Evaluation of pathology review at gynaecological oncology multidisciplinary team meetings: a 5-year prospective analysis of cases with major diagnostic discordance

The challenge of diagnosing neuroendocrine neoplasms: experience from a national reference center

Correctly diagnosing neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) has become increasingly challenging, given that more histomorphologic and immunophenotypic NEN mimics have been identified in recent years. A systemic review was conducted on the 4795 consult cases submitted with initial diagnoses of NEN to a national reference center in China from 2013 to 2021. Among them, 443 cases were misdiagnosed as epithelial NENs after reevaluation with the help of immunohistochemical and/or molecular tests, ranging from 7.1 to 13.2%, with yearly increases. The misdiagnoses varied among age groups and tumor sites. Exocrine carcinoma was the most common (63.2%), followed by mesenchymal tumors. Other common tumors that were misdiagnosed included hepatocellular carcinoma, salivary gland tumor, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Aberrant expression of neuroendocrine markers was frequent (218/408, 53.4%), with diffuse positivity ranging from 8.2 to 51.7% for synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and INSM1 stains in all non-NEN cases. Selecting appropriate immunohistochemical stains based on H&E morphology is the key to avoiding diagnostic pitfalls. Medical history and molecular genomic information greatly assist in correctly diagnosing NENs and their mimics.

Optimizing Outcomes through a Multidisciplinary Team Approach in Endometrial Cancer

This study aimed to assess the impact of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach on outcomes with endometrial cancer (EC) patients, utilizing 2013-2020 data from the Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry. Recurrence rate, treatments, and outcome indicators were compared between the MDT (319 cases) and non-MDT (324 cases) groups. Among 643 cases, 52.4% were over 65 years old, 98% had microscopic confirmation, and 73% were in stage I. Surgery was performed in 89%, with 41% receiving adjuvant therapies. Recurrence rates (10%) were similar between the two groups, but MDT patients who were older and predominantly in stage I exhibited 79% recurrence within one year (21% in the non-MDT group). Disease-free survival (DFS) showed no significant difference [HR 1.1; 95% CI 0.7-1.6], while differences in overall survival (OS) were notable [HR 1.5; 95% CI 1.0-2.4]. The 5-year OS rates were 87% and 79% in the MDT and non-MDT groups. Comparing the 2013-2015 to 2016-2020 study periods, a shift towards caring for older women, more advanced-stage patients, and those residing outside the metropolitan area, along with a greater number of relapsed cases (from 16% to 76%), were accounted for. These findings underscore the impact of an MDT on EC outcomes, highlighting the evolving patient demographics over time.

Head and neck tumors in children and adolescents: Impact of a multidisciplinary tumor board

INTRODUCTION

Cancer treatment in France is based on Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB). In the Ile-de-France region (IDF), which includes 12 million inhabitants from Paris and the surrounding area, pediatric tumors of head and neck are discussed since 2013 in a dedicated Interregional Pediatric Multicentric MTB (IPMTB). The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of the IDF head and neck IPMTB on the management of these tumors, 5 years after their implementation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of all patient files presented in the IPMTB for a benign or malignant head-and-neck tumor, between 2013 and 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 679 discussions were analyzed representing 428 patients. Median age was 7.5 years (range: 0-31 years). Malignant tumors represented 71% of cases, including 36% of rhabdomyosarcoma. Overall, 12% percent of the cases discussed came from centers outside of IDF. All meetings complied with multidisciplinary criteria required by French law. Proposals made during the IPMTB were followed in 86% of cases. Among the 251 proposals made by the referring teams prior to the IPMTB, 29% were secondarily modified after being discussed in the IPMTB.

CONCLUSION

Thanks to their multidisciplinarity, high number of cases discussed and usual respect of their proposals, the IPMTB have made it possible to improve the coordination between all specialties involved in the patient's management, to apply the most recent and scientifically validated protocols, and to share the knowledge of different teams concerning the management of particularly rare tumors.

Predictors of endometrial carcinoma in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia at a tertiary gynaecological cancer centre in Western Australia

AIM

Our objective was to assess clinical and pathological factors associated with a final diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia with a particular emphasis on the grading of atypia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review over five years on patients (N = 97) who underwent hysterectomy for a diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia at a statewide public tertiary gynaecologic oncology centre. Clinical and pathological characteristics were obtained.

