Extracorporeal shockwave therapy as a novel and potential treatment for degenerative cartilage and bone disease: Osteoarthritis. A qualitative analysis of the literature

Effectiveness of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Erectile Dysfunction: An Analysis of Sexual Function and Penile Hardness at Erection: An Umbrella Review

The present umbrella review of five systematic reviews and meta-analyses was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (Li-ESWT) in the treatment of vascular origin Erectile Dysfunction (ED). A search was carried out in the databases of Pubmed, Scopus, Medline, Scielo and Embase. Participants were divided into two groups: an experimental group receiving Li-ESWT and a control group receiving simulated shock waves. The main variable of this study is ED, measured using the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) and the Erection Hardness Score (EHS) scale. The results showed a statistically significant increase in the mean IIEF-EF score in the experimental group. Overall, four out of five articles reported an increase in the EHS score in the Li-ESWT group compared to the placebo. Concerning the treatment parameters, better outcomes were observed with an energy density of 0.09 mJ/mm2 and the application of 1500-2000 pulses. Additionally, a follow-up of 6-12 months resulted in greater improvement in ED compared to 3 months, although more studies investigating follow-ups beyond 12 months are needed. Obtaining conclusive and clear results is challenging; however, everything indicates that Li-ESWT is an innovative therapeutic alternative for vascular-origin ED due to its low risk and improvement in erectile function.

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Pain: A Narrative Review

Extracorporeal shock waves are high-intensity mechanical waves (500-1000 bar) of a microsecond duration with a morphology characterized by a rapid positive phase followed by a negative phase.

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal shock waves have been used for pain treatment for various sub-acute and chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) problems since 2000. The aim of this article is to update information on the role of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of various pathologies that cause MSK pain.

METHODS

Given that in the last two years, articles of interest (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses) have been published on less known indications, such as low back pain, nerve entrapments, osteoarthritis and bone vascular diseases, a literature search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Database, EMBASE, CINAHL and PEDro, with the aim of developing a narrative review of the current literature on this topic. The purposes of the review were to review possible new mechanisms of action, update the level of evidence for known indications and assess possible new indications that have emerged in recent years.

RESULTS

Although extracorporeal shock waves have mechanical effects, their main mechanism of action is biological, through a phenomenon called mechanotransduction. There is solid evidence that supports their use to improve pain in many MSK pathologies, such as different tendinopathies (epicondylar, trochanteric, patellar, Achilles or calcific shoulder), plantar fasciitis, axial pain (myofascial, lumbar or coccygodynia), osteoarthritis and bone lesions (delayed union, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, Kienbock's disease, bone marrow edema syndrome of the hip, pubis osteitis or carpal tunnel syndrome). Of the clinical indications mentioned in this review, five have a level of evidence of 1+, eight have a level of evidence of 1-, one indication has a level of evidence of 2- and two indications have a level of evidence of 3.

CONCLUSIONS

The current literature shows that ESWT is a safe treatment, with hardly any adverse effects reported. Furthermore, it can be used alone or in conjunction with other physical therapies such as eccentric strengthening exercises or static stretching, which can enhance its therapeutic effect.

Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review with meta-analysis and grade recommendations

Objective

To investigate extracorporeal shock wave therapy effect on knee osteoarthritis compared to a sham or kinesiotherapy by a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Data Sources

The search was performed in: Cochrane Library, PubMed, PEDro, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, LILACS, and Scielo.

Review methods

We performed the online search until October, 2022. The following terms were used (Osteoarthritis) AND (“knee joint”) AND (“Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy”). Eligibility criteria: (1) randomized clinical trials; (2) effects comparison of shockwave therapy to a sham or kinesiotherapy in individuals with knee osteoarthritis; (3) pain and physical function as outcome variables. Risk of bias assessed using the PEDro scale. PROSPERO registration (CRD42021235597).

