspects of oncologic care, with profound implications for patient outcomes and adjuvant therapy. Understanding and critically reviewing the existing data surrounding margins in this context is necessary to rigorously care for this challenging group of patients and minimize patient morbidity and mortality.

Observations

This review discusses the data related to the definitions related to surgical margins, methods for assessment, specimen vs tumor bed margin evaluation, and re-resection of positive margins. The observations presented emphasize notable controversy within the field about margin assessment, with early data coalescing around several key aspects of management, although studies are limited by their design.

Conclusions and Relevance

Stage I and II oral cavity cancer requires surgical resection with negative margins to obtain optimal oncologic outcomes, but controversy persists over margin assessment. Future studies with improved, well-controlled study designs are required to more definitively guide margin assessment and management.

Immediate resection of positive margins improves local control in oral tongue cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates the impact of immediate resection of positive margins on local control of oral tongue cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 273 consecutive oral tongue cancers resected from 2013 to 2018. Additional resection was performed in cases during the initial operation based on surgeon inspection of the specimen and/or frozen margins. Positive margins were defined as invasive carcinoma/high-grade dysplasia < 1 mm from the inked edge. Patients were grouped as follows: negative margin (Group 1); positive margin with immediate additional tissue resection (Group 2); and positive margin without additional tissue resection (Group 3).

RESULTS

Overall, the rate of local recurrence was 7.7 % (21/273), and the rate of positive main specimen margin was 17.9 %. Of these patients, 38.8 % (19/49) underwent immediate additional resection of the presumed positive margin. Group 3 had higher local recurrence rates than Group 1 after adjustment for T-stage (aHR 2.8 [95 % CI 1.0-7.7], p = 0.04). Group 2 had similar rates of local recurrence (aHR 0.45 [95 % CI 0.06-3.6], p = 0.45). Three year local recurrence free survival for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 91 %, 92 % and 73 %, respectively. Compared to the main specimen margin, sensitivity of intraoperative frozen tumor bed margins was 17.4 %, and specificity was 95 %.

CONCLUSION

In patients with positive main specimen margins, anticipation and detection in real-time with immediate additional tissue resection reduced local recurrence to rates similar to those with negative main specimen margins. These findings support the use of technology to provide real-time intraoperative margin data and guide additional resection for improved local control.

AIRO GORTEC consensus on postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in low-intermediate risk early stages oral squamous cell cancers (OSCC)

Evidence on the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in low-intermediate risk squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (OSCC) remains inconclusive. Members of a task force from two national radio-oncology Associations (AIRO and GORTEC) defined 14 clinically relevant questions to identify "gray areas" pertinent to the indication for PORT in this clinical setting. Consequently, a literature review was performed on the topic. The resulting statements were then rated by an Expert Panel (EP) using a modified Delphi method. Only radiation oncologists were part of the discussion and voting on the scenarios. There was agreement on the 14 statements at the first round of voting. The task force then decided to propose clinical cases for the two more controversial statements that had received a lower agreement to better capture the Experts' attitudes. The clinical cases highlighted a more significant decisional heterogeneity. However, the good level of consensus reached among the two Associations gives relevant support in informing clinical choices while acknowledging general indications cannot fit all clinical situations and do not replace multidisciplinary discussion.

Frozen-Permanent Section Discrepancy Rate in Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Frozen section evaluation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is critical for margin status and subsequent patient therapy. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the rate of frozen-permanent section discrepancies in blocks with two frozen section levels compared to ≥ three levels in oral cavity and oropharyngeal SCCs. A search of the cases with both intraoperative frozen sections and corresponding permanent sections for SCCs in the oral cavity and oropharynx was performed. Frozen sections and permanent slides were compared. The nature of discrepancies was assigned to one of the following: change in diagnosis, margin status, or distance of the tumor from the margin. The cause of the discrepancy was designated as one of the following: block sampling, gross sampling, interpretation, or technical error. The pathologist experience, frozen section technical experience, and intraoperative impact of each discrepancy were also evaluated. A total of 654 frozen and corresponding permanent blocks were assessed. For 532 of the frozen section blocks, two levels were cut, while 122 frozen section blocks had ≥ three levels. Thirty-five frozen-permanent section discrepancies were observed (5.4% of all blocks). Among these, 2.5% had a possible or definitive intraoperative impact. The percentage of discrepancies in the ≥ three levels group (5.7%) was slightly higher than the two-level group (5.3%), and this difference was not statistically significant. For the two-level group, the overall block sampling error rate was 4.5%. This was not significantly different from the 4.1% block sampling error rate seen in the ≥ three levels group. The rate of block sampling discrepancy did not show significant differences based on attending or frozen section technical experience. A change in margin distance (closer margin detected on permanent) occurred in 4% of the blocks and involved 16% of the patients. This review of oral cavity and oropharynx SCCs frozen/permanent section discrepancies shows that the error rate is not significantly different depending on the number of levels cut. The results suggest that always performing more than two frozen section levels may not yield a decreased discrepancy rate. A change in margin distance occurred quite frequently, but only in rare cases it had a definitive impact on the intraoperative management. Given the importance of correct intraoperative diagnosis in patient management, additional levels may be warranted depending on the clinical scenario.

