Recurrent Pericarditis

Efficacy and Safety of Interleukin-1 Inhibitors in the Management of Patients with Recurrent Pericarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of interleukin-1 (IL-1) inhibitors in patients with recurrent pericarditis (RP) remain to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the impact of IL-1 inhibitors on patients suffering from RP.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched to identify articles investigating the effects of IL-1 inhibitors in patients with RP up until January 2024. Relevant data on study characteristics and results were selected based on predefined criteria. The results were combined using a random effects model.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 102 patients from three open-label randomized controlled trials. Overall, the use of IL-1 inhibitors, in comparison to placebo, demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of pericarditis recurrence [risk ratio (RR) 0.13; 95% confident interval (CI) 0.05-0.30; p < 0.05; I2 = 0%]. However, the administration of IL-1 inhibitors may lead to certain adverse events (AEs), including infections and injection-site reactions. The risk of AEs is significantly higher with IL-1 inhibitors compared with placebo (RR 1.88; 95% CI 1.30-2.72; p < 0.05; I2 = 0%). Nevertheless, the occurrence of serious AEs among patients was relatively rare, and no fatalities were reported.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that IL-1 inhibitors can effectively reduce the risk of recurrence in patients with RP and are relatively safe.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO identifier number CRD42023492904.

Relapsing pericarditis: Peripheral blood neutrophilia, lymphopenia and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio herald acute attacks, high-grade inflammation, multiserosal involvement, and predict multiple recurrences

AIMS

To identify peripheral blood cellular correlates of active pericarditis and to verify whether peripheral blood neutrophils, lymphocytes and the neutrophil to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are associated with disease phenotype or prognosis.

METHODS

Observational prospective study on a cohort of 63 patients with idiopathic pericarditis followed for 12 months after each pericarditis recurrence. Two distinct analyses were performed: the "index attack" analysis focused on the first pericarditis episode in each patient, while the "all attacks" analysis included all episodes occurring during the study.

RESULTS

Absolute and relative neutrophilia and lymphopenia, together with high NLR, were observed during active pericarditis, as compared with disease remission, at both analyses. Neutrophils showed a positive correlation with plasma C-reactive protein levels, while lymphocyte count showed a negative correlation. Relative neutrophil count was higher, and lymphocyte count lower in patients with pleural effusion; a higher NLR and lower absolute lymphocyte count were observed in those with peritoneal involvement. No correlations were found between peripheral blood neutrophil or lymphocyte counts and size of pericardial effusion, or with the presence of myocardial involvement. Peripheral neutrophilia, lymphopenia and NLR during acute attacks predicted the number of recurrences in the following 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral blood neutrophilia and lymphopenia are typical of acute idiopathic pericarditis. Acute attacks of pericarditis are associated with neutrophilia and lymphopenia, as compared with disease remission. During acute attacks, neutrophilia and lymphopenia reflect the extent of serosal inflammation and could help to customize therapeutic management after remission has been achieved.

Interleukin-1 Trap Rilonacept Improved Health-Related Quality of Life and Sleep in Patients With Recurrent Pericarditis: Results From the Phase 3 Clinical Trial RHAPSODY

Background Recurrent pericarditis is characterized by painful flares and inflammation, which negatively impact health-related quality of life. RHAPSODY (rilonacept inhibition of interleukin-1 alpha and beta for recurrent pericarditis: a pivotal symptomatology and outcomes study) evaluated the efficacy and safety of rilonacept (IL-1α and -β cytokine trap) in recurrent pericarditis. A secondary analysis of these data evaluated the patient-reported outcome questionnaire score change during the trial. Methods and Results Participants completed 5 patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires assessing pericarditis pain, health-related quality of life, general health status, sleep impact, and overall symptom severity. PRO score changes during the treatment run-in period (12 weeks) and the blinded randomized withdrawal period (up to 24 weeks) were evaluated using descriptive statistics and mixed model repeated measures analyses. Participants with PRO data from the run-in period (n=84) and the randomized withdrawal period (n=61; 30 rilonacept, 31 placebo) were included in analyses. Run-in baseline PRO scores indicated that pericarditis symptoms during pericarditis recurrence impacted health-related quality of life. All PRO scores significantly improved (P<0.001) on rilonacept treatment during the run-in period. For the randomized withdrawal period, PRO scores were maintained for participants receiving rilonacept. For those receiving placebo and who experienced a recurrence, PRO scores deteriorated at the time of recurrence and then improved following rilonacept bailout. At randomized withdrawal Week 24/End of Study, scores of participants who received bailout rilonacept were similar to those of participants who had continued rilonacept. Conclusions These results demonstrate the burden of pericarditis recurrences and the improved physical and emotional health of patients with recurrent pericarditis while on rilonacept treatment. These findings extend prior rilonacept efficacy results, demonstrating improvements in patient-reported health-related quality of life, sleep, pain, and global symptom severity while on treatment. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03737110.

