Gleason grade 5 prostate cancer: sub-patterns and prognosis

Contemporary Diagnostic Reporting for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Morphologic Aspects, Molecular Correlates, and Management Perspectives

The diagnosis and reporting of prostatic adenocarcinoma have evolved from the classic framework promulgated by Dr Donald Gleason in the 1960s into a complex and nuanced system of grading and reporting that nonetheless retains the essence of his remarkable observations. The criteria for the "Gleason patterns" originally proposed have been continually refined by consensuses in the field, and Gleason scores have been stratified into a patient-friendly set of prognostically validated and widely adopted Grade Groups. One product of this successful grading approach has been the opportunity for pathologists to report diagnoses that signal carefully personalized management, placing the surgical pathologist's interpretation at the center of patient care. At one end of the continuum of disease aggressiveness, personalized diagnostic care means to sub-stratify patients with more indolent disease for active surveillance, while at the other end of the continuum, reporting histologic markers signaling aggression allows sub-stratification of clinically significant disease. Whether contemporary reporting parameters represent deeper nuances of more established ones (eg, new criteria and/or quantitation of Gleason patterns 4 and 5) or represent additional features reported alongside grade (intraductal carcinoma, cribriform patterns of carcinoma), assessment and grading have become more complex and demanding. Herein, we explore these newer reporting parameters, highlighting the state of knowledge regarding morphologic, molecular, and management aspects. Emphasis is made on the increasing value and stakes of histopathologists' interpretations and reporting into current clinical risk stratification and treatment guidelines.

CCT6A dysregulation in surgical prostate cancer patients: association with disease features, treatment information, and prognosis

OBJECTIVE

Chaperonin-containing tailless complex polypeptide 1 subunit 6A (CCT6A) involves several solid cancers' development and progression, while its clinical utility in prostate cancer management is rarely revealed. Consequently, the present study intended to investigate the linkage of CCT6A with disease features, treatment information, and prognosis of surgical prostate cancer patients.

METHODS

CCT6A in 220 surgical prostate cancer patients was determined via immunohistochemistry. Additionally, survival analyses on data from the public databases were performed to validate the prognostic value of CCT6A further.

RESULTS

CCT6A expression was upregulated in tumor tissue than in adjacent tissue (P < 0.001). Increased CCT6A was related to elevated Gleason score (P < 0.001) and pathological T stage (P = 0.029). CCT6A was increased in patients with positive surgical margin status (vs. negative) (P = 0.029) and patients with adjuvant external-beam radiation therapy (vs. no) (P = 0.001). Concerning the prognostic value, high tumor CCT6A was linked with shortened disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.009), which was also validated through further Cox's proportional hazard regression model analyses (hazard ratio: 2.695, 95% CI: 1.086-6.683, P = 0.032), whereas CCT6A was not correlated with overall survival (OS) (P > 0.050). Additionally, the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis database indicated that high tumor CCT6A was related to shortened DFS (P = 0.036), but it was not associated with OS (P > 0.050); meanwhile, the Human Protein Atlas database suggested that high tumor CCT6A was linked with reduced OS (P = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Tumor CCT6A high expression correlates with the elevated Gleason score, pathological T stage, and shortened DFS in surgical prostate cancer patients.

Induction of more aggressive tumoral phenotypes in LNCaP and PC3 cells by serum exosomes from prostate cancer patients

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most frequent and sixth most fatal cancer in men worldwide. Despite its high prevalence, our understanding of its etiology and the molecular mechanisms involved in the progression of the disease is substantially limited. In recent years, the potential participation of exosomes in this process has been suggested. Therefore, we aim to study the effect of exosomes isolated from the serum of patients with PCa on various cellular processes associated with increased tumor aggressiveness in two PCa cell lines: LNCaP-FGC and PC3. The exosomes were isolated by filtration wand ultracentrifugation. Their presence was confirmed by immunodetection of specific markers and their size distribution was analyzed by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS). The results obtained demonstrated that serum exosomes from PCa patients increased migration of PC3 cells and neuroendocrine differentiation of LNCaP-FGC cells regardless of the grade of the tumor. PCa serum exosomes also enhanced the secretion of enzymes related to invasiveness and resistance to chemotherapeutics, such as extracellular matrix metalloproteases 2 and 9, and gamma-glutamyltransferase in both cell lines. Altogether, these findings support the pivotal participation of exosomes released by tumoral cells in the progression of PCa. Future studies on the molecular mechanisms involved in the observed changes could provide crucial information on this disease and help in the discovery of new therapeutic targets.

Hidden clues in prostate cancer - Lessons learned from clinical and pre-clinical approaches on diagnosis and risk stratification

The heterogeneity of prostate cancer is evident at clinical, morphological and molecular levels. To aid clinical decision making, a three-tiered system for risk stratification is used to designate low-, intermediate-, and high-risk of disease progression. Intermediate-risk prostate cancers are the most frequently diagnosed, and even with common diagnostic features, can exhibit vastly different clinical progression. Thus, improved risk stratification methods are needed to better predict patient outcomes. Here, we provide an overview of the improvements in diagnosis/prognosis arising from advances in pathology reporting of prostate cancer, which can improve risk stratification, especially for patients with intermediate-risk disease. This review discusses updates to pathology reporting of morphological growth patterns, and proposes the utility of integrating prognostic biomarkers or innovative imaging techniques to enhance clinical decision-making. To complement clinical studies, experimental approaches using patient-derived tumors have highlighted important cellular and morphological features associated with aggressive disease that may impact treatment response. The intersection of urology, pathology and scientific disciplines is required to work towards a common goal of understanding disease pathogenesis, improving the stratification of patients with intermediate-risk disease and subsequently defining optimal treatment strategies using precision-based approaches.