Airway management

Comparison of the GlideScope Cobalt® and Storz DCI® Video Laryngoscopes in Children Younger Than 2 Years of Age During Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Trainee Evaluation Study

OBJECTIVES

Video laryngoscopy facilitates tracheal intubation during manual in-line stabilization in adults, but it is not clear whether these findings translate to children. We compared trainee intubation times obtained using the GlideScope Cobalt® and Storz DCI® video laryngoscopes versus direct laryngoscopy in young children with immobilized cervical spines.

METHODS

Ninety-three children younger than 2 years underwent laryngoscopy with manual in-line stabilization using direct laryngoscopy, GlideScope Cobalt® video laryngoscopy, or Storz DCI® video laryngoscopy. Laryngoscopists were anesthesiology trainees in postgraduate training year of 3 or more. Total time to successful intubation (TTSI), best glottic view, and maximum degrees of neck deviation were recorded. An intubation time difference longer than 10 seconds was defined as clinically significant.

RESULTS

Data are reported as median; 95% confidence interval. The TTSI was similar among groups although Storz times were longer (median, 33.3 seconds; 95% confidence interval, 26.2-43.3 seconds) when compared to direct laryngoscopy (median, 23.3 seconds; 95% confidence interval, 20.7-26.5 seconds; P = 0.02). Obtaining a grade 1 Cormack-Lehane glottic view was less likely with direct laryngoscopy (P = 0.002). Maximum degrees of neck deviation were: Storz (median, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.8), GlideScope (median, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-2.6), and direct laryngoscopy (median, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.1; P = 0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Trainees were able to safely perform tracheal intubation in children younger than 2 years using any of the studied laryngoscopes, although Storz use resulted in a longer TTSI when compared to direct laryngoscopy. Video laryngoscopy may enhance best Cormack-Lehane glottic view during manual in-line cervical spine immobilization, but additional technical skills are needed to successfully complete tracheal intubation.

Upper airway modifications in head extension during development

BACKGROUND

One of the requirements of laryngoscopy is to determine which head position will result in optimal visualization. Our hypothesis was that parameters derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can help quantify the effect of age on airway modifications due to head extension during development.

METHOD

In children undergoing planned MRI, additional sequences on the upper airways were performed: one in a near-neutral position, the other with the head extended at 35°. The axis of the face, the pharynx, the larynx, the trachea, and the line of glottic visualization were determined. The following angles were calculated: the Visu-Lar angle, formed by the line of glottic visualization and the laryngeal axis, and the Phar-Lar angle, formed by the pharyngeal and laryngeal axes.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-five patients (1 to 222 months of age [25-145] months) were included and 54% were under general anaesthesia. Age had no effect on the variation in the Visu-Lar angle, which diminished as a function of head extension, nor on the variation in the Phar-Lar angle, which was minimal in the neutral position. During extension, anatomical axes rotated similarly, and the visualization axis rotated the most, followed by the pharyngeal and laryngeal axes. These results were not correlated with general anaesthesia.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of age, head extension diminished the Visu-Lar angle, and increased the Phar-Lar angle. This study supports that, as in adults, head extension is probably the key factor for good visualization conditions during laryngoscopy on children, but clinical data is needed to confirm this result.

Complications of Deep Sedation for Individual Procedures (Lumbar Puncture Alone) Versus Combined Procedures (Lumbar Puncture and Bone Marrow Aspirate) in Pediatric Oncology Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pediatric oncology patients frequently undergo procedural sedation. The goal of this study was to determine the safety of combining procedures into a single sedation encounter and to assess if the magnitude of any complication is significant enough to justify separate sedation encounters for multiple procedures.

METHODS

This retrospective review included pediatric oncology patients sedated for lumbar puncture alone or combined procedures (lumbar puncture and bone marrow aspirate) from January 2012 to January 2014. Demographic characteristics, medication dosing, procedural success, sedation duration, and adverse events (AEs) with associated required interventions were recorded. Sedation-related complications were separated into serious adverse events (SAEs) and AEs. Data were analyzed by using multivariable modeling.

