Ranks underlie outcome of combining classifiers: Quantitative roles for diversity and accuracy

The DIRAC framework: Geometric structure underlies roles of diversity and accuracy in combining classifiers

Combining classification systems potentially improves predictive accuracy, but outcomes have proven impossible to predict. Similar to improving binary classification with fusion, fusing ranking systems most commonly increases Pearson or Spearman correlations with a target when the input classifiers are "sufficiently good" (generalized as "accuracy") and "sufficiently different" (generalized as "diversity"), but the individual and joint quantitative influence of these factors on the final outcome remains unknown. We resolve these issues. Building on our previous empirical work establishing the DIRAC (DIversity of Ranks and ACcuracy) framework, which accurately predicts the outcome of fusing binary classifiers, we demonstrate that the DIRAC framework similarly explains the outcome of fusing ranking systems. Specifically, precise geometric representation of diversity and accuracy as angle-based distances within rank-based combinatorial structures (permutahedra) fully captures their synergistic roles in rank approximation, uncouples them from the specific metrics of a given problem, and represents them as generally as possible.

Predicting drug toxicity at the intersection of informatics and biology: DTox builds a foundation

Hao et al. (2022) present DTox (deep learning for toxicology), a neural network designed to predict and probe the sites and potential mechanisms underlying chemical toxicity; results provide a map to facilitate modular testing and improvements across multiple disparate applications.

Improving SDG Classification Precision Using Combinatorial Fusion

Combinatorial fusion algorithm (CFA) is a machine learning and artificial intelligence (ML/AI) framework for combining multiple scoring systems using the rank-score characteristic (RSC) function and cognitive diversity (CD). When measuring the relevance of a publication or document with respect to the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations, a classification scheme is used. However, this classification process is a challenging task due to the overlapping goals and contextual differences of those diverse SDGs. In this paper, we use CFA to combine a topic model classifier (Model A) and a semantic link classifier (Model B) to improve the precision of the classification process. We characterize and analyze each of the individual models using the RSC function and CD between Models A and B. We evaluate the classification results from combining the models using a score combination and a rank combination, when compared to the results obtained from human experts. In summary, we demonstrate that the combination of Models A and B can improve classification precision only if these individual models perform well and are diverse.