Safety and efficacy of high intensity interval training in a patient with acute pulmonary embolism

High-Intensity Interval Training in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) appears to be safe and effective in cardiovascular diseases. However, there is a paucity of data on the effect of HIIT for patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). The present randomized controlled trial (RCT) therefore examined the efficiency and safety of HIIT in patients with acute PE.

METHODS

In single-center parallel open-label RCT, 24 patients (5 women) discharged recently with a diagnosis of intermediate-high risk acute PE were randomized (1:1) to supervised HIIT (n = 12) or control (n = 12) group. The primary outcomes were exercise capacity evaluated in terms of the estimated maximal oxygen uptake (eVO2max), lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second, FEV1), right ventricular (RV) function, (RV/left ventricle diameter (LV) ratio) and health related quality of life (HRQoL). Safety was the secondary outcome.

RESULTS

8-weeks of HIIT improved eVO2max (+65%, p < 0.001), FEV1 (%) (+17%, p = 0.031), and RV/LV ratio diameter (-27%, p = 0.005), as well as HRQoL. All patients in the HIIT group tolerated exercise training without serious adverse events. The control group did not improve (p > 0.05) eVO2max, RV/LV ratio diameter, or HRQoL; however, FEV1 (%) was slightly reduced (-6%, p = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

The present RCT of a tailored center based HIIT intervention provides preliminary evidence that this intervention could improve exercise capacity, lung function, RV function, and HRQoL without serious adverse events, which could provide marked clinical benefits following PE. Further larger multicenter randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these promising findings.

The effectiveness of exercise training in treating venous thromboembolism: a systematic review

This study aims to (1) evaluate the clinical safety of an exercise-based rehabilitation intervention for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE); (2) separately summarize the effects of exercise training in deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) and postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) survivors; and (3) identify commonly used exercise prescriptions and describe treatment progression. The Medline, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched for randomized control trials and cohort studies published prior to February 2020 comparing exercise training interventions with non-exercise interventions for patients with VTE. Two reviewers independently reviewed and appraised the risk of bias of each study. Nine articles were included for review, five of which were randomized clinical trials, while three were prospective cohort studies, and one was a retrospective cohort trial. The results showed that exercise-based rehabilitation training was safe for patients diagnosed with VTE, including patients with DVT, PE, and PTS, but offered limited evidence to support the use of regular exercise as an intervention to improve exercise capacity in patients with VTE. Exercise-based rehabilitation in VTE survivors is clearly an emerging field with a lack of large, adequately powered randomized controlled trials. Existing evidence suggests that exercise is safe, but evidence to support exercise therapy as a replacement for standard care in all VTE patients is insufficient. Prescription and progression patterns should be tailored for individuals based on health conditions and functional deficits.