Results

We identified 4217 studies, and 12 were included in the qualitative synthesis and the meta-analysis, totaling 403 individuals submitted to the intervention and 331 control individuals. Compared to sham, shockwave was favored in short-term for the function outcome (SMD = −1.93; 95%CI: [−2.77; −1.09]; I² = 83%; P < 0.01). For the pain outcome, the shockwave was favored in the short (MD = −2.05; 95%CI: [−2.59; −1.51]; I² = 84%; P < 0.01), medium (MD = −3.46; 95%CI: [−4.03; −2.89]; I² = 0%; P < 0.01) and long-term (MD = −2.01; 95%CI: [−3.36; −0.65]; I² = 98%; P < 0.01). The association with kinesiotherapy was favored in the short term for the function outcome (SMD = -1.88; 95%CI: [−2.98; −0.78]; I² = 94%; P < 0.01) and favored for the pain outcome in the short (MD = −1.44; 95%CI: [−1.81; −1.07]; I² = 37%; P = 0.14), medium (MD = −1,31; 95%CI: [−1.76; −0,85]; I² = 0%; P = 0.41), and long terms (MD = −1.63; 95%CI: [−1.73; −1.52]; I² = 0%; P = 0.43).

Conclusion

Shockwave therapy may improve functionality in patients with knee osteoarthritis in the short term and pain in all follow-up moments, compared with sham. When associated to kinesiotherapy, it may improve function in the short term and pain in all follow-up time points, although improvement in pain may not be clinically significant.

Physiotherapy treatment of lateral epicondylitis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Lateral epicondylitis is a tendinopathy with a prevalence of between 1-3% of the population aged 35-54 years. It is a pathology with a favorable evolution, but with frequent recurrences (which imply an economic extra cost).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to determine the efficacy of physiotherapy treatment for the treatment of epicondylitis and, if any, to identify the most appropriate techniques.

METHODS

A systematic search was carried out in October 2020 in the databases of PubMed, Cinahl, Scopus, Medline and Web of Science using the search terms: Physical therapy modalities, Physical and rehabilitation medicine, Rehabilitation, Tennis elbow and Elbow tendinopathy.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles were found, of which seven applied shock waves, three applied orthoses, three applied different manual therapy techniques, two applied some kind of bandage, one applied therapeutic exercise, one applied diacutaneous fibrolysis, one applied high intensity laser, and one applied vibration.

CONCLUSIONS

Manual therapy and eccentric strength training are the two physiotherapeutic treatment methods that have the greatest beneficial effects, and, furthermore, their cost-benefit ratio is very favorable. Its complementation with other techniques, such as shock waves, bandages or Kinesio® taping, among others, facilitates the achievement of therapeutic objectives, but entails an added cost.

Numerical Modeling of Shockwave Treatment of Knee Joint

Arthritis is a degenerative disease that primarily affects the cartilage and meniscus of the knee joint. External acoustic stimulation is used to treat this disease. This article presents a numerical model of the knee joint aimed at the computer-aided study of the regenerative effects of shockwave treatment. The presented model was verified and validated. A numerical analysis of the conditions for the regeneration of the tissues of the knee joint under shockwave action was conducted. The results allow us to conclude that to obtain the conditions required for the regeneration of cartilage tissues and meniscus (compressive stresses above the threshold value of 0.15 MPa to start the process of chondrogenesis; distortional strains above the threshold value of 0.05% characterized by the beginning of the differentiation of the tissues in large volumes; fluid pressure corresponding to the optimal level of 68 kPa to transfer tissue cells in large volumes), the energy flux density of therapeutic shockwave loading should exceed 0.3 mJ/mm².

Pain and Functional Scores in Patients Affected by Knee OA after Treatment with Pulsed Electromagnetic and Magnetic Fields: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of electromagnetic field treatment on the symptoms of knee osteoarthritis (OA). In addition, the influence of the type of control group and other covariates have been investigated to identify the sources of heterogeneity in the results of the available clinical trials.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials reporting pulsed electromagnetic field-based therapies for the treatment of knee OA have been included. Main outcomes were self-reported pain and activity scores collected by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and/or Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at short term after treatment.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies comprising 914 unique patients were included in the analysis. Overall reduction in pain score was observed after treatment (standardized mean difference -0.4059, P = 0.0091), while improvement in the activity score was not significant (standardized mean difference -0.4452, P = 0.0859). Type of control (i.e., placebo or alternative therapies) and time of follow-up resulted as the two major elements influencing the outcomes. Indeed, the restriction of the analysis to placebo-controlled trials demonstrated higher standardized mean differences between treatment and control groups, with lower P value for pain, while statistical significance became evident also for the activity score. On the contrary, no differences were observed pooling only studies comparing pulsed electromagnetic or magnetic fields to alternative treatments. In addition, longer follow-up correlated with lower differences between treated and control patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy effectively relieves knee OA symptoms at short term, but it is not superior to other conservative therapies such as physiotherapy.

