Achievement of partial combined control of major diabetes targets in primary care correlates with development of chronic complications in T2DM patients--A real life data

Comparing Patient Perspectives on Diabetes Management to the Deficit-Based Literature in an Ethnic Minority Population: A Mixed-Methods Study

Marginalized racial/ethnic minorities have disproportionately high rates of type 2 diabetes prevalence, complications and mortality. Researchers and policymakers have typically addressed these disparities using a deficit-based discourse focused on individual/cultural deficiencies or failure. A mixed-methods study was used to compare the deficit discourse to the perspectives of adults with diabetes in the Arab minority in Israel, using data from 10 focus groups (5 men's, 5 women's) and 296 quantitative in-person surveys. Both qualitative and quantitative data were triangulated. In addition, multivariable regression models tested associations between diabetes management perspectives and participant characteristics. Contrary to the deficit-based characterizations of patients as fatalistic and unknowledgeable, participants viewed diabetes as a chronic disease with serious complications. They expressed more support for patient responsibility in diabetes management than for passive fatalism, and were less fatalistic as educational level and adequacy of diabetes self-care training increased. The impact of social/environmental barriers and changing cultural norms on lifestyle behaviors was highlighted. Over 95% used prescription medications for diabetes management, although 35% reported economic barriers. The deficit discourse is not well-aligned with Arab patients' evolving perceptions and needs, and has deflected attention from the socioeconomic/structural determinants of health, and the healthcare system's responsibility to provide effective, culturally-relevant diabetes services.

Ethnicity and Antiphospholipid Syndrome in Israel

OBJECTIVE

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired coagulopathy associated with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. Whether ethnicity modulates APS clinical course is not known. The aim of our study was to assess the interplay of ethnicity and APS in Israel.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the ethnic distribution of APS patients from 3 medical centers in Israel compared to the general population. Ethnic groups were defined according to the Israeli Bureau of Statistics as Ashkenazi (European), former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), North African, Asian (West Asia, Greece, and Turkey), Israeli Arab individuals, and others.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 382 patients. The prevalence of Ashkenazi and Asian ethnicities was more pronounced (33% versus 12.8% and 15.4% versus 7.7%, respectively; P < 0.001), while Israeli Arabs were less represented (5.2% versus 31.1%; P < 0.001) relative to their part in the general population. Arab patients were younger at presentation (mean ± SD 28 ± 10 years versus 34 ± 13 years; P < 0.001) and were more likely to present with venous thrombosis (50% versus 35%; P = 0.037) and to suffer from venous thrombotic recurrence (45% versus 16%; P < 0.001) compared to other ethnicities. Mortality was higher among patients of Asian ethnic origin (8.8% versus 1.1%; P = 0.005); intriguingly, this group experienced cardiovascular risk factors more often (i.e., dyslipidemia and hypertension).

CONCLUSION

Ethnicity may affect the prevalence and/or natural course of APS, which is less prevalent and differs clinically in Israeli Arab patients, while mortality was linked with Asian ethnicity.

Long Term Follow up of Patients With Primary Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Introduction: Primary obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) is defined by specific morbidities and/or losses of pregnancy in the presence of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). This variant of APS is usually treated during pregnancy and the post-partum period. Data on occurrence of thrombotic event during long term follow-up of OAPS patients is limited. Methods: A multi-centre retrospectively cohort of female patients with primary APS (pAPS) was assembled during 2004-2019. Patients were grouped according to disease presentation as pure OAPS or thrombotic APS (tAPS) for those presenting with thrombosis. Clinical and serological data were compared between groups. Results: Of 219 pAPS female patients 67 (30.6%) were diagnosed with OAPS and 152 (69.4%) with tAPS. During >10 years of follow-up 24/67 (35.8%) OAPS and 71/152 (50%) tAPS suffered a new thrombotic event (p = 0.06), while obstetric morbidity was more likely in the OAPS group (31.3 vs. 10.5%, p < 0.001) respectively. Among patients with OAPS at presentation heart valve disease and the presence of ANA were related to thrombosis following diagnosis (25 vs. 4.7%, p = 0.02; and 45.8 vs. 20.8%, p = 0.04 respectively). Conclusion: Thrombotic event following diagnosis were common among female patients with pAPS regardless of disease presentation. Heart valve disease and ANA positivity may be risk factors for thrombosis during follow-up of patients presenting with pure OAPS.

A Personalized Care Plan Is Positively Associated With Better Clinical Outcomes in the Care of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Real-Life Study

OBJECTIVES

Our aim in this study was to determine whether the use of a personalized care plan is associated with better clinical outcomes of type 2 diabetes treatment in the real world.

METHODS

Quality of treatment was assessed using data from a yearly sample of patients with type 2 diabetes visiting primary care health centres in 2012-2016. Patients were divided into 3 groups as follows: 1) the patient has a copy of their personalized care plan, 2) the care plan exists in the patient record only or 3) the patient has no care plan. Data on smoking, laboratory tests, systolic blood pressure (sBP) and statin use were collected. We compared the outcomes between the 3 groups in terms of proportions of patients achieving the clinical targets recommended by international guidelines.

RESULTS

Evaluable data were available for 10,403 patients. Of these, 1,711 (16%) had a copy of their personalized care plan, and 3,623 (35%) had no care plan. Those patients who had a copy of their care plan were significantly more likely than those without to achieve the sBP target (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29 to 1.51; p<0.001; adjusted for age and gender) and low-density lipoprotein target (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.34 to 1.58; p<0.001), and to use statins (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.57 to 1.85; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had a copy of their care plan had a better control of sBP and low-density lipoprotein, and were more likely to use statins than patients without a care plan.

Effectiveness of standardized nursing care plans to achieve A1C, blood pressure, and LDL-C goals among people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus at baseline: four-year follow-up study

Background

No studies that have measured the role of nursing care plans in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Our objectives were firstly, to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing Standardized languages in Nursing Care Plans (SNCP) for improving A1C, blood pressure and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (ABC goals) in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus at baseline (A1C ≥7%, blood pressure ≥ 130/80 mmHg, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol≥100 mg/dl) compared with Usual Nursing Care (UNC). Secondly, to evaluate the factors associated with these goals.

Methods

A four-year prospective follow-up study among outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: We analyzed outpatients of 31 primary health centers (Madrid, Spain), with at least two A1C values (at baseline and at the end of the study) who did not meet their ABC goals at baseline. A total of 1916 had A1C ≥7% (881 UNC versus 1035 SNCP). Two thousand four hundred seventy-one had systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mmHg (1204 UNC versus 1267 SNCP). One thousand one hundred seventy had diastolic blood pressure ≥ 80 mmHg (618 UNC versus 552 SNCP); and 2473 had low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥100 mg/dl (1257 UNC versus 1216 SNCP). Data were collected from computerized clinical records; SNCP were identified using NANDA and NIC taxonomies.

Results

More patients cared for using SNCP achieved in blood pressure goals compared with patients who received UNC (systolic blood pressure: 29.4% versus 28.7%, p = 0.699; diastolic blood pressure: 58.3% versus 53.2%, p = 0.08), but the differences did not reach statistical significance. For A1C and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals, there were no significant differences between the groups. Coronary artery disease was a significant predictor of blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals.

Conclusions

In patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus, there is not enough evidence to support the use of SNCP instead of with UNC with the aim of helping patients to achieve their ABC goals. However, the use of SNCP is associated with a clear trend of a achievement of diastolic blood pressure goals.