Diagnostic strategies for the evaluation of the patient presenting with chest pain

Incidence and predictors of acute coronary syndrome within a year following a negative stress test-a false sense of security: is routine screening any useful?

One of the major issues in management of the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is classification of patients with atypical presentation who have low risk of having a coronary episode at presentation. There have been multiple studies on the stratification of high risk patients and medical management of such cases, however, there is a sub-class of patients who do not fit any category. In this paper, we have looked at the current literature on stratification of patients based on the study tools available and the risk of having a coronary episode during the following year. In our overview, we have found that the current methods in place namely, cardiac stress test and stress echocardiogram have a good prognostic factor in terms of mortality in the next one year and can safely stratify the patients at low risk when correlated with clinical presentation and laboratory studies. However, such data are limited for computerized tomography or magnetic resonant imaging and their application might be limited due to accessibility and cost of studies. Current guidelines for classification of high risk patient do an excellent job and we believe that proper application of stress tests together with other imaging modalities together with laboratory, clinical judgment, and proper use of medical management can help with safe discharge of patients from the emergency department (ED) and reduction of burden from healthcare.

The efficacy and safety of a chest pain protocol for short stay unit patients: A one year follow-up

BACKGROUND

The Alfred Emergency Short Stay Unit initiated a chest pain protocol for patients presenting with chest pain to risk stratify for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A 30-day follow-up of patients discharged with low-or-intermediate risk of ACS demonstrated no deaths or ACS.

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety of the chest pain protocol, a one year follow-up was undertaken.

METHODS

A questionnaire was designed for the one-year follow-up and it was administered via a telephone interview by emergency nurses to document adverse cardiac events and health care utilisation.

RESULTS

From 297 patients, 224 (75%) were contacted 12 months following discharge. There was one death from stroke (0.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01-2.5%) and another from an unknown cause. Five patients had been diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (2.2%; 95% CI: 0.7-5.1%), two patients had an acute myocardial infarction (0.9%; 95% CI: 0.03-2.1%) and four were diagnosed with angina (1.8%; 95% CI: 0.9-3.2%). Nearly half (n=103, 46%; 95% CI: 39.5-52.5%) had returned to the emergency department (ED) for various conditions including 42 patients with further chest pain. Ninety-six patients (43%; 95% CI: 39.3-52.7%) had specialist referrals and 124 investigations were performed. Thirty-four patients had cardiology referrals (15%; 95% CI: 10.7-20.5%) and 25 patients had gastroenterology referrals (11%; 95% CI: 7.3-16.0%). Diagnostic cardiac tests were performed on 38 patients: coronary angiography (n=10), 24-hour Holter monitoring (n=17), 24-hour blood pressure (BP) monitoring (n=4), thallium scans (n=5), exercise stress test (n=1) and CT scan (n=1).

CONCLUSION

Patients had a low risk of adverse events 12 months after discharge but substantial continuing health care utilization was observed. Complete assessment by health care professionals prior to discharge may help mitigate representations.

Noninvasive Imaging Techniques to Aid in the Triage of Patients with Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Review

The evaluation, treatment, and disposition of patients with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the Emergency Department continues to be a clinical challenge. Many patients with suggestive symptoms are admitted to the hospital to rule out a myocardial infarction by serial enzyme tests and EKGs and receive an expedited work-up for ischemia. However, the diagnosis can be difficult, given the wide range of potentially atypical symptoms that can signal ACS, which remains a major clinical risk for patients and a liability risk for emergency physicians. This article reviews imaging technologies such as echocardiography and nuclear perfusion imaging used currently in the diagnosis of ACS and rapidly advancing technologies such as CT and MRI that may be able to visualize calcifications, plaques, occlusions, and infarctions noninvasively in real time. Some noninvasive tests used to complete an ischemia work-up after serial enzyme testing and EKGs, such as exercise EKG, stress echocardiography, and stress perfusion imaging, also are reviewed.