Shockwave Treatment Enhanced Extracellular Matrix Production in Articular Chondrocytes Through Activation of the ROS/MAPK/Nrf2 Signaling Pathway

OBJECTIVE

Shockwave application is a potential treatment for osteoarthritis (OA), but the underlying mechanism remains unknown. Oxidative stress and a counterbalancing antioxidant system might be the key to understanding this mechanism. We hypothesized that reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the transcription factor nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2),which is an important regulator of cellular redox homeostasis, are plausible elements.

DESIGN

Porcine chondrocytes were cultured in a 3-dimensional pellet model and subjected to shockwaves. The effects of shockwaves with various energy-flux densities on optimal extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis were assessed. ROS, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, and the redox activity of Nrf2 were measured. To investigate the signaling mechanism involved in the shockwave treatment in chondrocytes, specific inhibitors of ROS, MAPK signaling, and Nrf2 activity were targeted.

RESULTS

Shockwaves increased ECM synthesis without affecting cell viability or proliferation. Furthermore, they induced transient ROS production mainly through xanthine oxidase. The phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and p38 and the nuclear translocation of Nrf2 were activated by shockwaves. By contrast, suppression of ROS signaling mitigated shockwave-induced MAPK phosphorylation, Nrf2 nuclear translocation, and ECM synthesis. Pretreatment of chondrocytes with the specific inhibitors of MEK1/2 and p38, respectively, mitigated the shockwave-induced nuclear translocation of Nrf2 and ECM synthesis. Nrf2 inhibition by both small hairpin RNA knockdown and brusatol reduced the shockwave-enhanced ECM synthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Shockwaves activated Nrf2 activity through the induction of transient ROS signaling and subsequently enhanced ECM synthesis in chondrocytes. This study provided fundamental evidence confirming the potential of shockwaves for OA management.

Biophysical Stimulation in Athletes' Joint Degeneration: A Narrative Review

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent degenerative joint disease and the main cause of pain and disability in elderly people. OA currently represents a significant social health problem, since it affects 250 million individuals worldwide, mainly adults aged over 65. Although OA is a multifactorial disease, depending on both genetic and environmental factors, it is reported that joint degeneration has a higher prevalence in former athletes. Repetitive impact and loading, joint overuse and recurrent injuries followed by a rapid return to the sport might explain athletes' predisposition to joint articular degeneration. In recent years, however, big efforts have been made to improve the prevention and management of sports injuries and to speed up the athletes' return-to-sport. Biophysics is the study of biological processes and systems using physics-based methods or based on physical principles. Clinical biophysics has recently evolved as a medical branch that investigates the relationship between the human body and non-ionizing physical energy. A physical stimulus triggers a biological response by regulating specific intracellular pathways, thus acting as a drug. Preclinical and clinical trials have shown positive effects of biophysical stimulation on articular cartilage, subchondral bone and synovia. This review aims to assess the role of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) and extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in the prevention and treatment of joint degeneration in athletes.

Extracorporeal shockwave treatment in knee osteoarthritis: therapeutic effects and possible mechanism

Osteoarthritis (OA), the most common degenerative joint disease, is characterized by the cardinal symptoms of chronic pain and restricted joint activity. The complicated pathological changes associated with OA and unclear mechanistic etiology have rendered existing non-surgical OA management options unsatisfactory. Increasing clinical and experimental evidence suggests that extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is beneficial in OA treatment. ESWT is found to have modifying effects on cartilage and subchondral bone alterations in OA progression, as well as the clinical complaints of patients, including chronic pain and limited joint activities. However, the specific treatment strategy regarding the dosage and frequency of ESWT is still underdetermined. This review discusses the existing evidence regarding the therapeutic indications and possible mechanism of ESWT for OA treatment.