RESULTS

Data from 972 sedation encounters involving 96 patients, each having 1 to 28 encounters (mean±SD, 10±5), were reviewed. Ninety percent were individual procedures and 10% were combined procedures. Overall, there were few SAEs, and airway obstruction was the most common SAE. Combined procedures required 0.31 mg/kg more propofol (P<.001) and took 1.4 times longer (P<.001) than individual procedures. In addition, when adjusting for possible confounding factors, the odds of having an SAE were 4.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.37-16.65); P=.014) times higher for combined procedures. All SAEs and AEs were manageable by the sedation team.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining procedures was associated with higher propofol doses, prolonged duration, and a small increase in likelihood of SAEs compared with individual procedures. All AEs fell within the scope of management by the sedation team. Balancing the increased, but manageable, risks versus the advantages of family/patient convenience, enhanced resource utilization, and minimization of potential neurotoxicity from anesthetics supports combining procedures when possible.

Pediatric critical care physician-administered procedural sedation using propofol: a report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium Database

OBJECTIVE

Increasing demand for pediatric procedural sedation has resulted in a marked increase in provision of pediatric procedural sedation by pediatric critical care physicians both inside and outside of the ICU. Reported experience of pediatric critical care physicians-administered pediatric procedural sedation is limited. We used the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium database to evaluate a multicenter experience with propofol by pediatric critical care physicians in all settings.

SETTING

Review of national Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium database to identify pediatric procedural sedation provided by pediatric critical care physicians from 2007 to 2012. Demographic and clinical data were collected to describe pediatric procedural sedation selection, location, and delivery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with pediatric procedural sedation-related adverse events and complications.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 91,189 pediatric procedural sedation performed by pediatric critical care physicians using propofol were included in the database. Median age was 60.0 months (range, 0-264 months; interquartile range, 34.0-132.0); 81.9% of patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists class I or II. Most sedations were performed in dedicated sedation or radiology units (80.9%). Procedures were successfully completed in 99.9% of patients. A propofol bolus alone was used in 52.8%, and 41.7% received bolus plus continuous infusion. Commonly used adjunctive medications were lidocaine (35.3%), opioids (23.3%), and benzodiazepines (16.4%). Overall adverse event incidence was 5.0% (95% CI, 4.9-5.2%), which included airway obstruction (1.6%), desaturation (1.5%), coughing (1.0%), and emergent airway intervention (0.7%). No deaths occurred; a single cardiac arrest was reported in a 13-month-old child receiving propofol and ketamine, with no untoward neurologic sequelae. Risk factors associated with adverse event included: location of sedation, number of adjunctive medications, upper and lower respiratory diagnosis, prematurity diagnosis, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, and painful procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric procedural sedation using propofol can be provided by pediatric critical care physicians effectively and with a low incidence of adverse events.

Nasal versus oronasal raised volume forced expirations in infants--a real physiologic challenge

Raised volume rapid thoracoabdominal compression (RTC) generates forced expiration (FE) in infants typically from an airway opening pressure of 30 cm H(2)O (V(30)). We hypothesized that the higher nasal than pulmonary airway resistance limits forced expiratory flows (FEF(%)) during (nasal) FE(n), which an opened mouth, (oronasal) FE(o), would resolve. Measurements were performed during a brief post-hyperventilation apnea on 12 healthy infants aged 6.9-104 weeks. In two infants, forced expiratory (FEFV) flow volume (FV) curves were generated using a facemask that covered the nose and a closed mouth, then again with a larger mask with the mouth opened. In other infants (n = 10), the mouth closed spontaneously during FE. Oronasal passive expiration from V(30) generated either the inspiratory capacity (IC) or by activating RTC before end-expiration, the slow vital capacity ((j) SVC). Peak flow (PF), FEF(25), FEF(50), FEF(25-75), FEV(0.4), and FEV(0.5) were lower via FE(n) than FE(o) (P < 0.05), but the ratio of expired volume at PF and forced vital capacity (FVC) as percent was higher (P < 0.05). FEF(75), FEF(85), FEF(90), FVC as well as the applied jacket pressures were not different (P > 0.05). FEFV curves generated via FE(o) exhibited higher PF than FV curves of IC (P < 0.05); PF of those produced via FE(n) were not different from FV curves of IC (P > 0.05) but lower than those of (j) SVC (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the higher nasal than pulmonary airways resistance unequivocally affects the FEFV curves by consistently reducing PF and decreases mid-expiratory flows. A monitored slightly opened mouth and a gentle anterior jaw thrust are physiologically integral for raised volume RTC in order to maximize the oral and minimize nasal airways contribution to FE so that flow limitation would be in the pulmonary not nasal airways.

