1
|
Cooper TJ, Cleland JG, Guazzi M, Pellicori P, Ben Gal T, Amir O, Al-Mohammad A, Clark AL, McConnachie A, Steine K, Dickstein K. Effects of sildenafil on symptoms and exercise capacity for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and pulmonary hypertension (The SilHF study): A randomised placebo-controlled multicentre trial. Eur J Heart Fail 2022; 24:1239-1248. [PMID: 35596935 PMCID: PMC9544113 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims Pulmonary hypertension (PHT) may complicate heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and is associated with a substantial symptom burden and poor prognosis. Sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase‐5 (PDE‐5) inhibitor, might have beneficial effects on pulmonary haemodynamics, cardiac function and exercise capacity in HFrEF and PHT. The aim of this study was to determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of sildenafil in patients with HFrEF and indirect evidence of PHT. Methods and results The Sildenafil in Heart Failure (SilHF) trial was an investigator‐led, randomized, multinational trial in which patients with HFrEF and a pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) ≥40 mmHg by echocardiography were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive sildenafil (up to 40 mg three times/day) or placebo. The co‐primary endpoints were improvement in patient global assessment by visual analogue scale and in the 6‐min walk test at 24 weeks. The planned sample size was 210 participants but, due to problems with supplying sildenafil/placebo and recruitment, only 69 patients (11 women, median age 68 (interquartile range [IQR] 62–74) years, median left ventricular ejection fraction 29% (IQR 24–35), median PASP 45 (IQR 42–55) mmHg) were included. Compared to placebo, sildenafil did not improve symptoms, quality of life, PASP or walk test distance. Sildenafil was generally well tolerated, but those assigned to sildenafil had numerically more serious adverse events (33% vs. 21%). Conclusion Compared to placebo, sildenafil did not improve symptoms, quality of life or exercise capacity in patients with HFrEF and PHT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John Gf Cleland
- National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK.,Robertson Centre for Biostatistics and Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, UK
| | - Marco Guazzi
- Cardiology Department, University of Milano, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Pellicori
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics and Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, UK
| | - Tuvia Ben Gal
- Heart Failure Unit, Cardiology department, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Offer Amir
- Division of Cardiology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University Jerusalem Israel & Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Zfat, Israel
| | - Abdallah Al-Mohammad
- Cardiology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andrew L Clark
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK
| | - Alex McConnachie
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics and Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, UK
| | - Kjetil Steine
- Department of Cardiology, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kenneth Dickstein
- University of Bergen, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hirani N, Brunner NW, Kapasi A, Chandy G, Rudski L, Paterson I, Langleben D, Mehta S, Mielniczuk L. Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Thoracic Society Position Statement on Pulmonary Hypertension. Can J Cardiol 2020; 36:977-992. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.11.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Revised: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
3
|
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) due to left heart disease, or WHO group 2 PH, is the most frequent cause of PH. It affects approximately 50% to 60% of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction as well as 60% of those with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and contributes significantly to disease progression and unfavorable outcomes. The diagnosis of PH is associated with poor prognosis and significant morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
|
4
|
Jose A, King CS, Shlobin OA, Kiernan JM, Cossa NA, Brown AW, Nathan SD. Ventricular Diastolic Pressure Ratio as a Marker of Treatment Response in Pulmonary Hypertension. Chest 2017; 152:980-989. [PMID: 28527879 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2017] [Revised: 03/30/2017] [Accepted: 05/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is diagnosed and classified through right-sided heart catheterization, with a number of hemodynamic markers used to help guide treatment decisions. These markers may not reflect the complex remodeling of the right ventricle or the interplay between ventricles and struggle to predict treatment response. This study investigates the use of a novel marker: the ratio of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure to right ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP/RVEDP) in predicting treatment outcomes in a cohort of patients with PH. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with PH at INOVA Fairfax Hospital's advanced lung disease program with simultaneous left-sided and right-sided heart catheterization. The primary end point was the time to clinical improvement, defined by an improvement in distance walked on the 6-min walk test (6MWT) of > 35 m in a year without interceding hospitalization for worsening PH or the need for additional PH therapy. RESULTS A total of 51 patients were included in the final analysis, 21 of whom (41.2%) had a salutary treatment effect with a mean improvement in the 6MWT of 75 m. Treatment responders were more likely to have a lower LVEDP/RVEDP ratio (1.08 vs 1.62; P = .051). This association persisted in the final multivariate regression model after adjustment for age and sex and controlling for severity of PH (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.65; P = .024). CONCLUSIONS The LVEDP/RVEDP ratio is a novel marker for therapeutic response in patients with PH treated with pulmonary vasodilator medications and may offer robust predictive value independent of existing markers of disease severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arun Jose
- Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine Division, The George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC.
| | - Christopher S King
- Advanced Lung Disease and Transplant Program, INOVA Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA
| | - Oksana A Shlobin
- Advanced Lung Disease and Transplant Program, INOVA Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA
| | - Joseph M Kiernan
- Cardiovascular Disease and Interventional Cardiology Program, INOVA Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA
| | - Nicolas A Cossa
- Cardiovascular Disease and Interventional Cardiology Program, INOVA Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA
| | - A Whitney Brown
- Advanced Lung Disease and Transplant Program, INOVA Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA
| | - Steven D Nathan
- Advanced Lung Disease and Transplant Program, INOVA Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA
| |
Collapse
|