Management of Muscle Spasticity in Children with Cerebral Palsy by Means of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy: A Systematic Review of the Literature

The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the management of muscle spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. An electronic database search was performed to identify studies relevant to the research question. Assessment of the quality of evidence in all relevant studies was performed with the help of the Oxford Center for Evidence-based Medicine guide. Four studies met our inclusion criteria for review: one was a low-quality randomized controlled clinical trial, two were individual case-control studies and one was a case series study. Reduction in muscle stiffness and improvement in joint range of motion were the outcomes in all of the selected studies that used extracorporeal shockwave therapy. However, considering the limited evidence provided by these studies, further research is needed to support the use of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the management of muscle spasticity in children with cerebral palsy.

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy improves pain and function in subjects with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

To examine the safety and effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) for reducing pain and improving functionality in people with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Google Scholar were systematically searched for randomized trials published up to September 30th of 2019. The main outcome measures to evaluate the treatment effect were pain, as reported on a visual analogue scale (VAS), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Secondary outcome measures were the range of motion (ROM) and walking tests. A quantitative analysis was conducted using the inverse variance method and the random effects model.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included (n = 782 participants and 877 knees). Moderate quality of evidence showed that ESWT causes a decrease on the pain VAS [mean difference (MD) = 1.7 cm; confidence interval (CI) 95%: 1.1-2.3] and WOMAC (MD = 13.9 points; CI 95%: 6.9-20.8). The effect of ESWT using medium energetic density was greater than with low or high density in the WOMAC (Chi² = 9.8, p = 0.002) and bordered statistical significance on the VAS (Chi² = 3.8, p = 0.05). Very low quality of evidence showed that ESWT causes moderate improvement in the knee ROM (MD = 17.5°; CI 95%: 9.4-25.5) and walking test [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.58; CI 95%: 0.35-0.81].

CONCLUSIONS

ESWT is an effective treatment for improving pain and functionality in patients with KOA in the short term with few minor side effects. Further clinical trials should include longer follow-up periods and be designed to lower the risk of bias.

Beneficial effects of manually assisted chiropractic adjusting instrument in a rabbit model of osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease characterized by injury of all joint tissues. Our previous study showed that in experimental osteoporosis, chiropractic manipulation (CM) exerts protective effects on bone. We here assessed whether CM might ameliorate OA by improving subchondral bone sclerosis, cartilage integrity and synovitis. Male New-Zealand rabbits underwent knee surgery to induce OA by anterior cruciate ligament injury. CM was performed using the chiropractic instrument ActivatorV 3 times/week for 8 weeks as follows: force 2 setting was applied to the tibial tubercle of the rabbit right hind limb (TM-OA), whereas the corresponding left hind limb received a false manipulation (FM-OA) consisting of ActivatorV firing in the air and slightly touching the tibial tubercle. After sacrifice, subchondral bone integrity was assessed in the tibiae by microCT and histology. Cartilage damage and synovitis were estimated by Mankin's and Krenn's scores, respectively, and histological techniques. Bone mineral density and content in both cortical and trabecular compartments of subchondral bone decreased in OA rabbits compared to controls, but partially reversed in the TM-OA group. Trabecular bone parameters in the latter group also showed a significant improvement compared to FM-OA group. Moreover RANKL, OPG, ALP and TRAP protein expression in subchondral bone significantly decreased in TM-OA rabbits with respect to FM-OA group. CM was associated with lower Mankin's and Krenn's scores and macrophage infiltrate together with a decreased protein expression of pro-inflammatory, fibrotic and angiogenic factors, in TM-OA rabbits with respect to FM-OA. Our results suggest that CM may mitigate OA progression by improving subchondral bone as well as cartilage and synovial membrane status.

