1
|
Listabarth S, König D, Berlakovich G, Munda P, Ferenci P, Kollmann D, Gyöeri G, Waldhoer T, Groemer M, van Enckevort A, Vyssoki B. Sex Disparities in Outcome of Patients with Alcohol-Related Liver Cirrhosis within the Eurotransplant Network—A Competing Risk Analysis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11133646. [PMID: 35806931 PMCID: PMC9267400 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is one of the most important risk factors for the development of alcohol-related liver cirrhosis (ALC). Importantly, psychiatrists are an integral part of the interdisciplinary care for patients with AUD and ALC. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether sex influences the outcome within this group of patients. For this purpose, data of all registrations for liver transplantations due to ALC within the Eurotransplant region from 2010 to 2019 were analyzed for sex disparities using competing risk models and in-between group comparisons. Relevant sex differences in registration numbers (24.8% female) and investigated outcomes were revealed. Risk ratios for a positive outcome, i.e., transplantation (0.74), and those of adverse outcomes, i.e., removal from waiting list (1.44) and death on waiting list (1.10), indicated a relative disadvantage for female patients with ALC. Further, women listed for liver transplantations were significantly younger than their male counterparts. Notably, sex disparities found in registration and outcome parameters were independent of differences found in the prevalence of AUD and liver transplantations. Further research is necessary to identify the underlying mechanisms and establish strategies to ensure equity and utility in liver transplantations due to ALC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Listabarth
- Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (S.L.); (D.K.); (M.G.); (B.V.)
| | - Daniel König
- Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (S.L.); (D.K.); (M.G.); (B.V.)
| | - Gabriela Berlakovich
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (G.B.); (D.K.); (G.G.)
| | - Petra Munda
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (P.M.); (P.F.)
| | - Peter Ferenci
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (P.M.); (P.F.)
| | - Dagmar Kollmann
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (G.B.); (D.K.); (G.G.)
| | - Georg Gyöeri
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (G.B.); (D.K.); (G.G.)
| | - Thomas Waldhoer
- Center for Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +43-(0)1-40160-34720
| | - Magdalena Groemer
- Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (S.L.); (D.K.); (M.G.); (B.V.)
| | | | - Benjamin Vyssoki
- Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (S.L.); (D.K.); (M.G.); (B.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dowling A, Lane H, Haines T. Community preferences for the allocation of scarce healthcare resources during the Covid-19 pandemic: a review of the literature. Public Health 2022; 209:75-81. [PMID: 35849934 PMCID: PMC9212404 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Objective The purpose of this thematic review is to examine the literature on the publics’ preferences of scarce medical resource allocation during COVID-19. Study design Literature review. Methods A review of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus was performed between December 2019 and June 2022 for eligible articles. Results Fifteen studies using three methodologies and spanning five continents were included. Five key themes were identified: (1) prioritise the youngest; (2) save the most lives; (3) egalitarian allocation approaches; (4) prioritise healthcare workers; and (5) bias against particular groups. The public gave high priority to allocation that saved the most lives, particularly to patients who are younger and healthcare workers. Themes present but not supported as broadly were giving priority to individuals with disabilities, high frailty or those with behaviours that may have contributed to their ill-health (e.g. smokers). Allocation involving egalitarian approaches received the least support among community members. Conclusion The general public prefer rationing scarce medical resources in the COVID-19 pandemic based on saving the most lives and giving priority to the youngest and frontline healthcare workers rather than giving preference to patients with disabilities, frailty or perceived behaviours that may have contributed to their own ill-health. There is also little public support for allocation based on egalitarian strategies.
Collapse
|
3
|
Díaz-Cobacho G, Cruz-Piqueras M, Delgado J, Hortal-Carmona J, Martínez-López MV, Molina-Pérez A, Padilla-Pozo Á, Ranchal-Romero J, Rodríguez-Arias D. Public Perception of Organ Donation and Transplantation Policies in Southern Spain. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:567-574. [PMID: 35303996 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This research explores how public awareness and attitudes toward donation and transplantation policies may contribute to Spain's success in cadaveric organ donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS A representative sample of 813 people residing in Andalusia (Southern Spain) were surveyed by telephone or via Internet between October and December 2018. RESULTS Most participants trust Spain's donation and transplantation system (93%) and wish to donate their organs after death (76%). Among donors, a majority have expressed their consent (59%), and few nondonors have expressed their refusal (14%). Only a minority are aware of the presumed consent system in force (28%) and feel sufficiently informed regarding the requirements needed to be an organ donor (16%). Participants mainly consider that relatives should represent the deceased's preferences and be consulted when the deceased's wishes are unknown, as is the case in Spain. CONCLUSION Public trust in the transplant system may contribute to Spain's high performance in organ donation. High levels of societal support toward organ donation and transplantation do not correspond with similar levels of public awareness of donation and transplantation policies in Spain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gonzalo Díaz-Cobacho
- Department of Philosophy 1, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; FiloLab-UGR Scientific Unit of Excellence, University of Granada, Spain
| | | | - Janet Delgado
- Department of Philosophy 1, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; ELPAT-ESOT Public Issues Working Group, European Society of Organ Transplantation, Padova, Italy; FiloLab-UGR Scientific Unit of Excellence, University of Granada, Spain
| | - Joaquín Hortal-Carmona
- Department of Philosophy 1, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; Centro de salud Albayzín, Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Granada, Spain
| | - M Victoria Martínez-López
- Department of Philosophy 1, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; ELPAT-ESOT Public Issues Working Group, European Society of Organ Transplantation, Padova, Italy; FiloLab-UGR Scientific Unit of Excellence, University of Granada, Spain