Toluidine blue versus frozen section for assessment of mucosal tumor margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

When the resected specimen is sent for intraoperative margin assessment, all margins are grossly checked, and selected margins undergo a frozen section (FS) examination. Therefore, there is a possibility of sampling error. This study evaluated the effectiveness of using toluidine blue (TB) as an intraoperative triage screening tool to detect positive mucosal margins of the resected specimens of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and serve as a guide for FS sampling.

METHODS

Surgical samples of 30 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven OSCC were included in the study. A total of 140 mucosal margins were analyzed intraoperatively by TB and FS, the results were compared with the final histopathology.

RESULTS

Of the 140 examined mucosal tumor margins, 14 stained positives with TB, six were true-positives, eight were false-positives, and there were no false-negatives, as confirmed by final histopathology of the same margins. The diagnostic performance measures were sensitivity 100.0%; specificity 94.0%; positive predictive value (PPV) 42.9%; negative predictive value (NPV) 100.0%; and accuracy 94.3% (95% CI: 89.0-97.5%). For FS, there were three true-positives, three false-negatives, and no false-positives. The diagnostic performance measures were sensitivity 50.0%; specificity 100.0%; PPV 100.0%; NPV 97.8%; and accuracy 97.9% (95% CI: 93.9-99.6%).

CONCLUSION

TB is less specific but more sensitive than FS for detecting positive mucosal margins of resected OSCC. Screening the tumor mucosal margins with TB before FS sampling may help identify more tumor-bearing margins.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Registration number: NCT03554967 . Registration date: June 13, 2018.

Recurrence and Disease-Free Survival in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Margin-Free Resection on Frozen Section: An Institutional Perspective

Introduction

The most important factor determining survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a disease recurrence. A high rate of recurrence was noted in previous studies conducted in Pakistan; however, these studies did not consider margin status as inadequate margin clearance leads to disease recurrence. In this study, we determined cancer recurrence in patients with HNSCC after nullifying this factor.

Methods

This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in Liaquat National Hospital (LNH) for a duration of three years. Data collection period was from January 2015 to December 2017. A total of 150 patients that underwent surgery at LNH for HNSCC with margin-free frozen sections were included in the study. Pathological tumor characteristics such as tumor type, size, depth of invasion and nodal status were determined.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 50.31±12.90 with mean tumor size of 3.38±1.76. Nodal metastases were present in 45.3% cases with 17.3% showing extranodal extension. Recurrence was observed in 66% of cases with median disease-free survival of 12 months and perineural invasion was noted in 12% cases. We found a significant association of disease recurrence with larger tumor size, depth of invasion and extranodal extension. Moreover, younger age (<30 years) and older age (>50 years) groups showed higher rates of recurrence than the middle age group (30-50 years). Similarly, univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that tumors with ≥1 cm depth of invasion and the presence of extranodal extension were more likely to have disease recurrence than tumors with <1 cm depth of invasion and without extranodal extension. Survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method for HNSCC revealed a significant difference in disease-free survival in patients with more than 2 cm tumor size and ≥1 cm depth of invasion than cases with ≤ 2cm tumor size and <1 cm depth of invasion.

