Development of the chest pain center: rationale, implementation, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness

Evaluation of a cardiac troponin process flow at the chest pain center with the shortest turnaround time

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction is crucial in chest pain management and cardiac troponin (cTn) test is an important step in it. Process improvement to shorten the test turnaround time (TAT) may improve patients' outcomes. The cTn test at chest pain center (CPC) of Zhongshan Hospital had the shortest TAT ever reported, but its process flow was not fully evaluated.

METHODS

We performed a stepwise evaluation of CPC cTn TAT and explored the potential factor that might cause delay. The performance of CPC cTn test was also compared with cTn test and human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test ordered from emergency department (ED).

RESULTS

At least 95% of CPC cTn tests were completed in 60 min, while 62% in 30 min. The medians of monthly order-to-collect time, collect-to-received time, and received-to-result time were ~7 min, ~3 min, and ~13 min, respectively. The samples collected at the bedside had longer collect-to-received time than the ones collected at the blood draw site next to the laboratory. Compared to ED cTn test and ED HCG test, CPC cTn test took less time in each step. A combination of the sample type switch and the centrifugation time reduction contributed the most to the shortening of TAT, which was reflected in the received-to-result time.

CONCLUSIONS

The current process flow of CPC cTn test satisfied the requirements of chest pain management, giving an example of how to implement process improvement for emergency medicine to shorten TAT of laboratory tests.

3 for the Price of 1: Teaching Chest Pain Risk Stratification in a Multidisciplinary, Problem-based Learning Workshop

Introduction

Chest pain is a common chief complaint among patients presenting to health systems and often leads to complex and intensive evaluations. While these patients are often cared for by a multidisciplinary team (primary care, emergency medicine, and cardiology), medical students usually learn about the care of these patients in a fragmented, single-specialty paradigm. The present and future care of patients with chest pain is multidisciplinary, and the education of medical students on the subject should be as well. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary, problem-based learning workshop to teach third-year medical students about risk assessment for patients presenting with chest pain, specifically focusing on acute coronary syndromes.

Methods

To create an educational experience consistent with multidisciplinary team-based care, we designed a multidisciplinary, problem-based learning workshop to provide medical students with an understanding of how patients with chest pain are cared for in a systems-based manner to improve outcomes. Participants included third-year medical students (n=219) at a single, tertiary care, academic medical center. Knowledge acquisition was tested in a pre-/post-retention test study design.

Results

Following the workshop, students achieved a 19.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] [17.3-22.2%]) absolute increase in scores on post-testing as compared to pre-testing. In addition, students maintained an 11.1% (95% CI [7.2-15.0%]) increase on a retention test vs. the pre-test.

Conclusion

A multidisciplinary, problem-based learning workshop is an effective method of producing lasting gains in student knowledge about chest pain risk stratification.

Out-of-hours exercise treadmill testing reduces length of hospital stay for chest pain admissions

AIMS

The objective was to examine the impact of out-of-hours exercise treadmill tests (ETTs) on length of hospital stay (LOS) for patients admitted to a chest pain assessment unit with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome.

METHODS

Prospective observational study with 30-day follow-up of low-to-intermediate-risk chest pain patients undergoing out-of-hours ETT. Eligible patients had a nonischemic ECG, normal 6-12-h ST-segment monitoring, a negative 12-h troponin T assay, and no contraindications to exercise. Observed LOS was compared to expected LOS in the absence of out-of-hours ETT, using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Estimated bed day savings and major adverse events at 30 days after discharge were examined.

RESULTS

Four hundred and twenty-two patients with a mean age of 52 years (SD 13 years, 25-83 years) were evaluated. Fifty-two per cent (n = 221) were men; 66% (n = 279) had one or less cardiovascular risk factors; and 79% (n = 334) of the patients presented on a Friday or Saturday. ETT was performed on a weekend day in 86% (n = 363) of the patients, facilitating same-day discharges in 71% (n =  300). The median LOS (interquartile range) was 1 day (1, 2 days) for patients assessed with out-of-hours ETT. The expected median LOS (IQR) was 3 days (2, 4 days) (P < 0.05) in the absence of out-of-hours ETT. Each out-of-hours ETT was estimated to save a mean (SD, range) of 1.6 (0.6, 1-4) bed days. Thirty-day mortality and readmission rates were 0 and 0.2% (1 of 422), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The availability of out-of-hours ETT facilitates safe early discharge and reduced LOS for low-to-moderate-risk patients admitted with symptoms of acute coronary syndrome.

An organized system of emergency care for patients with myocardial infarction: a reality?

An organized system of emergency care is an essential requirement for the modern treatment of ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. There is a strong need to deliver reperfusion therapy as soon as possible, with primary percutaneous coronary intervention being the preferred option if performed in a timely manner and thrombolytic therapy, particularly in the prehospital setting, being a good alternative if the primary percutaneous coronary intervention-related delay exceeds the equipoise. In this situation, emergency medical services have a primary role in rescuing patients from cardiac arrest, performing prehospital diagnosis, triage and treatment and safely transporting them to the most appropriate cardiological center, including interhospital transfer. A complete reorganization of the healthcare systems in different countries is frequently needed to build an ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction system of care, focusing on fast transport, use of telemedicine and diversion protocols to skip the unsuited centers.

How to improve the management of chest pain: hospitalists and use of prediction rules

BACKGROUND

Three percent of patients with acute myocardial infarction are still missed despite the excess number of admissions with chest pain. The purpose of this study was to review the characteristics of patients who were admitted with chest pain, to evaluate the appropriateness of admissions and the outcomes. We also discuss whether use of a prediction rule could have made a difference in the management of these cases.

METHODS

We performed retrospective chart review on all patients admitted to the hospitalist service with a diagnosis of chest pain. Each patient was risk stratified using Diamond and Forrester algorithm for probability of coronary artery disease (CAD), retrospectively. Results were analyzed using chi2 test or exact test and Student's t test.

RESULTS

Of 260 patients admitted with chest pain to the hospitalist service, only 24 (9.2%) received the final diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The patients in the ACS group were older and more likely to be male and to have a history of hyperlipidemia, CAD, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Of 34 patients who underwent cardiac catheterization, 20 (58.8%) had occlusive CAD and 14 of them received PCI. Risk stratification of patients, retrospectively, revealed 28.3% of the total patient population was high risk, while 6.6% of them were low risk. The number of ACS cases was highest in the high risk group, while none was detected in the low risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that using a prediction rule could have prevented about 6% of the chest pain admissions. Therefore, the use of risk stratification methods should be encouraged to decrease cost and improve efficiency of care.