| | - Alberto Molina-Pérez
- Department of Philosophy 1, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; ELPAT-ESOT Public Issues Working Group, European Society of Organ Transplantation, Padova, Italy; FiloLab-UGR Scientific Unit of Excellence, University of Granada, Spain; Institute for Advanced Social Studies, Spanish National Research Council (IESA-CSIC), Córdoba, Spain
| | - Álvaro Padilla-Pozo
- Department of Political and Social Sciences, University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julia Ranchal-Romero
- Institute for Advanced Social Studies, Spanish National Research Council (IESA-CSIC), Córdoba, Spain
| | - David Rodríguez-Arias
- Department of Philosophy 1, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; ELPAT-ESOT Public Issues Working Group, European Society of Organ Transplantation, Padova, Italy; FiloLab-UGR Scientific Unit of Excellence, University of Granada, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bel′eed-Akkari K, Hafidh K, Hajjaji I, Beshyah S, Elkhammas E. Solid organ transplantation medicine in Arab countries: A Narrative Review Focused on Ethical Aspects. IBNOSINA JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES 2021. [DOI: 10.4103/ijmbs.ijmbs_16_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
5
|
Organ donation in the US and Europe: The supply vs demand imbalance. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2020; 35:100585. [PMID: 33071161 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2020.100585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Organ donation and transplantation remain the best and most cost-effective clinical solution for end-stage organ failure. Several agencies across the US and Europe provide legislative, regulatory, and humanitarian services to generate smoother applications in all transplantation processes and donor-recipient relationships. US and European statistics present nine types of grafts, with kidneys being the most transplanted organ worldwide. However, organ shortage, religion, underrepresented minority groups, difficulties in obtaining consent, lack of understanding, and general ethical concerns present challenging barriers to organ donation, reflecting the complexity of graft procurement and allocation. Breaking down these barriers to reduce the organ-supply imbalance requires an appropriate multifaceted approach. Some of the key areas include increasing the potential donor pool and consent rates, apt organ allocation, and improving organ health. Additionally, suitable policies and standardized guidelines for both donors and recipients, alongside educational initiatives, are needed to ensure patient safety and global awareness. Looking forward, novel and effective research plans and initiatives are needed if we are to avoid a colossal supply-demand gap.
Collapse
|
6
|
Neuberger J, Callaghan C. Organ utilization - the next hurdle in transplantation? Transpl Int 2020; 33:1597-1609. [PMID: 32935386 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Nonutilization of organs from consented deceased donors remains a significant factor in limiting patient access to transplantation. Critical to reducing waste is a clear understanding of why organs are not used: accurate metrics are essential to identify the extent and causes of waste but use of these measures as targets or comparators between units/jurisdictions must be done with caution as focus on any one measure may result in unintended adverse consequences. Comparison between centres or countries may be misleading because of variation in definitions, patient or graft characteristics. Two of the most challenging areas to improve appropriate deceased donor organ utilization are appetite for risk and lack of validated tools to help identify an organ that will function appropriately. Currently, the implanting surgeon is widely considered to be accountable for the use of a donated organ so guidelines must be clear to allow and support sensible decisions and recognition that graft failure or inadvertent disease transmission are not necessarily attributable to poor decision-making. Accepting an organ involves balancing risk and benefit for the potential recipient. Novel technologies such as machine perfusion may allow for more robust guidance as to the functioning of the organ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chris Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital and the Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fifer CG, Cohen MS, Peng DM. A Noncompliant Teen Needs a Second Heart Transplant. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 108:1282-1284. [PMID: 31653289 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Carlen G Fifer
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Michigan C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, 1540 E Hospital Dr SPC 4284, Flr 11 Reception C, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-4284.
| | - Meryl S Cohen
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David M Peng
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Michigan C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ethical and legal implications of elective ventilation and organ transplantation: "medicalization" of dying versus medical mission. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2014; 2014:973758. [PMID: 25126582 PMCID: PMC4122128 DOI: 10.1155/2014/973758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2013] [Revised: 05/24/2014] [Accepted: 05/31/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
A critical controversy surrounds the type of allowable interventions to be carried out in patients who are potential organ donors, in an attempt to improve organ perfusion and successful transplantation. The main goal is to transplant an organ in conditions as close as possible to its physiological live state. “Elective ventilation” (EV), that is, the use of ventilation for the sole purpose of retrieving the organs of patients close to death, is an option which offsets the shortage of organ donation. We have analyzed the legal context of the dying process of the organ donor and the feasibility of EV in the Italian context. There is no legal framework regulating the practice of EV, neither is any real information given to the general public. A public debate has yet to be initiated. In the Italian cultural and legislative scenario, we believe that, under some circumstances (i.e., the expressed wishes of the patient, even in the form of advance directives), the use of EV does not violate the principle of beneficence. We believe that the crux of the matter lies in the need to explore the real determination and will of the patient and his/her orientation towards the specific aim of organ donation.
Collapse
|
9
|
Hwang DY, Gilmore EJ, Greer DM. Assessment of Brain Death in the Neurocritical Care Unit. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2013; 24:469-82. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2013.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|