Conclusion

A high rate of disease recurrence for HNSSC was noted in our study, despite margin-free primary tumor resection. Apart from tumor size and depth of invasion, extranodal extension was significantly associated with disease recurrence in HNSCC. This signifies a need for margin evaluation of neck dissection specimen in cases with extranodal extension.

A prospective study of intraoperative assessment of mucosal squamous cell carcinoma margins in the head and neck

BACKGROUND

In head and neck cancers, tumor margin assessment has important prognostic and therapeutic implications. Frozen section control of margins is commonly employed intraoperatively. However, this is not without limitations. The aim of this study is to determine whether intraoperative slicing of the whole specimen is feasible and what impact this may have on tumor margin assessment and the requirement for postoperative radiotherapy.

METHODS

From September 2016 to August 2018, we recruited 22 patients as a pilot study looking at both the practicalities and the clinical relevance of whole margin tumor analysis intraoperatively. Our project is a prospective single arm study with historical controls.

RESULTS

Forty-one percent of our patients required further intraoperative resection for close or involved margins. Seven of these patients who otherwise would have required adjuvant radiotherapy due to their margin status did not, after our intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that although requiring resources, this process was feasible without unduly increasing operative times and with potential patient benefit including reduced incidence of adjuvant radiotherapy.

Reconstruction for Various Subtypes of Unilateral Buccal Defects After Oncologic Surgery by Using Personalized Anterolateral Thigh Flaps

PURPOSE

Radical resection of buccal carcinoma frequently leads to intraoral or through-and-through buccal defects. Anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps can be harvested to reconstruct different buccal defect subtypes. The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical outcomes after the application of personalized ALT flaps for the precise reconstruction of unilateral buccal defects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with primary unilateral buccal carcinoma who underwent tumor ablation and simultaneous reconstruction of personalized ALT flaps from January 2015 to January 2018 were enrolled in this retrospective case series. Buccal defects were classified into 4 subtypes. Demographic features, defect range and reconstructive method, and perioperative characteristics were reviewed and recorded. Quality of life and mouth opening were assessed by the University of Washington Quality-of-Life questionnaire and interincisal distance (IID), respectively, during follow-up. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each study variable.

RESULTS

Four types of ALT flaps were harvested and used to reconstruct different buccal defects in 146 patients. Of the 193 skin paddles applied, 189 survived, and few recipient- and donor-site complications were observed. One hundred eight patients were assessed with the University of Washington Quality-of-Life questionnaire and followed until 12 months postoperatively. Our results showed that physical, functional, social, and emotional domain scores increased steadily during the follow-up period. Ninety-eight patients showed improvements in mouth opening when the IID before the operation was compared with the IID at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

A personalized ALT flap is a suitable choice for reconstructing unilateral buccal defects after oncologic surgery given its high success rate, customizable and flexible design, low complication rate, and satisfactory esthetic and functional results.

Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Head and Neck Cancer: A Case of Misuse and Abuse?

Surgical removal with negative margins is the preferred management of oral squamous cell carcinomas. This review summarizes statements by professional organizations and data supporting the specimen-driven approach to margin assessment. Practical aspects of the intraoperative margin assessment, as guided by gross examination, are presented. The most cost- and time-efficient method of intraoperative margin assessment depends on desired margin clearance and likelihood of other adverse histologic factors, such as extranodal extension, perineural invasion, which are likelier in advanced carcinomas. Intraoperative surgeon-pathologist communication can be improved by reporting to surgical team gross distances to all or selected closest margins, before choosing margins for microscopic frozen examination. Case specific mitigation strategies to minimize the negative impact of tumor-bed driven margin assessment or of suboptimal margin revision are proposed. Based on size, shape, histology, size of carcinoma at the margin, and orientation of the additional tissue, margin revision may be judged as adequate (conversion of a positive margin into a negative one), inadequate (positive margin remains positive), or indeterminate. The significance of anatomic subsite based labeling, radial margin sampling from the main resection specimen, and the relationship between the distance to closest margin and local control are highlighted. The modern definition of safe margin would account for other parameters, such as perineural invasion. An updated approach to resolution of frozen versus permanent sampling issues is outlined. Future studies are needed to design and validate risk models that would help to determine for individual patient what represents a safe margin and how to judge the quality of margin revision.