Comparison of the effects between low- versus medium-energy radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy on knee osteoarthritis: A randomised controlled trial

Objective

This study aimed to compare the effects between low- versus medium-energy radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy on knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Method

Forty-five patients (26 women and 19 men) aged 45–55 years with grade 2 KOA were randomly assigned into the following three groups (all n = 15): Group A received low-energy radial shock wave therapy (2000 shock/session [10 Hz], energy flux density [EFD] 0.02 mJ/mm²) with strengthening exercises once per week for 4 weeks; Group B received medium-energy radial shock wave therapy (2000 shock/session [10 Hz], EFD 0.178 mJ/mm²) with strengthening exercises once per week for 4 weeks; and Group C (control group) received sham shock wave therapy with strengthening exercises once per week for 4 weeks. Severity of pain was determined using the visual analogue scale, and knee physical function was assessed using the Arabic version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score physical function short form. Knee proprioception was measured before and after the treatment programme using an isokinetic dynamometer.

Results

The within-group analysis showed significant differences in severity of pain, knee physical function, and knee proprioception in Groups A and B before and after the treatment programme (p < 0.05). The between-group analysis showed significant differences in all variables after treatment, with more significant differences observed in Group B than in Groups A and C (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Low- and medium-energy radial shock wave therapies are effective modalities for the treatment of KOA, with medium-energy radial shock wave therapy being superior to low-energy radial shock wave therapy.

Efficacy and safety of the extracorporeal shockwave therapy in patients with postherpetic neuralgia: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Background

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is one of the most common types of chronic neuropathic pain, which seriously affects quality of the life because of pain severity and poor response to the currently available treatments. The main strategies for PHN management are medication and invasive interventional therapies; however, these approaches have many adverse effects, so it is important to find another effective and safe treatment for PHN.

Methods

A single-center, single-blind randomized clinical trial will evaluate 98 study participants randomized in a 1:1 ratio into control and experimental groups. The control group will receive conventional treatment including medication therapy and invasive interventional therapy. The experimental group will receive extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in addition to conventional therapy. The primary outcome is pain intensity assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS); the secondary outcomes are the following: quality of life assessed by the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), psychological state for anxiety and depression measured by the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), and sleep quality measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Assessors blinded to the randomization will collect data during the intervention period at baseline and weeks 1, 4, and 12. The plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 will be assessed before and after ESWT to explore the biochemical mechanisms of ESWT in the treatment of PHN.

Discussion

This randomized controlled trial will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ESWT in patients with PHN and thus will provide clinical evidence for its use in the management of PHN and explore the potential biochemical mechanisms of this treatment.

Trial registration

www.ChiCTR.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR1900025828. Registered on 10 September 2019

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Osteoarthritis is the most common musculoskeletal disease. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy had shown an effect on osteoarthritis in both some animal experiments and clinical studies, but there was no systematic review to confirm the value of shockwave therapy in the treatment of all types of osteoarthritis and compare it with other traditional therapies (especially traditional Chinese medicine).

Method

PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, WANFANG database, and VIP database were searched up to December 10, 2019, to identify randomized controlled trials comparing shockwave therapy and other treatments for osteoarthritis. Visual analogue scale and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index were extracted and analyzed by RevMan and STATA software as outcomes of pain reduction and functional improvement. Adverse reactions were recorded to evaluate the safety of shockwave therapy.

Results

Shockwave therapy had significant improvement in both pain reduction and functional improvement compared with placebo, corticosteroid, hyaluronic acid, medication, and ultrasound (P < 0.05). In functional improvement, shockwave therapy showed statistical improvement compared with kinesiotherapy and moxibustion (P < 0.05) but not with acupotomy surgery (P = 0.24). A significant difference between shockwave therapy and platelet-rich plasma was observed in pain reduction (P < 0.05) but not in functional improvement (P = 0.89). Meanwhile, a statistical difference was found between shockwave therapy and fumigation in functional improvement (P < 0.05) but not in pain reduction (P = 0.26). Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference between shockwave therapy and manipulation in both pain reduction (P = 0.21) and functional improvement (P = 0.45). No serious adverse reaction occurred in all of studies.

Conclusions

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy could be recommended in the treatment of osteoarthritis as a noninvasive therapy with safety and effectiveness, but the grade of recommendations needs to be discussed in a further study.

