1
|
Li C, Li W, Liu C, Zheng H, Cai J, Wang S. Artificial intelligence in multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging: A review. Med Phys 2022; 49:e1024-e1054. [PMID: 35980348 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is an indispensable tool in the clinical workflow for the diagnosis and treatment planning of various diseases. Machine learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) methods, especially those adopting the deep learning technique, have been extensively employed to perform mpMRI image classification, segmentation, registration, detection, reconstruction, and super-resolution. The current availability of increasing computational power and fast-improving AI algorithms have empowered numerous computer-based systems for applying mpMRI to disease diagnosis, imaging-guided radiotherapy, patient risk and overall survival time prediction, and the development of advanced quantitative imaging technology for magnetic resonance fingerprinting. However, the wide application of these developed systems in the clinic is still limited by a number of factors, including robustness, reliability, and interpretability. This survey aims to provide an overview for new researchers in the field as well as radiologists with the hope that they can understand the general concepts, main application scenarios, and remaining challenges of AI in mpMRI. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Li
- Paul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China
| | - Wen Li
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Chenyang Liu
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Hairong Zheng
- Paul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China
| | - Jing Cai
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Shanshan Wang
- Paul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China.,Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, 518066, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ahangari S, Beck Olin A, Kinggård Federspiel M, Jakoby B, Andersen TL, Hansen AE, Fischer BM, Littrup Andersen F. A deep learning-based whole-body solution for PET/MRI attenuation correction. EJNMMI Phys 2022; 9:55. [PMID: 35978211 PMCID: PMC9385907 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-022-00486-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep convolutional neural networks have demonstrated robust and reliable PET attenuation correction (AC) as an alternative to conventional AC methods in integrated PET/MRI systems. However, its whole-body implementation is still challenging due to anatomical variations and the limited MRI field of view. The aim of this study is to investigate a deep learning (DL) method to generate voxel-based synthetic CT (sCT) from Dixon MRI and use it as a whole-body solution for PET AC in a PET/MRI system. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifteen patients underwent PET/CT followed by PET/MRI with whole-body coverage from skull to feet. We performed MRI truncation correction and employed co-registered MRI and CT images for training and leave-one-out cross-validation. The network was pretrained with region-specific images. The accuracy of the AC maps and reconstructed PET images were assessed by performing a voxel-wise analysis and calculating the quantification error in SUV obtained using DL-based sCT (PETsCT) and a vendor-provided atlas-based method (PETAtlas), with the CT-based reconstruction (PETCT) serving as the reference. In addition, region-specific analysis was performed to compare the performances of the methods in brain, lung, liver, spine, pelvic bone, and aorta. RESULTS Our DL-based method resulted in better estimates of AC maps with a mean absolute error of 62 HU, compared to 109 HU for the atlas-based method. We found an excellent voxel-by-voxel correlation between PETCT and PETsCT (R2 = 0.98). The absolute percentage difference in PET quantification for the entire image was 6.1% for PETsCT and 11.2% for PETAtlas. The regional analysis showed that the average errors and the variability for PETsCT were lower than PETAtlas in all regions. The largest errors were observed in the lung, while the smallest biases were observed in the brain and liver. CONCLUSIONS Experimental results demonstrated that a DL approach for whole-body PET AC in PET/MRI is feasible and allows for more accurate results compared with conventional methods. Further evaluation using a larger training cohort is required for more accurate and robust performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahar Ahangari
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Anders Beck Olin
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Thomas Lund Andersen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Adam Espe Hansen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Barbara Malene Fischer
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Flemming Littrup Andersen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|