The role of adjuvant (chemo-)radiotherapy in oral cancers in the contemporary era

Squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity (OSCC) is predominantly managed with surgery. Post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) and chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) enhance disease control in OSCC patients with adverse anatomic and pathologic primary and nodal features. Knowledge about disease behavior, surgery and radiotherapy advances, and the emergence of new systemic agents prompt refinement of PORT volumes and POCRT regimens. Traditional and emerging prognostic models that include adverse histopathological features underpin such approaches. This review summarizes research over recent decades with emphasis on the 2015 to Feb 2019 period describing: (1) Indications for PORT and/or POCRT, addressing surgical "margin status" including the definition of a "clear" margin to permit withholding PORT/POCRT; these concepts include characterizing the specimen yielding these measurements, the optimal time point to assess these findings, and the putative value of a "revised margin" performed during the same operative procedure, (2) Emerging prognostic factors including nodal burden (total number of involved lymph nodes) and perineural invasion, (3) PORT volume design, dose/fractionation and optimal surgery-to-PORT interval, (4) Chemotherapy dose, schedule, and agents, and (5) On-going clinical trials involving systemic agents and combinations of chemotherapy with immunotherapy.

[Application of the nasolabial fold "smile" incision approach in posterior buccal cancer ablation]

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the feasibility and clinical result of radical resection of posterior buccal carcinoma by using the facial nasolabial fold "smile" incision approach.

METHODS

From August 2016 to March 2017, 23 patients with posterior buccal carcinoma were included in this study and underwent radical surgery. Upon finishing the cervical lymph node dissection, an arc-shaped incision was made at 1 cm lateral to the ipsilateral angulus oris, extending along the nasolabial fold upward to the inferolateral margin of the nasal alar while downward in direct continuity with the neck dissection incision.

RESULTS

Satisfactory exposure and easy resection of the primary tumor with negative surgical margin were achieved in all 23 patients. After 12-22 months of follow-up (16.5 months on average), all patients recovered favorably, and no local recurrence or distant metastasis was observed. Mouth opening was restored to normal in all cases. The scars were hidden in the nasolabial fold, thus named "smile" incision.

CONCLUSIONS

For posterior buccal cancer patients, the facial "smile" incision approach can satisfy the need of surgical exposure, facilitate operative performance, and preserve the annular integrity of the lips without affecting the radical tumor ablation, thereby maintaining a favorable mouth opening. With these advantages, the "smile" incision approach is considered worthy of being popularized in clinical application.

Surgical margins in oral squamous cell cancer: intraoperative evaluation and prognostic impact

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize recent findings regarding surgical management of oral squamous cell cancer (OSCC) through analysis of different intraoperative techniques for assessment of margins, evaluate the pros and cons of each, and ensuing prognostic impact.

RECENT FINDINGS

'En bloc' OSCC resection and histopathologic evaluation of margins on the formalin-fixed specimen remain the 'gold standard' for oral oncologic surgery, whereas assessment of intraoperative surgical margins and its overall clinical value are still questioned and debated in the literature. The commonly applied evaluation of frozen sections still raises concerns regarding its efficacy and reproducibility; therefore, several ancillary diagnostic methods have entered the field of head and neck oncology in the last decades, aiming to support the surgeon in achieving tumor-free margins during ablative procedures.

SUMMARY

Poor prognosis of OSCC is strongly associated with residual tumor after surgery. Negative surgical margins are one of the strongest prognosticators for disease-free survival and locoregional control, but their intraoperative determination seems still to be suboptimal and needs better refinement. The most studied techniques to assess intraoperative margins include fluorescence, Raman spectroscopy, narrow band imaging, optical coherence tomography, and cytological bone margins analysis; each has its unique characteristics that are described in detail herein.

Early squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue with histologically benign lymph nodes: A model predicting local control and vetting of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer pathologic T stage

BACKGROUND

The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual (AJCC8) added depth of invasion to the definition of pathologic T stage (pT). In the current study, the authors assess pT stage migration and the prognostic performance of the updated pT stage and compare it with other clinicopathologic variables in patients with early squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue (OTSCC; tumors measuring ≤4 cm) with histologically benign lymph nodes (pN0).

METHODS

A multi-institutional cohort of patients with early OTSCC was restaged as per AJCC8. Primary endpoints were local recurrence (LR) and locoregional recurrence (LRR). Influential variables were identified and an LR/LRR prediction model was developed.