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has become a common practice for treating knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, the effectiveness and safety of this treatment are still questionable. This meta-analysis is aimed at determining the degree of pain reduction and functional outcome after ESWT for knee OA.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other online databases. The articles comparing the outcomes between ESWT and controls were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Nine studies with 705 patients were included. The pooled data revealed significantly lower pain scores in the ESWT groups than in the control groups within two weeks of treatment and six months after treatment (visual analogue scale, - 1.59, p = 0.0003, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 2.45 to - 0.72 at 2 weeks; - 1.12, p = 0.005, 95% CI - 1.89 to - 0.34 at 6 months). The ESWT group also had better functional outcomes four to six weeks post treatment (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, - 11.96, p = 0.003, 95% CI - 19.76 to - 4.15). No rebound pain was noted for up to 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Using ESWT to treat knee OA may reduce pain and improve functional outcomes. The effect may last six months to one year. More prospective studies are needed to investigate the settings for ESWT to optimize treatment results.

Application and efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave treatment for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The increasing aging of the world population is accompanied by a rise in the incidence of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). There has been a growing interest in shockwave treatment for orthopedic diseases, including KOA. In previous trials, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) was compared to physical therapy or placebo in the treatment of KOA. However, the efficacy and safety of ESWT for KOA remains disputed. The present meta-analysis assessed the effects of ESWT in KOA. The PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Research Gate and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify comparative studies involving ESWT for patients with KOA. The outcome indicators included the visual analog scale (VAS) score, range of motion (ROM), the Lequesne index (LI) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC). In the comparison of the ESWT vs. placebo groups, the primary outcomes included the VAS score and ROM, while the LI was the secondary outcome. In the comparison of the ESWT vs. physical therapy groups, the primary outcomes included the pain score and ROM, while the secondary outcome was the WOMAC index. Relevant data were analyzed using RevMan v5.3. The ESWT group had a lower VAS core, larger ROM and a better LI than the placebo group after 1 month of therapy (P<0.05). Furthermore, at 1 month post-therapy, the ESWT group had a lower VAS score, larger ROM and a better WOMAC than the physical therapy group (P<0.05). The outcomes regarding pain, ROM, LI and WOMAC were significantly different between the two different groups (P<0.05). The present meta-analysis suggested that ESWT may achieve a better therapeutic effect for patients with KOA as compared to physical therapy. However, high-quality trials with large sample sizes are essential to substantiate these results.

Radial extracorporeal shock wave promotes the enhanced permeability and retention effect to reinforce cancer nanothermotherapeutics

Since most cancer nanomedicine relies on the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect to eradicate tumors, strategies that are able to promote nanoparticle (NP) delivery and extravasation are presupposed to elevate the EPR effect for more effective cancer therapeutics. However, nanothermotherapeutics still suffers from limited drug delivery into tumor sites, for even though numerous efforts have been made to enhance the selective tumor targeting of NPs. In this study, we uncovered that radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT), an important approach in physical therapy that has been overlooked in cancer treatment in the past, can largely improve the EPR-dependent tumor uptake of NPs. We here defined the optimal low dosage and desirable combinatory manner for rESWT in driving NP accumulation towards tumors. Two underlying biophysical mechanisms responsible for the rESWT-enhanced EPR effect were proposed. On one hand, rESWT-conducted compressive and tensile forces could relieve high intra-tumoral pressure; on the other hand, rESWT-induced cavitation bubbles could directly distend and disrupt tumor blood vessels. All these together synergistically promoted vessel vasodilation, tumor perfusion and NP extravasation. Further experiments revealed that the combinatory therapeutics between rESWT and nanothermotherapeutics greatly improved the tumor-killing efficacy. Thus, our findings open a new path to improve EPR-mediated drug delivery with the assistance of rESWT.

Clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

This study determined the clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and the predictors of its efficacy for knee osteoarthritis.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases and search engines, namely MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library Database, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), China Academic Journals Full-text Database, and Google Scholar, were searched until 5 March 2019, for randomized controlled trials without restrictions on language and publication year.

REVIEW METHODS

Eligible trials and extracted data were identified by two independent investigators. The included articles were subjected to a meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment. Outcomes of interest included treatment success rate, pain, and physical function outcomes. A meta-regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of treatment outcomes following shockwave therapy.

