Potentiation of morphine antiallodynic efficacy by ACPT-III, a Group III metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist, in rat spinal nerve ligation-induced neuropathic pain

Effect of metabotropic glutamate 5 receptor antagonists on morphine efficacy and tolerance in rats with neuropathic pain

The metabotropic glutamate 5 (mGlu5) receptor is involved in both pain processing and modulation of µ-opioid induced antinociception and antihyperalgesia. Systemic mGlu5 receptor antagonists 2-methyl-6-phenylethynylpyridine (MPEP) or 3-[(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl) ethynyl] pyridine (MTEP) provide antihyperalgesic effects in various pain models, but few studies have shown their interaction with morphine in neuropathic pain models. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of systemic and intrathecal MPEP/MTEP on morphine efficacy and tolerance in rats with chronic neuropathic pain. L5-6 spinal nerve ligation (SNL) was used to establish neuropathic pain model in rats. The Von Frey test and the hot water tail flick test were employed as behavior tests. Low, medium and high doses of MPEP/MTEP were tested for their effect on both acute morphine efficacy and chronic morphine tolerance. SNL provides sustained neuropathic pain on the ipsilateral hind paw of rats. Both systemic and intrathecal MPEP/MTEP had antiallodynia effects and boosted morphine's efficacy in a dose-dependent manner in the Von Frey tests but not in the tail flick tests. In fact, high doses of MTEP and MPEP attenuated morphine's antinociceptive effect in the latter test. After intrathecal chronic co-administration with morphine, low-doses of MTEP/MPEP attenuated morphine tolerance in both tests. Systemically, only MTEP attenuated morphine tolerance, and only in the Von Frey tests, not in the tail flick tests, whereas MPEP had no effect on morphine tolerance in either tests. The therapeutic use of mGlu5 receptor antagonists may have distinct effects in different pain models.

Antinociceptive effects of amiloride and benzamil in neuropathic pain model rats

Amiloride and benzamil showed antinocicepitve effects in several pain models through the inhibition of acid sensing ion channels (ASICs). However, their role in neuropathic pain has not been investigated. In this study, we investigated the effect of the intrathecal amiloride and benzamil in neuropathic pain model, and also examined the role of ASICs on modulation of neuropathic pain. Neuropathic pain was induced by L4-5 spinal nerve ligation in male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 100-120 g, and intrathecal catheterization was performed for drug administration. The effects of amiloride and benzamil were measured by the paw-withdrawal threshold to a mechanical stimulus using the up and down method. The expression of ASICs in the spinal cord dorsal horn was also analyzed by RT-PCR. Intrathecal amiloride and benzamil significantly increased the paw withdrawal threshold in spinal nerve-ligated rats (87%±12% and 76%±14%, P=0.007 and 0.012 vs vehicle, respectively). Spinal nerve ligation increased the expression of ASIC3 in the spinal cord dorsal horn (P=0.01), and this increase was inhibited by both amiloride and benzamil (P<0.001 in both). In conclusion, intrathecal amiloride and benzamil display antinociceptive effects in the rat spinal nerve ligation model suggesting they may present an alternative pharmacological tool in the management of neuropathic pain at the spinal level.

Contribution of opioid and metabotropic glutamate receptor mechanisms to inhibition of bladder overactivity by tibial nerve stimulation

The contribution of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR) and opioid receptors to inhibition of bladder overactivity by tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) was investigated in cats under α-chloralose anesthesia using LY341495 (a group II mGluR antagonist) and naloxone (an opioid receptor antagonist). Slow infusion cystometry was used to measure the volume threshold (i.e., bladder capacity) for inducing a large bladder contraction. After measuring the bladder capacity during saline infusion, 0.25% acetic acid (AA) was infused to irritate the bladder, activate the nociceptive C-fiber bladder afferents, and induce bladder overactivity. AA significantly (P < 0.0001) reduced bladder capacity to 26.6 ± 4.7% of saline control capacity. TNS (5 Hz, 0.2 ms) at 2 and 4 times the threshold (T) intensity for inducing an observable toe movement significantly increased bladder capacity to 62.2 ± 8.3% at 2T (P < 0.01) and 80.8 ± 9.2% at 4T (P = 0.0001) of saline control capacity. LY341495 (0.1-5 mg/kg iv) did not change bladder overactivity, but completely suppressed the inhibition induced by TNS at a low stimulus intensity (2T) and partially suppressed the inhibition at high intensity (4T). Following administration of LY341495, naloxone (0.01 mg/kg iv) completely eliminated the high-intensity TNS-induced inhibition. However, without LY341495 treatment a 10 times higher dose (0.1 mg/kg) of naloxone was required to completely block TNS inhibition. These results indicate that interactions between group II mGluR and opioid receptor mechanisms contribute to TNS inhibition of AA-induced bladder overactivity. Understanding neurotransmitter mechanisms underlying TNS inhibition of bladder overactivity is important for the development of new treatments for bladder disorders.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2010

This paper is the thirty-third consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2010 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurologic disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration (Section 16); and immunological responses (Section 17).