Automated external defibrillators: safety and efficacy in children and adolescents

Automated external defibrillator: Rhythm analysis and defibrillation on paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Objective

This study aims to quantify the reliability of automated external defibrillators (AED) in paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (pOHCA) by evaluating the defibrillation and the shock advisory system efficacy. Furthermore, the relationship between the initial energy dose and patient outcomes is analysed.

Methods

We studied data from all pOHCA cases (age < 18 years) treated by the Paris Fire Brigade between January 2010 and December 2018, limited to those with available AED signals. The efficacy of shocks is the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes are the shock advisory system performance, pre-hospital return of a spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival and energy dose. Energy dose, weight and age are compared using a Wilcoxon test according to the outcome's values.

Results

A total of 1,990 electrocardiogram strips extracted from 349 pOHCA cases were included in the study. Shock advisory system had a sensitivity of 89.4% and a specificity of 99.8% for the detection of shockable rhythms. Shock efficacy observed for all patients who received a shock was 83.1% and first shock efficacy for patients in initial ventricular fibrillation was 96%. Patients who received a shock had a pre-hospital ROSC rate of 74.3%, a survival rate at hospital admission of 71.4% and 34.3% at hospital discharge.

Conclusion

This study shows that AED detect shockable rhythm with a good sensitivity and specificity and that shocks are associated with a very high rates of termination of shockable rhythms in pOHCA.

Significance of automated external defibrillator in identifying lethal ventricular arrhythmias

Automated electrical defibrillator (AED) is critical in saving children who develop unexpected cardiac arrest (CA), but its diagnostic capacity is not fully acknowledged. Retrospective cohort study of patients with aborted sudden cardiac death (SCD) was performed. Twenty-five patients (14 males) aged 1.3 to 17.5 years who presented with CA survived with prompt cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Eighteen patients had no prior cardiac diagnosis. Cardiac arrest occurred in 10 patients with more than moderate exercise, in 7 with light exercise, and in 8 at rest (including one during sleep). Twenty-two patients were resuscitated with AED, all of which were recognized as a shockable cardiac rhythm. Thorough investigations revealed 6 ion channelopathies (4 catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, one long QT syndrome, and one Brugada syndrome), 5 congenital heart disease (including 2 with coronary artery obstruction), 6 cardiomyopathies, 2 myocarditis, and 2 miscellaneous. Four patients had no identifiable heart disease. In 5 patients, the downloaded AED-recorded rhythm strip delineated the underlying arrhythmias and their responses to electrical shocks. Four patients who presented with generalized seizure at rest were initially managed for seizure disorder until AED recording identified lethal ventricular arrhythmias.Conclusions: AED reliably identifies the underlying lethal ventricular arrhythmias in addition to aborting SCD. What is Known: • Although infrequent in children, sudden cardiac death (SCD) is often an unexpected and tragic event. The etiology is diverse and sometimes remains unknown despite extensive investigations. • Automated external defibrillator (AED) is both therapeutic in aborting SCD and diagnostic in identifying the underlying lethal ventricular arrhythmias. However, the diagnostic aspect of AED is under-acknowledged by most medical providers. What is New: • Four of 25 patients (16%) were initially managed for possible seizure disorders until AED recording identified lethal ventricular arrhythmia. • The AED recording of the lethal arrhythmia during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) should always be obtained as it plays a crucial role in the decision-making process before ICD implantation. All medical providers should become familiar with downloading cardiac rhythm strips from AED when requested.

Successful parental use of an automated external defibrillator for an infant with long-QT syndrome

Congenital long-QT syndrome with 2:1 atrioventricular block presenting in the perinatal period is rare, has a poor prognosis, and leads to high risk for lethal ventricular arrhythmic events. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator seems to be the most effective treatment in the prevention of arrhythmic sudden cardiac death in patients with long-QT syndrome. Technical limitations and risks associated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in asymptomatic infants is considered too great to justify use for primary prophylaxis against sudden cardiac death. In this case report we describe the first successful parental use of an automated external defibrillator prescribed for primary prophylaxis against sudden cardiac death in an infant with long-QT syndrome.