Incessant pericarditis following the second dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine successfully treated with anakinra: a case report

Background

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to the development of the first mRNA vaccines used in humans. These vaccines are well tolerated, safe, and highly effective; however, post-marketing surveillance is revealing potential rare adverse effects. We report a case of incessant pericarditis following administration of the second dose of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, unresponsive to conventional therapy, and successfully treated with anakinra.

Case summary

A 30-year-old man presented to the Emergency Department for incessant pericarditis unresponsive to evacuative pericardiocentesis and conventional first-line anti-inflammatory therapy. Given the typical ‘inflammatory phenotype’ clinically characterized by fever, C-reactive protein (CRP) elevation, and leucocytosis, we decided, in agreement with the rheumatologist team, to avoid glucocorticoid and to administer anakinra. A sudden clinical and echocardiographic improvement was observed, with complete resolution of the symptoms and of the pericardial effusion; similarly, CRP values progressively decreased. The patient was discharged at home; no recurrences of pericarditis were described at clinical and instrumental follow-up made 3 months later.

Discussion

Several cases of pericarditis have been described in patients who received the COVID-19 vaccination, especially with the mRNA vaccine that can induce a non-adaptive immunity response against the viral spike protein, triggering cardiac damage for a molecular mimicry mechanism; however, defined pathogenesis of pericarditis associated with mRNA vaccine is still missing. The clinical scenario described is characterized by the typical ‘inflammatory phenotype’, triggered by a disproportionate and uncontrolled activation of the inflammasome based on an interleukin-1 (IL-1) overproduction. We administered anakinra, an IL-1 blocking drug, with a sharp clinical, echocardiographic and laboratoristic improvement. The complete response observed in this case suggests that vaccine-related pericarditis could be triggered by an auto-inflammatory pathway based on IL-1 overproduction. Further research is, therefore, warranted to determine the mechanisms by which the mRNA vaccine may cause pericarditis in order to choose the most targeted therapy.

Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Pericarditis: Definitions and New Treatments

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The purpose of the review is to analyze the pathogenetic mechanisms that underlie acute pericarditis, with attention to autoimmune and autoinflammatory pericarditis, and, in addition, to review the available therapeutic armamentarium.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several studies have been published on the use of anti-IL-1 drugs in recurrent pericarditis, including anakinra and rilonacept. The latest, the RHAPSODY study, based on the use of rilonacept in recurrent pericarditis, has recently reached phase 3 with promising results in terms of efficacy and safety. Alterations in the function of the inflammasome and the consequent overproduction of IL-1 play a pivotal role in the genesis of autoinflammatory pericarditis. Recent studies added evidence to the importance of anti-IL-1 drugs in the treatment of recurrent pericarditis with raised C-reactive protein. In the era of tailored medicine, anti-IL-1 agents may be very useful in the subset of patients with recurrent pericarditis and a clear inflammatory phenotype.

Health-related quality of life in patients with recurrent pericarditis: results from a phase 2 study of rilonacept

BACKGROUND

Impact of recurrent pericarditis (RP) on patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was evaluated through qualitative patient interviews and as an exploratory endpoint in a Phase 2 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilonacept (IL-1α/IL-1β cytokine trap) to treat RP.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were conducted with ten adults with RP to understand symptoms and HRQoL impacts, and the 10-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health (PROMIS GH) v1.2 was evaluated to determine questionnaire coverage of patient experience. The Phase 2 trial enrolled participants with active symptomatic RP (A-RP, n = 16) and corticosteroid-dependent participants with no active recurrence at baseline (CSD-RP, n = 9). All participants received rilonacept weekly during a 6-week base treatment period (TP) plus an optional 18-week extension period (EP). Tapering of concomitant medications, including corticosteroids (CS), was permitted during EP. HRQoL was assessed using the PROMIS GH, and patient-reported pain and blood levels of c-reactive protein (CRP) were collected at Baseline and follow-up periods. A secondary, descriptive analysis of the Phase 2 trial efficacy results was completed using HRQoL measures to characterize both the impact of RP and the treatment effect of rilonacept.

RESULTS

Information from qualitative interviews demonstrated that PROMIS GH concepts are relevant to adults with RP. From the Phase 2 trial, both participant groups showed impacted HRQoL at Baseline (mean PROMIS Global Physical Health [GPH] and Global Mental Health [GMH], were lower than population norm average). In A-RP, GPH/MPH improved by end of base TP and were sustained through EP (similar trends were observed for pain and CRP). Similarly, in CSD-RP, GPH/MPH improved by end of TP and further improved during EP, during CS tapering or discontinuation, without disease recurrence (low pain scores and CRP levels continued during the TP and EP).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study demonstrating impaired HRQoL in RP. Rilonacept treatment was associated with HRQoL improvements using PROMIS GH scores. Maintained/improved HRQoL during tapering/withdrawal of CS without recurrence suggests that rilonacept may provide an alternative to CS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.Gov; NCT03980522; 5 June 2019, retrospectively registered; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03980522 .