RESULTS

There were a total of 494 patients, with 49 LR and 73 LRR. AJCC8 pT criteria resulted in upstaging of 37.9% of patients (187 of 494 patients), including 34.5% (64 of 185 patients) from pT2 to pT3, without improving the prognostication for LR or LRR. Both LR and LRR were found to be similar for patients with AJCC8 pT2 and pT3 disease. On multivariate analysis, LR was only found to be associated with distance to the closest margin (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.64 [P = .0007]) and perineural invasion (hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.10-0.64 [P = .046]). Based on these 2 predictors, a final proportional hazards regression model (which may be used similar to a nomogram) was developed. The proposed model appeared to be superior to AJCC pT stage for estimating the probability of LR and LRR for individual patients with early OTSCC.

CONCLUSIONS

AJCC8 pT criteria resulted in pT upstaging of patients with pN0 disease without improved LR or LRR prognostication. The proposed model based on distance to the closest margin and perineural invasion, status outperformed pT as a predictor of LR and LRR in patients with early OTSCC.

The role of adjuvant treatment in early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: An international collaborative study

BACKGROUND

Up to half of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) have stage I to II disease. When adequate resection is attained, no further treatment is needed; however, re-resection or radiotherapy may be indicated for patients with positive or close margins. This multicenter study evaluated the outcomes and role of adjuvant treatment in patients with stage I to II OCSCC.

METHODS

Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival, local-free survival, and disease-free survival rates were calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Of 1257 patients with T1-2N0M0 disease, 33 (2.6%) had positive margins, and 205 (16.3%) had close margins. The 5-year OS rate was 80% for patients with clear margins, 52% for patients with close margins, and 63% for patients with positive margins (P < .0001). In a multivariate analysis, age, depth of invasion, and margins were independent predictors of outcome. Close margins were associated with a >2-fold increase in the risk of recurrence (P < .0001). The multivariate analysis revealed that adjuvant treatment significantly improved the outcomes of patients with close/positive margins (P = .002 to .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with stage I to II OCSCC and positive/close margins have poor long-term outcomes. For this population, adjuvant treatment may be associated with improved survival. Cancer 2018;124:2948-55. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Surgical Margins: The Perspective of Pathology

Neoplasms of the head and neck constitute a broad spectrum of benign and malignant entities. When treatment involves resection, assessment of the surgical margins represents an important component of the pathologic examination. Margin status is an important indicator of a complete surgical resection. The ability to generalize conclusions such as 'safe distance' measurements from work performed mSCCa or cutaneous malignancy to other types of neoplasms in the head and neck region seems limited. This article reviews conditions and considerations for reliable margin assessment and interpretation.

Improving margin revision: Characterization of tumor bed margins in early oral tongue cancer

OBJECTIVES

To improve margin revision, this study characterizes the number, fragmentation, and orientation of tumor bed margins (TBM) in patients with pT1-2 pN0 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral tongue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pathology reports (n=346) were reviewed. TBM parameters were indexed. In Group 1 patients all margins were obtained from the glossectomy specimen and there were no TBM. In Revision Group/Group 2 (n=103), tumor bed was sampled to revise suboptimal margins identified by examination of the glossectomy specimen. In Group 3 (n=124), TBM were obtained before examination of the glossectomy specimen.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Fewer TBMs were obtained per patient in Group 2 compared to Group 3 (57/103, 55% of patients with <3 vs. 117/124, 94%, ≥3 TBMs, respectively). The new margin surface was more frequently indicated in Group 2 compared to Group 3 (59/103, 57%, vs. 19/124, 15%, p<.001). If glossectomy specimen margins are accepted as the reference standard, then the TBM was 15% sensitive in Group 2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7-29) and 32% sensitive in Group 3 (95% CI, 15-55). TBM fragmentation (23/103, 22% vs. 42/124, 34%) and frozen vs. permanent discrepancies (8/103, 3% vs. 3/124, 2%) were similar between Groups 2 and 3. The new margin surface was not indicated in 6 of 11 cases with discrepant frozen vs. permanent pathology findings, precluding judgment on final margin status. To facilitate the assessment of final margins, TBM should be represented by one tissue fragment with a marked new margin surface.