PCSK9 inhibitor, ezetimibe, and bempedoic acid: Evidence-based therapies for statin-intolerant patients

Association of lipid-lowering drugs with risk of sarcopenia: a drug target mendelian randomization study and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lipid-lowering drugs are widely used among the elderly, with some studies suggesting links to muscle-related symptoms. However, the causality remains uncertain.

METHODS

Using the Mendelian randomization (MR) approach, we assessed the causal effects of genetically proxied reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) through inhibitions of hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), and Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 (NPC1L1) on sarcopenia-related traits, including low hand grip strength, appendicular lean mass, and usual walking pace. A meta-analysis was conducted to combine the causal estimates from different consortiums.

RESULTS

Using LDL-C pooled data predominantly from UK Biobank, genetically proxied inhibition of HMGCR was associated with higher appendicular lean mass (beta = 0.087, P = 7.56 × 10- 5) and slower walking pace (OR = 0.918, P = 6.06 × 10- 9). In contrast, inhibition of PCSK9 may reduce appendicular lean mass (beta = -0.050, P = 1.40 × 10- 3), while inhibition of NPC1L1 showed no causal impact on sarcopenia-related traits. These results were validated using LDL-C data from Global Lipids Genetics Consortium, indicating that HMGCR inhibition may increase appendicular lean mass (beta = 0.066, P = 2.17 × 10- 3) and decelerate walking pace (OR = 0.932, P = 1.43 × 10- 6), whereas PCSK9 inhibition could decrease appendicular lean mass (beta = -0.048, P = 1.69 × 10- 6). Meta-analysis further supported the robustness of these causal associations.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetically proxied HMGCR inhibition may increase muscle mass but compromise muscle function, PCSK9 inhibition could result in reduced muscle mass, while NPC1L1 inhibition is not associated with sarcopenia-related traits and this class of drugs may serve as viable alternatives to sarcopenia individuals or those at an elevated risk.

Comprehensive review of statin-intolerance and the practical application of Bempedoic Acid

Statin-intolerance (SI) has prevalence between 8.0 % and 10 %, and muscular complaints are the most common reason for discontinuation. Bempedoic acid (BA), an ATP citrate lyase inhibitor, decreases hepatic generation of cholesterol, upregulates low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor expression in the liver, and eventually clears circulating LDL-cholesterol from the blood. Multiple randomized clinical trials studying BA demonstrate a reduction in LDL levels by 17-28 % in SI. The CLEAR OUTCOME trial established significant cardiovascular benefits with BA. A dose of 180 mg/day of BA showed promising results. BA alone or in combination with ezetimibe is US Food and Drug Administration-approved for use in adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and/or established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. BA reduced HbA1c by 0.12 % (p < 0.0001) in patients with diabetes. Adverse events of BA include myalgia (4.7 %), anemia (3.4 %), and increased aminotransferases (0.3 %). BA can cause up to four times higher risk of gout in those with a previous gout diagnosis or high serum uric acid levels. Reports of increased blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine were noted. Current evidence does not demonstrate a reduction in deaths from cardiovascular causes. More studies that include a diverse population and patients with both high and low LDL levels should be conducted. We recommend that providers consider BA as an adjunct to statin therapy in patients with a maximally tolerated dosage to specifically target LDL levels.

Prescribing statin therapy in physically (in)active individuals vs prescribing physical activity in statin-treated patients: A four-scenario practical approach

Statins are among the most commonly prescribed medications worldwide. Statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) represent a frequent statin-related adverse effect associated with statin discontinuation and increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. Emerging evidence indicate that the majority of SAMS might not be actually caused by statins, and the nocebo/drucebo effect (i.e. adverse effects caused by negative expectations) might also explain SAMS. Physical activity (PA) is a cornerstone in the management of CVD risk. However, evidence of increased creatine-kinase levels in statin-treated athletes exposed to a marathon has been generalized, at least to some extent, to the general population and other types of PA. This generalization is likely inappropriate and might induce fear around PA in statin users. In addition, the guidelines for lipid management focus on aerobic PA while the potential of reducing sedentary behavior and undertaking resistance training have been overlooked. The aim of this report is to provide a novel proposal for the concurrent prescription of statin therapy and PA addressing the most common and clinically relevant scenarios by simultaneously considering the different stages of statin therapy and the history of PA. These scenarios include i) statin therapy initiation in physically inactive patients, ii) PA/exercise initiation in statin-treated patients, iii) statin therapy initiation in physically active patients, and iv) statin therapy in athletes and very active individuals performing SAMS-risky activities.