RESULTS

The rate of concurrent endometrial carcinoma was 34% (n = 33) with most being stage 1A endometrioid. A significant group difference was reported for age at diagnosis (t = -2.20 P = 0.031 d = 0.43) with carcinoma patients on average older (M_age  = 60.2 (8.9) years) than patients without carcinoma (M_age  = 55.5 (12.3) years). No significant group differences were found for body mass index, endometrial thickness or time between diagnosis and treatment. Significantly higher rates of carcinoma were reported in patients with moderate atypical hyperplasia (27.6%) and severe atypical hyperplasia (66.7%), compared to mild atypical hyperplasia (7.1%). Only severe atypical hyperplasia (odds ratio (OR) = 21.5, 95% CI 2.8-163.1, P = 0.003) and postmenopausal status (OR = 13.2, 95% CI 1.3-139.0, P = 0.032) significantly increased the risk of carcinoma in a multivariate model.

CONCLUSION

Severe atypical hyperplasia and postmenopausal status were significant predictors of concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia. The grading of atypical hyperplasia may be utilised by gynaecologic oncologists in the triage and referral process of managing these patients; however, the grading system requires external validation in larger prospective studies.

Cytopathological review of cervical pathology: Impact for women and follow-up results

BACKGROUND

Cervical screening programs have had an important effect on the reduction of cervical cancer rates. Comprehensive programs require access to pathological review to improve the sensitivity of screening cytology and the specificity of diagnostic histology.

AIMS

To determine the number of cases where cervical cytology or histology was amended at cytopathological review; whether amendments were 'upgrades' or 'downgrades', and how amendments aligned with follow-up results for these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed of all patients reviewed from January 2016 to December 2017 (n = 287 cases, from 254 patients) at colposcopy multidisciplinary meetings at Wellington Hospital, a tertiary referral hospital. Where amendments to cytology or histology were made, follow-up results were retrieved where available (85.7% and 84.2% respectively).

RESULTS

Cytology or histology was amended in 24.7% of cases. Smear cytology was amended in 16.7%. Where cytology was upgraded (n = 9), 44% had subsequent results of equal or higher grade including one case of adenocarcinoma. Where cytology was downgraded (n = 19), 93.8% (81.9-100%) had follow-up studies showing equal or lower results. Cervical biopsy histology was amended in 12.2% of cases (upgraded n = 19, downgraded n = 6). Large loop excision of the transformation zone or cone biopsy histology was amended in three cases (7.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Cytopathological review appears to improve the specificity of the comprehensive cervical screening program, leading to a reduction in unnecessary treatment. Additionally, a small number of cases of malignant or premalignant disease were detected.

A detailed morphological and immunohistochemical comparison of primary endometrial and tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas and their corresponding omental metastases

Increasingly, high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) of fallopian tube/ovarian origin are managed initially with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and pre-treatment diagnosis is often based upon relatively limited core biopsy and/or cytology specimens. Endometrial HGSC can also present with adnexal and peritoneal metastasis, thus mimicking a primary tubo-ovarian neoplasm, but the role of NACT in these cases is less established. Immunohistochemistry has been considered useful in this distinction but with a wide range of reported findings in the literature. In this study we have examined tumour growth patterns and the expression p16, Ki-67, WT1, PAX2, HER2, ER-α, ER-β, PR, and BAF250a in 18 tubo-ovarian and 14 endometrial HGSCs, comparing the findings in primary and omental sites. Metastatic tubo-ovarian carcinomas demonstrated significantly more varied architectural patterns than metastatic endometrial HGSCs (median 2.5 versus 1). None of the immunohistochemical markers proved completely reliable but only endometrial HGSC were WT1 negative (7/14 metastatic tumours) or demonstrated over-expression of HER2 (2/14 cases). Micropapillary tumour elements more often showed retained PAX2 and WT1 expression, low Ki-67 labelling, and (in endometrial tumours) PR staining. Diverse architectural patterns suggest tubo-ovarian origin in a metastatic HGSC. Immunohistochemical results should be cautiously interpreted, particularly in small specimens.