A Pediatric Case Report of Epstein-Barr Virus-associated Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis With Pericardial Effusion and Multiple Coronary Artery Aneurysms

Pediatric coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) are mainly detected in Kawasaki disease and in chronic active Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection sometimes, and cardiac complications are rare in viral-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) patients. Here, we report a pediatric case of EBV-associated HLH with pericardial effusion and multiple CAAs, whereas the patient did not fulfill the diagnostic criteria of Kawasaki disease or chronic active EBV. The case indicates that CAAs may occur in EBV-HLH. Specifically, in a patient with a long-term fever and a high EBV DNA copy number, the detection of cardiac complications may help signal the possible occurrence of HLH, and CAAs may affect the prognosis for high risk of cardiac events.

Quantitative assessment of pericardial delayed hyperenhancement helps identify patients with ongoing recurrences of pericarditis

Objectives

Recurrences of pericarditis (RP) are often difficult to diagnose due to lack of clinical signs and symptoms during subsequent episodes. We aimed to investigate the value of quantitative assessment of pericardial delayed hyperenhancement (DHE) in diagnosing ongoing recurrences of pericarditis.

Methods

Quantitative DHE was measured in 200 patients with established diagnosis of RP using cardiac MRI. Conventional clinical criteria for diagnosis of pericarditis were ≥2 of the following: chest pain, pericardial rub, ECG changes and new or worsening pericardial effusion.

Results

A total of 67 (34%) patients were identified as having ongoing episode of recurrence at the time of DHE measurements. In multivariable analysis, chest pain (OR: 10.9, p<0.001) and higher DHE (OR: 1.32, p<0.001) were associated with ongoing recurrence of RP. Addition of DHE to conventional clinical criteria significantly increased the ability to diagnose ongoing recurrence (net reclassification improvement (NRI): 0.80, p<0.001; integrated discrimination improvement (IDI): 0.12, p<0.001). Among 150 patients with history of RP who presented with chest pain, higher DHE was still independently associated with ongoing recurrence (OR: 1.28, p<0.001), showed incremental value over clinical criteria (NRI: 0.76, p<0.001; IDI: 0.13, p<0.001) and demonstrated a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 74%.

Conclusion

Among patients with RP, quantitative DHE provided incremental information to diagnose ongoing recurrences over conventional clinical criteria of pericarditis. Quantitative DHE demonstrated acceptable test characteristics to diagnose ongoing recurrence even in RP patients presenting with chest pain.

Colchicine for steroid-resistant recurrent pericarditis in a child

Recurrent pericarditis is rare in children and is considered idiopathic in most cases. Its course is chronic, and preventing recurrences is important for the patient's quality of life. Although a treatment strategy in pediatric recurrent pericarditis has not yet been established, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most common treatment for management of this condition, followed by corticosteroids, colchicine, immunosuppressive agents, immunoglobulins, and interleukin-1β receptor antagonists (e.g. anakinra). Herein, we report a case of recurrent pericarditis with pericardial effusion in a 5-year-old child who presented with fever and epigastric pain. He responded poorly to NSAIDs and corticosteroid therapy, but was successfully treated with colchicine.

Recurrent pericarditis: still idiopathic? The pros and cons of a well-honoured term

In developed countries, more than 80% of cases of acute pericarditis remain without an established diagnosis after a conventional and standard diagnostic approach. These cases are generally labelled as 'idiopathic', i.e. without a known cause. This lack of information is a matter of concern for both patients and clinicians. Some years ago, this term reflected the state of the art of scientific knowledge on the topic. Advances have changed this point of view, in light of available molecular techniques like polymerase chain reaction able to identify viral cardiotropic agents in pericardial fluid and biopsies. Furthermore, the remarkable efficacy of interleukin-1 antagonists, a therapy targeting the innate immune response, suggests clinical and pathogenic similarity between a proportion of patients with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis and classical autoinflammatory diseases. So, it seems useful to discuss the pros and cons of using the term "idiopathic" in light of the new knowledge.

Pericardial Disease in Cancer Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To understand the variety of conditions in which the pericardium may be affected in cancer patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cancer may affect the pericardium directly (primary cancer; uncommon) or through metastases (commoner). Cancer treatment (chemotherapy and radiotherapy) may affect the pericardium leading to pericarditis and myopericarditis. Pericardial effusions, tamponade and constrictive pericarditis are complications that can also occur. A variety of techniques (predominantly cardiac imaging related) are used to make the diagnosis with the treatment strategy dependent on whether the pericardial disease is due to cancer or as a result of cancer treatment. A variety of pericardial diseases may be caused by cancer and cancer treatment. Determining the aetiology and providing effective treatment can often be challenging.