RESULTS

We included 50 trials (4844 patients) with a median (range) PEDro score of 6 (5-9). Meta-analyses results revealed an overall significant effect favoring shockwave therapy on the treatment success rate (odds ratio 3.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.21-4.69, P < 0.00001; heterogeneity (I²) = 62%), pain reduction (standardized mean difference (SMD) -2.02, 95% CI -2.38 to -1.67, P < 0.00001; I² = 95%), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function outcome (SMD -2.71, 95% CI -3.50 to -1.92, P < 0.00001; I² = 97%). Follow-up duration and energy flux density were independent significant predictors of shockwave efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Shockwave therapy is beneficial for knee osteoarthritis. Shockwave dosage, particularly the energy level and intervention duration, may have different contributions to treatment efficacy.

The effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on the treatment of moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis and cartilage lesion

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a major cause leading to chronic bone and muscle pain. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has been applied in treating KOA in recent years.

METHODS

From April 2016 to April 2017, 82 patients were diagnosed with KOA that received ESWT were selected as the ESWT group. The treatment parameters were as follows, 2.0 bar, 0.25 mJ/mm, and 8 Hz/s for twice a week for 4 weeks continuously. In addition, 104 patients receiving oral administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) from April 2015 to April 2016 were also selected as the NSAIDs group. At 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks upon the completion of treatment, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) were adopted to evaluate the changes in pain and function of patients in both groups. For the ESWT group, the 50-m quick walk time and gait analysis were applied to observe the functional recovery at 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks upon the completion of treatment; meanwhile, patients were followed up by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 24 weeks upon the completion of treatment, so as to observe the cartilage changes.

RESULTS

Differences in VAS, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after treatment were statistically significant compared with that before treatment (4.59 ± 0.5, P < .05; 2.55 ± 0.5, P < .05; 4.39 ± 0.49, P < .05). Differences in 4, 8, and 12 weeks after treatment were statistically significant compared with that before treatment (90.41 ± 6.64, P < .05; 59.94 ± 3.19, P < .05; 90.49 ± 6.87, P < .05). Gait analysis suggested differences in 50 m walk time, walking speed, swing phase, and stance phase 8 weeks after treatment were statistically significant compared with that before treatment (36.23 ± 4.08, P < .05; 1.25 ± 0.09, P < .05; 58.56 ± 0.87, P < .05; 41.44 ± 0.87, P < .05). Differences in the VAS and WOMAC at 4 and 8 weeks after treatment between ESWT group and NASIDs group were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The ESWT has potential in reducing pain and improving knee function, and the therapeutic effects may peak at 8 weeks after the completion of treatment. Further research is needed to arrive at a definitive conclusion.

Shockwave Targeting on Subchondral Bone Is More Suitable than Articular Cartilage for Knee Osteoarthritis

Our study compared the effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) on the subchondral bone and the articular cartilage in the treatment of early osteoarthritis (OA) of rat knee. The rats were divided into 5 groups which included Sham group, Meniscus group (ESWT applied on medial meniscus), OA group (arthrotomy and medial menisectomy (MMx) and anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT), T(M) group (arthrotomy and MMx and ACLT followed by ESWT on medial tibial subchondral bone) and Articular cartilage group (arthrotomy and MMx and ACLT followed by ESWT on medial articular cartilage). Evaluations included the pathological changes of the synovium, articular cartilage and subchondral bone, and compared with ESWT on the meniscus, medial tibial subchondral bone and articular cartilage. The ESWT (0.25 mJ/mm² and 800 impulses) did not cause any damages on the cartilage of the meniscus and the tissue of the joint when compared with Sham group. Among the treatment of osteoarthritic groups (OA, T(M) and Articular cartilage groups), T(M) group showed significant in pathological examination, micro-CT analysis, cartilage grading score and grading of synovium changes by compared with OA and Articular cartilage groups (P < 0.05) in the treatment of early OA knee. In immunohistochemical analysis, T(M) group significantly increased the expression of TGF-β1 but reduced DMP-1, MMP-13 and ADAMTS-5 in the cartilage by compared with OA group and Articular cartilage group (P < 0.05). Our results showed that subchondral bone was an excellent target than articular cartilage for ESWT on early knee osteoarthritis.