Medical simulation topic interests in a pediatric healthcare system

INTRODUCTION

Encouraged by evidence suggesting that simulation-based educational programs can translate to improved patient care, interest and investment in medical simulation have grown considerably in the past decade. Despite such growth, simulation is still a developing field, and little is known of the perceived needs for simulation training among practicing clinicians. This study describes medical simulation interests among clinicians in a pediatric health care system.

METHODS

A web-based survey addressing previous medical simulation experience, medical simulation interests, and demographics was distributed to physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists within a pediatric healthcare system in the Delaware Valley.

RESULTS

All three groups expressed the highest level of interest in simulated resuscitation events ("mock codes") and the least interest in simulations involving communication and electronic medical records. "Airway problems" was identified as the most popular medical simulation topic of interest. Although the rank order of interest in medical simulation categories was similar across groups, physicians reported the lowest levels of interest in all simulation categories. Characteristics such as previous simulation experience and group (eg, nurses and respiratory therapists) were associated with medical simulation interests. Years in practice did not impact interest.

CONCLUSIONS

For adult learners, educational experiences should be targeted to the learners' perceived needs but should also address unrecognized deficits. Collectively, physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists were most interested in participating in simulations addressing "codes" (emergency resuscitations) and airway management; these perceptions may provide a focus for designing simulation events that appeal to diverse learning styles. Prior experience with medical simulation seems to increase interest in subsequent simulation activities and offers the optimistic possibility that first-hand experience with simulation may help overcome structural and cultural barriers. Future research should seek to better understand potential obstacles for the participation of healthcare providers, especially physicians, in simulation-enhanced learning.

Effect of head posture on pediatric oropharyngeal structures: implications for airway management in infants and children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although head and neck posture has direct effects on the upper airway in infants and children, many of these effects remain unclear or not well established. As airway patency and airway access are critical in sedated and/or unconscious children, recent developments in this area should be made known to pediatric anesthesiologists, intensive care physicians and other emergency caregivers.

RECENT FINDINGS

All recent studies observed large interindividual variability in anatomical measurements, especially in trachea length. More evidence has been gained that lateral position improves upper airway patency in sedated children. Several studies brought indirect information on head posture for laryngoscopy and intubation.

SUMMARY

The site of obstruction of the airway in sedated children in different postures is now more clear. Implications of head flexion and extension in intubated children have been extensively studied, and clinical consequences have been detailed. Due to large interindividual anatomic variability, depth marks set on the tubes by their manufacturers and guidelines regarding calculations of insertion depth should be made with caution in infants and neonates. Despite several studies, there is still little scientific evidence regarding proper head posture for laryngoscopy and intubation.

Current world literature

This bibliography is compiled by clinicians from the journals listed at the end of this publication. It is based on literature entered into our database between 1 February 2008 and 31 January 2009 (articles are generally added to the database about two and a half months after publication). In addition, the bibliography contains every paper annotated by reviewers; these references were obtained from a variety of bibliographic databases and published between the beginning of the review period and the time of going to press. The bibliography has been grouped into topics that relate to the reviews in this issue.